Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2008 (2008), Article ID 340164, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/340164
Research Article

Bootstrap and Order Statistics for Quantifying Thermal-Hydraulic Code Uncertainties in the Estimation of Safety Margins

Department of Nuclear Engineering, Polytechnic of Milan, Via Ponzio 34/3, Milano 20133, Italy

Received 30 April 2007; Revised 8 December 2007; Accepted 21 December 2007

Academic Editor: Cesare Frepoli

Copyright © 2008 Enrico Zio and Francesco Di Maio. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Gavrilas, J. Meyer, B. Youngblood, D. Prelewicz, and R. Beaton, “A generalized framework for assessment of safety margins in nuclear power plants,” in Proceedings of the International Meeting on Updates in Best Estimate Methods in Nuclear Installation Safety Analysis (BE '04), pp. 28–36, Washington, DC, USA, November 2004.
  2. S. Martorell, Private Communication, 200.
  3. UNRSC, 1998, An approach for using probabilistic risk assessment in risk-informed decisions on plant-specific changes to the licensing basis, RG 1.17.
  4. S. Martorell, Y. Nebot, J. F. Vilanueva et al., “Safety margins estimation method considering uncertainties within the risk-informed decision-making framework,” in Proceedings of the American Nuclear Society's Topical Meeting on Reactor Physics (PHYSOR '06), vol. 2006, Vancouver, BC, Canada, September 2006.
  5. S. S. Wilks, “Determination of sample sizes for setting tolerance limits,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 91–96, 1941. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. S. S. Wilks, “Statistical prediction with special reference to the problem of tolerance limits,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 400–409, 1942. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. B. Efron and R. J. Tibshiriani, An Introduction to the Bootstrap, Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 57, Chapman & Hall, New York, NY, USA, 1993.
  8. V. Kopustinskas, R. Urbonas, A. Kaliakta, and R. Bolado-Lavin, “Input parameters distribution sensitivity study of RBMK-1500 reactor one group distribution header complete blockage scenario,” in Proceedings of the European Safety & Reliability Conference (ESREL '05), pp. 1125–1132, Tri Cityá, Poland, June 2005.
  9. A. Guba, M. Makai, and L. Pál, “Statistical aspects of best estimate method—I,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 217–232, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. G. Apostolakis, “The concept of probability in safety assessments of technological systems,” Science, vol. 250, no. 4986, pp. 1359–1364, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. J. C. Helton and W. L. Oberkampf, “Alternative representations of epistemic uncertainty,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 85, no. 1–3, pp. 1–10, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. M. Marseguerra, E. Zio, and R. Canetta, “Using genetic algorithms for calibrating simplified models of nuclear reactor dynamics,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1219–1250, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. M. Marseguerra, R. Masini, E. Zio, and G. Cojazzi, “Variance decomposition-based sensitivity analysis via neural networks,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 229–238, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. W. T. Nutt and G. B. Wallis, “Evaluation of nuclear safety from the outputs of computer codes in the presence of uncertainties,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 57–77, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. A. Wald, “An extension of Wilks method for setting tolerance limits,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 45–55, 1943. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. G. Heinrich, “Changing times, testing times: A bootstrap analysis of poverty and inequality using the PACO database,” CERT Discussion Papers 9802, Centre for Economic Reform and Transformation, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh, UK, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  17. A. M. Zoubir and B. Boashash, “The bootstrap and its application in signal processing,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 56–76, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. M. J. Fortin, G. M. Jacquez, and B. Shipley, “Computer-intensive methods,” in Enyclopedia of Environmetrics, A. El-Shaarawi and W. W. Piegorsch, Eds., vol. 1, pp. 399–402, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  19. E. Ušpuras and A. Kaliatka, Accident and Transient Processes at NPPs with Channel-Type Reactors: Monography, vol. 28 of Thermophysics, Lithuanian Energy Institute, Kaunas, Lithuanian, 2006.
  20. C. Z. Mooney and R. D. Duval, Bootstrapping: A Nonparametric Approach to Statistical Inference, Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Sage, Newburry Park, CA, USA, 1993.
  21. C. Swanepoel, “The teaching and practical implementation of the non-parametric bootstrap,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS 6 '02), Cape Town, South Africa, July 2002.
  22. A. Kaliatka, M. Vaisnoras, and V. Vileiniskis, “Best estimate analysis of group distribution header blockage events in RBMK-1500 reactors,” Kerntechnik, vol. 70, no. 5-6, pp. 270–276, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  23. R. Urbonas, A. Kaliatka, and E. Uspuras, “Comparison of modern analysis approaches based on the postulated GDH blockage event at Ignalina NPP,” Energetika, vol. 2, pp. 14–21, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  24. R. Urbonas, E. Uspuras, and A. Kaliatka, “State-of-the-art computer code RELAP5 validation with RBMK-related separate phenomena data,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 225, no. 1, pp. 65–81, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar