Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2013, Article ID 787196, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/787196
Research Article

A THERP/ATHEANA Analysis of the Latent Operator Error in Leaving EFW Valves Closed in the TMI-2 Accident

1Brazilian Nuclear Energy Commission, 22290-901 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
2COPPE—Graduate Program of Nuclear Engineering, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, 21941-914 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

Received 6 November 2012; Revised 7 March 2013; Accepted 10 March 2013

Academic Editor: Alejandro Clausse

Copyright © 2013 Renato A. Fonseca et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. NRC, “A technique for human event analysis,” NUREG-1624, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  2. NRC, “A technique for human error analysis,” NUREG/CR-6350, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, USA, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  3. B. Reer, “Review of advances in human reliability analysis of errors of commission—part 2: EOC quantification,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 93, no. 8, pp. 1105–1122, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. Le Bot, “Human reliability data, human error and accident models—Illustration through the Three Mile Island accident analysis,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 153–167, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Reason, Human Error, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1990.
  6. NRC, “Reactor Safety Study: An Assessment of Accident Risks in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants,” WASH-1400. NUREG-75/014, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, USA, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  7. A. D. Swain and D. Guttman, “Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications,” NUREG/CR-1278, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, USA, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  8. NRC, “Evaluation of human reliability analysis methods against good practices,” NUREG-1842, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, USA, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  9. E. Hollnagel, Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM), Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 1998.
  10. E. Hollnagel, “The reliability of man-machine interaction,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 38, no. 1-2, pp. 81–89, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. E. Hollnagel, Human Reliability Analysis: Context and Control, Academic Press, London, UK, 1993.
  12. E. Hollnagel, “Reliability analysis and operator modelling,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 327–337, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. NRC, “Development of the NRC's Human Performance Investigation Process (HPIP),” NUREG/CR-5455, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, USA, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  14. NRC, “The SPAR-H human reliability analysis method,” NUREG/CR-6883, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, USA, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  15. NRC, “Investigation into the March 28, 1979 three mile island accident by office of inspection and enforcement,” NUREG-0600, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, USA, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  16. J. W. Kim, W. Jung, and J. Park, “A systematic approach to analysing errors of commission from diagnosis failure in accident progression,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 137–150, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Z. Mohaghegh, R. Kazemi, and A. Mosleh, “Incorporating organizational factors into Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) of complex socio-technical systems: a hybrid technique formalization,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 1000–1018, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. M. Groth and A. Mosleh, “A data-informed PIF hierarchy for model-based human reliability analysis,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 108, pp. 154–174, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. The National Diet of Japan, The Official Report of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission, Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission (NAIIC), Tokyo, Japan, 2012.