Proposal and Validation of a New Classification of Surgical Outcomes after Colorectal Resections within an Enhanced Recovery Programme
Table 2
Univariable analysis.
Factor
N (%)
Outcome 1
Outcome 2a–5
Total
231
79 (34.2%)
152 (65.8%)
Gender M
122 (52.8%)
41 (33.6%)
81 (66.4%)
0.841
Gender F
109 (47.2%)
38 (34.9%)
71 (65.1%)
Age < 65
78 (33.8%)
36 (46.2%)
42 (53.8%)
0.006
Age > 65
153 (66.2%)
43 (28.1%)
110 (71.9%)
Elective
191 (82.7%)
74 (38.7%)
117 (61.3%)
0.001
Urgent
40 (17.3%)
5 (12.5%)
35 (87.5%)
Malignant
176 (76.2%)
70 (39.8%)
106 (60.2%)
0.001
Nonmalignant
55 (23.8%)
9 (16.4%)
46 (83.6%)
Right colon
84 (36.4%)
33 (39.3%)
51 (60.7%)
0.424
Left colon
70 (30.3%)
25 (35.7%)
45 (64.3%)
Rectum
68 (29.4%)
19 (27.9%)
49 (72.1%)
Total colect.§
9 (3.9%)
2 (22.2%)
7 (77.8%)
Experienced surgeon
217 (93.9%)
75 (34.6%)
142 (65.4%)
0.647
Nonexperienced surgeon&
14 (6.1%)
4 (28.6%)
10 (71.4%)
Laparoscopic
148 (64.1%)
72 (48.6%)
76 (51.4%)
0.000
Open $
83 (35.9%)
7 (8.4%)
76 (91.6%)
Year 1
37 (16.0%)
5 (13.5%)
32 (86.5%)
0.010
Year 2
53 (22.9%)
16 (30.2%)
37 (69.8%)
Year 3
43 (18.6%)
16 (37.2%)
27 (62.8%)
Year 4
50 (21.6%)
25 (50.0%)
25 (50.0%)
Year 5
48 (20.8%)
17 (35.4%)
31 (64.4%)
Including transverse and splenic flexure; including sigmoid; §, including subtotal colectomies; &, supervised by an experienced consultant; $, including lap to open conversions.
