Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2009, Article ID 436218, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/436218
Research Article

CFD Analysis of a Slug Mixing Experiment Conducted on a VVER-1000 Model

1Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica, Nucleare e della Produzione, Università di Pisa (UNIPI), 2 Via Diotisalvi, 56100 Pisa, Italy
2Forschungszentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (FZD) Institute of Safety Research, P.O. Box 51 01 19, 01314 Dresden, Germany
3Experimental Thermal Hydraulics Department, OKB Gidropress, Ordshonikidize 21, 142103 Podolsk, Moscow district, Russia

Received 13 June 2008; Accepted 3 November 2008

Academic Editor: Dirk Lucas

Copyright © 2009 F. Moretti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. U. Rohde, T. Höhne, S. Kliem et al., “Fluid mixing and flow distribution in a primary circuit of a nuclear pressurized water reactor—Validation of CFD codes,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 237, no. 15–17, pp. 1639–1655, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. K. T. Kiger and F. Gavelli, “Boron mixing in complex geometries: flow structure details,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 208, no. 1, pp. 67–85, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. B. Hemstroem and N.-G. Andersson, “Physical modelling of a rapid boron dilution transient—II: study of the Ringhals case, using a more complete model,” Report US 97:20, Vattenfall, Sweden, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Gavrilas and K. Kiger, “OECD/CSNI ISP Nr. 43 Rapid Boron-Dilution Transient Tests for Code Verification,” September 2000.
  5. U. Rohde, T. Höhne, S. Kliem et al., “FLOMIX-R Project—Final Summary Report,” European Commission.
  6. M. Scheuerer, M. Andreani, D. Bestion et al., “ECORA Project—Condensed Final Summary Report,” European Commission, March 2005.
  7. European Commission—Europeaid Cooperation Office, TACIS Project R2.02/02, “Development of safety analysis capabilities for VVER-1000 transients involving spatial variations of coolant properties (temperature or boron concentration at core inlet),” Terms of Reference.
  8. F. Menter, “Evaluation of computational fluid dynamic methods for reactor safety analysis,” CFD Best Practice Guidelines for CFD Code Validation for Reactor-Safety Applications, EU/FP5 ECORA Project, EVOL-ECORA-D01, Germany, February 2002.
  9. J. Mahaffy, B. Chung, F. Dubois et al., “Best practice guidelines for the use of CFD in nuclear reactor safety applications,” NEA/CSNI/R(2007)5, May 2007.
  10. T. Höhne, U. Rohde, D. Melideo et al., “Pre-test CFD simulations of gidropress mixing facility experiments using ANSYS CFX,” in Proceeding of the 17th AER Symposium on VVER Reactor Physics and Reactor Safety, Yalta, Crimea, Ukraine, September 2007.
  11. T. Höhne, U. Rohde, D. Melideo et al., “CFD simulations of gidropress mixing facility experiments in the framework of TACIS project R2.02/02,” in Proceedings of TOPSAFE Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, September-October 2008.
  12. F. Moretti, D. Melideo, F. D'Auria, T. Höhne, and S. Kliem, “CFX simulations of ROCOM slug mixing experiments,” Journal of Power and Energy Systems, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 720–733, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. L. Vyskocil, “CFD simulation of slug mixing in VVER-1000 reactor,” in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE-14), p. 10, Miami, Fla, USA, July 2006.
  14. ANSYS ICEM-CFD 10.0 User Manual, (embedded in the software package), 2005.
  15. ANSYS CFX-10.0 User Manual, (embedded in the software package), 2005.