An Empirical Study of Platform Enterprises’ Privacy Protection Behaviors Based on fsQCA
Table 4
Configurations for high privacy protection and nonhigh privacy protection.
High privacy protection
Nonhigh privacy protection
Technology + regulation driven
User-driven + competition effect
Dominant platforms policy
Business growth
Data-driven + competition effect
H1
H2
H3
NH1
NH2
Firm heterogeneity
Technology capital
●
●
⊗
⊗
⊗
Business model
⊗
⊗
⊗
●
Market structure
Market concentration
●
⊗
●
●
⊗
Market share
⊗
⊗
●
⊗
Policy
Local policy
●
●
●
●
Industry standards
●
⊗
⊗
●
⊗
Raw coverage
0.125
0.041
0.175
0.372
0.064
Unique coverage
0.125
0.039
0.172
0.372
0.064
Consistency
0.928
0.947
0.864
0.967
0.964
Overall solution consistency
0.339
0.437
Overall solution coverage
0.896
0.966
Note. ●and ● indicate that the condition is present, ⊗ and ⊗ indicate that the condition is absent, ● and ⊗ indicate a core condition, and ● and ⊗ indicate a marginal condition. A blank cell indicates that the condition may or may not be present.
