Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations

Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations / 2021 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 5541047 |

Xuelong Fu, Zhengbo Ji, Wei Lin, Yunfeng Yu, Tao Wu, "The Advancement of Neutron Shielding Materials for the Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel", Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2021, Article ID 5541047, 13 pages, 2021.

The Advancement of Neutron Shielding Materials for the Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel

Academic Editor: Alexander Zulauf
Received10 Jan 2021
Accepted01 May 2021
Published07 May 2021


With the development of nuclear industry, spent nuclear fuel (SNF) generated from nuclear power plants arouses people’s attention as a result of its high radioactivity, and how to guarantee the reliable operation of nuclear facilities and the staff’s safety occupies a crucial position. To avoid the lethal irradiation, a lot of functional neutron shielding composites have been developed to transform fast neutrons into thermal neutrons which can be absorbed with high macroscopic cross-sectional elements. Irradiation characteristics of nuclear industry have promoted the advancement of neutron shielding materials. Here, we review the latest neutron shielding materials for the storage of spent nuclear fuel containing additives such as boron carbide (B4C), boron nitride (BN), boric acid (H3BO3), and colemanite. Different types of neutron shielding materials, including metal matrix alloys, polymer composites, high density concrete, heavy metals, paraffin, and other neutron shielding composites with high macroscopic cross-sectional elements, arediscussed. The elemental composition, density, and thermal and mechanical properties of neutron shielding materials are also summarized and compared.

1. Introduction

Traditional coal-based energy structure has caused environmental pollution and ecological destruction, while the energy and environmental problems have become the greatest social and economic constraints of sustainable development [1]. More attention has been paid to clean energy, such as nuclear energy, which embodies huge amount of energy. Although nuclear power could not yield greenhouse gas emissions after taking the environmental protection into consideration, it creates its own waste-spent nuclear fuel with high level radioactivity and generates the particle emissions or high-energy electromagnetic waves. About 437 nuclear power units are in operation around the world, with total installed capacity of 377 gigawatts. These nuclear power plants have generated 3.5 million tons of radioactive wastes, yet still engendering 10,000 tons annually. Normally, spent nuclear fuel contains different radioactive isotopes, and the half-lives of these radioactive isotopes can last for tens of thousands of years, as shown in Figure 1. Moreover, nuclear waste can generate alpha, beta, gamma, proton, and second gamma particle emissions, accompanied by a lot of neutron emissions [2]. Therefore, it is imperative to promote the research and development of neutron shielding materials to ensure the reliable operation and sustainable development of nuclear industry.

Spent nuclear fuel reprocessing includes once-through fuel cycle and recycling treatment, and it always involves the issue of spent fuel storage, regardless of what kind of posttreatment is used. According to the time schedule, storage mode of the SNF can be classified into wet pool storage, dry cask storage, and geological storage. In most cases, the SNF should be firstly stored in the wet pools for 3–5 years, to take the heat generated by nuclear fuel away and attenuate fast neutrons. While dry cask storage is a safer storage mode, it can transfer radioactive waste from wet pools to on-site dry casks directly. These casks always use passive air cooling and do not need other system to back it up. Dry cask storage mode can last for decades owing to its superiority. It presents a certain amount of physical and chemical changes occurring in the process of dry cask storage, including irradiation damage and He build-up and migration owing to radioactive substances in the spent nuclear fuel [4]. Normally, neutrons can easily penetrate through a majority of materials and interact with the nuclei of the atom, because neutrons have no electrical charge and can lead to emission of nuclear energy via nuclear fission. This energy can be in ranges and cause lethal damage to human beings and environments. As a result, it must be shielded immediately with the support of neutron shielding materials.

Usually, neutron shielding materials are composed of metals, nonmetals, composite materials, polymer composites, or compounds. Neutron shielding substances always have high macroscopic neutron absorbing cross section, such as boron (B), cadmium (Cd), silver (Ag), indium (In), hafnium (Hf), europium (Eu), gadolinium (Gd), and dysprosium (Dy). Radiation shielding materials and their developments have become the focus of research in order to meet the challenges arising from the requirements of nontoxic, low density, and excellent physical properties. The main objective of this work is to provide the research basis for radiation shielding materials and pave the way for the research directions and application prospect of neutron shielding materials.

2. Neutron Shielding Mechanism

The electrically neutral neutrons with strong penetration capabilities are mainly produced by nuclear fission and cannot be easily affected by electrostatic force. According to the energy level, they are usually divided into thermal neutrons (0.025 eV), slow neutrons (1 keV–0.025 eV), moderate-energy neutrons (100 keV–1 keV), fast neutrons (100 keV–10 MeV), and high-energy neutrons (energy higher than 10 MeV). Normally, neutron shielding materials, acting as neutron moderators and neutron absorbers, can alleviate the fast neutrons and absorb the thermal neutrons, as a result lowering the neutron transmission ratio and ensuring the radiation dosage within the safety threshold value. Figure 2 presents the schematic illustration of neutron absorbing mechanism. Neutron shielding materials need to have the effect of neutron shielding performance and neutron irradiation resistance [5]. The main concern of neutron shielding materials concentrates on the planning and designing of component composition, including the heavy elements interacting with fast neutrons via inelastic scattering, light elements acting as a moderator reacting with thermal neutrons via elastic scattering, and boron elements with a high neutron absorption cross section, to attain the purpose of neutron shielding via the synergistic reaction of these substances.

On the other hand, radiation resistance of neutron shielding materials is determined by the relative density, microstructure, vacancies, and interstitial defects inside [6]. Usually, neutron irradiation damage generates the vacancies and interstitial atoms, and the interstitial atoms move quickly to the surface of materials, resulting in volume swelling and causing the appearance of vacancies. In addition, these defects are inclined to aggregate and bring greater resistance to dislocation movement, causing the hardening and embrittlement of neutron shielding materials. He built-up bubbles are generated at grain boundaries or their vicinity in the material. The movement of interstitial defects generated by neutron irradiation causes the swelling of neutron shielding materials and the interface structure evolution of interstitial defects in a nanostructured material, as shown in Figure 3. Moreover, researchers pay attention to simulation analysis as a complement to experiments to explore the behavior of materials at atomic level.

3. Materials and Properties

Neutron absorbers are used to control the criticality of spent nuclear fuel storage systems, including borated stainless steel, B4C/Al composite, amorphous alloys, and B/Al alloy. Neutron shielding materials contain polymer-based composites, high density concrete, heavy metals, paraffin, and other neutron shielding materials with additives, such as hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN), boron carbide (B4C), boric acid, colemanite, cadmium (Cd), gadolinium (Gd), and samarium oxide (Sm2O3) fillers. The shielding materials present the good neutron shielding performance efficiently, and the neutrons can be effectively shielded via elastic and inelastic scattering.

3.1. Neutron Absorbers
3.1.1. Borated Stainless Steel

Borated stainless steels contain a certain amount of natural or enriched boron (0.20 to 2.25 wt%). Because boron (B) is recognized as an effective thermal neutron shielding element, borated stainless steels with limited fraction of boron element have been broadly applied in the nuclear engineering field for decades [8]. High boron-containing steel, especially borated stainless steel with boron content ranging from 1% to 2%, is one of the largest consumed radiation protection material. It has excellent fast neutron moderating properties, thermal neutron absorption properties, gamma ray shielding performance, combined with excellent physical properties. Nevertheless, excessive addition of boron will cause the formation of fragile phase (Fe,Cr)2B, resulting in much lower thermal ductility and increasing the difficulty of the preparation of borated stainless steel, owing to the low solubility limits of boron in the borated stainless steel. On the other hand, excessive addition of boron element causes the degradation of corrosion resistance associated with boride formation [9] and decreases the mechanical properties such as thermal ductility, plasticity, toughness, and machinability. It is necessary to consider the microstructure, mechanical properties, and neutron shielding performance of borated stainless steel [10] and the effects of secondary irradiation on the neutron transmission ratio, causing variations in the internal structure of stainless steels [11]. Figure 4 illustrates the relationship between effective multiplication factor (Keff) and boron content and schematic representation of the microstructure based on the MCNP simulation. Furthermore, thermal stability and microstructure variations of borated stainless steel have been evaluated, such as aging effects on the mechanical properties of stainless steel, differential thermal analysis, and low speed impact measurements [12]. Besides, the effects of aging at various temperatures on the variation of grain size are also examined. The formability and weldability of borated stainless steel are also probed to improve the ductility of welded joint, in order to broaden the usage of borated stainless steel in the field of nuclear engineering [13]. The main concern is how to improve or eliminate the network structure so as to obtain the uniform distribution of boride layer and promote the high wear resistance of boron-containing materials, which is also the main concern of high borated stainless steel investigation. Further studies on helium formation and its formation mechanism under irradiation conditions are still ongoing.

