Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 839249, 17 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/839249
Research Article

Demonstration of Emulator-Based Bayesian Calibration of Safety Analysis Codes: Theory and Formulation

1MIT, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
2FPoliSolutions, LLC, 4618 Old William Penn Highway, Murrysville, PA 15668, USA
3INL, P.O. Box 1625, Idaho Falls, ID 83415-3870, USA

Received 16 January 2015; Revised 1 April 2015; Accepted 28 May 2015

Academic Editor: Francesco Di Maio

Copyright © 2015 Joseph P. Yurko et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. L. Kelly and C. L. Smith, “Bayesian inference in probabilistic risk assessment: the current state of the art,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 628–643, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. Higdon, M. Kennedy, J. C. Cavendish, J. A. Cafeo, and R. D. Ryne, “Combining field data and computer simulations for calibration and prediction,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 448–466, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  3. D. Higdon, J. Gattiker, B. Williams, and M. Rightley, “Computer model calibration using high-dimensional output,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 103, no. 482, pp. 570–583, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  4. A. Keane and P. Nair, Computational Approaches for Aerospace Design: The Pursuit of Excellence, John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
  5. MUCM, Managing Uncertainty in Complex Models Project, http://www.mucm.ac.uk.
  6. C. E. Rasmussen and C. Williams, Gaussian Processes in Machine Learning, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2004.
  7. K. Murphy, Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2012.
  8. C. Linkletter, D. Bingham, N. Hengartner, D. Higdon, and K. Q. Ye, “Variable selection for Gaussian process models in computer experiments,” Technometrics, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 478–490, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  9. N. Zuber, G. E. Wilson, B. E. Boyack (LANL) et al., “Quantifying reactor safety margins Part 5: evaluation of scale-up capabilities of best estimate codes,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 97–107, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. N. Zuber, U. S. Rohatgi, W. Wulff, and I. Catton, “Application of fractional scaling analysis (FSA) to loss of coolant accidents (LOCA): methodology development,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 237, no. 15–17, pp. 1593–1607, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Yurko, Uncertainty quantification in safety codes using a Bayesian approach with data from separate and integral effect tests [Ph.D. thesis], MIT, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2014.
  12. F. M. Hemez and S. Atamturktur, “The dangers of sparse sampling for the quantification of margin and uncertainty,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 96, no. 9, pp. 1220–1231, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Sacks, W. J. Welch, T. J. Mitchell, and H. P. Wynn, “Design and analysis of computer experiments,” Statistical Science, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 409–435, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  14. W. J. Welch, R. J. Buck, J. Sacks, H. P. Wynn, T. J. Mitchell, and M. D. Morris, “Screening, predicting, and computer experiments,” Technometrics, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 15–25, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. N. A. Cressie, Statistics for Spatial Data, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  16. M. C. Kennedy and A. O'Hagan, “Bayesian calibration of computer models,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B. Statistical Methodology, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 425–464, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  17. M. N. Schmidt, “Function factorization using warped Gaussian processes,” in Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 921–928, New York, NY, USA, June 2009. View at Scopus
  18. J. Luttinen and A. Ihler, “Variation Gaussian process factor analysis for modeling Spatio-temporal data,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 22, pp. 1177–1185, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  19. H. Haario, E. Saksman, and J. Tamminen, “An adaptive metropolis algorithm,” Bernoulli, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 223–242, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  20. R. Neal, “MCMC using Hamiltonian dynamics,” in Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo, pp. 113–162, Chapman & Hall, CRC Press, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  21. J. Yurko, J. Buongiorno, and R. Youngblood, “Bayesian calibration of safety codes using data from separate and integral effects tests,” in Proceedings of the International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis, Sun Valley, Idaho, USA, 2015.