Research Article | Open Access

# Effective Atomic Number Determination of Rare Earth Oxides with Scattering Intensity Ratio

**Academic Editor:**Borut Mavko

#### Abstract

Effective atomic numbers () of scientific samples (rare earth) were determined experimentally by scattering of 59.54 keV gamma photons from 5 Ci ^{241}Am annular radioactive source. The scattered gamma photons were collected by using a high-resolution HPGe semiconductor detector placed at to the incident beam. This experiment was carried out on several elements in the atomic range for 59.54 keV incident photons. Photopeak efficiency and air and sample absorption corrections were performed on Rayleigh to Compton scattering intensity ratio; then the ratio was plotted as a function of atomic number and a fit curve was constituted. The effective atomic numbers of rare earth oxide samples were determined by this fit curve. Also, related parameters were determined by absorption technique with the same incident photon energy. Obtained values from this fit curve were compared to theoretical values and were found to closely agree with theoretical calculations.

#### 1. Introduction

Effective atomic number is an important parameter that should be determined for materials in composite, alloy, and mixture form. Reliable data on the effective atomic numbers were used in radiation biology, medical physics, radiation dosimetry, nuclear industry, and space research programs. Also, the effective atomic number is used for determining the X- and *γ*-ray absorption fraction of materials. There are a few techniques (particle induced X-ray emissions (PIXE), proton induced gamma ray emission (PIGE), fast neutron activation analysis (FNNA), induced coupled plasma (ICP), electrical impedance methods, XRF, chemical analysis, and atomic absorption spectroscopy) to define the effective atomic number of composite materials that was created by two or more constituents. One of these techniques is total photon interaction calculation by using transmission experiments. In addition to these techniques, intensity ratio of scattered photons, emerging from suitable sample-source and detector arrangement, was a significant experimental method to determine effective atomic number in a nondestructive way. The scattered intensity ratio method is regardless of density of the sample and depends on the mixture of composite material. The above-mentioned research techniques used in a present study are subapplication of the XRF technique.

Rare earth oxides of lanthanids are widely used in scientific, industrial, commercial, and medical applications. For example, praseodymium oxide in solid solution with ceria or ceria-zirconia is used as oxidation catalysis; europium oxide is used in nuclear reactor as a neutron absorber, fluorescent lamps, and screening for Down syndrome and other genetic diseases. In addition to these applications, terbium oxide (green phosphors in fluorescent lamps and color TV tubes) and dysprosium oxide (neutron-absorbing control rods in nuclear reactors, various data storage applications, and in improving the corrosion resistance of the magnets) are also important.

In recent years determination of the effective atomic number is increasingly studied. Due to the advantages, most of the investigations on this subject have been carried out using scattering intensity ratios. Singh et al. [1] have measured the effective atomic numbers of scientific (lanthanide oxides and alloys of lead and tin of known composition) and biological samples (iodine content of tissues) using scattering intensity ratio of 145 keV gamma rays. Singh et al. [2] have determined the effective atomic number of scientific samples by scattering intensity ratio of 59.54 keV gamma photons. There are some points should be considered in the determination process of the effective atomic number by scattering intensity ratio method. One of these points is thickness of sample. Increasing thicknesses are creating multiple scattering centers on the target. Therefore, the multiple scattering densities are increasing with the increasing thickness. Singh et al. [3] have determined the effect of multiple scattering on the effective atomic number. The effective atomic number of composite materials using Rayleigh to Compton scattering of 279 keV gamma rays was investigated by Singh et al. [4].

In this paper, we have determined the effective atomic number of rare-earth samples by scattering intensity ratio method. For this purpose, La_{2}O_{3}, Pr_{2}O_{3}, Eu_{2}O_{3}, Sm_{2}O_{3}, and Er_{2}O_{3} rare earth samples were investigated in 167° scattering angle with HPGe semiconductor detector.

#### 2. Theory

When an X-ray impinges upon a sample, three things may happen: the incident X-ray may be diffracted, scattered, or absorbed. Scattering will occur when an X-ray photon collides with one of the electrons of the absorbing element. Where this collision is elastic, that is, when no energy is lost in the collision process, the scattering is said to be coherent (Rayleigh) scattering. Since no energy change is involved, the coherently scattered radiation will retain exactly the same wavelength as the incident beam. The probability of Rayleigh scattering occurrence theoretically is given as where is the atomic form factor, representing the momentum transferred to the electron. (= m) is the classical electron radius and is the scattering angle.

Compton scattering is the interaction of a high energy photon with an electron and the resulting “scattered” photon which has a reduced frequency and therefore reduced energy. Compton scattering requires that light is viewed as a particle and not just a wave because it is the “collision” of the photon with the electron and the exchange of energy, which accounts for the shift in energy. The occurrence probability of Compton scattering is provided by Klein-Nishina relation: where and are scattered and incident photon energies. In large values of the momentum transfer, incoherent scattering function () is equal to number of the atomic electrons, and when momentum transfer approaches the zero, is approaching the zero at the same time. In this instance, the ratio of Rayleigh scattering cross-section to Compton scattering cross-section is given as where is the atomic Compton scattering cross-section that occurs from scattering by bound electrons. The atomic Compton scattering cross-section is given as Equation (3) represents the ratio of Rayleigh to Compton scattering. The value obtained from this equation is proportional to the atomic number of investigated material. This proportion depends on ratio. Theoretical data for calculation of the Rayleigh to Compton cross-section from parameters for and was created by Hubbell et al. [5].

The value, which is directly related to the atomic number of elemental interest, is calculated via weighting of the atomic percentages of elements using atomic form factor and incoherent scattering function: here represents the atomic percentages and is calculated by and the atomic mass of the th element as The effective atomic number of material is calculated via the ratio of its atomic cross-section to electronic cross-section: The atomic cross-section () is calculated as where , , and represent mass attenuation coefficient, Avogadro’s number, and atomic weight, respectively [6]. The total electronic cross-section for interest element is given as follows: here is the number of atoms of element relative to the total number of atoms of all elements in the mixture. is the atomic number of the th element in a molecule, and is the total mass attenuation coefficient of the th element in a molecule [4].

#### 3. Experimental Setup and Present Measurements

In this study, firstly we were aimed to determine the scattering intensity ratios of scientific samples to obtain their effective atomic numbers. For this purpose, we used 5 Ci annular source as an exciter and HPGe semiconductor detector to collect the scattering photons. The HPGe detector was a DSG planar high purity germanium crystal with a diameter of 16 mm, a length of 10 mm, a beryllium window of 0.12 mm, and active area of 200 mm^{2}. The schematic arrangement of the experimental setup used in the present study is shown in Figures 1 and 2. A bias voltage of −1500 V was applied to the detector with a resolution of 182 eV at 5.9 keV. The rare-earth samples of thickness ranging from 0,189 to 0,265 g/cm^{2} were used. In this study, the study samples were La_{2}O_{3}, Pr_{2}O_{3}, Eu_{2}O_{3}, Sm_{2}O_{3}, and Er_{2}O_{3}. Spectrum of samples was processed by using a Canberra (AccuSpec) Pc-based multichannel analyzer card. For the best counting rates from detector we set the time constant of Ortec model 472 amplifier at 6 *μ*s. Operating parameters of the system were governed and controlled by the computer program Genie-2000. The data were collected into 1024 channels of the MCA. Data were analyzed by the Origin 7.5 software program. A typical spectrum of La_{2}O_{3} target is shown in Figure 3. Also a typical spectrum of V (pure vanadium) target is shown in Figure 4.

