Research Article  Open Access
Erlan G. Batyrbekov, Yuriy N. Gordienko, Mendykhan U. Khasenov, Yuriy V. Ponkratov, "Method of Measuring the Efficiency of the Conversion of Nuclear Energy into Optical Energy", Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2015, Article ID 161535, 5 pages, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/161535
Method of Measuring the Efficiency of the Conversion of Nuclear Energy into Optical Energy
Abstract
A method of measuring the efficiency of converting nuclear energy into optical energy was developed based on correlations between intensities of the research line and the nitrogen second positive system in an ArN_{2} mixture. In addition, the values of the coefficient of the conversion of nuclear energy into radiation at the lines of a Hg triplet in mixtures of ХеHg and KrHg were determined. The values measured correspond to a selectiveness of pumping of 7^{3}S_{1} that was close to 1 ().
1. Introduction
The study of optical (laser and spontaneous) radiation of nuclearexcited plasmas is of interest for the development of a method to extract energy from nuclear reactors and to control and adjust nuclear reactors’ parameters [1–3]. The essential parameters in the process of studying nuclearexcited plasma radiation are the values of the power of the nuclear reaction products deposited into gas and the efficiency of the conversion of nuclear energy into optical energy (). The power of nuclear reaction products deposited into gas can be calculated for a specific geometry of the irradiating area or measured based on the gas overpressure after the pumping pulse [3]. The measurement of the parameter is more complex, as one must measure the absolute intensity of the optical radiation from the area under consideration [4–6].
This paper focuses on developing a method for measuring the coefficients for converting nuclear energy into optical energy; our method involves radiation intensity comparisons in the mixture under study, where the radiation intensity was measured in a wellstudied mixture. The studies were carried out with Polonium210 particle excitations.
2. Experimental Setup
The parameter (the ratio of the optical power at the defined wavelength or molecular band to the power deposited into the gas) was determined by comparing the measured radiation intensities in the studied mixture with the intensity of the nitrogen band in an Ar + N_{2} mixture. The gas pressure was selected such that the maximal range of particles with energies of 5 MeV was similar for all the mixtures and the pumping power was comparable. A cylinder of diameter 25 mm and length 70 mm, carrying on its surface 18 sources containing ^{210}Po, was installed in a stainless steel chamber (Figure 1). The maximal range of particles with energies of 5 MeV in Ar, Kr, and Xe under normal conditions is 37, 28, and 20 mm, respectively [7]. The activity of the sources was 9.6 GBq, which corresponds to an average energy deposition of approximately 10^{−4} W·cm^{−3} in 1.5 atm of Ar. Before we set up the sources, the chamber was heated and degassed under vacuum with a pressure of approximately 10^{−3} Pa. After the chamber was set up, the sources were pumped down without heating for 23 weeks until the receipt of wellreproduced (up to 3–7% of intensity for various gases) luminescence spectra was verified. The gas pressure was measured by a standard manovacuum meter and VDG1 vacuum meter, and the spent gases’ purities were as follows: 99.992% for Ar and 99.999% for both Kr and Xe. The emission spectrum was analysed by a SPM2 monochromator with a quartz prism and FEU106 photomultiplier operating in the photon counting mode. The emission spectra were recorded under the maximal width of the monochromator slit; the forms of all the studied lines were similar to a triangle. In this case, the maximal value of the signal from the photomultiplier was proportional to the integral spectral intensity of the lines.
3. Efficiency of the Ar + N_{2} Mixture’s Luminescence
The efficiency of the Ar + N_{2} mixture’s luminescence was determined by calculation. A scheme of kinetic processes similar to the one described in [8] was used. The lifetime of Ar’s metastable levels is approximately 50 s [9], and the radiation transferred from ^{3}Р_{1} and ^{1}Р_{1} into a normal state under atmospheric pressure was fully trapped. Therefore, all 4 levels of ^{3}Р and ^{1}Р, as well as one level of , were considered. Table 1 presents the processes relevant to the calculations and the proper rate coefficients.

Consider the transition . The number of photons emitted in this transition is determined by the following formula:where the Einstein coefficients are presented in [10] and the density of nitrogen molecules on the level was calculated by considering processes 1–23. Moreover, the direct nitrogen excitation was insignificant, as our measurements show that the intensity of the nitrogen second positive system in N_{2} (100 Torr) is approximately 140 times less than that in the Ar (1140 Torr) + N_{2} (100 Torr) mixture. The intensity of the transitions from in the Ar + N_{2} mixture was approximately 15 times less than the intensity of the transitions from .
The coefficient of the conversion of nuclear energy into optical energy can be determined by comparing the measured transition intensity () of the nitrogen molecules at the wavelength and the studied transition intensity () at the wavelength . A simple formula can be derived in the case of radioisotope pumping when processes 4, 22, and 23 can be ignored:where is the transition energy with wavelength , is the energy consumed by the formation of one atom in processes 1–5, and is the relative spectral sensitivity of the setup. To reduce the effect of the determination error of on the accuracy of the definition of , N_{2} molecular transitions closer to the wavelength of were selected.
The radiation intensity dependence measured in line 337.1 nm on the partial pressure of N_{2} in an Ar + N_{2} mixture is satisfactorily correlated with the dependence of on the N_{2} pressure within the range of 3–100 Torr (Figure 2).
4. Efficiency of the Luminescence of Gas Mixtures with Hg
In the mixtures of Xe or Kr with Hg, the 7^{3}S_{1} level of the Hg atom is effectively populated by pumping with a rigid ionizer [11]. The main part of the energy (>98%) within 200–830 nm is emitted at triplet and resonance Hg lines (Figure 3). Because the harmful impurities that can result from radiationchemical reactions are not accumulated in this mixture, it can be used as a scintillator for a nuclearexcited source of light. Thus, the values of the coefficient of the nuclear energy conversion into optical energy in these mixtures have great significance.
The step of populating the 7^{3}S_{1} level occurs in the processes of dissociative recombinations of molecular ions (, , and ) with electrons [11]. Here, we describe the more essential processes in Xe + Hg plasma (where М is the third particle):
The 7^{3}S_{1} level is populated either in process (8) or by cascade transitions from the 7^{3}Р_{0,1,2} levels.
In the recombination mechanism of the 7^{3}S level, populating the dependence of the emission intensity of this level on Hg vapour’s density is determined by the following formula [18]:where is the intensity under a high density of Hg atoms; is the rate constant of charge exchanges of (, ) ions at Hg atoms [19]; and the coefficient of electronion recombinations is assumed to be identical for basic molecular ions (≈10^{−6} cm^{3} s^{−1}).
By the above method, the ratio of the optical radiation’s power to the power deposited into the gas () was determined for Hg triplet lines in mixtures of Хe + Hg and Kr + Hg. In terms of laser creation, the value of the 7^{3}S_{1} level pumping selectivity () is of interest. This value can be determined as the ratio of to the quantum efficiency:where and are the energy and probability of a transition, respectively; is the lifetime of the 7^{3}S_{1} level; and is the energy of an electronion pair formation in Хe or Kr. The mixtures’ excitations were produced by particles of ^{210}Ро. The value does not depend on the types of ionized particles that are produced [3], but it can depend on the value of the power deposited into the gas (). Our analysis of the processes’ kinetics in the studied mixtures showed that in the typical conditions for a stationary nuclear reactor (), the value of under a sufficiently high pressure of Hg does not depend on the specific pumping power. Instead, the value of is determined based on comparisons of the measured radiation intensities in the studied mixtures with the intensity of in the Ar + N_{2} mixture. was measured under a chamber temperature of () K, and the nitrogen pressure in the Ar + N_{2} mixture varied from 10 to 100 Torr; the obtained values of were averaged based on the measurements’ results. The following values of were obtained: 3.0% (), 3.6% (436 nm), and 1.5% (405 nm) were obtained for the mixture of Хe (760 Torr) + Hg (1.6 mTorr). The total value of at Hg triplet lines comprised ()% of the total. Under low Hg pressure, not all the ions can be recharged at Hg atoms. Thus, we recalculate after considering dependency (9). At a sufficiently high Hg pressure , the value of is equal to ()%, which is sufficiently close to quantum efficiency (12%).
Regarding the mixture with Kr (850 Torr) + Hg (1.5 mTorr), the total value of was equal to 11.2%. A recalculation under high Hg pressure yielded the value ()%, which is comparable with the quantum efficiency (11%). An value exceeding the value can be explained by experimental discrepancies and energy transfers from the level to the 7^{3}S_{1} level.
5. Conclusion
A measurement method was developed for the conversion of nuclear energy into optical energy, and this method is based on comparing the studied line intensity and nitrogen second positive system intensity in an ArN_{2} mixture. The conversion efficiency level of nuclear energy was determined in radiated emissions on Hg triplet lines in Хe + Hg and Kr + Hg mixtures. The measured values correspond to the selectivity of the 7^{3}S_{1} pumping level, which is close to 1 (). In the calculation model [20], the recombination flow is divided into even shares between the 7^{3}P, 7^{3}S_{1}, and 6^{3}D levels. Because cascade transitions from 7^{3}P populate the 7^{3}S_{1}level, this setup corresponds to a value of approximately 2/3. The method will be used to measure the coefficients of nuclear energy conversion into optical energy in gaseous mixtures in nuclear reactor cores.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgment
The work is supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan with Grant no. 2068/GF4 (Contract no. 271 from 12.02.2015).
