Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations

Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations / 2020 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 3287320 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3287320

Jingwei Li, Dong Xu, Wenlong Wang, Xujiang Wang, Yanpeng Mao, Chao Zhang, Wen Jiang, Changliang Wu, "Review on Selection and Experiment Method of Commonly Studied Simulated Radionuclides in Researches of Nuclear Waste Solidification", Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2020, Article ID 3287320, 13 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3287320

Review on Selection and Experiment Method of Commonly Studied Simulated Radionuclides in Researches of Nuclear Waste Solidification

Academic Editor: Arkady Serikov
Received21 Feb 2020
Revised03 Jun 2020
Accepted12 Jun 2020
Published28 Aug 2020

Abstract

Although many types of simulated radionuclides have been widely used as a substitute for actual nuclear waste in the studies of nuclear waste solidification, the understanding of the applicability and validity of simulated radionuclides is still insufficient. In particular, the selection and use of simulated radionuclides, which can play a decisive role in the accuracy of the experimental results, still lack unified or integrated references. This paper provides a critical review on the selection, experimental methods, and applicability of the most commonly studied simulated radionuclides, followed by a careful discussion and recommendation of simulated radionuclides suitable for different solidified bodies. The main factors (e.g., temperature, pH, and atmosphere) affecting the choice of simulated radionuclides were analyzed in detail. This work helps to integrate the selection and use of simulated radionuclides, and it will be beneficial for improving the effectiveness of nuclide solidification research.

1. Introduction

Nuclear energy is a high-efficiency energy source with high energy density, low cost, and no air pollution emission [1]. However, the nuclear facilities of nuclear power, medicine, scientific research, industry, and agriculture can generate large amounts of nuclear waste during operation and decommissioning [2, 3]. Nuclear waste contains more than 30 radioactive elements, mainly including actinides (such as Pu and U), fission elements (such as Cs, Sr, I, Xe, and Ru), and other radioactive elements, which can emit radioactive alpha rays (α-rays), beta rays (β-rays), and gamma rays (γ-rays) during the decay of the nucleus, and X-rays by atomic shell electron transitions [46]. Nuclear waste can cause irreversible radioactive contamination to air, land, and water due to the high radioactivity and radiotoxicity [7]. When the human body is exposed to high doses of radiation, radioactive substances can cause irreversible damage to the human body, causing mutations in human cells and cancer [7, 8]. Based on two parameters, the radionuclide half-life and radioactivity, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) classified radioactive waste into five categories: very short-lived waste (VSLW), very low-level waste (VLLW), low-level waste (LLW), intermediate-level waste (ILW), and high-level waste (HLW) [7]. The main sources and types of radionuclides in nuclear waste are shown in Table 1. It can be seen that radionuclides and their isotopes are widely distributed in facilities, water, waste residues, and other wastes.


SourcesRadionuclideFormTypeWaste form

Uranium mining and manufacturing226Ra, 238U, 234U, 235USolidα, γWaste ore, resin, plastic, tailings, residue, waste equipment
238U, 234U, 235U, 234Pa, 230Th, 226RaLiquidα, γMine water, extraction water, purification waste liquid, wastewater
238U, 234U, 235U, 222RnGaseousαExhaust gas, dust, radioactive aerosol
Reactor operation, spent fuel137Cs, 144Ce, 239Pu, 129I, 90Sr, 133Xe, 135Xe, 239Np, 87Kr, 85Kr, 3H, 103Ru, 106Ru, 99TcSolid and liquidα, β, γRadioactive resin, mud, filter residue, waste equipment, waste tools, waste materials, cooling water, circulating water, ground drainage
131I, 3H, 129I, 133Xe, 85Kr, 84BrGaseousβ, γExhaust gas, radioactive aerosol

Reactor operating facility60Co, 3H, 14C, 28Al, 56Mg, 55Fe, 59FeSolidβ, γReactor vessel, waste core component, cladding material, graphite, waste equipment, concrete
58CoLiquidβ, γCirculating cooling water, decontamination wastewater
16NGaseousβ, γExhaust gas, radioactive aerosol

Medicine, scientific research, industry, and agriculture utilization60Co, 129I, 137Cs, 90SrSolidβ, γWaste radioactive sources, radioisotopes, animal and plant pollutants, waste equipment, wastewater
137Cs, 238U, 147Pm, 90Sr, 89SrLiquidβ, γ

It is necessary to properly treat and dispose of nuclear waste for long-term safe and cost-effective management. Among the various nuclear waste management procedures, the immobilization treatment and geological disposal methods are most widely used [7, 9]. Concrete and cement composites are widely used for LLW and ILW immobilization due to their good physical, chemical, and mechanical properties as well as low prices [1012]. The common method for HLW immobilization is to form borosilicate glass or ceramic composites by vitrification or the melt process [8, 13]. Many studies [1418] have been conducted to investigate the immobilization characteristics, mechanism, and effectivity of various solidifying materials on nuclear waste. The main purposes of these studies are summarized as developing new solidifying materials, increasing the loading of radioactive waste, reducing the leaching of radionuclides, enhancing the mechanical strength of solidified bodies, and reducing the disposal difficulty and cost. Additionally, computer simulation methods [13, 1923], such as quantum mechanical and empirical models of atomic bonding, density functional theory plus Hubbard U correction (DFT + U), energy minimization, molecular dynamics (MD), and Monte Carlo (MD) methods, have also been widely applied to study the radiation effects in various solidified bodies.

In most cases, actual nuclear wastes could not be used in these studies due to their radioactive, corrosive, and other harmful properties to the human body. In addition, it is unpractical to study the radiation damage to the solidified bodies for hundreds of years or even thousands of years through actual experiments [2, 24]. Researchers [2427] found that some nonradioactive isotopes of the radionuclides or some other nonradioactive elements had similar physical and chemical properties to the corresponding radionuclides. These nonradioactive isotopes or elements have been widely used as the simulated radionuclides to test or evaluate the solidification effect of solidifying materials on nuclear waste. Some simulated radionuclides commonly used in existing studies are shown in Table 2.


RadionuclidesSimulated nuclides and source compoundsImmobilization scheme

137CsCs+—CsNO3, CsCl, CsOH, Cs2CO3 [10, 15, 28, 29]Immobilization in cement, pollucite, glass, ceramic, polymer, geopolymer, inorganic mineral, etc.
90SrSr2+—SrCl2·6H2O, Sr(OH)2, SrCO3, SrSO4, SrF2, Sr(NO3)2 [3034]
60CoCo2+—Co(NO3)2·6H2O, CoCl2·6H2O [29, 35, 36]
239PuPu4+, Ce4+—PuO2, CeO2 [24, 25, 37]
129II, —KI, KIO3, NaI, NH4IO3 [35, 38, 39]

Although various kinds of simulated radionuclides (Cs+, Sr2+, Co2+, Pu4+, Ce4+, I, and ) and solidified bodies (cement, glass, ceramic, polymer, pollucite, geopolymer, etc.) have been used in existing studies, the understanding of the applicability and validity of simulated radionuclides is still insufficient. Some important issues about simulated radionuclides still exist including the following: why these kinds of simulated radionuclides are chosen, and are they suitable? How should they be used, and are the experimental results valid? Choosing proper simulated radionuclides and experimental methods is very important to obtain effective research results. For example, (i) Cs+ can be used as the simulated radionuclides of 137Cs in the studies of cement solidified 137Cs [10, 28, 29]. pH and temperature are one of the most important parameters and concerns for the success of the solidification/stabilization treatment of cement [40, 41]. In this case, CsNO3 or CsCl is often used as the resource of Cs+ [28, 29, 42, 43] because they are soluble in water with little heat release, and the aqueous solution is nearly neutral, which will have little influence on the hydration of cement and the experimental results. However, Cs2CO3 and CsOH are not suggested to be used in cement waste forms because their aqueous solutions are highly alkaline (e.g., for 50 g/L Cs2CO3, pH = 10∼13; CsOH has an even higher pH than Cs2CO3), and a lot of heat is released when CsOH dissolves in water. The use of Cs2CO3 or CsOH might adversely affect the research results and lead to low-confidence research conclusions. (ii) Ceramic is considered to be an ideal host for HLW [44, 45], and some researchers [14, 20, 23] used Cs2CO3 or CsNO3 to prepare Cs-containing ceramic waste forms by calcining the raw materials to over 1000°C. Differently, the preparation of Pu- (or Ce-) containing ceramic waste forms needs special treatment to reduce Pu(IV) (or Ce(IV)) to Pu(III) (or Ce(III)) [25, 46]. However, Pu(IV) (or Ce(IV)) can cause a structural change from the ordered pyrochlore to a disordered defect fluorite, which may adversely affect the study of actual solidification forms [46]. Different simulated radionuclides may be treated differently in the same kind of solidified body. Therefore, the selection and use of simulated radionuclides can play a decisive role in the accuracy of the research results. However, despite common usage worldwide, there are no unified or integrated references for the selection and experimental method of the commonly studied simulated radionuclides.

This paper is oriented to review the selection, kinds, and experimental methods of simulated radionuclides commonly studied in the research of nuclear waste solidification. The advantages and disadvantages of the simulated radionuclides in different solidification conditions are discussed. The primary objective of the work is to (i) advance the understanding of various solidification approaches of nuclear waste and the role of simulated radionuclides and (ii) provide comprehensive references for the selection and use of simulated radionuclides in different solidification materials for nuclear waste solidification studies.

2. Simulants of 137Cs and Experimental Methods

Fission product 137Cs is one of the most important artificial radionuclides generated from nuclear reactors, nuclear weapon tests, radioactive wastes, or waste liquid [20]. It is a gamma emitter with radiotoxicity, high volatility, mobility, and a relatively long half-life (close to 30 years) [47], which can be present in LLW, ILW, and HLW [48]. When 137Cs permeates into the food chain and is transferred to the human body, it can cause respiratory disease, acute and chronic injury, and even soft tissue tumors. Therefore, nuclear waste containing 137Cs must be pretreated and stabilized prior to disposal for the sake of preventing it from leaching into the environment [27].

137Cs has been classified as an easy-to-measure nuclide, which can be used as the signal nuclide for nuclear power plant accidents [49]. It is reported that solid-phase or liquid-phase 137Cs exists in an oxide form such as Cs2MoO4, Cs2UO4, or Cs2ZrO3 in spent fuels [5052], and the gaseous-phase Cs is considered to exist in Cs2CO3 (g), CsOH (g), and CsI (g) [5355]. Thus, many studies were conducted to investigate the immobilization characteristics of solid-phase and liquid-phase 137Cs, and Cs+ was the most used simulant of 137Cs due to the similarity in physical and chemical properties.

2.1. Simulated 137Cs in the Immobilization Method by Using Cementitious Material

Cementitious materials have been widely used for radioactive waste solidification as long-term storage and disposal materials due to the good physical, chemical, and mechanical properties [11, 28, 56, 57]. Since the cement-based systems have presented the gradual dissolution and leaching of radionuclides, many studies have been conducted to improve this stabilization technique [5861]. CsNO3 or CsCl was often used as the simulant of 137Cs in those studies of cementitious material immobilization methods. The experimental methods of cementitious material solidification experiments for 137Cs are relatively simple and usually include the dissolution of simulated 137Cs, solidification, leaching tests, chemical tests, and mechanical performance tests.

Fan et al. investigated the effects of ferrihydrite nanoparticle incorporation in cementitious materials on radioactive waste immobilization [10]. In the experimental process, the cement-based solidified body for simulated 137Cs, 238U, and 90Sr was prepared first. The mass proportion of each simulated radionuclide in the solidified body was set as approximately 4%. First, CsNO3 (0.72 g), UO2(NO3)2·6H2O (1.85 g), and Sr(NO3)2 (0.78 g) were dissolved in 20 mL of ultrapure water to prepare the radioactive waste solution. Then, 20 mL of simulated solution and 5 mL of suspension were added into 50 g of Type I ordinary Portland cement and mixed to reach a well-dispersed coherent state. The mixture was cast into a cylinder mold, demolded after 24 h, and then cured in at 20 ± 1°C and a relative humidity (RH) of 45 ± 5% for 28 days before the leaching test. In the end, the leaching test was conducted following the standard method of ANSI/ANS-16.1-2003R2008 (American National Standard Measurement of the Leachability of Solidified Low-Level Radioactive Wastes by a Short-Term Test Procedure). In another study [28], CsNO3 was added into the used matrix (ordinary Portland cement blended with blast furnace slag), and the mass proportion of Cs was 3% in the total matrix.

In the study of the immobilization of the simulated radionuclide 133Cs+ by fly ash-based geopolymer [15], CsNO3 (analytical reagent grade) was used as the simulated radionuclide. Before being mixed with ordinary Portland cement and fly ash in proportion, CsNO3 was first dissolved in deionized water to form a homogeneous solution. The mass proportion of Cs in the resulting geopolymer/cement mixture was 2%. The mixtures were made into 20 mm × 20 mm × 20 mm cubes and then cured in humid air with a relative humidity (RH) of 90 ± 1% and a temperature of 60 ± 0.5°C. In addition to microstructural and mineralogical analysis, leaching tests (long-term leaching, simulated environment leaching, and acid corrosion tests) and mechanical performance tests (compressive strength, freeze-thaw performance, and high-temperature performance tests) were also conducted to study the performance of the solidified body. Jang et al. used similar experimental methods to study the physical barrier effect of the geopolymer waste form on the diffusivity of Cs and Sr [62], and the difference was that the nuclide simulants were CsCl and SrCl2·6H2O.

Cs+-compounds, which have the properties of water solubility, room temperature stability, and low toxicity, which can be selected as the simulants of 137Cs in the experiments. According to former studies, the mass proportion of Cs+ in the cementitious mixture was no more than 5%, and ICP-MS or ICP-OES was usually used to quantitatively analyze Cs+ in the leaching test.

The advantage of CsNO3 and CsCl is that their aqueous solutions are close to neutral, and thus, they have less of an effect on cement solidification. One challenge associated with CsNO3 and CsCl is matching the amount dissolved in water with the water–cement ratio during the solidification experiments.

2.2. Simulated 137Cs in the Immobilization Method by Using Pollucite

Pollucite belongs to the group of analcime zeolites, and the specific structure of pollucite is beneficial to hold Cs ions tightly and avoid leaching in aqueous media [63, 64]. The thermal stability of pollucite has been confirmed to be excellent relative to several cesium aluminosilicate minerals [65]. Therefore, pollucite (CsAlSi2O6) may be feasible as one of the final phases to dispose of 137Cs-containing waste for extended periods of time [6668]. Pollucite can be synthesized by the hydrothermal route (Figure S1) or recrystallized by heat treatment [6971].

Chen et al. investigated the method of the hydrothermal conversion of Cs-polluted soil into pollucite for 137Cs immobilization [18]. In the experiment, alumina was mixed with ground soil to form certain molar ratios of Al/Si, and then, 5 mass% CsOH solutions were added into the mixture at Cs/Al/Si ratios of 1/1/5, 1/1.5/5, 1/2/5, and 1/2.5/5, respectively, in order to synthesize pollucite. The specimens were pressed in a stainless rectangular-shaped mold and then cured for various setting times (0–24 h) in a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave at setting temperatures (100–240°C) for pollucite preparation. The pollucite (CsAlSi2O6·xH2O) samples showed low flexural strength (5 MPa). With the addition of Ca(OH)2, a strong solidified body was synthesized, which showed the highest flexural strength of 30 MPa. EXAFS measurements were performed to investigate the coordination environments of the synthesized pollucite and further confirm the coordination state of Cs in the synthesized pollucite structure. According to the EXAFS test, the polluted Cs was immobilized into the structure of the synthesized pollucite. The leaching test of Cs in pollucite samples was conducted according to ASTM C 1285-02 (American Society for Testing Material, 2008) [72], rather than ANSI/ANS-16.1-2003R2008. The ASTM C 1285-02 method is suitable for glass waste forms or multiphase glass ceramics [72]. Pollucite can be converted into ceramic by calcination and is also suitable for this leaching test method. This hydrothermal technology showed potential to directly immobilize the 137Cs-polluted soil.

Montagna et al. also studied the storage of 137Cs by borosilicate and aluminosilicate pollucite nanocrystals [48]. CsOH, silica sources (precipitation silica Zeosil 175MP Rhône-Poulenc or fumed silica Aerosil 200), H3BO3, NaOH, and aluminum (AlOOH) hydroxides were mixed at certain molar ratios (0.22 ≤ (B + Al)/Si ≤ 0.43, 0 ≤ B/(B + Al) ≤ 1, and 0.10 ≤ Cs/(Na + Cs) ≤ 1). The mixtures were sealed in a stainless steel autoclave and then heated for 2–30 days at 115–195°C to prepare pollucite crystalline materials.

The process of Cs-pollucite preparation is relatively simple. Similar methods were also applied in other researches [67, 70, 73, 74], and the pollucite was verified to incorporate Cs into the crystalline structure, which presented an excellent immobilization effect on Cs. The advantage of CsOH is that it does not introduce any other ions except for O and H into the synthesis reaction of pollucite, and the reaction products are only pollucite and H2O, which is conducive to the purity of the prepared pollucite. However, CsOH is highly corrosive and should be placed in a sealed container that is stored in a cool, dry place.

2.3. Simulated 137Cs in the Immobilization Method by Using Glass Waste Forms

Glass waste forms have the potential to provide durable, wide-ranging, and good radiation resistance immobilization of HLW [26, 75, 76]. Sohn et al. studied the stability of Cs and Sr in Na-aluminoborosilicate glasses [77]. In this study, three glass compositions were prepared based on the following systems: Na2O-Al2O3-B2O3-SiO2-Cs2O (system NABS-Cs), Na2O-Al2O3-B2O3-SiO2-SrO (system NABS-Sr), and Na2O-Al2O3-B2O3-SiO2-SrO-Cs2O (system NABS-SrCs). The preparation process of glass samples is described as follows: (i) simulated nuclides (Cs2CO3 and SrCO3) and reagent-grade Na2CO3 were preheated and decarbonated at 850°C for over 30 minutes; (ii) reagent-grade B2O3, Al2O3, and SiO2 were dried at 1200°C for over 20 minutes; (iii) these reagents were weighed and mixed according to the set ratios and then melted in a platinum crucible at 1200°C for 1 h; (iv) the melt was quenched, and the obtained glass was crushed and ground; and (v) the melting and grinding process was conducted twice. This experimental method enabled the preparation of glass samples with a fairly homogeneous chemical composition, and most simulated nuclides were immobilized in crystalline materials during the devitrification of the glasses. The prepared glasses were analyzed by a JEOL 733 electron microprobe to check the chemical change by melting. The analyzed mass proportions of Cs2O and SrO were 4.54%–13.71% and 4.97%–10.44%, respectively, in the aluminoborosilicate glasses. The results showed that the Cs2O content in the samples decreased markedly (2%-3%) because Cs2CO3 was partially decomposed and volatilized during melting. Compared with Cs2O, the SrO content was almost unchanged.

To investigate the influence of the hydrothermal reaction between glass and water on Cs and Sr immobilization, this study conducted hydrothermal treatment of the prepared glass samples. The powdered glass samples were sealed in a gold capsule with deionized water and then heated in an autoclave at 200°C with a vapor pressure of 1.54 MPa for 60 days. The heating temperature was determined according to the maximum temperature (150–200°C) in the deep geological repositories in the first few hundred years after disposal [78]. The produced crystalline phases were identified as Analcime-type zeolite by the XRD method. Cs and Sr were found to be fixed in the analcime-type zeolite (Figure S2). The experimental methods in this study have great reference value for the preparation method of 137Cs- (or 90Sr-) containing glasses as well as the hydrothermal treatment of the glasses for the hydrothermal reaction study. Similar methods were also used in related studies [7982].

In mixed alkali glasses (e.g., Na-K or Na-Cs silicate glasses), physical properties such as the electrical conductivity, molar volume, glass transition temperature, and thermal expansion coefficient can be nonlinear due to the mixed alkali effect (MAE) [83, 84]. The MAE has attracted much attention because it is very important for developing unique glass materials with a controllable electrical conductivity or thermal expansion coefficient, respectively [19, 85]. Kaneko et al. [19] prepared borosilicate (Si : B = 1 : 1) and Si-rich borosilicate (Si : B = 2 : 1) glasses containing alkali cations Cs+ and Na+ to study the MAE on nuclides solidification. In the preparation process of the glass samples, chemically pure Cs2CO3 together with SiO2, B(OH)3, and Na2CO3 were used to prepare the glass samples by the melting method (temperatures of 1350°C, 1100°C, and 1350°C for silicate, borate, and borosilicate glasses, resp.). The Cs+/(Cs++Na+) ratios were set at 0.0, 0.2, 0.5, 0.8, and 1.0. XRD was used to identify the crystal structures of the synthesized samples. A strong magnetic field MAS NMR was used to examine the structure of mixed alkali borosilicate glasses for the sake of correlating the MAE with the alkali environment. An AVANCE III spectrometer using a commercial probe (4 mm) was used to acquire the solid-state 133Cs and 23Na NMR spectra of all samples. According to the NMR analysis, the chemical shifts of alkali ions are affected by both the coordination number and the kinds of nearby atoms (Si or B). The coordination characteristics of Cs+ in the crystal of borosilicate glasses could help to study the immobilization mechanism of 137Cs in the actual glass solidified body (Figure S3).This experimental method was effective for studying the MAE in Cs-containing glasses, and similar methods were also used in other studies [86, 87].

It can be seen that the high-temperature calcination process (1100∼1350°C) is an essential process for glass preparation. In the typical preparation process of borosilicate glass, Cs2CO3 and Na2CO3 could offer Cs2O and Na2O for the SiO2-B2O3-R2O composition system (R2O refers to Na2O, K2O, or Cs2O) during the high-temperature solid-phase reaction. The NMR and XRD analysis results in the above studies confirmed that Cs+ could enter the crystalline structure of the prepared glasses and successfully simulated the immobilization process of 137Cs in the glass solidified bodies. The high temperature may inevitably cause some volatilization loss of Cs2O in the glass [77], and this can lead to numerical deviations in the quantitative analysis of Cs+. Thus, the residual Cs+ content in the prepared glass samples needs to be determined in some quantitative studies, such as the leaching test of the glass solidified body.

Different from the synthesis of pollucite, CsOH could not be used as the raw material of glass because of its very strong alkalinity. It may react violently with the metal containers and corrode the glasses at high temperature, which will make the experiment unsafe.

2.4. Simulated137Cs in the Immobilization Method by Using Ceramic Waste Forms

Ceramic matrices exhibited more remarkable radiation resistance and chemical durability than glasses, and they were considered as the ideal hosts for immobilizing HLW [8, 44, 45].

In Yang et al.’s study [27], the (Cs, Ba)-hollandite ceramics were prepared to study the chemical evolution in the hollandite matrix due to radioactive decay (137Cs ⟶ 137Ba), and nonradioactive 133Cs and 133Ba were chosen as the simulants of parent 137Cs and daughter 137Ba, respectively. The [CsxBay]O16 (0.3 < x, y < 0.75) ceramics were designed for 137Cs and 137Ba immobilization, and they were synthesized by a solid-state reaction method. The raw materials were Cs2CO3, BaCO3, Ti2O3, and TiO2, among which Ti2O3 was introduced to conserve the charge neutrality when Cs+ ions were replaced by Ba2+ ions. The materials were preheated and weighed based on the composition of [CsxBay]O16 (0.3 < x, y < 0.75) ceramics. Then, they were homogenized in an agate mortar in ethyl alcohol by grinding and mixing for 3 h. The mixtures were pressed into discs (12 mm in diameter, 2 mm in thickness) at a pressure of 12 MPa by using a hydraulic press. Then, the as-prepared discs were sintered in 5% H2/Ar at 1250°C for 4 h to prepare the ceramic samples. Some other studies [14, 23, 88, 89] also used similar reagent-grade oxide, carbonate powders, and melt methods to prepare hollandite waste forms.

The phase composition and evolution of the ceramics were analyzed by XRD, and the microstructure evolution was detected by a Renishaw inVia Raman spectrometer, field scanning electron microscopy (FSEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). The EDX mapping images of the prepared [Cs0.55Ba0.5]O16 ceramic sample are shown in Figure S4 (e1, e2, e3, and e4), and all of the elements Cs, Ba, Ti, and O were found to be homogenously distributed on the sample surface. Furthermore, the EXD spectra in Figure S4 (f1 and f2) indicated that the experimental compositions of the ceramic samples were very close to the targeted compositions, and more than 80% of Cs was retained in the ceramic sample. The results indicated that the experimental method in this study could prepare Cs, Ba-containing ceramic samples with uniform element distribution and low nuclide loss for nuclide solidification research.

This study used the following equation to estimate the structural stability: [90], where is the tolerance factor, is the average ionic radii of cations in the A site, is the average ionic radii of cations in the B site, and is the oxygen ion radius (1.4 Å). The calculation results showed that the value of was close to 1 (1.033–1.097), which suggested that the crystalline structure of the (Cs, Ba)-hollandite ceramics was stable. A diagram of the crystal structure was used to depict the evolution of simulated 137Cs decay to simulated 137Ba (Figure S5), which showed that the nuclides were chemically immobilized in the ceramic crystal. Overall, this study combined a Cs, Ba-containing ceramic preparation experiment, mathematical calculations, and crystal model construction, which provided comprehensive experimental methods for analyzing the immobilization and decay characteristics of simulated 137Cs in the ceramic system.

In another study [20], which investigated the effects of Cs substitution on the crystal structure of phase-pure hollandite of the system, Ba1.15−xCs2xCr2.3Ti5.7O16(0 ≤ x ≤ 1.15), CsNO3, Ba(O2C2H3)2, Cr(NO3)3·9H2O, and Ti(OC3H7)4 were used as starting materials for the preparation of the hollandite samples. Unlike Yang et al.’s study, the starting materials were dissolved individually in a suitable solvent and homogenized by mixing the solutions. The resultant solution was concentrated in a rotary evaporator at 90°C and was then calcined at 400°C for 4 h to remove all of the volatile organics. The calcined powder was pressed into discs (20 mm in diameter, 3 mm in thickness) at a pressure of 35 MPa for subsequent sintering at 1050°C/4 h. The material mixing method in this study can make the components more homogeneous, but the pretreatment process for the mixture before calcination is more complicated.

In addition to XRD analysis, time-of-flight (TOF) neutron powder diffraction (NPD) experiments were also performed for the structural analysis of phase-pure samples in this study. Furthermore, Rietveld refinement of XRD and NPD data was carried out to extract the structural features. Powder XRD data was refined by using the TOPAS 4.2 (Bruker AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany) software package in the GUI mode, starting with the tetragonal (I4/m) and monoclinic (I2/m) structural models. Figure S6 shows a standard I2/m hollandite unit cell with one tunnel site for Ba/Cs (A site), two distinct crystallographic octahedral sites for Cr/Ti (M1 and M2), and four distinct oxygen sites (O1, O2, O3, and O4). The structural models for the compositions of Ba1.15−xCs2xCr2.3Ti5.7O16, x = 0, 0.15, and 0.25 were well developed from the Rietveld analysis of powder diffraction data (Table 3), which could help to deeply investigate the immobilization mechanism of Cs in hollandite. The results showed that approximately 35% of the Ba was replaced by Cs in the hollandite system Ba1.15Cr2.3Ti5.7O16.


Compositionx = 0x = 0.15x = 0.25

Space groupI4/mI2/mI2/m
Unit cell parametersa (Å)10.0561 (2)10.0244 (6)10.192 (1)
b (Å)2.9333 (2)2.911 (0)
c (Å)2.95210 (7)10.0075 (6)10.159 (1)
β90.058 (2)90.126 (3)
Volume, V3)298.53 (2)298.95 (3)303.34 (7)
d, Å5.085.095.18
Refinement residualRwp (%)3.723.684.83

d” is the mean diagonal length of the tunnel cross section, and “Rwp” is the weighted Rietveld parameter [20].

Overall, the simulants of 137Cs should be selected according to the solidified bodies and the practical experimental methods. Table 4 shows the application conditions and advantages of the simulants of 137Cs in the present studies.


SimulantsSolidified bodyExperimental methodAdvantages

CsNO3 or CsClCementitious materialsDissolved in deionized water and directly mixed in the solidified body for immobilization (<100°C)Stable at low temperature, soluble in water, easy to obtain
CsOHPolluciteHydrothermal reaction (100–200°C)OH- in CsOH can be converted to H2O by reaction; no other elements were introduced into pollucite except for Cs
Cs2CO3 or CsNO3Glass or ceramicMelting method (1000–1350°C)Decompose at high temperature, releasing Cs2O for the solid-phase reaction; CsOH is not used because it is strongly alkaline and will react violently with the metal container

3. Simulants of 90Sr and Experimental Methods

90Sr is a very common beta-emitter in nuclear installations [30], which exists in wastewater, ion-selective inorganic resins, waste soils, and so on [91]. It can easily migrate into ground water due to its water solubility, and thus, it should be stabilized to prevent it from polluting the environment. Sr2+ is the main simulant of 90Sr in present studies of 90Sr immobilization [32, 33, 62]. In some of the studies mentioned above [10, 62, 77], 90Sr was studied simultaneously with 137Cs in the same solidified bodies in which Sr(NO3)2, SrCO3, and SrCl2·6H2O were used as the simulants of 90Sr.

In the study of the immobilization of Sr by crystalline zirconium phosphate [32], Sr(NO3)2 was added to HZr2(PO4)3 (molar ratios: 0.1–0.5) and mixed, and then the mixture was heated in the temperature range of 750–1200°C for the preparation of the SrZr4(PO4)6 solidified body. In addition to conventional composition and structure analysis, the leaching characteristics of Sr in various solvents (0.1 mol/L HCl, deionized water and sea water) in an autoclave at 160°C were also investigated. The leaching test results indicated that the crystalline proton type zirconium phosphate had excellent Sr2+ leaching resistance, which was thermally and chemically resistant in different leaching environments. In the heating process, Sr(NO3)2 could decompose and offer SrO for SrZr4(PO4)6 during the high-temperature solid-phase reaction.

Walkley et al. investigated the mechanism of incorporation of Sr into metakaolin-based geopolymer gels to assess their potential as materials for the solidification of radioactive waste [92]. In this study, the activating solutions were prepared by dissolving NaOH and KOH in Na2SiO3·9H2O, and Sr(OH)2·8H2O was added to metakaolin to produce a sample containing an isotope of Sr2+. Then, the activating solutions and metakaolin were mixed to form a homogeneous paste, which was subsequently cast in sealed containers cured for 3 months at either 20 ± 2°C or 80 ± 2°C. The obtained molar ratio of Sr/Al was 0.00025, which was representative of the waste forms produced by the cementation of radioactive ion exchange resins [31, 93]. Sr(OH)2 is easily soluble in water and can be completely ionized, and that is why it was chosen as the experimental material.

In addition to Sr(NO3)2 [94, 95], SrCO3 [33], and Sr(OH)2, SrSO4 [30] and SrF2 [34] were used to prepare glass or ceramic waste forms with other materials in some studies due to their high melting points (>1400°C). The application conditions and advantages of the simulants of 90Sr in the present studies are shown in Table 5.


SimulantsSolidified bodyExperimental method and temperatureAdvantages

SrCl2·6H2O, Sr(NO3)2Cementitious materialsDirectly mixed in the solidified body for immobilization (<100°C)Soluble in water; the aqueous solution is neutral and does not affect hydration
Sr(OH)2Geopolymer gelDirectly mixed in the solidified body for immobilization (<100°C)Easily soluble in water, completely ionized, no other elements were introduced except for Sr
SrCO3, SrSO4, or SrF2Glass or ceramicMelting method (1000–1350°C)High melting points (>1400°C), participates in solid-phase reaction at high temperature to provide SrO for the product (SrF2 converts to SrO at >1000°C in air)
Sr(NO3)2Phosphate or geopolymerMelting method (750–1200°C)Decomposes at high temperature (melting point is 570°C), releasing SrO for the solid-phase reaction

4. Simulants of Some Other Nuclides and Experimental Methods

Except for 137Cs and 90Sr, which have been widely studied, some other radionuclides such as 239Pu, 60Co, and 129I are also common nuclides in nuclear waste [96, 97]. These radionuclides are usually distributed in HMW and MMW, which have strong radiation hazards [35, 98]. It is important to pretreat and stabilize these elements prior to disposal. Therefore, many studies have been conducted to investigate the solidification/stabilization method and mechanism.

4.1. Simulants of 239Pu

The safe disposition of radioactive actinides (239Pu, 230Th, 238U, etc.) generated by the nuclear fuel cycle has been a major topic in the nuclear industry due to their long-term radiotoxic contribution to HLW [26, 46]. Ceramics are considered to be suitable host materials for the immobilization of minor actinides [99101]. Plutonium (Pu) is a representative actinide existing in HMW, and there has been extensive interest in using materials to immobilize it [46, 96, 102].

Kulkarni et al. prepared Pu-pyrochlore, (La1−xPux)2Zr2O7 (x = 0∼1), as the ceramic waste form for 239Pu immobilization [25]. PuO2, ZrO2, graphite, and La2O3 were mixed in appropriate ratios and heated up to 1400°C in a helium atmosphere to prepare the Pu-pyrochlore. The TG and DTA analysis results of the 2PuO2 + 2ZrO2 +C mixture are shown in Figure S7. The high-temperature chemical reaction was slow, extending over a temperature range of 1000∼1400°C associated with a broad endothermic peak. The XRD analysis of the product indicated that it was Pu2Zr2O7, the XRD pattern of which was similar to that of La2Zr2O7. According to the XRD, TG, and DTA results, the chemical reaction could be given as follows: 2PuO2 + 2ZrO2 + C ⟶ Pu2Zr2O7 + CO. It could be concluded that the immobilization effect of Pu-pyrochlore on Pu is mainly a chemical immobilization based on the Pu ion entering the lattice of pyrochlore. Burakov and Anderson also used PuO2 to prepare Pu-pyrochlore for the durability study of actinide ceramic waste forms [37]. The prepared samples showed highly physicochemical resistance to ion-saturated solutions simulating underground water after alteration experiments at 90°C for 3 months.

PuO2 can be used as the simulant of 239Pu in the studies of nuclide solidification. However, the challenge is that PuO2 is highly toxic and has strong radioactivity, and thus, it is not proper to be used in actual experiments [103]. Many studies used Ce4+ as a substitute for Pu4+ because they have the same chemical valence state and similar ionic radii and chemical properties, and CeO2 has much lower toxicity and radioactivity than PuO2 [24, 46, 104106].

In Lian et al.’s study about the ion beam irradiation in La2Zr2O7-Ce2Zr2O7 [46], Ce was used as an analog element for Pu because of the similarity with regard to the ionic size and oxidation state of Ce and Pu. In the experiment, CeO2, ZrO2 and La2O3 powders were mixed and sintered in air at 1673 K for 32h to prepare (La1−xCex)2Zr2O7. Then, the prepared powders were reduced, treated, and sealed under vacuum containing residual He in quartz vials. The purpose of the reduction treatment was to reduce Ce(IV) to Ce(III). This is because Ce(IV) can cause a structural change from the ordered pyrochlore to a disordered defect fluorite due to the smaller ionic size (0.097 nm) compared to that of Ce(III) (0.114 nm). Ce(III) is more stable than Ce(IV) in the vacuum environment, and a single-phase stable Ce-pyrochlore is beneficial to obtaining precise experimental results. The microstructural evolution of the Ce-doped La2Zr2O7 and Ce2Zr2O7 upon ion beam irradiation was characterized by in situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM), ex situ high-resolution TEM, and electron energy-loss spectrometry (EELS) techniques. According to the results, the Ce4+ fraction was estimated to be ∼30%, suggesting that Ce3+mainly dominated in the pyrochlore structure upon ion irradiation.

4.2. Simulants of 60Co

60Co is an isotope of cobalt (Co), which is mainly generated during the operation of nuclear reactors. It has high penetrating gamma radiation (Eγ: 1.17 MeV and 1.33 MeV) and a half-life of 5.26 years [36]. It mainly exists in the coolant, which is a source of serious radiation exposure to the radiation workers during normal operation [107].Once it has entered the environment, it may be absorbed by soil or react with particles and cause health effects [108].

Some researchers studied the immobilization of 60Co by using hydroxyapatite for 60Co-containing nuclear waste management. Ul Hassan et al. [16] studied the immobilization of Co-containing radioactive corrosion products by the cold sintering of calcium hydroxyapatite (HAp), and Co2+ was used to simulate60Co. According to the previous study [108], the simulated radioactive solutions were prepared by dissolving Co(NO3)2·6H2O salt in distilled water and adjusting the initial pH values of the solutions to 5.0 ± 0.1. In the experiment, Co2+ was absorbed by HAp, which was prepared by mixing (NH4)2HPO4 and Ca(NO3)2·4H2O solutions. The absorbent (Co-HAp) slurries were then dried overnight at 110°C in a vacuum oven. The dried Co-HAp powder was sintered by applying the optimized sintering conditions (200°C, 100 min, and 500 MPa). The sketch of the experimental arrangement used for the cold sintering of Co-HAp is shown in Figure S8.

The measured specific surface area of the prepared HAp was 112.35 m2/g, which enabled a much higher adsorption capacity of HAp than those sorbents in some typical Co2+ adsorption studies [97, 108, 109]. The results showed that 0.4 g of the prepared HAp could absorb 93.8 ± 0.2% of 1 mM Co2+ in 100 ml of aqueous solution. After sintering at 200°C, the Co-HAp was tested by SEM-EDS for the microstructural characterization and elemental distribution analysis. The EDS-elemental area mapping showed that the absorbed Co2+ was homogeneously distributed in the sintered matrix. The normalized leaching rate (NLRi) of the absorbed Co2+ in Co-HAp was then measured by a standard product consistency test (PCT). The calculated NLRi values of Co2+ were 2.5 × 10−5 g/m2/day, which is better than the release limit of 0.3 g/m2/day set by the Department of Energy (DOE) of USA for types of phosphate glass [110].

In conventional sintering methods [111, 112], HAp was sintered at high temperatures ranging from 900 to 1300°C in air. However, the high temperature can cause the decomposition or dihydroxylation of the HAp-based radioactive waste matrices [113] or the volatilization of radionuclides such as 129I [114]. The cold sintering technique of HAp for the immobilization of radioactive waste is more efficient, economical, and environmentally friendly.

Venkatesan et al. used a similar simulant and experimental method [36] as above. The advantage of using Co(NO3)2·6H2O as the source of Co2+ is that it will not affect the adsorption of Co2+ by HAp because NO3 does not further react with HAp to destroy its structure.

4.3. Simulated Radioiodine and Other Nuclear Waste

Radioactive iodine isotopes, principally 129I and 131I, are radiation hazards emanating from the waste stream of spent fuel reprocessing facilities, which have high mobility and long half-lives (exceeding 1 million years) [115]. 129I is consistently found to be one of the largest dose contributors in geologic repository performance assessments [98]. The capture and immobilization of 129I are necessary in the reprocessing facility for safe disposal on a geological time scale.

Riley et al. [98] have reviewed the immobilization methods and materials of radioiodine, and a wide range of sorbents for the capture and waste forms for the immobilization of radioiodine were summarized and assessed. As described in this review, various iodine species such as NaI, NaIO3, HgI2, and I2(g) were used as the simulants of 129I in the current literature. Depending on the solidification approach and what form of iodine is present in the waste forms, the iodine species used as simulants of radioiodine are different.

In addition to the iodine species mentioned above, NH4IO3 was used as the simulant of 129I in Hassan et al.’s study [35]. The cold sintering of iodine-hosted HAp for the immobilization of volatile radioiodine (I) was investigated. During the experiment, an anionic solution of {NH4IO3 + (NH4)2HPO4} was mixed with a cationic solution of Ca(NO3)2·4H2O dropwise at a flow rate of 3.3 ml, which formed a Ca:P:I molar ratio of 10:6:2. Then, IO-HAp was synthesized at 70°C and dried for 12 h at 110°C. The cold sintering of the IO-HAp powder was carried out by applying the temperature of 200°C, a uniaxial pressure of 500 MPa, and a holding time of 10 min. According to the XRD, TGA/DSC, XRF, ICP-MS characterization, and PCT test of the IO-HAp powder samples, IO-HAp showed several advantages for the immobilization of 129I and other volatile radionuclides for long-term geological disposal, such as simple, fast, energy-saving, and efficient solidification. The advantage of NH4IO3 is that could be released as NH3 during the synthesis reaction of IO-HAp, which will not affect the Ca:P:I molar ratio and the crystal structure of IO-HAp. However, NH3 is harmful to the experimenters, and that is why the synthesis of IO-HAp was carried out in a fume hood under continuous stirring of 200 RPM [35].

Radioactive resins are problematic wastes that are produced during the ion exchange process for primary coolant purification and liquid radioactive waste treatment, which contain various radionuclides (e.g., 137Cs, 60Co, and90Sr) [11]. Sun et al. [116] investigated the solidification of borate radioactive resins using sulfoaluminate cement blended with zeolite. In this study, the simulated borate radioactive resins were prepared by the following steps: (i)Amberlite INR 78 resin and INR 77 resin were saturated by H3BO3 and NaOH, respectively, and then mixed in a mass ratio of 1:3 and (ii) CoCl2·6H2O and CsCl were added in the resins as the simulated radionuclides, and the concentrations of Co and Cs in the blended resins were 3.963 g/L and 4.093 g/L, respectively. This preparation method for simulated radioactive resins is simple and easy to operate.

In Li et al.’s study [29], a new resin mixture of styrene base cation and anion exchange resins with a mixing ratio of 1:1 (by mass) was contacted with a known concentration of saturated solution containing CsCl and CoCl2 for a prolonged time (1 week). The solution contacting the resins was shaken several times every day. By this static method, the saturation of simulated resins was performed. Then, the resins were dehydrated until the moisture content decreased to 45–50% before cementation. The saturation process is a key step in the preparation of the simulated radioactive resins.

5. Summary and Conclusions

Simulated radionuclides are used to directly simulate the solidification and migration characteristics of the actual radionuclides in various solidified bodies. The aim of this work is to review the selection and experimental methods for the simulants of the most commonly studied radionuclides (e.g., 137Cs, 90Sr, 60Co, 239Pu, and 129I) in the research of nuclear waste solidification and provide the selection basis of commonly used simulated radionuclides in various application conditions.

It is found that the nonradioactive isotopes of radionuclides are preferred as the simulants of the corresponding radionuclides because of their similar ionic radii, chemical valence state, and some other physicochemical properties. It is suggested that the simulated radionuclides are suitable for the corresponding solidified bodies and immobilization methods. In addition, the compounds containing simulated radionuclides should be nontoxic or have low toxicity and be nonradioactive or have low radioactivity to reduce the health risk to the experimenters. For 137Cs solidification studies, Cs+ (cesium salt) is mostly used as the simulated nuclide. CsNO3, CsCl, CsOH, Cs2CO3, and CsNO3 are the commonly used Cs+-containing compounds. For 90Sr solidification studies, Sr2+ (strontium salt) is mostly used as the simulated nuclide. SrCl2·6H2O, Sr(NO3)2, SrCO3, SrSO4, or SrF2 is chosen to be used as the source of Sr2+. For 239Pu solidification studies, PuO2 and CeO2 are mostly used as the simulants in the ceramic solidification methods occurring at high temperature. Co(NO3)2·6H2O is commonly used as the simulant of 60Co, and various iodine species such as NH4IO3, NaI, NaIO3, HgI2, and I2(g) are used as the simulants of 129I. For radioactive resin solidification studies, simulated radionuclides such as CsCl and CoCl2 are added in resins for the preparation of simulated radioactive resins. Multiple simulated nuclides can be simultaneously used in the same nuclear waste solidification experiment.

The preparation conditions of the solidified body for radionuclides, such as the temperature, phase, atmosphere, reaction principle, etc., dominate the selection of the simulants. For different solidification methods and materials, some recommendations for the selection of simulated radionuclides are summarized as follows:(i)For cementitious material geopolymer solidification methods and cold sintering methods, the compounds containing simulated radionuclides should be soluble in water and stable at low temperature (<200°C). Moreover, the pH value of the aqueous solution of the simulants is recommended to be close to that of the solidification environment, which will have less influence on the solidification process(ii)For hydrothermal methods and other cold sintering methods with a reaction temperature at ∼200°C, the simulated radionuclides should not introduce other elements or ions except for those mainly involved in the reactions. In this case, the reaction products containing simulated radionuclides are usually phase-pure for the sake of obtaining precise research results(iii)For glass, ceramic, or some other solidified bodies, which are prepared by the melting methods, the simulants of radionuclides should have physicochemical stability at room temperature and can decompose at high temperature (approximately 900°C∼1400°C) to release the oxides of simulated radionuclides for the solid-phase reactions(iv)It is recommended that the simulated radionuclides are homogenized in the raw materials to increase the uniformity of the prepared solidified bodies, and this can improve the representativeness and validity of the test results.

This work will be beneficial in extending the applications of simulated radionuclides in new solidification materials and promoting the development of nuclear waste solidification techniques. However, there are still some other radionuclides that have not been reported in the research of nuclear waste solidification. Further studies will be conducted on the solidification methods and simulants of more radionuclides.

Data Availability

No data were used to support this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the support of the National Engineering Laboratory of Coal-Fired Pollutants Emission Reduction, Shandong University. This work was supported by the National Key Research & Development Program of China (No. 2017YFC0703100).

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1: the hydrothermal route for Cs-pollucite preparation. Figure S2: distribution of cations between the starting glasses and formed zeolites. Figure S3: 133Cs MAS NMR spectra of 4βCs2O-4(1-β)Na2O-8SiO2-2B2O3 glasses. Figure S4: element mapping and EDX spectra of [Cs0.55Ba0.5][Ti3+1.55Ti4+6.45]O16. Figure S5: the substitution of Ba2+ for Cs+ in the ceramic system. Figure S6: hollandite unit cell with I2/m symmetry. M1 and M2 are two distinct crystallography sites for octahedral cations (Cr and Ti). Figure S7: TG and DTA curves of 2PuO2 + 2ZrO2 + C in helium. Figure S8: experimental arrangement used for the cold sintering of Co-HAp. (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. J. Bouchard, Nuclear Energy, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2012.
  2. F. J. Maringer, J. Šuráň, P. Kovář et al., “Radioactive waste management: review on clearance levels and acceptance criteria legislation, requirements and standards,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 81, pp. 255–260, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. W. A. Stewart, E. R. Vance, S. A. Moricca et al., “Immobilisation of higher activity wastes from nuclear reactor production of Mo-99,” Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2013, Article ID 926026, 16 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. Q. Hao, “Research on nuclear waste treatment and management strategies,” North China Electric Power University, Beijing, China, 2013, M.S. thesis. View at: Google Scholar
  5. X. Liu, J. Wu, L.-A. Hou, and J. Wang, “Removal of Co, Sr and Cs ions from simulated radioactive wastewater by forward osmosis,” Chemosphere, vol. 232, pp. 87–95, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. P. Sengupta, “A review on immobilization of phosphate containing high level nuclear wastes within glass matrix—present status and future challenges,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 235-236, pp. 17–28, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. Koťátková, J. Zatloukal, P. Reiterman, and K. Kolář, “Concrete and cement composites used for radioactive waste deposition,” Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, vol. 178-179, pp. 147–155, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. L. Wang and T. Liang, “Ceramics for high level radioactive waste solidification,” Journal of Advanced Ceramics, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 194–203, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. B. Eskander, T. A. Bayoumi, and H. M. Saleh, “Performance of aged cement-polymer composite immobilizing borate waste simulates during flooding scenarios,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 420, no. 1–3, pp. 175–181, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. Fan, B. Cao, N. Deng, Y. Hu, and M. Li, “Effects of ferrihydrite nanoparticle incorporation in cementitious materials on radioactive waste immobilization,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 379, Article ID 120570, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. Li and J. Wang, “Advances in cement solidification technology for waste radioactive ion exchange resins: a review,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 135, no. 1–3, pp. 443–448, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. H. E. Saleh and S. Eskander, “Long-term effect on the solidified degraded cellulose-based waste slurry in cement matrix,” Acta Montanistica Slovaca, vol. 14, pp. 291–297, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  13. A. Jan, J.-M. Delaye, S. Gin, and S. Kerisit, “Molecular dynamics simulation of ballistic effects in simplified nuclear waste glasses,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 505, pp. 188–201, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. Amoroso, J. C. Marra, M. Tang et al., “Melt processed multiphase ceramic waste forms for nuclear waste immobilization,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 454, no. 1–3, pp. 12–21, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Q. Li, Z. Sun, D. Tao et al., “Immobilization of simulated radionuclide 133Cs+ by fly ash-based geopolymer,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 262, pp. 325–331, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. Ul Hassan, S. Iqbal, J. I. Yun, and H. Jin Ryu, “Immobilization of radioactive corrosion products by cold sintering of pure hydroxyapatite,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 374, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. H. Yang, H.-S. Park, and Y.-Z. Cho, “Immobilization of Cs-trapping ceramic filters within glass-ceramic waste forms,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 110, pp. 1121–1126, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Y. Chen, Z. Jing, K. Cai, and J. Li, “Hydrothermal conversion of Cs-polluted soil into pollucite for Cs immobilization,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 336, pp. 503–509, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. S. Kaneko, Y. Tokuda, Y. Takahashi, H. Masai, and Y. Ueda, “Structural analysis of mixed alkali borosilicate glasses containing Cs+ and Na+ using strong magnetic field magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance,” Journal of Asian Ceramic Societies, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. P. Tumurugoti, S. K. Sundaram, and S. T. Misture, “Cesium immobilization in (Ba, Cr)-hollandites: effects on structure,” Journal of Solid State Chemistry, vol. 258, pp. 72–78, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. X. J. Wang, H. Y. Xiao, X. T. Zu, and W. J. Weber, “A DFT+U study of cerium solubility in La2Zr2O7,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 424, no. 1–3, pp. 69–74, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. R. E. Williford and W. J. Weber, “Computer simulation of Pu3+ and Pu4+ substitutions in gadolinium zirconate,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 299, no. 2, pp. 140–147, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. Y. Yang, X. Wang, S. Luo, X. Yang, and J. Ma, “Stability studies of [CsxBay][(Al3+, Ti3+)2y+xTi4+8-2yx]O16 ceramics for radioactive caesium immobilization,” Ceramics International, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 7865–7870, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. X. Jiali, Z. Kuibao, H. Zongsheng et al., “Rapid disposal of simulated Ce-bearing radioactive soil waste using self-propagating synthesized zirconolite-rich waste matrice,” Ceramics International, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 14534–14540, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. N. K. Kulkarni, S. Sampath, and V. Venugopal, “Preparation and characterisation of Pu-pyrochlore: [La1−xPux]2 Zr2O7 (x = 0-1),” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 281, no. 2-3, pp. 248–250, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. Meng, X. Ding, J. Zhao, W. Li, C. Ren, and H. Yang, “Preparation and characterization of cerium-gadolinium monazites as ceramics for the conditioning of minor actinides,” Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 89, pp. 1–6, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Y. Yang, X. Yang, X. Wang, S. Luo, J. Ma, and Y. Huang, “Chemical evolution effects on phase and microstructure of [CsxBay][Ti3+2y+xTi4+8-2y-x]O16 ceramic waste forms for radioactive cesium immobilization,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 517, pp. 57–62, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. W. Gashier, T. Miura, K. Hashimoto, R. J. Hand, and H. Kinoshita, “Leaching behaviour of cementitious nuclear wasteforms containing caesium and strontium,” Advances in Applied Ceramics, vol. 113, no. 8, pp. 447–452, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. J. Li, Z. Gang, and J. Wang, “Solidification of low-level-radioactive resins in ASC-zeolite blends,” Nuclear Engineering & Design, vol. 235, no. 7, pp. 817–820, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. Chen, X. Shu, F. Luo et al., “Rapid vitrification of simulated Sr2+ radioactive contaminated soil for nuclear emergencies,” Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, vol. 319, no. 1, pp. 115–121, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. Y. Koma, A. Shibata, and T. Ashida, “Radioactive contamination of several materials following the fukushima daiichi nuclear power station accident,” Nuclear Materials and Energy, vol. 10, pp. 35–41, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. S. Nakayama and K. Itoh, “Immobilization of strontium by crystalline zirconium phosphate,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 1047–1052, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. J. A. Peterson, J. V. Crum, B. J. Riley, R. M. Asmussen, and J. J. Neeway, “Synthesis and characterization of oxyapatite [Ca2Nd8(SiO4)6O2] and mixed-alkaline-earth powellite [(Ca, Sr, Ba)MoO4] for a glass-ceramic waste form,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 510, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. G. Mesko, D. E. Day, and B. C. Bunker, “Immobilization of CsCl and SrF2 in iron phosphate glass,” Waste Management, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 271–278, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M. U. Hassan and H. J. Ryu, “Cold sintering and durability of iodate-substituted calcium hydroxyapatite (IO-HAp) for the immobilization of radioiodine,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 514, pp. 84–89, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. S. Venkatesan, M. U. Hassan, and H. J. Ryu, “Adsorption and immobilization of radioactive ionic-corrosion-products using magnetic hydroxyapatite and cold-sintering for nuclear waste management applications,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 514, pp. 40–49, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. B. E. Burakov and E. B. Anderson, “Durability of actinide ceramic waste forms under conditions of granitoid rocks,” Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports, Tucson, AZ, USA, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  38. D. Li, I. D. Kaplan, K. A. Price et al., “Iodine immobilization by silver-impregnated granular activated carbon in cementitious systems,” Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, vol. 208-209, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. S. Chong, J. A. Peterson, B. J. Riley et al., “Glass-bonded iodosodalite waste form for immobilization of 129I,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 504, pp. 109–121, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. M. Chrysochoou and D. Dermatas, “Evaluation of ettringite and hydrocalumite formation for heavy metal immobilization: literature review and experimental study,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 20–33, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. R. B. Perkins and C. D. Palmer, “Solubility of chromate hydrocalumite (3CaO·Al2O3·CaCrO4·nH2O) 5–75°C,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 983–992, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. S. M. Park and J. G. Jang, “Carbonation-induced weathering effect on cesium retention of cement paste,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 505, pp. 159–164, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. A. Guerrero, S. Goñi, M. P. Lorenzo, and J. A. Ibañez, “Development of new cement based matrices for safe disposal of hazardous metals: cadmium and caesium,” Advances in Applied Ceramics, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 190–196, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. W. J. Weber, A. Navrotsky, S. Stefanovsky, E. R. Vance, and E. Vernaz, “Materials science of high-level nuclear waste immobilization,” MRS Bulletin, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 46–53, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. Y. Zhang, E. R. Vance, and T. McLeod, “Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy of Np and Pu in zirconia and pyrochlore-structured Y2Ti2O7,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 420, no. 1–3, pp. 278–281, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. J. Lian, M. Wangl, G. Hairer, B. Heleank, and C. Ewingr, “Ion beam irradiation in La2Zr2O7–Ce2Zr2O7 pyrochlore,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 218, pp. 236–243, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. J. Baudin, C. Adam, and J. Garnier-Laplace, “Dietary uptake, retention and tissue distribution of 54Mn, 60Co and 137Cs in the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mikiss Walbaum),” Water Research, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 2869–2878, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. G. Montagna, R. Arletti, G. Vezzalini, and F. Di Renzo, “Borosilicate and aluminosilicate pollucite nanocrystals for the storage of radionuclides,” Powder Technology, vol. 208, no. 2, pp. 491–495, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. T. A. Bayoumi, “Bioaccumulation of 137Cs and 60Co from radioactive waste streams using Veronica anagallis-aquatica,” BioTechnology: An Indian Journal, vol. 6, pp. 282–288, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  50. S. Imoto, “Chemical state of fission products in irradiated UO2,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 19–27, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. H. Kleykamp, “The chemical state of the fission products in oxide fuels,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 131, no. 2-3, pp. 221–246, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. E. H. P. Cordfunke and R. J. M. Konings, “Chemical interactions in water-cooled nuclear fuel: a thermochemical approach,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 152, no. 2-3, pp. 301–309, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. M. K. Jeon, J. M. Shin, J. J. Park, and G. I. Park, “Simulation of Cs behavior during the high temperature voloxidation process using the HSC chemistry code,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 430, no. 1–3, pp. 37–43, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. J. Jokiniemi, “The growth of hygroscopic particles during severe core melt accidents,” Nuclear Technology, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 16–23, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. J. Yang, J. J. Ma, S. H. Ma, and X. Q. Dai, “Theoretical study of direct versus oxygen-assisted water dissociation on Co(0 0 0 1) surface,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 681, pp. 29–35, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. S. Komarneni and D. M. Roy, “Mechanisms of immobilization of nuclear waste elements by cement minerals, cement and mortar,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 11, no. 5-6, pp. 789–794, 1981. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. H. M. Saleh and S. B. Eskander, “Impact of water flooding on hard cement-recycled polystyrene composite immobilizing radioactive sulfate waste simulate,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 222, pp. 522–530, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. A. Guerrero and S. Goñi, “Efficiency of a blast furnace slag cement for immobilizing simulated borate radioactive liquid waste,” Waste Management, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 831–836, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. L. K. Pan, B. D. Chang, and D. S. Chou, “Optimization for solidification of low-level-radioactive resin using Taguchi analysis,” Waste Management, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 767–772, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. X. Shen and L. Yang, “Study on the immobilization of simulated high-level radioactive waste by alkali-activated slag cement,” Chinese Journal of Nuclear Science & Engineering, vol. 12, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  61. T. Singh and K. Pant, “Solidification/stabilization of arsenic containing solid wastes using portland cement, fly ash and polymeric materials,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 131, no. 1–3, pp. 29–36, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. J. G. Jang, S. M. Park, and H. K. Lee, “Physical barrier effect of geopolymeric waste form on diffusivity of cesium and strontium,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 318, pp. 339–346, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. K. Yanagisawa, N. Yamasaki, N. Kozai, and S. Muraoka, “Leachability of waste form containing cesium produced by hydrothermal hot-pressing,” Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 1072–1074, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. Y. Yokomori and S. Idaka, “The crystal structure of analcime,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 21, no. 4–6, pp. 365–370, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. S. A. Gallagher and G. J. McCarthy, “High temperature thermal stability of CsAlSiO4 and CsAlSi2O6,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 89–94, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. H. Mimura, M. Shibata, and K. Akiba, “Hydrothermal reactions of zeolites loaded with cesium or strontium,” Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 167–173, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. Y. Yokomori, K. Asazuki, N. Kamiya et al., “Final storage of radioactive cesium by pollucite hydrothermal synthesis,” Scientific Reports, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 4195, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. G. D. Gatta, N. Rotiroti, T. Boffa Ballaran, C. Sanchez-Valle, and A. Pavese, “Elastic behavior and phase stability of pollucite, a potential host for nuclear waste,” American Mineralogist, vol. 94, no. 8-9, pp. 1137–1143, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. P. Bosch, D. Caputo, B. Liguori, and C. Colella, “Safe trapping of Cs in heat-treated zeolite matrices,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 324, no. 2-3, pp. 183–188, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. J. Fan, Z. Jing, Y. Zhang, J. Miao, Y. Chen, and F. Jin, “Mild hydrothermal synthesis of pollucite from soil for immobilization of Cs in situ and its characterization,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 304, pp. 344–350, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. J. Im, D. Seoung, S. Y. Lee et al., “Pressure-Induced metathesis reaction to sequester Cs,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 513–519, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. C. M. Jantzen and N. E. Bibler, “The Product Consistency Test (ASTM C1285) for Waste Form Durability Testing,” , John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  73. T. A. Vereshchagina, E. A. Kutikhina, C. Y. Yu et al., “One-step immobilization of cesium and strontium from alkaline solutions via a facile hydrothermal route,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 510, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. Z. Jing, K. Cai, Y. Li et al., “Hydrothermal synthesis of pollucite, analcime and their solid solutions and analysis of their properties,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 488, pp. 63–69, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. S. Gin, A. Abdelouas, L. J. Criscenti et al., “An international initiative on long-term behavior of high-level nuclear waste glass,” Materials Today, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 243–248, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. C. M. Jantzen, D. I. Kaplan, N. E. Bibler, D. K. Peeler, and M. John Plodinec, “Performance of a buried radioactive high level waste (HLW) glass after 24 years,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 378, no. 3, pp. 244–256, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. W. Sohn, T. Shoji, H. Kaneda, and T. Ishii, “Implications of analcime hydrothermally formed from Na-alumino-borosilicate glasses containing Cs and Sr for the stability of high-level radioactive waste form,” Resource Geology, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 51–59, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. D. Savage, J. E. Robbins, and R. J. Merriman, “Hydrothermal crystallization of a radioactive waste storage glass,” Mineralogical Magazine, vol. 49, no. 351, pp. 195–201, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. A. Kidari, J.-L. Dussossoy, E. Brackx, D. Caurant, M. Magnin, and I. Bardez-Giboire, “Lanthanum and neodymium solubility in simplified SiO2-B2O3-Na2O-Al2O3-CaO high level waste glass,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 95, no. 8, pp. 2537–2544, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. L. Li, D. M. Strachan, H. Li, L. L. Davis, and M. Qian, “Crystallization of gadolinium- and lanthanum-containing phases from sodium alumino-borosilicate glasses,” Journal of Non-crystalline Solids, vol. 272, no. 1, pp. 46–56, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. A. Mabrouk, D. De Sousa Meneses, N. Pellerin et al., “Effects of boron on structure of lanthanum and sodium aluminoborosilicate glasses studied by X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy and infrared spectrometry,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 503-504, pp. 69–77, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. D. Caurant, O. Majerus, P. Loiseau, I. Bardez, N. Baffier, and J. L. Dussossoy, “Crystallization of neodymium-rich phases in silicate glasses developed for nuclear waste immobilization,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 354, no. 1–3, pp. 143–162, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. F. Berkemeier, S. Voss, Á. W. Imre, and H. Mehrer, “Molar volume, glass-transition temperature, and ionic conductivity of Na- and Rb-borate glasses in comparison with mixed Na-Rb borate glasses,” Journal of Non-crystalline Solids, vol. 351, no. 52–54, pp. 3816–3825, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. M. Subhadra and P. Kistaiah, “Infrared and Raman spectroscopic studies of alkali bismuth borate glasses: evidence of mixed alkali effect,” Vibrational Spectroscopy, vol. 62, pp. 23–27, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. C. P. E. Varsamis, E. I. Kamitsos, and A. Vegiri, “Molecular dynamics investigation of mixed-alkali borate glasses: short-range order structure and alkali-ion environments,” Physical Review B, vol. 80, no. 18, Article ID 184202, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. T. Minami, Y. Tokuda, H. Masai et al., “Structural analysis of alkali cations in mixed alkali silicate glasses by 23Na and 133Cs MAS NMR,” Journal of Asian Ceramic Societies, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 333–338, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. Y. Tokuda, Y. Takahashi, H. Masai et al., “Local structure of alkalis in mixed-alkali borate glass to elucidate the origin of mixed-alkali effect,” Journal of Asian Ceramic Societies, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 412–416, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. J. Amoroso, J. Marra, S. D. Conradson, M. Tang, and K. Brinkman, “Melt processed single phase hollandite waste forms for nuclear waste immobilization: Ba1.0Cs0.3A2.3Ti5.7O16; A=Cr, Fe, Al,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 584, pp. 590–599, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. H. Yang, M. Fu, B. Wu, Y. Zhang, R. Ma, and J. Qian, “Effect of Fe2O3 on the immobilization of high-level waste with magnesium potassium phosphate ceramic,” Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2019, Article ID 4936379, 10 pages, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. S. E. Kesson and T. J. White, “Radius ratio tolerance factors and the stability of hollandites,” Journal of Solid State Chemistry, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 122–125, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. M. Qian, Q. Cheng, and C. Ge, “Dynamic behavior of gas bubble in single bubble sonoluminescence—vibrator model,” Shengxue Xuebao/Acta Acustica, vol. 27, pp. 289–294, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  92. B. Walkley, X. Ke, O. H. Hussein, S. A. Bernal, and J. L. Provis, “Incorporation of strontium and calcium in geopolymer gels,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 382, Article ID 121015, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. A. Kirishima, T. Sasaki, and N. Sato, “Solution chemistry study of radioactive Sr on Fukushima daiichi NPS site,” Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 152–161, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. D. K. Bhattacharyya and N. C. Dutta, “A study of the immobilization of strontium over crystalline titania,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 2248–2250, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. X. Ke, S. A. Bernal, T. Sato, and J. L. Provis, “Alkali aluminosilicate geopolymers as binders to encapsulate strontium-selective titanate ion-exchangers,” Dalton Transactions, vol. 48, no. 32, pp. 12116–12126, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. D. Bregiroux, R. Belin, P. Valenza, F. Audubert, and D. Bernache-Assollant, “Plutonium and americium monazite materials: solid state synthesis and X-ray diffraction study,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 366, no. 1-2, pp. 52–57, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. S. Handley-Sidhu, T. K. Mullan, Q. Grail, M. Albadarneh, T. Ohnuki, and L. E. Macaskie, “Influence of pH, competing ions and salinity on the sorption of strontium and cobalt onto biogenic hydroxyapatite,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, Article ID 23361, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. B. J. Riley, J. D. Vienna, D. M. Strachan, J. S. Mccloy, and J. L. Jerden, “Materials and processes for the effective capture and immobilization of radioiodine: a review,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 470, pp. 307–326, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. Y. Arinicheva, A. Bukaemskiy, S. Neumeier, G. Modolo, and D. Bosbach, “Studies on thermal and mechanical properties of monazite-type ceramics for the conditioning of minor actinides,” Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 72, pp. 144–148, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. D. Bregiroux, O. Terra, F. Audubert et al., “Solid-state synthesis of monazite-type compounds containing tetravalent elements,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 46, no. 24, pp. 10372–10382, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. O. Terra, N. Dacheux, F. Audubert, and R. Podor, “Immobilization of tetravalent actinides in phosphate ceramics,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 352, no. 1–3, pp. 224–232, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. P. M. Kowalski, G. Beridze, V. L. Vinograd, and D. Bosbach, “Heat capacities of lanthanide and actinide monazite-type ceramics,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 464, pp. 147–154, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. H. Y. Xiao, M. Jiang, F. A. Zhao, Z. J. Liu, and X. T. Zu, “Thermal and mechanical stability, electronic structure and energetic properties of Pu-containing pyrochlores: La2-Pu Zr2O7 and La2Zr2-Pu O7 (0 ≤ y ≤ 2),” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 466, pp. 162–171, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. H. S. Kim, C. Y. Joung, B. H. Lee, J. Y. Oh, Y. H. Koo, and P. Heimgartner, “Applicability of CeO2 as a surrogate for PuO2 in a MOX fuel development,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 378, no. 1, pp. 98–104, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. S. S. Shoup, C. E. Bamberger, J. L. Tyree, and L. M. Anovitz, “Lanthanide-containing zirconotitanate solid solutions,” Journal of Solid State Chemistry, vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 231–239, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. S. J. Patwe and A. K. Tyagi, “Solubility of Ce4+ and Sr2+ in the pyrochlore lattice of Gd2Zr2O7 for simulation of Pu and alkaline earth metal,” Ceramics International, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 545–548, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. C. C. Lin, “A review of corrosion product transport and radiation field buildup in boiling water reactors,” Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 207–224, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. I. Smičiklas, S. Dimović, I. Plećaš, and M. Mitrić, “Removal of Co2+ from aqueous solutions by hydroxyapatite,” Water Research, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 2267–2274, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. N. Gupta, A. K. Kushwaha, and M. C. Chattopadhyaya, “Adsorptive removal of Pb2+, Co2+ and Ni2+ by hydroxyapatite/chitosan composite from aqueous solution,” Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, vol. 43, pp. 125–131, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. I. W. Donald, B. L. Metcalfe, and R. N. J. Taylor, “The immobilization of high level radioactive wastes using ceramics and glasses,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 32, no. 22, pp. 5851–5887, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. E. Champion, “Sintering of calcium phosphate bioceramics,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 5855–5875, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  112. G. Muralithran and S. Ramesh, “The effects of sintering temperature on the properties of hydroxyapatite,” Ceramics International, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 221–230, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. A. Karimzadeh, M. R. Ayatollahi, A. R. Bushroa, and M. K. Herliansyah, “Effect of sintering temperature on mechanical and tribological properties of hydroxyapatite measured by nanoindentation and nanoscratch experiments,” Ceramics International, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 9159–9164, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  114. A. Coulon, D. Laurencin, A. Grandjean et al., “Key parameters for spark plasma sintering of wet-precipitated iodate-substituted hydroxyapatite,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 2009–2016, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. D. Laurencin, D. Vantelon, V. Briois et al., “Investigation of the local environment of iodate in hydroxyapatite by combination of X-ray absorption spectroscopy and DFT modeling,” RSC Advances, vol. 4, no. 28, pp. 14700–14707, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  116. Q. Sun, J. Li, and J. Wang, “Solidification of borate radioactive resins using sulfoaluminate cement blending with zeolite,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 241, no. 12, pp. 5308–5315, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Jingwei Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views426
Downloads353
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.