Research Article
Robust Frame Duplication Detection for Degraded Videos
Table 7
The comparison results for the AGN5 group.
| | | v01 | v02 | v03 | v04 | v05 | v06 | v07 | v08 | v09 | v10 | v11 | v12 | v13 | Average |
| | Precision | Ours | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.22 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.12 | 0.87 | | Farid [8] | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.37 | 0.71 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.51 | | Li [4] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.85 |
| | Recall | Ours | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.98 | | Farid [8] | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.50 | | Li [4] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.35 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.35 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 |
| | F1-score | Ours | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.36 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.22 | 0.88 | | Farid [8] | 0.89 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.54 | 0.83 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.36 | 0.00 | 0.47 | | Li [4] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.77 |
|
|
