Clinical Study
Laparoscopic versus Open Omental Patch Repair for Early Presentation of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Matched Retrospective Cohort Study
Table 2
Perioperative comparison between open and laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer.
| Items | Open () | Laparoscopic () | |
| CD classification, n (%) | | | 0.34 | 0-I | 93 (86.1%) | 37 (92.5%) | | II | 4 (3.7%) | 2 (5.0%) | | III | 1 (0.9%) | 1 (2.5%) | | IV | 5 (4.6%) | 0 (0%) | | V | 5 (4.6%) | 0 (0%) | | Wound complication, (%) | 6 (5.6%) | 0 (0%) | NA | Ileus, (%) | 2 (1.8%) | 2 (5.0%) | 0.63 | Organ space infection, (%) | 5 (4.6%) | 1 (2.5%) | 0.91 | Leakage, (%) | 1 (0.9%) | 0 (0%) | NA | Ventilation ⩾48 hrs, (%) | 2 (1.8%) | 0 (0%) | NA | Sepsis, (%) | 5 (4.6%) | 0 (0%) | NA | Return to OT, (%) | 1 (0.9%) | 0 (0%) | NA | Death, (%) | 5 (4.6%) | 0 (0%) | NA | Median ICU stay (days), range | 0 (0–22) | 0 (0–5) | 0.16 | Median hospitalization stay (days), range | 5 (3–96) | 4 (2–15) | <0.01 |
|
|
CD: Clavien-Dindo. OT: operating theatre. NA: not applicable. ICU: intensive care unit.
|