|
Study | Assessment tool name | Method of validation | Participants | Types of validity established |
|
Sevdalis et al. [11] | OTAS | Assessment of teamwork during surgical procedures | Surgical trainees, human factors experts, and psychologists | Construct |
|
Hull et al. [12] | OTAS | Content validity metric scoring by expert panel performing surgical procedures | Expert surgeons, nurses, anaesthetists supervisors, anaesthetists, and scrub nurses | Content |
|
Yule et al. [13] | NOTSS | Structured interviews regarding difficult nonroutine cases | Consultant surgeons | Face |
|
Crossley et al. [15] | NOTSS | Assessment of NTS during surgical procedures | Surgical trainees, surgical care practitioners, scrub nurses, and anaesthetists | Concurrent |
|
Beard et al. [14] | NOTSS | Assessment of trainees performing surgical procedures | Surgical trainees, clinical supervisors, anaesthetists, and scrub nurses | Construct and content |
|
Mishra et al. [16] | NOTECHS | Assessment of NTS during laparoscopic cholecystectomies | Surgical trainees, nurses, and anaesthetists | Concurrent, convergent, face, content, and construct |
|
Fletcher et al. [17] | ANTS | Assessment of NTS observed in 8 clinical scenario videos | Consultant anaesthetists | Content |
|
Violato et al. [18] | MSF | Assessment of surgeons using MSF | Surgeons from various specialties and their nominated colleagues | Content and face |
|
Paisley et al. [20] | EBSTAF | Assessment of trainees before and after 1 year of training | Surgical trainees (SHO) | Construct |
|
Mitchell et al. [22] | SPLINTS | Assessment of scrub practitioners in 7 scenarios | Scrub practitioners | Content |
|