Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations

Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations / 2014 / Article
Special Issue

Supercritical Water-Cooled Reactors

View this Special Issue

Editorial | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 548672 |

Jiejin Cai, Claude Renault, Junli Gou, "Supercritical Water-Cooled Reactors", Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2014, Article ID 548672, 2 pages, 2014.

Supercritical Water-Cooled Reactors

Received24 Jul 2014
Accepted24 Jul 2014
Published18 Aug 2014

Supercritical water-cooled reactor (SCWR) is the water-cooled reactor using supercritical pressure water as coolant [1]. It is considered as one of the promising Generation IV reactors, due to its advantages of plant simplification and high thermal efficiency [2, 3].

Several design concepts of SCWRs have been proposed: (a) supercritical water-cooled thermal neutron reactor; (b) supercritical water-cooled fast neutron reactor; (c) supercritical water-cooled mixed neutron spectrum reactor; (d) supercritical water-cooled pebble bed reactor; (e) supercritical heavy-water-cooled reactor. The detailed design parameters of some typical SCWR concepts around the world are summarized in Table 1 [4]. Recently, the use of thorium in the SCWRs has been investigated [5, 6].

NameProposed byDesign conceptModerateRated power (MW)Outlet temperature (°C)Pressure (MPa)Net efficiency (%)

W21Tokyo UniversityThermal neutron spectrum SCWRH2O15705082544
TWG1Water TWG (Japan)Fast neutron spectrum SCWRH2O1728AlternativeAlternative38~45
W6-1AECL (Canada)CANDU-X-MARK1D2O9104302541
INEL (USA)Thermal neutron spectrum SCWRH2O16005002544
B500SKD1RussiaIntegrative SCWRH2O51538123.638

The advantages of the SCWRs are shown as follows [1].(i)Supercritical water has excellent heat transfer properties allowing a high power density, a small core, and a small containment structure.(ii)The use of a supercritical Rankine cycle with its typically higher temperatures improves efficiency (would be ~45%).(iii)This higher efficiency would lead to better fuel economy and a lighter fuel load, lessening residual (decay) heat.(iv)SCWR is typically designed as a once-through, direct cycle, whereby steam or hot supercritical water from the core is used directly in a steam turbine, which makes the design simple.(v)Water is liquid at room temperature, cheap, nontoxic, and transparent, simplifying inspection and repair (compared to liquid metal cooled reactors).(vi)A fast SCWR could be a breeder reactor which could burn the long-lived actinide isotopes.(vii)A heavy-water SCWR could breed fuel from thorium (4x more abundant than uranium), with increased proliferation resistance over plutonium breeders.

Some challenges in SCWRs are the subjects of research work which need us to research, among which are the following [47].(i)Lower water inventory (due to compact primary loop) means less heat capacity to buffer transients and accidents (e.g., loss of feedwater flow or large break loss of coolant accident) resulting in accident and transient temperatures that are too high for conventional metallic cladding.(ii)Higher pressure combined with higher temperature and also a higher temperature rise across the core result in increased mechanical and thermal stresses on vessel materials that are difficult to solve.(iii)The coolant greatly reduces its density at the exit of the core, resulting in a need to place extra moderator there.(iv)Extensive material development and research on supercritical water chemistry under radiation are needed.(v)Special start-up procedures are needed to avoid instability before the water reaches supercritical conditions.(vi)A fast neutron SCWR requires a relatively complex reactor core design in order to achieve a negative void coefficient.In order to help readers understand the development of the SCWRs in the world, we sponsored a special issue on the supercritical water-cooled reactor and hoped to get some papers from the topics which include but are not limited to the following:(i)reactor core and fuel designs,(ii)materials, chemistry, and corrosion,(iii)thermal-hydraulics and safety analysis,(iv)plant systems, structures, and components,(v)computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and coupled codes,(vi)neutronic properties,(vii)balance of plant,(viii)other applications.

Now the special issue is published, which includes 5 papers. The contents include a new concept of core design, like “A simplified supercritical fast reactor with thorium fuel,” calculation code development, like “Preliminary development of thermal power calculation code H-power for a supercritical water reactor,” “Code development in coupled PARCS/RELAP5 for supercritical water reactor,” and flow distribution, one of the important issues of thermal hydraulics in the nuclear reactor, like “Core flow distribution from coupled supercritical water reactor analysis.” It also contains some experimental results, like “Experimental investigation on flow-induced vibration of fuel rods in supercritical water loop.” We hope that readers of this special issue will find not only the development status of SCWRs and updated reviews on SCWRs, but also the formulation of important questions to be resolved such as how to develop the codes for SCWRs.

Jiejin Cai
Claude Renault
Junli Gou


  1. Y. Oka, S. Koshizuka, Y. Ishiwatari, and A. Yamaji, Super Light Water Reactors and Super Fast Reactors, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2010.
  2. S. Liu and J. Cai, “Convergence analysis of neutronic/thermohydraulic coupling behavior of SCWR,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 265, pp. 53–62, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Liu and J. Cai, “Neutronic and thermohydraulic characteristics of a new breeding thorium-uranium mixed SCWR fuel assembly,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 429–436, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. X. Yang, G. H. Su, W. Tian, J. Wang, and S. Qiu, “Numerical study on flow and heat transfer characteristics in the rod bundle channels under super critical pressure condition,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1723–1734, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. Liu and J. Cai, “Neutronics assessment of thorium-based fuel assembly in SCWR,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 260, pp. 1–10, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Liu and J. Cai, “Design & optimization of two breeding thorium-uranium mixed SCWR fuel assemblies,” Progress of Nuclear Energy, vol. 70, pp. 6–19, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  7. Ph. Marsault, C. Renault, G. Rimpault, P. Dumaz, and O. Antoni, “Pre-design studies of SCWR in fast neutron spectrum: evaluation of operating conditions and analysis of the behavior in accidental situations,” in Proceedings of the International Conference of Asian Political Parties (ICAPP '04), Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, June 2004. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Jiejin Cai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.