Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2013, Article ID 172518, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/172518
Research Article

Moderating Material to Compensate the Drawback of High Minor Actinide Containing Transmutation Fuel on the Feedback Effects in SFR Cores

Department of Reactor Safety, Institute of Resource Ecology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Postfach 51 01 19, 01314 Dresden, Germany

Received 4 September 2012; Accepted 4 February 2013

Academic Editor: Wei Shen

Copyright © 2013 Bruno Merk. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. IAEA TM on Innovative Fast Reactor Designs with Enhanced Negative Reactivity Feedback Features,” IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, Austria, 2012, accessed March 11, 2013, http://www.iaea.org/NuclearPower/Meetings/2012/2012-02-27-02-29-TM-NPTD.html.
  2. H. Hummel and D. Okrent, Reactivity Coefficients in Large Fast Power Reactors, ANS, 1970.
  3. R. N. Hill and H. Khalil, “Evaluation of LMR design options for reduction of sodium void worth,” in Proceedings of International Conference on the Physics of Reactors, vol. 1, pp. 11–19, Marseille, France, 1980.
  4. G. Rimpault, L. Buiron, P. Sciora, and F. Varaine, “Towards GEN IV SFR design: promising ideas for large advanced SFR core designs,” in International Conference on the Physics of Reactors (PHYSOR '08), pp. 2394–2400, Interlaken, Switzerland, September 2008. View at Scopus
  5. B. Carluec and P. L. Pinto, “Lessons learned from Fushima accident as regards the safety approach of the ASTRID project at conceptual design stage,” in Proceedings of the IAEA Technical Meeting on Impact of the Fukushima Event on Current and Future Fast Reactor Design, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany, March 2012, accessed March 11, 2013, http://www.iaea.org/NuclearPower/Meetings/2012/2012-03-19-03-23-TM-NPTD.html.
  6. L. Buiron et al., “Innovative core design for generation IV sodium-cooled fast reactors,” in Proceedings of the International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP '10), Nice, France, 2007.
  7. K. Sun et al., “Void reactivity decomposition for the sodium coold fast reactor in equilibrium closed fuel cycle,” in Proceedings of the Advances in Reactor Physics to Power the Nuclear Renaissance (PHYSOR '10), Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, 2010.
  8. B. Merk, E. Fridman, and F. P. Weiß, “On the use of zirconium based moderators to enhance the feedback coefficients in a MOX fuelled sodium cooled fast reactor,” Nuclear Science and Engineering, vol. 171, 2, pp. 136–149, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  9. B. Merk, E. Fridman, and F. P. Weiß, “On the use of a moderation layer to improve the safety behavior in sodium cooled fast reactors,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 921–929, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. B. Merk and F. P. Weiß, “Analysis of the influence of different arrangements for ZrH moderator material on the performance of a SFR core,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 38, pp. 2374–2385, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. B. Merk and F. P. Weiß, “On the effect of different placing ZrH moderator material on the performance of a SFR core,” in Advances in Reactor Physics—Linking Research, Industry, and Education (PHYSOR '12), Knoxville, Tenn, USA, 2012.
  12. E. A. Villarino, R. J. J. Stammler, A. A. Ferri, and J. J. Casal, “HELIOS: angularly dependent collision probabilities,” Nuclear Science and Engineering, vol. 112, pp. 16–31, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  13. R. Sanchez et al., “APOLLO II: a user-oriented, portable, modular code for multigroup transport assembly calculations,” Nuclear Science and Engineering, vol. 100, article 352, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  14. IAEA Fast Reactor Database, 2006, http://www.iaea.org/inisnkm/nkm/aws/frdb/auxiliary/generalInformation.html.
  15. A. E. Waltar and A. B. Reynolds, Fast Breeder Reactors, Pergamon Press, New York, NY, USA, 1981.
  16. A. Pay, E. Francillon, B. Steinmetz, D. Barnes, and N. Meda, “European Fast Reactor (EFR) fuel element design,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Anaheim, Calif, USA, 1989, http://www.iasmirt.org/iasmirt-3/SMiRT10/DC_250515.
  17. J. Carmack and K. O. Pasamehmetoglu:, “Review of transmutation fuel studies,” in INL/EXT-08-13779, or GNEP-FUEL-TD-RT-2008-000050, U.S. Department of Energy, Transmutation Fuel Campaign, 2008, http://www.inl.gov/technicalpublications/Documents/3901056.pdf.
  18. W. M. Mueller, J. P. Blackledge, and G. G. Libowitz, Metal Hydrides, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1968.
  19. K. Tuček, J. Carlsson, and H. Wider, “Comparison of sodium and lead-cooled fast reactors regarding reactor physics aspects, severe safety and economical issues,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 236, no. 14–16, pp. 1589–1598, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. E. Bays, H. Zhang, and H. Zhao, “The industrial sodium cooled fast reactor,” in ANFM, INL/CON-09-15519 PREPRINT, 2009, http://www.inl.gov/technicalpublications/Documents/4363828.pdf.
  21. D. Olander, E. Greenspan, H. D. Garkisch, and B. Petrovic, “Uranium-zirconium hydride fuel properties,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 239, pp. 1406–1424, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  22. D. W. Wootan, J. A. Rawlins, L. L. Carter, H. R. Brager, and R. E. Schenter, “Analysis and results of a hydrogen-moderated isotope production assembly in the fast flux test facility,” Nuclear Science and Engineering, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 150–156, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. C. Lefèvre, C. H. Mitchell, and G. Hubert:, “European fast reactor design,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 162, pp. 133–143, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. U. Rohde, U. Grundmann, and S. Kliem, “DYN3D - advanced reactor simulations in 3D,” Nuclear Energy Review, vol. 2, pp. 28–30, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  25. C. Beckert and U. Grundmann, “A nodal expansion method for solving the multigroup SP3 equations in the reactor code DYN3D,” in Proceedings of the Joint International Topical Meeting on Mathematics and Computations and Supercomputing in Nuclear Applications (M&C+SNA '07), Monterey, Calif, USA, April 2007. View at Scopus
  26. R. J. M. Konings et al., “The EFTTRA-T4 experiment on americium transmutation,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 282, no. 2-3, pp. 159–170, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar