Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 2358403, 13 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2358403
Research Article

Analysis of Seismic Soil-Structure Interaction for a Nuclear Power Plant (HTR-10)

Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Nuclear Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Li Shi

Received 30 December 2016; Revised 25 April 2017; Accepted 18 May 2017; Published 13 June 2017

Academic Editor: Michael I. Ojovan

Copyright © 2017 Xiaoxin Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. Tuñón-Sanjur, R. S. Orr, S. Tinic, and D. P. Ruiz, “Finite element modeling of the AP1000 nuclear island for seismic analyses at generic soil and rock sites,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 237, no. 12-13, pp. 1474–1485, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. I. Politopoulos, I. Sergis, and F. Wang, “Floor response spectra of a partially embedded seismically isolated nuclear plant,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 78, pp. 213–217, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. C. Chen and O. R. Maslenikov, “Seismic soil-structure interaction responses of N-reactor facility,” Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, Transactions of the ASME, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. V. Farahani, T. M. Dessalegn, N. R. Vaidya, and E. Bazan-Zurita, “Seismic soil-structure interaction analysis of a nuclear power plant building founded on soil and in degraded concrete stiffness condition,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 297, pp. 320–326, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. N. Saxena, D. K. Paul, and R. Kumar, “Effects of slip and separation on seismic SSI response of nuclear reactor building,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 241, no. 1, pp. 12–17, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. L. Halbritter, N. J. Krutzik, Z. Boyadjiev, and T. Katona, “Dynamic analysis of VVER type nuclear power plants using different procedures for consideration of soil-structure interaction effects,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 182, no. 1, pp. 73–92, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. M. Ghiocel and R. G. Ghanem, “Stochastic finite-element analysis of seismic soil-structure interaction,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 66–77, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. B. Fatahi, S. H. R. Tabatabaiefar, and B. Samali, “Soil-structure interaction vs Site effect for seismic design of tall buildings on soft soil,” Geomechanics and Engineering, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 293–320, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Z. Wu, D. Lin, and D. Zhong, “The design features of the HTR-10,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 218, pp. 25–32, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. Brinkmann, J. Pirson, S. Ehster et al., “Important viewpoints proposed for a safety approach of HTGR reactors in Europe: Final results of the EC-funded HTR-L project,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 236, no. 5-6, pp. 463–474, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. J. Apsel and J. E. Luco, “Impedance functions for foundations embedded in a layered medium: An integral equation approach,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 213–231, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. E. Kausel, R. V. Whitman, J. P. Morray, and F. Elsabee, “The spring method for embedded foundations,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 48, no. 2-3, pp. 377–392, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. P. Wolf, Soil–Structure Interaction Analysis in Time Domain, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1988.
  14. J. Dominguez and J. M. Roesset, “Dynamic stiffness of rectangular foundations,” Tech. Rep. R78 20, Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1978. View at Google Scholar
  15. M. Yazdchi, N. Khalili, and S. Valliappan, “Dynamic soil-structure interaction analysis via coupled finite-element-boundary-element method,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 499–517, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. O. Von Estorff and M. Firuziaan, “Coupled BEM/FEM approach for nonlinear soil/structure interaction,” Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 715–725, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. M. Roesset, “A review of soil-structure interaction,” in Soil-Structure Interaction The Status of Current Analysis Methods And Research, J. J. Johnson, Ed., NUREG/CR-1780 and UCRL-53011, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  18. E. Kausel, “Early history of soil-structure interaction,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 822–832, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. Clouteau, R. Cottereau, and G. Lombaert, “Dynamics of structures coupled with elastic media—a review of numerical models and methods,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 332, no. 10, pp. 2415–2436, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. Lysmer, F. Ostadan, and C. Chin, SASSI2000—System for Analysis of Soil-Structure Interaction, University of California, Berkeley, Calf, USA, 1999.
  21. H. L. Wong and J. E. Luco, Soil-Structure Interaction: A Linear Continuum Mechanics Approach (CLASSI), Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of Southern, Los Angeles, Calf, USA, 1980.
  22. J. Lysmer and R. L. Kuhlemeyer, “Finite dynamic model for infinite media,” Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, vol. 95, no. EM4, pp. 859–877, 1969. View at Google Scholar
  23. Z. P. Liao and H. L. Wong, “A transmitting boundary for the numerical simulation of elastic wave propagation,” International Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 174–183, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. J. Deeks and F. M. Randolph, “Axisymmetric time-domain transmitting boundaries,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 25–42, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. L. Kellezi, “Local transmitting boundaries for transient elastic analysis,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 533–547, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. ASCE Standard, Seismic Analysis of Safety-Related Nuclear Structures and Commentary (4-98), American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Va, USA, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. J. B. Liu, Z. Y. Wang, X. L. Du, and Y. X. Du, “Three-dimensional visco-elastic artificial boundaries in time domain for wave motion problems,” Engineering Mechanics, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 46–51, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  28. J. B. Liu and Y. D. Lu, “A direct method for analysis of dynamic soil-structure interaction based on interface idea,” in Proceedings of the Chinese-Swiss Workshop on Soil-Structure Interaction Location, Beijing, China, 1997.
  29. NRC Regulatory Guides 1.60, Design Response Spectra for Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, USA, 2014.
  30. Stand Review Plan for Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants: LWR Edition—Design of Structures, Components, Equipment, and Systems, Chapter 3, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, USA, 2014.
  31. P. B. Schnabel, J. Lysmer, and H. B. Seed, “SHAKE—A Computer Program for Earthquake Response Analysis of Horizontally Layered Sites,” Tech. Rep. EERC 72-12, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, UCB, December 1972. View at Google Scholar
  32. P. Somerville and R. Graves, “Conditions that give rise to unusually large long period ground motions,” The Structural Design of Tall Buildings, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 211–232, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus