Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 9304520, 13 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9304520
Research Article

Sensitivity Evaluation of AP1000 Nuclear Power Plant Best Estimation Model

Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Qi Cai

Received 18 January 2017; Revised 8 March 2017; Accepted 16 March 2017; Published 28 June 2017

Academic Editor: Arkady Serikov

Copyright © 2017 Hao Shi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Petruzzi and F. D'Auria, “Uncertainties in predictions by system thermal-hydraulic codes: the CASUALIDAD method,” in Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE '14), American Society of Mechanical Engineers, July 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. H. Glaeser, “GRS method for uncertainty and sensitivity evaluation of code results and applications,” Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2008, Article ID 798901, 7 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Petruzzi A., F. D'Auria, J. Micaelli et al., “The BEMUSE program (best estimate methods uncertainty and sensitivity evaluation),” 2004.
  4. M. Perez, F. Reventos, L. Batet et al., “Status report on the area, classification of the methods, conclusions and recommendations: results of the phase VI of the BEMUSE programme,” Nuclear Engineering & Design, vol. 241, no. 10, pp. 4206–4222, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  5. E. Borgonovo and S. Tarantola, “Advances in sensitivity analysis,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 107, pp. 1-2, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. Borgonovo and E. Plischke, “Sensitivity analysis: a review of recent advances,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 248, no. 3, pp. 869–887, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  7. A. Saltelli, K. Chan, and E. Scott, Sensitivity Analysis, John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, NY, USA, 2000. View at MathSciNet
  8. D. M. Hamby, “A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models,” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 135–154, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Ionescu-Bujor and D. G. Cacuci, “A comparative review of sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of large-scale systems—I: Deterministic methods,” Nuclear Science and Engineering, vol. 147, no. 3, pp. 189–203, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. M. Hoseyni, M. Pourgol-Mohammad, A. A. Tehranifard, and F. Yousefpour, “A systematic framework for effective uncertainty assessment of severe accident calculations; Hybrid qualitative and quantitative methodology,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 125, pp. 22–35, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. C. Helton, J. D. Johnson, C. J. Sallaberry, and C. B. Storlie, “Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis,” SANDIA Report SAND, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  12. P. G. Rousseau, G. P. Greyvenstein, B. W. Botha et al., Sensitivity Analysis of the PBMR Gas Cooled Nuclear Reactor Cycle with the Aid of a Simplified Simulation Model, Faculty of Engineering, North-West University, IFAC, 2000.
  13. I. Korsakissok, A. Mathieu, and D. Didier, “Atmospheric dispersion and ground deposition induced by the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant accident: a local-scale simulation and sensitivity study,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 70, pp. 267–279, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. X. Xiaofei and C. Xinrong, “Investigation the sensitivity of RELAP5 simulation on 600 MW PWR nuclear power plant core,” in Proceedings of the Academic Annual Meeting of China Nuclear Society, vol. 2, 2011, in Chinese.
  15. S.-M. Lee and K.-Y. Kim, “Optimization of the upper plenum of a PBMR to enhance thermal performance in the reactor core,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 38, no. 2-3, pp. 720–724, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Petruzzi and F. D'Auria, “Approaches, relevant topics, and internal method for uncertainty evaluation in predictions of thermal-hydraulic system codes,” Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2008, Article ID 325071, 17 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. de Crécy, P. Bazin, H. Glaeser et al., “Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of the LOFT L2-5 test: results of the BEMUSE programme,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 238, no. 12, pp. 3561–3578, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Westinghouse Electric Company, AP1000 Design Control Document, Revision 17, 2010.
  19. F. D’ Auria, H. Glaeser, S. Lee et al., “Best estimate safety analysis for nuclear power plants: uncertainty evaluation,” IAEA Safety Report Series, vol. 52, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  20. D. Li, X. Liu, and Y. Yang, “Improvement of reflood model in RELAP5 code based on sensitivity analysis,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 303, pp. 163–172, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. E. Zio and N. Pedroni, “Monte Carlo simulation-based sensitivity analysis of the model of a thermal-hydraulic passive system,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 107, pp. 90–106, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. X. Zheng, H. Itoh, H. Tamaki, and Y. Maruyama, “An integrated approach to source term uncertainty and sensitivity analyses for nuclear reactor severe accidents,” Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 333–344, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Ansaldo Nucleare S.p.A., AP1000 Relap5 Mod. 3.3 input deck. Westinghouse Proprietary Information, 2010.
  24. D. Lioce, M. Asztalos, A. Alemberti, L. Barucca, M. Frogheri, and G. Saiu, “AP1000 passive core cooling system pre-operational tests procedure definition and simulation by means of Relap5 Mod. 3.3 computer code,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 250, pp. 538–547, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. Hanhong, C. Pingdong, M. Hongxing, Z. Weizhong, Z. Xinguan, and W. Minghui, The Third Generation of Nuclear Power Technology: AP1000[M], China Electric Power Press, 2010.
  26. J. W. Winters, R. P. Vijuk, and W. E. Cummins, AP1000 Design Control Document, Weistinghouse Electric Company LLC, Pittsbrugh, PA, USA, 2004.
  27. S.-R. Park, W.-P. Baek, S.-H. Chang, and B.-H. Lee, “Development of an uncertainty quantification method of the best estimate large LOCA analysis,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 135, no. 3, pp. 367–378, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. Perez, F. Reventos, L. Batet et al., “Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of a LBLOCA in a PWR Nuclear Power Plant: results of the phase v of the BEMUSE programme,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 241, no. 10, pp. 4206–4222, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus