Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2017, Article ID 9029406, 20 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9029406
Research Article

Nuclear Waste Management Decision-Making Support with MCDA

1Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
2National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Kashirskoe Shosse 31, Moscow 115409, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed to A. Schwenk-Ferrero; ude.tik@orerref-knewhcs.ardnaskela

Received 2 February 2017; Revised 5 May 2017; Accepted 31 May 2017; Published 25 July 2017

Academic Editor: Luca Podofillini

Copyright © 2017 A. Schwenk-Ferrero and A. Andrianov. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. International Atomic Energy Agency, Nuclear Technology Review, GC(60)/INF/2, 2016.
  2. International Atomic Energy Agency, Technological Implications of International Safeguards for Geological Disposal of Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste, Nuclear Energy Series. no. NW-T-1.21, 2010.
  3. IAEA, Policies and Strategies for Radioactive Waste Management, IAEA Nuclear Energy Series no. NW-G-1.1, 2009.
  4. V. Štefula, “Inventory of Radioactive Wastes,” Technical report of SAPIERR project, Deliverable D1, 2004.
  5. A. Schwenk-Ferrero, “German spent nuclear fuel legacy: characteristics and high-level waste management issues,” Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2013, Article ID 293792, 11 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. OECD, NEA OECD Nuclear Energy Data 7300, OECD, 2016, http://www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/pubs/2016/7300-ned-2016.pdf.
  7. EASAC, “Management of spent nuclear fuel and its waste,” JRC Reference Report 23, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  8. International Atomic Energy Agency, “Technical, economic and institutional aspects of regional spent fuel storage facilities,” IAEA TECDOC No 1482, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  9. International Atomic Energy Agency, Safety Indicators in Different Timeframes for The Safety Assessment of Underground Radioactive Waste Repositories, IAEA-TECDOC-767.
  10. International Atomic Energy Agency, Safety Indicators for The Safety Assessment of Radioactive Waste Disposal, IAEA-TECDOC-1372.
  11. International Atomic Energy Agency, Radioactive Waste Management Objectives, IAEA Nuclear Energy Series no. NW-O, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 2011.
  12. United States Department of Energy, Guidebook to Decision Making Methods, WSRC-IM-2002-00002, USDOE, Washington, DC, USA, 2001.
  13. R. L. Keeney and H. Raiffa, Decision with Multiple Objectives, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1976. View at MathSciNet
  14. C. L. Hwang and K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, vol. 186, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1981. View at MathSciNet
  15. J.-P. Brans and P. Vincke, “A preference ranking organisation method: (The PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decision-making),” Management Science, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 647–656, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  16. T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1980. View at MathSciNet
  17. International Atomic Energy Agency, Selection of Away-from-Reactor Facilities for Spent Fuel Storage, IAEA TECDOC no. 1558, 2007.
  18. International Atomic Energy Agency, “Agency,” A Guidebook on Spent Fuel Storage (IAEA technical series Report) 240, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  19. “An Integrated Approach to the Back-End of the Fuel Cycle Conference ID: 46528 (CN-226),” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Spent Fuel from Nuclear Power Reactors, vol. 19, Vienna, Austria, June 2015.
  20. “Identifying and Testing Indicators for Assessing The Long-Term Performance of Geological Repositories The European SPIN Project (Project FIKW–CT–2000–00081),” https://cordis.europa.eu/documents/documentlibrary/66628791EN6.pdf.
  21. K. Taji, J. K. Levy, J. Hartmann et al., “Identifying potential repositories for radioactive waste: multiple criteria decision analysis and critical infrastructure systems,” International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 404–423, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Andrianov, V. Kanke, I. Kuptsov, and V. Murogov, “Towards sustainable nuclear power development,” International Journal for Nuclear Power, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 287–293, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  23. T. Briggs, P. L. Kunsch, and B. Mareschal, “Nuclear waste management: An application of the multicriteria PROMETHEE methods,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. L. D. Phillips, “Multi-Attribute Decision Analysis for Recommending Sites to Be Investigated for Their Suitability as a Repository for Radioactive Wastes,” Nirex Science Report PE/NRX/18.
  25. J. Figueira, G. Salvatore, and E. Matthias, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, Springer, Boston, Mass, USA, 2005.
  26. V. Belton and T. J. Stewart, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. D. von Winterfeldt and W. Edwards, Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1986.
  28. V. Kuznetsov, G. Fesenko, A. Schwenk-Ferrero, A. Andrianov, and I. Kuptsov, “Innovative nuclear energy systems: state-of-the art survey on evaluation and aggregation judgment measures applied to performance comparison,” Energies, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 3679–3719, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. V. Kuznetsov, G. Fesenko, A. Andrianov, and I. Kuptsov, “INPRO activities on development of advanced tools to support judgment aggregation for comparative evaluation of nuclear energy systems,” Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2015, Article ID 910162, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. R. Steur, F. Depisch, and J. Kupitz, “The Status of the IAEA International Project on Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycles (INPRO) and the Ongoing Activities of the Phase 1B of INPRO,” in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, pp. 377–384, Arlington, Va, USA, April 2004, https://www.iaea.org/INPRO/CPs/index.html. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. International Atomic Energy Agency, Nuclear Energy Basic Principles, IAEA Nuclear Energy Series no. NE-BP, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 2008.
  32. C. Boutellier, C. McCombie, and I. Mele, “Multinational repositories: ethical, legal and political/public aspects,” International Journal of Nuclear Law, vol. 1, no. 1, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. R. Wigeland, T. Taiwo, H. Ludewig et al., “Nuclear Fuel Cycle Evaluation and Screening,” Final Report, Fuel Cycle Research & Development FCRD-FCO-2014-000106, Department of Energy (DOE), 2014. View at Google Scholar
  34. A. Andrianov, V. Kanke, I. Kuptsov, and V. Murogov, “Reexamining the ethics of nuclear technology,” Science and Engineering Ethics, pp. 1–20, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. A. Andrianov, “Approaches and software for multi-objective optimization of nuclear power structures,” Sustainability, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 721–739, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. A. Andrianov, I. Kuptsov, and T. Utyanskaya, “Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios,” Nuclear Energy and Technology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 102–107, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. A. Andrianov, Y. Korovin, I. Kuptsov, V. Murogov, and O. Andrianova, “Consideration of economic risks in a comparative analysis of nuclear technologies with different maturity levels,” Nuclear Energy and Technology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 158–163, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. H. Wang, W. Jiao, R. Lahdelma, C. Zhu, and P. Zou, “Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis for evaluation of combined heat and power units,” Energies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 59–78, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. Yoon et al., “An Integrated Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach for Evaluating Nuclear Fuel Cycle Systems for Long-Term Sustainability on the Basis of an Equilibrium Model: Technique for..., Nuclear Engineering and Technology,” 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2016.07.009.
  40. J. S. Dyer, J. C. Butler, T. Edmunds, and J. Jia, “A multiattribute utility analysis of alternatives for the disposition of surplus weapons-grade plutonium,” Operations Research, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 749–762, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. R. P. Hämäläinen, M. R. K. Lindstedt, and K. Sinkko, “Multiattribute risk analysis in nuclear emergency management,” Risk Analysis, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 455–467, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. J. C. Butler, A. N. Chebeskov, J. S. Dyer, T. A. Edmunds, J. Jia, and V. I. Oussanov, “The United States and Russia evaluate plutonium disposition options with multiattribute utility theory,” Interfaces, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 88–101, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. W. S. Charlton, R. F. Lebouf, C. Gariazzo et al., “Proliferation resistance assessment methodology for nuclear fuel cycles,” Nuclear Technology, vol. 157, no. 2, pp. 143–156, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. S. K. Kim, H. S. Park, and C. H. Jung, “MAUT approach for selecting a proper decommissioning scenario,” in Proceedings of the (WM '07) Conference, Tucson, Ariz, USA, February 2007.
  45. K. N. Papamichail and S. French, “25 years of MCDA in nuclear emergency management,” IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 481–503, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet