Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2009, Article ID 579430, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/579430
Project Report

The SPES3 Experimental Facility Design for the IRIS Reactor Simulation

1Westinghouse, Science & Technology Center, 1344 Beulah Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15235, USA
2Nuclear & Radiological Engineering/Medical Physics Programs, George W. Woodruff School, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
3SIET, S.p.A. Via Nino Bixio 27, 29100 Piacenza, Italy
4Department of Energy, CeSNEF-Nuclear Engineering Division, Politecnico di Milano, Via La Masa 34, 20156 Milano, Italy
5ENEA, Via Martiri di Monte Sole 4, 40129 Bologna, Italy
6Mangiarotti Nuclear, Viale Sarca 336, 20126 Milano, Italy
7FER, University of Zagreb, Unska 2, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
8ORNL, P. O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA
9Ansaldo Nucleare, Corso F.M. Perrone, 25, 16161 Genova, Italy

Received 31 October 2008; Accepted 25 May 2009

Academic Editor: Yanhua Yang

Copyright © 2009 Mario Carelli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. D. Carelli, “IRIS: a global approach to nuclear power renaissance,” Nuclear News, September 2003. View at Google Scholar
  2. M. D. Carelli, L. E. Conway, L. Oriani et al., “The design and safety features of the IRIS reactor,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 230, no. 1–3, pp. 151–167, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. M. D. Carelli, B. Petrović, M. Dzodzo et al., “SPES-3 experimental facility design for IRIS reactor integral testing,” in Proceedings of the European Nuclear Conference (ENC '07), Brussels, Belgium, September 2007.
  4. B. Petrović, M. D. Carelli, and N. Cavlina, “IRIS—international reactor innovative and secure: progress in development, licensing and deployment activities,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Options in Countries with Small and Medium Electricity Grids, Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 2006.
  5. N. Zuber, “Appendix D—a hierarchical, two-tired scaling analysis,” An Integrated Structure and Scaling Methodology for Severe Accident Technical Issue Resolution 20555, NUREG/CR-5809, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, USA, November 1991. View at Google Scholar
  6. N. Zuber, W. Wulff, U. S. Rohatgi, and I. Catton, “Application of fractional scaling analysis (FSA) to loss of coolant accidents (LOCA), part 1: methodology development,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal-Hydraulics (NURETH-11 '05), Avignon, France, October 2005, paper 153.
  7. W. Wulff, N. Zuber, U. S. Rohatgi, and I. Catton, “Application of fractional scaling analysis (FSA) to loss of coolant accidents (LOCA), part 2: system level scaling for system depressurisation,” in Proceedings of the 11th Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal-Hydraulics (NURETH-11 '05), Avignon, France, October 2005, paper 111.
  8. Regulatory Guide 1.203, “Transient and accident analysis methods,” USNRC, December 2005.
  9. T. K. Larson, F. J. Moody, G. E. Wilson et al., “IRIS small break LOCA phenomena identification and ranking table (PIRT),” in Proceedings of the International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP '05), Seoul, Korea, May 2005.