Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2008 (2008), Article ID 312154, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/312154
Research Article

Regulatory Scenario for the Acceptance of Uncertainty Analysis Methodologies for the LB-LOCA and the Brazilian Approach

Reactor Department, Comissão Nacional de Energia Nuclear, Rua Gal. Severiano 90, Rio de Janeiro 22290-901, Brazil

Received 9 May 2007; Accepted 8 November 2007

Academic Editor: Cesare Frepoli

Copyright © 2008 Maria Regina Galetti. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. 10 CFR 50.46, “Acceptance criteria for emergency core cooling systems for light water cooled nuclear power reactors,” January 1974, Appendix K to 10 CFR 50, “ECCS Evaluation Models,” U.S. Federal Register, Vol. 39, No. 3.
  2. CSNI Code Validation Matrix of Thermal-Hydraulic Codes for LWR LOCA and Transients, OECD/NEA-CSNI Report 132, March 1987.
  3. “Compendium of ECCS Research for Realistic LOCA Analysis,” December 1988, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG-1230.
  4. “Quantifying Reactor Safety Margins: Application of Code Scaling, Applicability, and Uncertainty Evaluation Methodology to a Large Break Loss of Coolant Accident,” December 1989, NUREG/CR-5249.
  5. N. Aksan, F. D'Auria, H. Glaeser, R. Pochard, C. Richards, and A. Sjöberg, “Separate Effects Test Matrix for Thermal-Hydraulic Code Validation, Volume I: Phenomena Characterisation and Selection of Facilities and Tests, Volume II: Facility and Experiment Characteristics,” September 1993, NEA/CSNI/R(93)14 Part 1 and Part 2.
  6. 2D/3D Program Work Summary Report, GRS-100 and 101. Prepared Jointly by JAERI, GRS, Siemens UB KWU, U.S. NRC, MPR Associates, Edited by: P.S. Damerell and J.W. Simons MPR Associates, INC.
  7. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission SECY-83-472, Information Report from William J. Dircks to the Commissioners, “Emergency Core Cooling System Analysis Methods,” November 1983.
  8. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Emergency Core Cooling Systems, Revisions to Acceptance Criteria,” September 1988, Federal Register, 53, 180.
  9. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guide 1.157, “Best-Estimate Calculation of Emergency Core Cooling System Performance,” May 1989.
  10. January 2001, ACRS Letter Report—Subject: Issues Associated with Industry-Developed Thermal-Hydraulic Codes.
  11. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, SRP Section 15.0.2, “Transient and Accident Analysis Methods,” December 2005, NUREG-0800.
  12. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guide 1.203, “Transient and Accident Analysis Methods,” December 2005.
  13. R. Meyer, “Technical Basis for Revision of Embritllement Criteria in 10 CFR 50.46,” March 2006, RES-NRC, RIC 2006, Session T1BC, Fuels—Cladding Behavior for Regulatory Applications.
  14. R. Yang, “Industry Perspective on Proposed LOCA on Proposed LOCA Criteria,” March 2006, Electric Power Research Institute, RIC 2006, Session T1BC, Fuels—Cladding Behavior for Regulatory Applications.
  15. C. Grandjean, “LOCA Acceptance Criteria—Considerations and questions raised from a review of past and recent R&D Work,” January 2007, IRSN, Cadarache, NRC/IRSN Meeting, Bethesda.
  16. M. Tschiltz, “Regulatory Structure of Draft Rule Risk-Informed 10 CFR 50.46,” March 2006, RES-NRR, RIC 2006, Session W4D, Risk-Informed Activities.
  17. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Safety Evaluation by the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Related to Acceptability of the Topical Report WCAP-12945 (P) ‘Westinghouse Code Qualification Document for Best-Estimate Loss of Coolant Accident Analysis’ for referencing in PWR Licensing Applications, Westinghouse Electric Corporation”.
  18. European Best-Estimate LOCA Seminar, January 2006, Brussels, Belgium.
  19. Safety Evaluation by the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation: Topical Report EMF-2103(P), Revision 0, “Realistic Large Break LOCA Methodology for Pressurized Water Reactors,” April 2003, Project Number 693, TAC NO.MB7554.
