Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 705878, 18 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/705878
Research Article

Estimating Alarm Thresholds for Process Monitoring Data under Different Assumptions about the Data Generating Mechanism

1Statistical Sciences, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
2Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK

Received 7 December 2012; Revised 10 May 2013; Accepted 15 May 2013

Academic Editor: Michael F. Simpson

Copyright © 2013 Tom Burr et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. Burr, A. Bakel, S. Bryan et al., “Roles for process monitoring in nuclear safeguards at aqueous reprocessing plants,” Journal of Nuclear Materials Management, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 42–53, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  2. T. Burr, M. S. Hamada, J. Howell, M. Skurikhin, L. Ticknor, and B. Weaver, “Data requirements for learning alarm rules for process monitoring,” in Proceedings of the 9th ANS/INMM conference on facilities operation and safeguards interface, Savannah, Ga, USA, 2012.
  3. T. Burr, M. S. Hamada, M. Skurikhin, and B. Weaver, “Pattern recognition options to combine process monitoring and material accounting data in nuclear safeguards,” Statistics Research Letters, vol. 1, no. 1, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  4. C. Roes, Shewhart-Type Charts in Statistical Process Control [Ph.D. thesis], University of Amsterdam, 1995.
  5. W. Albers and W. C. M. Kallenberg, “Self-adapting control charts,” Statistica Neerlandica, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 292–308, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. W. Albers and W. Kallenberg, “Alternative Shewhart-type charts for grouped observations,” Metron, vol. 64, pp. 357–375, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  7. W. Albers and W. C. M. Kallenberg, “New corrections for old control charts,” Quality Engineering, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 467–473, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. W. Albers and W. Kallenberg, “Improved data driven control charts,” International Journal Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 37, pp. 423–439, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  9. W. Albers, W. C. M. Kallenberg, and S. Nurdiati, “Parametric control charts,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 159–184, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. W. Albers and W. Kallenberg, “Are estimated control charts in control?” Technical Report 1569, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  11. W. Albers, W. Kallenberg, and S. Nurdiati, “Parametric control charts,” Technical Report 1623, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, University of Twente, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  12. W. Albers and W. Kallenberg, “Estimation in Shewhart control charts,” Memorandum 1559, University of Twente, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  13. S. Chakraborti, “Run length, average run length and false alarm rate of shewhart X-bar chart: exact derivations by conditioning,” Communications Statistics in Simulation and Computation, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 61–81, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. L. K. Chan, K. P. Hapuarachchi, and B. D. Macpherson, “Robustness of XQ and R charts,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 117–123, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. G. Chen, “The mean and standard deviation of the run length distribution of X-charts when control limits are estimated,” Statistica Sinica, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 789–798, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. B. Colosimo and E. Castillo, Bayesian Process Monitoring, Control, and Optimization, Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, 2007.
  17. L. de Haan and A. K. Sinha, “Estimating the probability of a rare event,” Annals of Statistics, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 732–759, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Dekkers and L. de Haan, “On the estimation of the extreme-value index and large quantile estimation,” Annals of Statistics, vol. 17, pp. 1795–1832, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  19. B. Ghosh, M. Reynolds Jr., and Y. Hui, “Shewhart XQ-charts with estimated process variance,” Communications in Statistics, vol. 10, pp. 1797–1822, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  20. P. Hall and I. Weissman, “On the estimation of extreme tail probabilities,” Annals of Statistics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 1311–1326, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. J. Hyndman and Y. Fan, “Sample quantiles in statistical packages,” The American Statistician, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 361–365, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. W. A. Jensen, J. B. Birch, and W. H. Woodall, “High breakdown estimation methods for phase I multivariate control charts,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 615–629, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. G. R. Mercado, M. D. Conerly, and M. B. Perry, “Phase I control chart based on a kernel estimator of the quantile function,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1131–1144, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. G. Nedumaran and J. J. Pignatiello Jr., “On estimating X̄ control chart limits,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 206–212, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. E. A. Pappanastos and B. M. Adams, “Alternative designs of the Hodges-Lehmann control chart,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 213–223, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. C. Quesenberry, “The effect of sample size on estimated limits for XQ and X control charts,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 25, pp. 237–247, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  27. W. H. Woodall and D. C. Montgomery, “Research issues and ideas in statistical process control,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 376–386, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. T. Hastie, R. Tibshirini, and J. Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2001.
  29. W. Zhou and B.-Y. Jing, “Adjusted empirical likelihood method for quantiles,” Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 689–703, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. R Development Core Team. R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2004, http://www.r-project.org/.
  31. C. Fraley and A. E. Raftery, “Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis, and density estimation,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 97, no. 458, pp. 611–631, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. T. Benaglia, D. Chauveau, D. R. Hunter, and D. S. Young, “Mixtools: an R package for analyzing finite mixture models,” Journal of Statistical Software, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1–29, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. T. Burr and M. S. Hamada, “Estimating alarm thresholds and the number of components in mixture distributions,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, vol. 685, pp. 55–61, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  34. B. Jones and J. Wark, “Near real time materials accountancy system for THORP, ESARDA Bulletin,” 1991, http://esarda2.jrc.it/db_proceeding/mfile/P_1991_avignon_117.pdf.
  35. T. Burr, M. Suzuki, J. Howell, M. S. Hamada, and C. E. Longo, “Signal estimation and change detection in tank data for nuclear safeguards,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, vol. 640, no. 1, pp. 200–212, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. Suzuki, M. Hori, S. Nagaoka, and T. Kimura, “Study on loss detection algorithms using tank monitoring data,” Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 184–192, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. T. Burr, M. S. Hamada, J. Howell, and M. Suzuki, “Loss detection results on simulated tank data modified by realistic effects,” Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 209–221, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. L. Wadsworth and J. A. Tawn, “Likelihood-based procedures for threshold diagnostics and uncertainty in extreme value modelling,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 543–567, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. Black and R. Hickey, “Maintaining the performance of a learned classifier under concept drift,” Intelligent Data Analysis, vol. 3, pp. 453–474, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  40. C. Xerri, J. Beckers, M. Boella et al., “Control of nuclear material holdup in MOX fuel fabrication plants in Europe,” ESARDA Bulletin, vol. 31, pp. 69–75, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  41. R. O. Hoover, S. Phongikaroon, M. F. Simpson, S. X. Li, and T.-S. Yoo, “Development of computational models for the mark-IV electrorefiner-Effect of uranium, plutonium, and zirconium dissolution at the fuel basket-salt interface,” Nuclear Technology, vol. 171, no. 3, pp. 276–284, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. Simpson and S. Herrmann, “Modeling the pyrochemical reduction of spent UO2 fuel in a pilot-scale reactor,” Tech. Rep. INL/CON-06-11597, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  43. M. A. Williamson and J. L. Willit, “Pyroprocessing flowsheets for recycling used nuclear fuel,” Nuclear Engineering and Technology, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 329–334, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. D. Vaden, R. Benedict, K. Goff, R. Bucher, and A. Yacout, “Material accountancy in an electrochemical fuel conditioning facilty, Argonne National Laboratory report-9606116,” 1996, http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/27/063/27063600.pdf.
  45. J. Zhang, “EChem modeling: a kinetic model for electrorefining based on diffusion control,” Los Alamos National Laboratory Report, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  46. D. Vaden, “Fuel conditioning facility electrorefiner process model,” Separation Science and Technology, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1985–2001, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. G. Cowell, J. Howell, and T. Burr, “Some implications of applying NRTA to a MOX facility with significant temporary stores,” in Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Institute of Nuclear Materials Management, 2010.