3.1.2. B4C/Al Composite

B4C/Al composite, composed of uniform distribution of B4C particles in the aluminum matrix, is one of the most widely investigated materials in the engineering field [14]. The microstructure, mechanical properties, and neutron attenuation performance of B4C/Al composite reinforced with micro-/nanoparticles are widely studied, and its preparation methodologies include vacuum hot pressing followed by hot rolling [15], mechanical alloying method followed by hot press molding [16] or spark plasma sintering (SPS) [17], and stir casting technique followed by cold extrusion [18]. The effects of B4C content on the microstructure and mechanical properties of B4C/Al composite are systematically investigated. However, severe interfacial reaction between Al and B4C particles occurs at the interface, and the byproducts presented are inclined to aggregate, resulting in the nonuniform distribution of boron and the deterioration of mechanical properties of composite materials, as presented in Figure 5. Normally, it is necessary to add a certain amount of titanium (Ti) in the metal smelting process to reduce the degree of interfacial reaction. In order to decrease the secondary gamma ray irradiation, a novel neutron shielding B4C/Al composite containing gadolinium (Gd) ((15% B4C + 1% Gd)/Al) prepared by vacuum hot pressing has been developed [19]. Macroscopic transmission cross section (Σ) of (15% B4C + 1% Gd)/Al composite is as high as 21.3 cm−1, and the addition of Gd can replace a part of B4C content in the composite, which can increase the plasticity of the composite and maintain the neutron shielding performance simultaneously.

3.1.3. Carbon Nanotubes (CNTs)

Some other studies concern the effects of carbon nanotube (CNT) on the mechanical and neutron irradiation performance of aluminum matrix composite, owing to the excellent irradiation resistance of CNT. The relative mechanical and thermal properties of B4C/CNT composites via hot molding process are experimentally investigated while aluminum is used as an additive [20], and the effects of CNT content on the thermal and mechanical properties of B4C/CNT composites are also evaluated with the duration of neutron irradiation damage. Furthermore, the dispersion of CNTs in aluminum is probed to improve their radiation resistance [21]. The tensile properties of 0.5 wt% Al/CNT composite are improved while tensile ductility of the materials is not seriously affected after radiation, decreasing the volume fraction of void/pore at high displacements per atom (DPA). Irradiation damage can generate the accumulated outgas of helium and other fission gases and provide the guidance for gas accumulation problem. Figure 6 presents the schematic illustration of shape changes on CNT, recombination, and helium outgas. Under the ion irradiation, the disintegration of CNT and formation of aluminum carbide from high-energy ion, and restructuring to helical CNT structure from low energy ion are indicated. Figure 7 exhibits the fabrication process and the microstructure and mechanical properties of Al/CNT composites, and the testing results prove that the dispersion of CNTs in grain improves the tensile strength without sacrificing the ductility.

Additionally, helium behavior, bubble formation, and its evolution in the process of neutron irradiated that B4C/Al composite is deeply investigated [22], and the results reveal that helium bubbles in Al matrix are so much larger when compared with B4C reinforcements after the irradiation of helium ion with the intensity of 1.5 × 1017 ions/cm2; besides, bubbles generated at the interface or nearby are oriented. With the irradiation of proton, the bubble zone appears along the matrix grain boundary. The microstructure evolution of 15 wt% B4C/Al composites prepared by liquid-stirring process is also probed [23]. Figure 8 presents the neutron transmission of B4C/Al composite with different B4C fraction, and Cd plate with the thickness of 0.5 mm is taken for comparison.

3.1.4. Amorphous Alloys

Amorphous alloys, acting as thermal absorbing materials, have unique advantages over conventional carbon billets, including the stability of physical and chemical properties and homogeneous distribution of alloying elements, to ensure amorphous alloys with good corrosion resistance and neutron shielding performance [24, 25]. The amorphous alloys with high fraction of boron elements have been developed for reducing the irradiation dosage of spent nuclear fuel, and the neutron transmission ratio as well as corrosion resistance is also determined [26]. In addition, mechanical properties of amorphous alloys are investigated for practical SNF storage applications to guarantee the safety of nuclear facilities, especially in the storage of spent nuclear fuel with high radioactivity. Amorphous alloys as a thermal spraying coating can be sprayed on the spent nuclear fuel containers. These amorphous alloys have been made to undergo a series of corrosion resistance tests and long-term irradiation damage tests. Moreover, the performance of boron-containing amorphous ribbons Fe72−xB25−xMo3Crx (where x = 0, 5, 10, 15, or 20 at%) for nuclear engineering applications has been analyzed [27]. The testing results suggest that boron-containing amorphous ribbons with a certain amount of chromium present satisfying neutron shielding performance and good mechanical properties such as tensile properties and flexural properties. Furthermore, corrosion resistance of neutron shielding materials has high requirements to ensure enough lifetime for spent nuclear fuel storage facilities. Uniform protective layers with a certain amount of Cr elements can be successfully prepared, and the prepared amorphous alloys have good corrosion resistance, which can be attributed to the homogeneous distribution of Cr in the amorphous alloys [28, 29].

3.1.5. B/Al Alloy

To some degree, B/Al alloy is similar to borated stainless steel, owing to the low solubility of boron in aluminum. Only limited amounts of boron and aluminum react with each other, and the formation of rich borides around the grain boundary increases the brittleness of alloying material. If the neutron absorbing material with limited boron content is used in the spent fuel pool, the critical control of nuclear reaction cannot be guaranteed. Therefore, spent fuel storage materials are usually combined with 10B-enriched neutron to ensure a composite with high 10B areal density, avoiding the addition of excess boron and the serious deterioration of processing performance of material.

EaglePicher company develops two different neutron absorbing materials, 1100 aluminum alloy and 6351 aluminum alloy, with boron content ranging from 0.5% to 4.5% and 0.5% to 2.5%, respectively [30]. In order to prepare the ingots with a more uniform distribution of boron elements, titanium salt is added with a certain concentration. The B/Al alloy has good corrosion resistance in 80°C deionized water, while in the aqueous solution of boric acid, there is local pitting corrosion with the PH value ranging from 4.5 to 6.5. There is no obvious dimensional change or radiation damage with the neutron dose for dry storage vessel design life of B/Al alloy under the neutron irradiation (1 × 1017 nvt). Table 1 presents the advantages and disadvantages of neutron shielding metal alloy materials.

MaterialsBoron content (wt%)AdvantagesDisadvantages

Borated stainless steel0.20–2.25Irradiation resistance, corrosion resistance, high temperature resistanceLow boron solubility, highly enriched 10B
B4C/Al composite<25Low density, low porosity, good mechanical properties, corrosion resistanceVarious effects in the process of manufacturing
B4C/Al ceramics27.4–50.9Low density, high boron contentHigh porosity, poor structure performance, low corrosion resistance
B/Al alloy0.5–4.5Low density, high thermal conductivityLow mechanical performance, low boron solubility
Amorphous alloy<20Excellent neutron shielding efficiency, high corrosion resistanceDistribution of alloying elements, interfacial reaction

3.1.6. Neutron Absorbing Material Containing Cd and Gd Elements

Cadmium is a soft, malleable, ductile, bluish-white divalent metal, which is widely used in batteries, electroplating, sensors, pigments, and nuclear engineering. When cadmium elements are applied in the nuclear engineering, it is necessary to add a coating layer such as stainless steel owing to its poor strength, high toxicity, and low corrosion resistance. On the other hand, gadolinium (Gd) has two types of isotopes with high neutron absorption cross section, which is also an excellent neutron absorbing material. Such materials can be used as a kind of neutron absorbing materials for long-term spent fuel storage and have been used in Yucca Mountain spent fuel storage facilities. The mechanical properties, weld properties, corrosion resistance, and neutron absorption behavior of Gd alloys have been studied in Idaho National Laboratory. Nevertheless, the manufacturing of neutron absorbing materials is still in the laboratory stage.

Moreover, the materials containing lithium compounds have been developed as neutron absorbers [31, 32]. The reason lies in the fact that lithium nuclei absorb thermal neutrons via the nonradioactive 6Li(n,a)T reaction. An effective methodology for the preparation of high density LiF pellets, which is suitable for self-supporting neutron shielding function, has been developed [33].

3.2. Neutron Shielding Materials
3.2.1. Polymer-Based Composites

Polymer-based composites are the productive candidates for neutron attenuation as a result of the following reasons. First of all, polymer composites, containing high content of hydrogen elements, have the smallest atomic diameter and can transform fast neutrons into thermal neutrons effectively; second, they are lighter than metal matrix composites, and functional polymer composites can be used as structural materials when combined with micro- or nanoparticles, whiskers, fibers, and tubes. Polymer composites also have reasonable structural, mechanical properties, satisfying radiation shielding properties, etc. [34]. Usually, organic polymer, with high content of hydrogen being the best moderating material, has an obvious effect on the moderation of fast neutrons, and hydrogen atom with the smallest atomic diameter, contained in the polymer composite, is also a desirable case for thermal neutron shielding. To further enhance the neutron shielding performance, boron-containing neutron absorber is usually added to organic polymers. Organic polymers, mainly including high density polyethylene (HDPE) [35], epoxy resin (EP) [36], phenolic resin [37], polyimide resin (PI) [38], and EPDM [39], are commonly used in radiation shielding engineering in the polymer material, while boron-containing materials including B2O3, BN, B4C, and colemanite are always used as neutron absorbers. It is reported that 10B-containing materials such as boron carbide and boron nitride are excellent neutron absorbers, among which boron nitride is the only available engineering material. Boron nitride nanotubes (BNNTs) are currently very expensive, while boron nitride nanoparticles can be easily obtained from boron nitride powder by sonication centrifugation method. Furthermore, polymer materials enriched with low atomic number elements such as hydrogen proved to be appropriate candidates for neutron shielding.

After the addition of boron-containing materials, boron and hydrogen can capture the thermal neutrons with the emerging of secondary gamma rays and enhance thermal neutron absorption capacity. Polymer-based neutron shielding materials are usually prepared via high speed mixing, kneading, plasticizing, and laminating. The results show that polymer composites have good engineering properties and dimensional stability with satisfactory radiation resistance, which is suitable for engineering applications, with the temperature ranging from 80°C to 100°C. With the increase of irradiation dosage, the testing results demonstrate that the emission gases include H2, CO2, CO, and CH4, and the dimension of polymer composite and mass attenuation change significantly. When compared with metal alloy materials, organic polymer neutron absorbing material is more vulnerable to irradiation damage. Long-term irradiation generally reduces the molecular weight of polymer, lowering the softening temperature and increasing the material’s solubility to a certain extent.

As one of the most widely used polymers, high density polyethylene (HDPE) has been developed to be applied in the field of neutron shielding engineering, but the obvious drawback of HDPE is its low glass transfer temperature (90°C). Besides, the thermal neutron capture of hydrogen is accompanied by secondary gamma rays, which can be lethal to human beings. As a result, researchers develop the neutron shielding resin with high temperature resistance, for example, KRAFTON-HB4 (150°C) [40], containing boron elements to reduce the emission dosage of secondary gamma rays based on the epoxy resin, and EPONITE (200°C) [41]. Recently, boron-containing polymer as a new neutron shielding resin with the heatproof resistance of 300°C has been studied [42]. With the increase of boron areal density, neutron shielding performance can be enhanced with the improvement of the collision between thermal neutrons and neutron shielding polymers [43].

(1) B4C or BN/HDPE. High density polyethylene (HDPE) is a very effective neutron shielding thermoplastic polymer and displays excellent attenuation behavior owing to its high hydrogen content (14.4% by weight). It is also the most common polymer used in the neutron shielding engineering. The chemical composition of HDPE is presented in Table 2. Under the irradiation atmosphere, hydrogen elements contained in the HDPE can capture the thermal neutrons via 1H (n, γ)2H reaction, with thermal neutron absorbing cross section of 0.33 barn at room temperature. It is always accompanied by emitted γ-rays with the energy of 2.2 MeV. These γ-rays can affect the physical properties of polymer composite and degrade the mechanical properties of polymer composite at certain situations. On the other hand, fast neutrons can be attenuated when collided with hydrogen elements, and captured by boron elements added to HDPE via 10B(n,α)7Li reaction [44]. Meanwhile, it is reported that 10B-containing materials such as boron carbide (B4C) and boron nitride (BN) are excellent neutron absorbers by virtue of their huge thermal neutron absorbance [45]. Nevertheless, boron fillers used in these composites suffer from the lack of interfacial adhesion with the HDPE matrix, leading to a limited improvement or even decay of physical and radiation shielding properties of HDPE/BN or B4C composites [46]. Owing to the poor contact angle between particles and polymers, fillers should be functionalized firstly. Alkoxysilanes, as one of the most widely used materials, can activate the surface of fillers through hydroxyl group. Figure 9 illustrates the effects of (a) B4C and (b) silane untreated or treated boron nitride on the tensile strength and elastic modulus of HDPE matrix composite materials.

ResinPolyethyleneKRAFTON-HB4Eponite300°C resinDeveloped resin


Element (wt%)

On the other hand, a Sandwich type of B4C-based neutron shielding composites reinforced by carbon fiber has been developed [47]. The carbon fiber reinforced B4C-based neutron shielding composites enhanced not only thermal neutron shielding performance but also mechanical and thermal stability. This was attributed to the appropriate combination of the B4C with good radiation shielding property and the carbon fibers with good tensile strength and thermal conductivity. Moreover, the effects of particle size and content of B4C particles on the thermal neutron shielding performance of HDPE/B4C composite are also investigated based on the experimental and simulation studies [48]. It can be concluded that mean size of B4C particles and their distribution can influence the collision between thermal neutrons and neutron shielding composites, as a result affecting the neutron shielding performance.

Neutron shielding performance of polymer composites, composed of high density polyethylene with different amounts of modified boron carbide, increases with the volume fraction of B4C particles in the composite matrix. Nevertheless, the effects of boron carbide and thermal oxidative aging on mechanical properties and swelling of composites in different solvents are also studied in these composites [49].

(2) Epoxy Resin. Epoxy resin presents a variety of forms, accompanied by strong adhesion and high mechanical properties, and it exhibits good chemical stability after curing process. It is always combined with other reinforcements such as fibers, whiskers, and particles. The composite materials are prepared using various methods to form a complicated interplay between reinforcements and polymers, affecting the macroscopic and microscopic morphology, mechanical properties, and durability of polymer-based composite. In the system, macroscopic properties might be degraded depending on the interfacial adhesion between different materials. It has been reported that the mean size, aspect ratio, and content of the reinforcements are the crucial factors affecting the performance of polymer composites [50, 51]. Usually, polymer composites with low concentration of reinforcements exhibit high mechanical properties owing to the unanimous distribution of fillers, but when containing higher fraction of B4C particles, deposition and agglomeration in the polymer matrix can be observed, resulting in poor adhesion between B4C particles and epoxy resin and lowering the mechanical strength and durability. Consequently, silane coupling agents, combined with ultrasonic dispersion process, have been widely applied to improve the interfacial adhesion between epoxy polymer and fillers and enhance the relative durability. Relevant research illustrates that hydroxyl groups and B-O bonds can enhance the interfacial adhesion via the formation of covalent bonds and silane condensation. Uniform dispersion of B4C particles and good interfacial adhesion between epoxy resin and B4C particles can be observed under the assistance of ultrasonic dispersion technique [36], because unanimous dispersion of fillers in the polymer is crucial for achieving satisfying mechanical properties.

Meanwhile, functional epoxy-based composites with the mixture of B4C, Al(OH)3, and PbO fillers have been prepared using ultrasonic dispersion approach [52]. The results suggest that this dispersion approach guarantees the good wettability between reinforcements and epoxy resin and enhances the interfacial adhesion effectively. With the addition of different fillers to the epoxy resin, a synergistic effect can be created in different materials on condition of ultrasonic dispersion, as a result increasing the relative properties such as mechanical properties, flame retardancy, thermal degradation behavior, and neutron transmission ratio. Besides, molybdenum (Mo) powder is added to epoxy resin in order to enhance the neutron shielding performance of epoxy resin and find out the optimum epoxy-molybdenum ratio [53]. Neutron shielding performance of epoxy-based composites is investigated for the optimized epoxy/Mo composition ratio, when compared with other neutron shielding materials such as stainless steel, paraffin, B4C particles, and high density concrete. On the other hand, tensile strength of polymer composite using ultrasonic dispersion process is maintained when compared to the testing results of neat EP matrix, while the tensile strength decreases obviously for the composite untreated.

(3) Polyimide Resin. As one of the high performance polymers, polyimide (PI) resin is universally known as a result of its excellent thermal stability with temperature up to 400°C, high irradiation resistance, good chemical stability, adhesive bonding, and electrical insulation properties [54]. Moreover, tensile strength of PI resin without additives exceeds 100 MPa, and the tensile strength of PI film reached about 90% even after 5 × 107 Gy irradiation. A variety of neat polyimide or polyimide-based polymer composites have been developed, and majority of composites are put into use in the electronic or microelectronic component and aviation filed. Some works focus on the preparation of a flexible polyimide film with high electrical insulation and good thermal conductivity, which is composed of functionalized boron nitride (f-BN) and glycidyl methacrylate-grafted graphene (g-TrG) mixed with PI resin [55]. Hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) reinforced PI-based composite has also been prepared with the mixtures of alkoxysilane functionalized h-BN particles and polyamic acid through a variety of amidization and imidization procedures [56]. On the other hand, polyamide resin has been utilized to prepare the neutron shielding hybrid composite laminates with different configurations (5/4, 4/3, 3/2, 2/1) using hot molding process in atmospheric environments, consisting of stacking layers of neutron shielding composite, AA6061 aluminum plates, and carbon fiber reinforced PI composite [57]. The testing results illustrate that neutron shielding performance of hybrid composite laminates decreases obviously with the increasing of the configurations, owing to the enhancement of 10B areal density in the composite laminates. The effects of carbon fibers on the neutron shielding performance of composite laminates are also taken into consideration. The application prospect of polyimide resin is promising, and it can be used at elevated temperature owing to its high temperature. Some researchers have investigated heat resistant boron-loaded resin with temperature of 300°C for neutron shielding to satisfy the application requirement.

(4) Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer (EPDM). As one of the synthetic resins, EPDM rubber is a good candidate for neutron shielding engineering owing to its high hydrogen fraction. It has outstanding radiation stability after gamma irradiation with the dosage of 1.178 kGy, and it is a potential polymeric material as a matrix mixed with neutron absorber for neutron shielding function. Özdemir et al. [39] have prepared the EPDM rubber mixed with boric acid to take it as neutron moderator and absorber, and its vulcanization kinetics has also been probed so as to deeply understand the vulcanization behavior with the addition of boric acid. On the other hand, flexible EPDM rubber with boron trioxide is investigated, and its thermal, mechanical, and neutron shielding properties are also examined [58]. The testing results illustrate that flexible composite acting as an effective neutron shielding material has satisfied the requirements of advanced composite.

Moreover, some studies determine the neutron shielding behavior of EPDM rubber embedded with lead filler using Monte Carlo simulation [59] and probe the thermal and mechanical properties of electron beam irradiated HDPE/EPDM blends in the presence of triallyl cyanurate [60]. The effects of fillers content on the mechanical properties and neutron shielding performance are estimated, after considering the variation of energy by means of energy dissipation.

