Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2015, Article ID 865829, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/865829
Research Article

Normal and Accidental Scenarios Analyses with MELCOR 1.8.2 and MELCOR 2.1 for the DEMO Helium-Cooled Pebble Bed Blanket Concept

Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino 1, 56126 Pisa, Italy

Received 21 September 2015; Accepted 6 December 2015

Academic Editor: Eugenijus Ušpuras

Copyright © 2015 Bruno Gonfiotti and Sandro Paci. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. Chatelard, N. Reinke, A. Ezzidi et al., “Synthesis of the ASTEC integral code activities in SARNET—focus on ASTEC V2 plant applications,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 74, pp. 224–242, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Paci, F. Parozzi, and M. T. Porfiri, “Validation of the ECART code for the safety analysis of fusion reactors,” Fusion Engineering and Design, vol. 75–79, pp. 1243–1246, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Paci and M. T. Porfiri, “Analysis of an ex-vessel break in the ITER divertor cooling loop,” Fusion Engineering and Design, vol. 81, no. 18, pp. 2115–2126, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. B. J. Merrill, P. W. Humrickhouse, and R. L. Moore, “A recent version of MELCOR for fusion safety applications,” Fusion Engineering and Design, vol. 85, no. 7–9, pp. 1479–1483, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. B. J. Merrill, Recent Updates to the MELCOR 1.8.2 Code for ITER Applications, Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, Idaho, USA, 2007.
  6. C. Séropian, M. Barrachin, J. P. Van Dorsselaere, and D. Vola, “Adaptation of the ASTEC code system to accident scenarios in fusion installations,” Fusion Engineering and Design, vol. 88, no. 9-10, pp. 2698–2703, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. Oh, C. Davis, R. Moore et al., Development of Safety Analysis Codes and Experimental Validation for a Very High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor, Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, Idaho Falls, Idaho, USA, 2004.
  8. M. F. Young, “MELCOR development for HTGR applications,” in Proceedings of the Cooperative Severe Accident Research Program (CSARP '08), Bethesda, Md, USA, 2008.
  9. G. Federici, R. Kemp, D. Ward et al., “Overview of EU DEMO design and R&D activities,” Fusion Engineering and Design, vol. 89, no. 7-8, pp. 882–889, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Gasparotto, L. V. Boccaccini, L. Giancarli, S. Malang, and Y. Poitevin, “Demo blanket technology R&D results in EU,” Fusion Engineering and Design, vol. 61-62, pp. 263–271, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. Carloni, B. Gonfiotti, S. Paci, and L. V. Boccaccini, “LOCA accident for the DEMO helium cooled blanket,” Fusion Science and Technology, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 353–357, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. M. Dalle Donne, Conceptual Design of the Cooling System for a DEMO Fusion Reactor with Helium Cooled Solid Breeder Blanket and Calculation of the Transient Temperature Behavior in Accidents, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe (FZK), Karlsruhe, Germany, 1992.
  13. D. N. Dongiovanni, T. Pinna, and D. Carloni, “RAMI analysis for DEMO HCPB blanket concept cooling system,” Fusion Engineering and Design, vol. 98-99, pp. 2125–2129, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. D. Carloni and S. Kecskes, Helium Cooled Blanket Design Development, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany, 2012.
  15. M. Dalle Donne, European DEMO BOT Solid Breeder Blanket, Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany, 1994.
  16. S. Paci, Analysis of the External Radioactive Release for an In-Vessel Break in the Power Plant Conceptual Study Using the ECART Code, Pisa University, Pisa, Italy, 2003.
  17. N. Taylor, D. Baker, S. Ciattaglia et al., “Preliminary safety analysis of ITER,” Fusion Science and Technology, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 573–580, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  18. Q. Kang and D. Carloni, “Safety analysis of LOCA accident for the DEMO blanket,” in Proceedings of the Symposium of Fusion Nuclear Technology (SOFT '14), San Sebastian, Spain, 2014.
  19. B. J. Merrill, P. W. Humrickhouse, and R. L. Moore, A Comparison of Modifications to MELCOR Versions 1.8.2 and 1.8.6 for ITER Safety Analysis, Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, Idaho, USA, 2010.
  20. O. Gauntt, J. E. Cash, R. K. Cole et al., MELCOR Computer Code Manuals Vol 2. Reference Manual Version 1.8.6 September 2005, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 2005.
  21. L. L. Humphries, R. K. Cole, D. L. Louie, V. G. Figueroa, and M. F. Young, MELCOR Computer Code Manuals Vol 2. Reference Manual Version 2.1.6840 2015, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 2015.
  22. R. L. Moore, Pedigree Analysis of the MELCOR 1.8.2 Code to be Used for ITER's Report Preliminary on Safety, Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, Idaho, USA, 2007.
  23. X. Jin, B. Merrill, and L. V. Boccaccini, “Ex-vessel LOCA for the European HCPB TBM system using the pedigreed MELCOR182 for fusion,” in Proceedings of the 4th Meeting of the “European MELCOR User Group”, Cologne, Germany, 2012.