Research Article
Study on the Development Model of the Combination of “Third-Tier” Industrial Heritage and Rural Tourism under the Concept of Urban Image
Table 1
Evaluation scores of FAW third tier industrial heritage tourism development.
| | Evaluation | score | 10 | 7-9 | 4-6 | 3-0 |
| Historical and cultural value | Age and integrity | | 8 | | | 0.6896 | | Important people and events | | 9 | | | 0.3978 | | Representativeness | 10 | | | | 0.741 | Social value | Social recognition | 10 | | | | 0.751 | | Resource scarcity | | 7 | | | 0.462 | Artistic value | Integrity | 10 | | | | 0.0729 | | Uniqueness | | | 5 | | 0.2875 | Scientific value | Enterprise advanced nature | | 8 | | | 0.38 | | Product advanced nature | | | 5 | | 0.2725 | Entertainment value | Experiential | | | 4 | | 0.2296 | | Ornamental | | 7 | | | 0.1827 | Economic value | Development cycle | | | 6 | | 0.204 | | Economic input | | | 4 | | 0.1464 | Environment condition | Environmental capacity | | | 5 | | 0.114 | | Traffic convenience | 10 | | | | 0.602 | | Supporting services | 10 | | | | 0.131 | | Supporting setting | 10 | | | | 0.305 | Tap potential | Associativity | 10 | | | | 0.721 | | Complementarity | | 8 | | | 0.3288 | | Sustainability | | 7 | | | 0.336 |
|
|