Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 278638, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/278638
Research Article

Scenario Grouping and Classification Methodology for Postprocessing of Data Generated by Integrated Deterministic-Probabilistic Safety Analysis

KTH, Division of Nuclear Power Safety, AlbaNova University Center, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden

Received 28 January 2015; Revised 27 March 2015; Accepted 31 March 2015

Academic Editor: Francesco Di Maio

Copyright © 2015 Sergey Galushin and Pavel Kudinov. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Y. Adolfsson, J.-E. Holmberg, G. Hultqvist, P. Kudinov, and I. Männistö, “Proceedings of the deterministic/probabilistic safety analysis workshop October 2011,” Research Report VTT-R-07266-11, VTT, Espoo, Finland, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  2. T. Aldemir, “A survey of dynamic methodologies for probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 52, pp. 113–124, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Hess, “Framework for risk-informed safety margin characterization,” EPRI Report 1019206, EPRI, Palo Alto, Calif, USA, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  4. P. E. Labeau, C. Smidts, and S. Swaminathan, “Dynamic reliability: towards an integrated platform for probabilistic risk assessment,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 219–254, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. E. Zio and P. Baraldi, “Identification of nuclear transients via optimized fuzzy clustering,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1068–1080, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. Mercurio, L. Podofillini, E. Zio, and V. N. Dang, “Identification and classification of dynamic event tree scenarios via possibilistic clustering: application to a steam generator tube rupture event,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1180–1191, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. Mandelli, Scenario Clustering and Dynamic PRA, Nuclear Engineering Department, The Ohio State University, 2011.
  8. E. Raimond, “SARNET workpackage 5.3—level 2 PSA Specification of a benchmark exercise relative to hydrogen combustion for application of dynamic reliability methods, IRNS/DSR/SAGR/FT.2005-154,” in Network of Excellence for a Sustainable Integration of European Research on Severe Accident Phenomenology, IRNS, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  9. S. Galushin and P. Kudinov, “An approach to grouping and classification of scenarios in integrated deterministic-probabilistic safety analysis,” in Proceedings of the Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM '12), Honolulu, HI, USA, June 2014.
  10. S. Tuffery, Data Mining and Statistics for Decision Making, Wiley Series in Computational Statistics, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2011.
  11. I. T. Jolliffe, Principal Component Analysis, Springer Series in Statistics, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2002. View at MathSciNet
  12. Ilango and V. Mohan, “A survey of grid based clustering algorithms,” International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, vol. 2, no. 8, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  13. T. M. Mitchell, Machine Learning, Mcgraw-Hill Series in Computer Science, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1997.
  14. J. Han, H. Cheng, D. Xin, and X. Yan, “Frequent pattern mining: current status and future directions,” Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 55–86, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  15. O. Z. Maimon and L. Rokach, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2005.
  16. M. Ester, H.-P. Kriegel, J. Sander, and X. Xu, “A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD ’96), pp. 226–231, AAAI Press, 1996.
  17. L. Fausett, Fundamentals of Neural Networks Architectures, Algorithms, and Applications, vol. 16 of Prentice Hall International Editions, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1994.
  18. Y. Vorobyov and T. N. Dinh, “A genetic algorithm-based approach to dynamic PRA simulation,” in Proceedings of the ANS PSA Topical Meeting—Challenges to PSA During the Nuclear Renaissance, American Nuclear Society, Knoxville, Tenn, USA, 2008.
  19. W.-K. Liao, Y. Liu, and A. Choudhary, “A grid-based clustering algorithm using adaptive mesh refinement,” in Proceedings of the 7thWorkshop on Mining Scientific and Engineering Datasets, Lake Buena Vista, Fla, USA, 2004.
  20. O. Z. Maimon and L. Rokach, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2005.
  21. J. Han and M. Kamber, Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 2001.
  22. L. Rokach and O. Maimon, “Top-down induction of decision trees classifiers—a survey,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Part C: Applications and Reviews, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 476–487, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. K. P. Soman, S. Diwakar, and V. Ajay, Data Mining Theory and Practice, Phi Learning Private Limited, New Delhi, India, 2006.
  24. L. Breiman, J. Friedman, R. Olshen, and C. Stone, Classification and Regression Trees, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 1984.
  25. J. Neter, M. H. Kutner, C. J. Nachtscheim, and W. Wasserman, Applied Linear Statistical Models, Irwin, McGraw-Hill, Chicago, Ill, USA, 4th edition, 1996.