References
 M. A. Prelas, F. P. Boody, G. H. Miley, and J. F. Kunze, “Nuclear driven flashlamps,” Laser and Particle Beams, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 25–62, 1988. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. Batyrbekov, “Converting nuclear energy into the energy of coherent optical radiation,” Laser and Particle Beams, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 673–687, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. P. Mel'nikov, A. A. Sinyanskii, A. N. Sizov, and G. H. Miley, Lasers with Nuclear Pumping, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2015. View at: Publisher Site
 F. P. Boody and M. A. Prelas, “Absolutely calibrated spectra of nucleardriven rare gases, 400–950 nm,” in Proceedings of the Specialist Conference ‘The Physics of NuclearExcited Plasma and the Problems of NuclearExcited Lasers’, vol. 2, pp. 149–155, Obninsk, Russia, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
 L. T. S. Lin, M. Prelas, Z. He et al., “Design of an ICF plant using a nucleardriven solidstate laser,” Laser and Particle Beams, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 95–109, 1995. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. A. Batyrbekov, S. K. Kunakov, Y. A. Piotrovskii, A. V. Redkin, and Y. A. Tolmachev, “Measurement of the absolute intensities of optical spectrum lines from the ^{3}He(n,p)T plasma formed during irradiation of ^{3}He by a neutron flux from a steadystate VVRK reactor,” High Temperature, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 633–638, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
 M. J. Berger, J. S. Coursey, M. A. Zucker, and J. Chang, “StoppingPower and Range Tables for Electrons, Protons, and Helium Ions,” http://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/Star/Text/ASTAR.html. View at: Google Scholar
 N. G. Basov and V. A. Danilychev, “Condensed and compressedgas lasers,” Soviet Physics Uspekhi, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 31–56, 1986. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. A. Radzig and B. M. Smirnov, Parameters of Atoms and Atomic Ions, Energoatomizdat, Moscow, Russia, 1986 (Russian).
 L. I. Kusnezova, N. E. Kusmenko, Y. Y. Kusjakov, and Y. A. Plastinin, Probabilities of Optical Transitions of Diatomic Molecules, Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 1980 (Russian).
 G. A. Batyrbekov, E. G. Batyrbekov, M. U. Khasenov et al., “Luminescence of the mixtures of mercury and rare gases with molecular additions under excitation by the ionizing radiation,” Journal of Applied Spectroscopy, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 770–774, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
 D. Smith and N. G. Adams, “Chargetransfer reaction ${\text{Ar}}^{+}+{\text{N}}_{2}\leftrightarrows {{\text{N}}_{2}}^{+}+\text{Ar}$ at thermal energies,” Physical Review A, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 2327–2330, 1981. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. A. Ivanov, “Dissociative recombination of molecular ions in noblegas plasmas,” Soviet Physics Uspekhi, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 17–36, 1992. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. M. Smirnov, Excited Atoms, Energoatomizdat, Moscow, Russia, 1986 (Russian).
 J. F. Loiseau, P. Plgnolet, and B. Held, “Numerical simulation of ArN_{2} excitation transfer in flowing afterglow,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 745–750, 1992. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. Puech, F. Collier, and P. Cottin, “Energy transfer between electronically excited argon and nitrogen: a kinetic model for the 3371 and the 3577 A laser emissions,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 2887–2891, 1977. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Levron and A. V. Phelps, “Quenching of N_{2}(${\text{A}}^{3}{\sum}_{u}^{+},v=\mathrm{0,1}$) by N_{2}, Ar and H_{2},” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 2260–2262, 1978. View at: Google Scholar
 M. U. Khasenov, “Emission of the ^{3}HeXeCd mixture in the active zone of a nuclear reactor,” Quantum Electronics, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 1124–1126, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Johnsen and M. A. Biondi, “Charge transfer of atomic and molecular raregas ions with mercury atoms at thermal energy,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 73, no. 10, pp. 5045–5047, 1980. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. M. Barysheva, N. V. Bochkova, A. A. Kosorukova, and E. P. Magda, “Kinetic model of the HeXeHgH_{2} laser with nuclear pumping,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference “Problems of the Nuclear Pumped Lasers and Pulsed Reactors”, pp. 218–224, 2003 (Russian). View at: Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 Erlan G. Batyrbekov et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.