#### 4. Result and Discussion

This experiment represents a procedure to determine effective atomic number of rare earth through measurements of Rayleigh and Compton scattering intensity using photon energy of 59.54 keV. The values of rare earth were needed to be determined precisely because of their applications especially in space physics, nuclear physics, medical physics, radioisotope monitoring, neutron capturing, lasers, scattering and attenuation of radiation, testing of multicomponent, designs of radiation shielding, calculations of absorbed dose in radiotherapy, and many other radioactive applications.

In the present measurements, a target of known atomic number (Be, C, Al, Si, Ca, Ti, V, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Y, Zr, Nb, Mo, Ru, Rh, Pd, Ag, Cd, Sn, La, Dy, Yb, Ta, Au, and Pb) and thickness (0.022–0.865 g/cm^{2}) was used. The scattered spectra of the targets are recorded for a period of 3600–61200 s. The background was recorded after removing the target out of the primary beam to permit the registration of events due to cosmic rays and to any other process independent of the target. The background count rate was subtracted from measurements. In the recorded scattered spectra, Rayleigh and Compton peaks were not simple. They were with superimposed continuum; hence, the following formula was used to subtract the additional unwanted counts included in this process:
where and are the channel numbers specifying the region of observed Photopeak, and are the counts at the respective channels, and is the simple integration of counts between the limits . These observed intensities were corrected for Photopeak efficiency of the HPGe detector, absorption in the air between target and the detector, and self-absorption in the primary target, as per the relation
here is the observed intensity under the Rayleigh (or Compton) peak; is the correction factor for absorption of photons in the air present between the target and the detector; is the self-absorption correction factor for the scattered photons in the target; is the Photopeak efficiency of the detector for Rayleigh (or Compton) scattered photons. The self-absorption correction factor was determined using the work of Weyrich [7]:
here and represent the absorption coefficients of incident and scattered photons, respectively, and is the sample thickness.

The Photopeak efficiency curve for the HPGe detector is shown in Figure 5 and created experimentally 13.81–1212.95 keV photon energy by using Am^{241}, Ba^{133}, Cs^{137}, and Eu^{152}. Each of these radioactive sources of known activity was placed at the position of the elemental target, and the energy spectra were recorded by the HPGe detector. The solid angle subtended by the detector at the centre of the source is thus the same as in the actual measurements. For a gamma emitted from a radioisotope source with a known activity, the efficiency is given by the expression
where is net peak area in counts, is the activity of source at the time of standardization, is the absolute gamma ray emission probability, is the decay constant, and is the elapsed time since standardization. The energies and emission probabilities of the sources used in the present work were taken from Table of Radioactive Isotopes [8].

The intensity ratio of Rayleigh and Compton scattered peaks for different targets of known atomic number is plotted as a function of atomic number and is given in Figure 6. In this figure, due to lack of the same features (size, thickness) of the target samples, some deviations occurred in the atomic range . The solid curve represents the best-fit curve through experimental data points corresponding to the intensity ratio of Rayleigh to Compton scattering in Figure 6 [9]. The equation for the best-fit curve is

Each of the rare earth samples is replaced with the elemental target and the scattered spectra are recorded. The intensities under the observed Rayleigh and Compton peaks were evaluated. The use of (11) provides the actual intensities under these peaks originating from interactions of 59.54 keV photons with the target atoms (electrons) and the scattered photons traveling in direction of the detector. The effective atomic number of La_{2}O_{3}, Pr_{2}O_{3}, Eu_{2}O_{3}, Sm_{2}O_{3}, and Er_{2}O_{3} is then deduced from the best-fit curve of Figure 6. Also, the effective atomic numbers of these samples were theoretically evaluated from known elemental concentration of the constituent elements using mixture rule and WinXCom program [10]. The present effective atomic numbers, other experimental values in the literature, and Rayleigh to Compton scattered intensity ratios are given in Table 1. Also theoretical values of the effective atomic numbers of rare earth are given in Table 1. The overall error in the experimental parameters was the sum of the uncertainties in different factors, namely, the evaluation of peak areas (1.69–3.71%), target mass thickness (1.45–3.20%), the Photopeak efficiency (1.10–2.04%), and statistical error (<1.00%). Total errors affecting the experimental parameters were calculated between 2.68 and 5.40%. Theoretical calculations do not take into account molecular and solid-state effects. XCOM database neglects a strong interaction between atoms and Coulomb interaction between the photoelectron and the positively charged ion. Also, database does not calculate energy absorption coefficients. This situation can be a reason to discrepancy between theoretical and experimental values.

| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

*Singh et al. [1]. |

It was clearly seen that the experimental measured values were in good agreement with calculated theoretical values. Also, the present measurements showed the usability of this experimental technique to measure effective atomic number. To obtain more definite conclusions on the effective atomic number using this method, more experimental data are clearly needed, particularly for different scattering angles and chemical compounds.

#### 5. Conclusion

There are many articles about determining the effective atomic number of composite materials. Some of these articles are related with mass attenuation technique. We have presented the effective atomic number of some rare earth with scattering intensity ratio. For this purpose, La_{2}O_{3}, Pr_{2}O_{3}, Eu_{2}O_{3}, Sm_{2}O_{3}, and Er_{2}O_{3} rare earth samples were investigated in 167° scattering angle with HPGe semiconductor detector. Our calculations include sample, air attenuation correction and detectors photopeak efficiency.

#### Highlights

(i)The effective atomic number of composite material is an important parameter.(ii)Scattering intensity ratio is a significant technique to determine effective atomic numbers.(iii)Our present experimental values in good agreement with theory and other experimental.

#### Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

#### References

- M. P. Singh, A. Sharma, B. Singh, and B. S. Sandhu, “Non-destructive evaluation of scientific and biological samples by scattering of 145 keV gamma rays,”
*Radiation Measurements*, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 960–965, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - M. P. Singh, A. Sharma, B. Singh, and B. S. Sandhu, “A non-destructive technique for assigning effective atomic number to scientific samples by scattering of 59.54 keV gamma photons,”
*Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A*, vol. 619, no. 1–3, pp. 63–66, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - M. Singh, B. Singh, and B. S. Sandhu, “Investigations of multiple scattering of 320 keV
*γ*rays: a new technique for assigning effective atomic number to composite material,”*Physica Scripta*, vol. 79, no. 3, Article ID 035101, 8 pages, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - M. P. Singh, B. S. Sandhu, and B. Singh, “Measurement of the effective atomic number of composite materials using Rayleigh to Compton scattering of 279 keV gamma rays,”
*Physica Scripta*, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 281–286, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - J. H. Hubbell, E. H. Veigele, R. T. Briggs, D. T. Brown, R. J. Cromer, and J. Howertan, “Atomic form factors, Incoherent scattering functions and photon scattering cross sections,”
*Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data*, vol. 4, pp. 471–538, 1975. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - D. C. Wang, P. Luo, and H. Yang, “Measurement of the mass attenuation coefficients for SiH
_{4}and Si,”*Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B*, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 161–165, 1995. View at: Google Scholar - W. Weyrich, “The electron momentum distribution in solid potassium fluoride, studied by compton scattering,”
*Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft für Physikalische Chemie*, vol. 79, no. 11, pp. 1085–1095, 1975. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - R. B. Firestone and L. P. Ekström, WWW Table of Radioactive Isotopes, version 2.1, January 2004, http://ie.lbl.gov/toi/.
- D. Demir and A. Turşucu, “Measurement of the effective atomic number of Fe
_{x}Cr_{1-x}and Fe_{x}Ni_{x}alloys using scattering of gamma rays,”*Journal of Alloys and Compounds*, vol. 581, pp. 213–216, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - L. Gerward, N. Guilbert, K. B. Jensen, and H. Levring, “X-ray absorption in matter. Reengineering XCOM,”
*Radiation Physics and Chemistry*, vol. 60, no. 1-2, pp. 23–24, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

#### Copyright

Copyright © 2013 A. Turşucu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.