  20. R. P. Martin, “AREVA NP's Realistic Accident Analysis Methodologies,” January-February 2007, Lecture 32A, Seminar and Training on Scaling, Uncertainty and 3D Coupled Calculations in Nuclear Technology (3D S. UN. COP 2007), College Station, Texas, USA.
  21. Safety Evaluation by the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation: Topical Report WCAP-16009-P, Revision 0, “Realistic Large Break LOCA Methodology using Automated Statistical Treatment of Uncertainty Method (ASTRUM),” November 2004, Westinghouse Electric Company, Project Number 700, TAC NO.MB9483.
  22. August 2006, Letter from NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation to AREVA NP, INC—Subject: Request For Additional Information Followup Re: Topical Report EMF-2103(P), Revision 1, Realistic Large Break LOCA Methodology for Pressurized Water Reactors, (TAC NO. MC4259).
  23. Letter from AREVA to Document Control Desk USNRC—Subject: Additional Information Regarding the Review of EMF-2103(P), Revision 1, “Realistic Large Break LOCA Methodology for Pressurized Water Reactors,” February 2007.
  24. G. B. Wallis, “Contribution to the paper Statistical aspects of best estimate method-1 by Attila Guba, Mihály Makai, Lénárd Pál,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 80, pp. 309–311, 2003.
  25. Y. Orechwa, “Comments on evaluation of nuclear safety from the outputs of computer codes in the presence of uncertainties by W.T. Nutt and G.B. Wallis,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 133–135, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. G. B. Wallis and W. T. Nutt, “Reply to comments on evaluation of nuclear safety from the outputs of computer codes in the presence of uncertainties by W.T. Nutt and G.B. Wallis, by Y. Orechwa,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 137–145, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. H. Glaeser, “Best-estimate approach in German licensing,” Lecture 28A, Seminar and Training on Scaling, Uncertainty and 3D Coupled Calculations in Nuclear Technology (3D S. UN. COP 2007), January-February, College Station, Texas, USA.
  28. N. K. Popov and J. C. Luxat, “Best Estimate and Uncertainty Analysis for CANDU Reactors,” Lecture 35A, Seminar and Training on Scaling, Uncertainty and 3D Coupled Calculations in Nuclear Technology (3D S. UN. COP 2007), January-February, College Station, Texas, USA.
  29. F. D'Auria, N. Debrecin, and G. M. Galassi, “Outline of the uncertainty methodology based on accuracy extrapolation,” Nuclear Technology, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 21–38, 1994.
  30. November 1997, 3rd National Journey in Reactor Thermal-Hydraulic—JONATER III, Work Report, Brazilian Institutions: CNEN, CTMSP, NUCLEN, CDTN and IPEN.
  31. M. R. Galetti, F. D'Auria, and C. Camargo, “Questions arising from the application of Best-Estimate Methods to the Angra 2 NPP Licensing Process in Brazil,” November 2000, International Meeting on “Best Estimate” Methods in Nuclear Installation Safety Analysis, Washington, DC.
  32. M. R. Galetti and G. M. Galassi, “Angra 2 NPP Licensing - Regulatory Independent Calculation—Description of the process to achieve the LBLOCA reference case with Relap5/Mod3.2.2 code,” May 2001, NT-CODRE-No06/01, CNEN.
  33. F. D'Auria and G. M. Galassi, “Best-estimate analysis and uncertainty evaluation of the angra 2 LBLOCA DBA,” DIMNP NT-433(01)-rev.1, University of Pisa, July 2001.
  34. F. D'Auria and W. Giannotti, “Development of a code with the capability of Internal assessment of uncertainty,” Nuclear Technology, vol. 131, pp. 159–196, 2000.
  35. F. D'Auria, E. Fontani, and W. Giannotti, “Preliminary results of the application of the Relap5/Mod3.2 code to UPTF experiments,” DIMNP-NT-379, University of Pisa, April 1999.
  36. JAERI-Memo, 62-093, Evaluation Report on SCTF Core III S3-SH1 Overall Thermal-Hydraulic Characteristics under Combined Injection Mode for German-Type PWR, March 1987.