3.2.2. Concrete

Concrete is one of the most widely used materials to shield gamma ray and neutrons in nuclear installations, and it can be easily molded into complex shape with low cost for construction and maintenance. Concrete has good structure performance and is suitable for neutron and proton shielding when compared with other shielding substances [61]. Depending on the shielding requirement, various types of concrete with different densities and combinations are being used. Radiation attenuation in concrete mainly lies in the types of aggregate, water-cement ratio, elemental composition, and moisture content apart from the density of concrete. Moreover, operating temperature plays a vital role in deciding the neutron shielding properties as a result of the loss of water content and microcracking [62]. On the other hand, polymer concrete such as glass-polymer-concrete ternary hybrid composites, composed of ternary blended concrete with glass waste and polymer as reinforcement and binder, is studied [63], and the relative chemical, thermal, and mechanical properties are investigated. The compressive strength relating to ages increases up to the maximum value of 52.43 MPa at the ratio of 10% and 8% by mass of glass powder and polymer, respectively, while thermal conductivity for the optimum specimen is 0.73 W/m·K compared to the conventional one (1.2 W/m·K). Concrete with the addition of boron carbide as fine aggregates is prepared to test the attenuation properties by getting the attenuation coefficient of concrete/B4C [64]. It was indicated that attenuation coefficient of the specimen with 20 wt% of B4C is 0.299 cm−1, while that of the sample without B4C is 0.238 cm−1.

On the other hand, novel high density magnetite concrete with different configurations has been developed as an effective neutron shielding material [65], and neutron shielding performance of this low activation concrete is measured to ensure high density concrete with optimum shielding efficiency. When compared with ordinary concrete, high density magnetite concrete exhibits an obvious advantage, making it more competitive. In addition, WinXCom and NXcom programs are being used to investigate the gamma rays and neutrons shielding of twelve concrete samples with or without mineral additives, in order to reduce the difficulty and increase the efficiency [66]. The linear attenuation coefficients, total mass attenuation, half-value thicknesses, effective atomic numbers, and atomic cross-sections with different photon energies have been tested and calculated.

3.2.3. Heavy Metals

Neutron shielding efficiency of heavy metals is correlated with the types of radiation source and its energy level. Heavy metals such as lead oxide, bismuth, barium, and other high atomic number materials have been prepared to attenuate the lethal radiation rays. At present, various types of heavy metal oxide glasses, including bismuth borosilicate glasses [67], binary bismuth silicate glasses [68], and silicate and borated heavy metal oxide glasses [69], have been developed to replace the lead-based glasses with satisfying neutron shielding performance. Actually, high atomic number materials cannot block or absorb all types of radiations emitted from nuclear radiation sources, especially the emission radiation from nuclear laboratories. Usually, the radioactive shielding instruments made from lead oxide and composites of lead oxide/tungsten/tin for attenuation or absorption of undesired radiations are heavy and bulky, which is not consistent with the requirements of lightweight materials in the applications. With the development of nuclear engineering, the demand for novel shielding materials has increased to apply special radiation circumstances according to the radiation type.

3.2.4. Paraffin

As one of the early applicable materials, paraffin is widely used in the nuclear engineering owing to its high fraction of hydrogen elements, just like polyethylene or water to some degree. A paraffin layer wrapped around a radiation source can moderate the high-energy neutrons and transform fast neutrons into thermal neutrons. It is always combined with other substances enriched in neutron absorbing elements, such as paraffin-boric acid neutron shielding blocks [70]. The borated paraffin with low content of boric acid is less obvious for the absorbent of thermal neutrons, while the paraffin with high content cannot attenuate fast neutrons effectively. Neutron shielding performance of borated paraffin is evaluated using 241Am-Be neutron source and gamma ray transport calculations and compared with that of other applicable materials. The testing results illustrate that borated paraffin can moderate fast neutrons emitted from radiation source more effectively than other materials, as a result improving the collision probability with 10B nuclei and promoting the absorbent of thermal neutrons. On the other hand, a heavy shield for gamma ray detector has been conducted, and the neutron shielding performance is verified with neutron absorption experiments.

4. Conclusions

With the rapid advancement of nuclear power, storage of spent nuclear fuel and transportation safety have become unavoidable issues. To achieve high density storage of spent nuclear fuel, neutron absorbing materials have become more and more important. At present, the most challenging problem is to consider the disposal of spent nuclear fuel in geological repositories because the half-lives of spent nuclear fuel can last for hundreds of thousands of years. In the short term, the strong radiation beams are beta and gamma ray radiation, while the main radiation for radioactive substances is the natural decay of actinides, which is the most important source of radiation in the longer term. Meanwhile, the mobility of released radionuclides and long-term storage of spent nuclear fuel must be taken into consideration.

