Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2011, Article ID 284274, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/284274
Research Article

Modeling of Spray System Operation under Hydrogen and Steam Emissions in NPP Containment during Severe Accident

Physical & Technical Center, LLC, P.O. Box 236 Sarov, Nizhny Novgorod 607190, Russia

Received 21 April 2011; Revised 15 July 2011; Accepted 8 August 2011

Academic Editor: Rafael Miró

Copyright © 2011 Vadim E. Seleznev et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Babic and I. Kljenak, “CFD spray simulations for nuclear reactor safety applications with lagrangian approach for droplet modelling,” in Proceeding of the International Conference Nuclear Energy for New Europe, p. 13, Portoroz, Slovenia, September 2007.
  2. F. Terzuoli, M. C. Galassi, D. Mazzini, and F. D’Auria, “CFD code validation against stratified air-water flow ex-perimental data,” Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2008, Article ID 434212, 7 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. J. Kim, U. Lee, S. W. Hong, S. B. Kim, and H. D. Kim, “Spray effect on the behavior of hydrogen during severe accidents by a loss-of-coolant in the APR1400 containment,” International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1207–1216, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Xiong, Y. Yang, and X. Cheng, “CFD application to hydrogen risk analysis and PAR qualification,” Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2009, Article ID 213981, 13 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. P. Royl, H. Rochholz, W. Breitung, J. R. Travis, and G. Necker, “Analysis of steam and hydrogen distributions with PAR mitigation in NPP containments,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 202, no. 2-3, pp. 231–248, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E.-A. Reinecke, S. Kelm, W. Jahn et al., “Review of LP&CFD recombiner modelling and experiments: applicability to reactor simulations and open issues,” in Proceedings of the 3rd European Review Meeting on Severe Accident Research, p. 38, Nesseber, Bulgaria, September 2008.
  7. D. C. Wilcox, Turbulence modeling for CFD, Griffin Printing, Santa Ana, Calif, USA, 2nd edition, 1994.
  8. A. Celic, Performance of Modern Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models, Shaker, Aachen, Germany, 2004.
  9. A. D. Saveliev, “Viscous gas flow simulations based on the (q—ν) turbulence model,” Journal of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 589–600, 2003 (Russian). View at Google Scholar
  10. P. G. Frik, Turbulence: Approaches and Models, Institute of Computer Research, Moscow, Russia, 2003.
  11. J. D. Anderson Jr., Computational Fluid Dynamics: Basics with Applications, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1995.
  12. D. Laerence, “‘Best’ practical guidelines for the use of CFD in nuclear reactor safety applications,” in Proceedings of the CFD Workshop on Test Cases, Databases & BPG for Nuclear Power Plants, p. 18, University of Manchester, July 2008.
  13. H. Wilkening, D. Baraldi, and M. Heitsch, “On the importance of validation when using commercial CFD codes in nuclear reactor safety,” in Computation Fluid Dynamics for Nuclear Reactor Safety (CFD4NRS), pp. 525–538, Garching, Germany, September 2006.
  14. V. E. Seleznev, V. V. Aleshin, and S. N. Pryalov, Modeling of Pipeline Networks and Ductwork Systems: Methods, Models and Algorithms M, MAKS Press, Moscow, Russia, 2007.
  15. A. Favre, “Equatijns des gaz turbulents compressibles: formes generales,” Journal Mecanique, vol. 4, pp. 361–390, 1965. View at Google Scholar
  16. M. A. Mikheev and I. M. Mikheeva, Fundamentals of Heat Transfer, Stereotype, Energiya, Moscow, Russia, 2nd edition, 1977.
  17. D. B. Spalding, Combustion and Mass Transfer, Mashinostroenie, Moscow, Russia, 1985.
  18. N. M. Vitushkina, A. A. Lukianov, and N. N. Shan’gin, “Modeling of space effects during steam condensation in a model containment using the KUPOL-3D code,” Heat Engineering, no. 9, pp. 73–75, 2006 (Russian). View at Google Scholar
  19. V. P. Isachenko, Heat Exchange during Condensation, Energiya, Moscow, Russia, 1977.
  20. V. N. Lukanin, M. G. Shatrov, G. M. Kamfer et al., Heat Engineering, Vyssh.Shk., Moscow, Russia, 2nd edition, 2000.
  21. S. S. Kutateladze, Heat Transfer during Condensation and Boiling, Mashgiz, Moscow, Russia, 2nd edition, 1952.
  22. S.S. Kutateladze and V. M. Borishansky, A Reference Book of Heat Transfer, Gosenergoizdat, Moscow, Russia, 1958.
  23. A. N. Plankovsky and P. I. Nikolaev, Processes and Machines of Chemical and Petrochemical Technology, Khimia, Moscow, Russia, 1987.
  24. ANSYS CFX-Solver Theory Guide. Release 13.0, SAS IP, Inc., 2010.
  25. H. J. Allelin, K. Fischer, J. Vendel et al., “International standard problem ISP-47 on containment thermal hydraulics,” Final Report JT03231730 NEA/CSNI, OECD, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  26. ANSYS Mechanical APDL Documentation. Release 13.0, SAS IP, Inc., 2010.
  27. S. V. Puzach, A. I. Bogatishchev, S. I. Zernov et al., Calculation of True Fire Resistance of Building Structures Accounting for Real Parameters of Fire and Operation of Fire Suppression, Forced Ventilation and Smoke Removal Systems (Mathematical Model and Technique), Mord.Kn.Izd.: Kov.Tip., Saransk, Russia, 2004.
  28. V. E. Seleznev, V. V. Aleshin, R. I. Il’kaev et al., Numerical Simulation of Gas pipeline Networks: Theory, Computational Implementation, and Industrial Applications, KomKniga, Moscow, Russia, 2005.
  29. “ISP-47, international standard problem on containment thermal hydraulics,” Final report NEA/CSNI/R, OECD, 2207.
  30. J. Vendel, J. Malet, E. Porcheron et al., “ISP-47, international standard problem on containment thermal-hydraulics, step 1: TOSQANMISTRA, TOSQAN-MISTRA phase A: air-steam-helium mixtures, comparison code-experiments,” Rapport DSU/SERAC/LPMA/05-10, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  31. J. Malet, E. Porcheron, P. Cornet et al., “ISP-47, international standard problem on containment thermal-hydraulics, step 1: TOSQANMISTRA, phase A: air-steam mixtures TOSQAN experimental results,” Rapport DPEA/SERAC/LPMAC/02-45, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  32. J. Malet, P. Cornet, P. Brun, A. Nuboer, B. Menet, and L. Thause, “ISP-47, international standard problem on containment thermal-hydraulics, step 1: TOSQANMISTRA, phase B: air-steam-helium mixtures TOSQAN experimental results,” Rapport DSU/SERAC/LECEV/05-17, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  33. A. Bentaib, C. Caroli, B. Chaumont et al., “Evaluation of the impact that PARs have on the hydrogen risk in the reactor containment methodology and application to PSA level 2,” Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2010, Article ID 320396, 7 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar