Research Article
HTR-Based Power Plants’ Performance Analysis Applied on Conventional Combined Cycles
Table 8
Main results achieved from the case study for comparison purposes.
| | | CBC (He) | RC (CO2) | Combined cycle options | | | He-CO2 | He-Xe | He-C2H6 | He-NH3 | He-H2O |
| | (%) | 45.79 | 50.17 | 49.51 | 50.91 | 48.58 | 53.51 | 53.63 | | (%) | 62.07 | 64.51 | 63.66 | 65.46 | 62.46 | 68.79 | 53.63 | | (kJ/kg) | 863.3 | 897.1 | 885.4 | 910.4 | 868.6 | 956.7 | 959.0 | | Ratio WF/ (kg/MW) | 1.158 | 1.115 | 1.129 | 1.098 | 1.151 | 1.045 | 1.043 | | TIT (K) | 1173 | 1143 | 535.2 | 580 | 525 | 570 | 770 | | 1.034 | — | 0.714 | 0.637 | 0.739 | 0.652 | 0.483 | | — | 2.893 | 1.840 | 7.717 | 1.135 | 0.458 | 0.316 | | 2.37 | — | 7.33 | 5.93 | 7.72 | 6.21 | 2.82 | | 1390.7 | 1390.7 | 1390.7 | 1390.7 | 1390.7 | 1390.7 | 1390.7 | | 368.7 | 432.2 | 328.3 | 310.5 | 325.4 | 273.8 | 202.3 |
|
|
