Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 324710, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/324710
Research Article

Uncertainty Analysis of Method-Based Operating Event Groups Ranking

1EC JRC-IET, European Commission Joint Research Centre, Institute for Energy and Transport, P.O. Box 2, 1755 ZG Petten, The Netherlands
2Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Unska 3, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

Received 11 June 2014; Revised 25 August 2014; Accepted 25 August 2014; Published 18 September 2014

Academic Editor: Alejandro Clausse

Copyright © 2014 Zdenko Šimić et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Noël, “European clearinghouse: development areas and priorities in operational experience feedback for nuclear power plants,” Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 152–156, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. Zhang, R. Chen, G. Sun, Z. Xiao, and D. Yang, “An overview of IAEA incident reporting system,” Nuclear Safety, no. 1, pp. 28–30, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  3. Z. Šimić, M. Maqua, and D. Wattrelos, “A model-based approach to operational event groups ranking,” Kerntechnik, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 88–96, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. Z. Šimić, “Operational events groups ranking sensitivity analysis,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Safety Reliability and Risk Analysis (ESREL '13), vol. 5, p. 5, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013.
  5. S. Park, H. Yang, G. Heo, M. Zubair, and R. K. Ur, “Study on nuclear accident precursors using AHP and BBN,” Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2014, Article ID 206258, 12 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. J. C. Helton, “Quantification of margins and uncertainties: conceptual and computational basis,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 96, no. 9, pp. 976–1013, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. Arenas, R. Bratton, F. Reventos, and K. Ivanov, “Uncertainty analysis of light water reactor fuel lattices,” Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2013, Article ID 437409, 10 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. C. Helton, J. D. Johnson, C. J. Sallaberry, and C. B. Storlie, “Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 91, no. 10-11, pp. 1175–1209, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. Banuelas and J. Antony, “Modified analytic hierarchy process to incorporate uncertainty and managerial aspects,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 42, no. 18, pp. 3851–3872, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. T. Entani and H. Tanaka, “Interval estimations of global weights in AHP by upper approximation,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 158, no. 17, pp. 1913–1921, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  11. SigmaZon, Quantum XL 2013, Monte Carlo Simulation, Experimental and Statistical Tool, 2014, http://www.sigmazone.com/articles.htm.
  12. N. Subramanian and R. Ramanathan, “A review of applications of Analytic Hierarchy Process in operations management,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 215–241, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. L. Saaty, “Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making. Why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors. The analytic hierarchy/network process,” RACSAM—Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas y Naturales A: Matematicas, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 251–318, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus