Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2009, Article ID 214285, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/214285
Research Article

Physics Features of TRU-Fueled VHTRs

Department of Nuclear Engineering, Texas A&M University, 129 Zachry Engineering Center, 3133 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3133, USA

Received 9 April 2009; Accepted 14 April 2009

Academic Editor: Jan Leen Kloosterman

Copyright © 2009 Tom G. Lewis III and Pavel V. Tsvetkov. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. E. ElBaradei, “Nuclear power and sustainable development,” IAEA, 2006.
  2. “Report to Congress on advanced fuel cycle initiative: the future path for advanced spent fuel treatment and transmutation research,” Tech. Rep. 03-GA50439-06, U.S. DOE, 2003.
  3. “Report to Congress on Spent Nuclear Fuel Recycling Program Plan,” U.S. DOE, 2006.
  4. P. V. Tsvetkov, D. E. Ames II, A. B. Alajo, and T. G. Lewis III, “Spectrum shifting as a mechanism to improve performance of VHTRs with advanced actinide fuels,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 238, no. 8, pp. 1958–1964, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. T. Kim, T. Taiwo, R. Hill, W. Yang, and F. Venneri, “A feasibility study of reactor-based deep-burn concepts,” Tech. Rep. ANL-AFCI-155, Argonne National Laboratory, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  6. Office of Nuclear Energy, Science, and Technology, “The US generation IV implementation strategy,” 03-GA50439-06, United States of America, 2003.
  7. “Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems Ten Year Program Plan Volume I,” Office of Nuclear Energy, Science, and Technology, U.S. DOE, March 2005.
  8. D. Hanson, “Screening Tests for Selection of VHTR Advanced Fuel,” General Atomics, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2003.
  9. “Final Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada,” Vol. 2, Appendix A, “Inventory and Characteristics of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level Radioactive Waste, and Other Materials”, DOE/EIS-0250, U.S. DOE, 2002.
  10. “Evaluation of high temperature gas-cooled reactor performance: benchmark analysis related to initial testing of the HTTR and HTR-10,” Tech. Rep. IAEA-TECDOC-1382, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, 2003.
  11. P. M. Mills, R. Soto, and G. Gibbs, “Next generation nuclear plant pre-conceptual design report,” INL Report INL/EXT-07-12967 Rev. 1, NGNP Project, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  12. “SCALE: a modular code system for performing standardized computer analyses for licensing evaluation,” Tech. Rep. ORNL/TM-2005/39, Ver. 5.1, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn, USA, November 2006.