More and more requirements for neutron shielding materials have been proposed, including (1) low density and good physical properties, combined with high neutron moderation and thermal neutron absorption cross section; (2) sufficient structure property and intensity; and (3) preparation of different types of components suitable for the assembly. After considering the neutron shielding performance, bearing ability, and mechanical properties of neutron shielding materials at elevated temperature, they have great application potential in the field of nuclear reactors, accelerators, and neutron emitters, especially for the storage rack of spent nuclear fuel. This work can provide a theoretical basis for the optimization design and experimental preparation of novel neutron shielding materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents conflicts of interest in connection with the work submitted.


The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Fund of Qing Lan Project, Natural Science Foundation of Higher Education Institutions of Jiangsu Province (17KJB430006), and Foundation of Huaian Science and Technology Project (HAB201838, HAP202008, and HAB202069). Finally, the authors thank Dr. Feida Chen, from NUAA, for the help in the tests.


  1. S. Chu and A. Majumdar, “Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future,” Nature, vol. 488, no. 8, pp. 294–303, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. N. M. A. Mohamed, “Direct reuse of spent nuclear fuel,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 278, pp. 182–189, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Al Saadi and Y. Yi, “Dry storage of spent nuclear fuel in UAE-economic aspect,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 75, pp. 527–535, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. Bruno and R. C. Ewing, “Spent nuclear fuel,” Elements, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 343–349, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. M. Sukegawa, Y. Anayama, and K. Okuno, “Flexible heat resistant neutron shielding resin,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 417, pp. 850–853, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. G. Ackland, “Controlling radiation damage,” Science, vol. 327, no. 3, pp. 1587-1588, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. X. M. Bai, A. F. Voter, R. G. Hoagland et al., “Efficient annealing of radiation damage near grain boundaries via interstitial emission,” Science, vol. 327, no. 5973, pp. 1631–1634, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. D. A. Moreno, B. Molina, C. Ranninger, F. Montero, and J. Izquierdo, “Microstructural characterization and pitting corrosion behavior of UNS S30466 borated stainless steel,” Corrosion, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 573–583, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. D. V. Fix, J. C. Estill, L. L. Wong, and R. B. Rebak, “General and localized corrosion of austenitic and borated stainless steels in simulated concentrated ground waters,” in Proceedings of the ASME/JSME 2004 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, July 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  10. S. E. Soliman, D. L. Youchison, and T. A. Balliett, “Neutron effects on borated stainless steel,” Nuclear Technology, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 346–352, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. Bastürk, J. Arztmann, W. Jerlich et al., “Analysis of neutron attenuation in boron-alloyed stainless steel with neutron radiography and JEN-3 gauge,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 341, pp. 189–200, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. C. V. Robino and M. J. Cieslak, “High-temperature metallurgy of advanced borated stainless steels,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1673–1685, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. T. D. Park, K. K. Baek, and D. S. Kim, “PWHT effect on the mechanical properties of borated stainless steel GTA weldments for nuclear shield,” Metals and Materials, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 46–50, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. B. Wierschke, Evaluation of Aluminum-Boron Carbide Neutron Absorbing Materials for Interim Storage of Used Nuclear Fuel, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2015.
  15. H. S. Chen, W. X. Wang, Y. L. Li et al., “The design, microstructure and tensile properties of B4C particulate reinforced 6061Al neutron absorber composites,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 632, pp. 23–29, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. P. Zhang, Y. Li, and W. Wang, “The design, fabrication and properties of B4C/Al neutron absorbers,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 437, no. 1–3, pp. 350–358, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. H. S. Chen, W. X. Wan g, Y. L. Li et al., “The design, microstructure and mechanical properties of B4C/6061Al neutron absorber composites fabricated by SPS,” Materials and Design, vol. 94, pp. 360–367, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. B. Manjunatha, H. B. Niranjan, and K. G. Satyanarayan, “Effect of mechanical and thermal loading on boron carbide particles reinforced Al-6061 alloy,” Materials Science & Engineering A, vol. 632, pp. 147–155, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Z. G. Xu, L. T. Jiang, Q. Zhang, J. Qiao, D. Gong, and G. H. Wu, “The design of a novel neutron shielding B4C/Al composite containing Gd,” Materials and Design, vol. 111, pp. 375–381, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. T. Kobayashi, K. Yoshid, and T. Yano, “Microstructure, mechanical and thermal properties of B4C/CNT composites with Al additive,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 440, pp. 524–529, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. K. Pyo So, D. Chen, A. Kushim et al., “Dispersion of carbon nanotubes in aluminum improves radiation resistance,” Nano Energy, vol. 22, pp. 319–327, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. F. Zhang, X. Wang, J. B. Wierschke, and L. Wang, “Helium bubble evolution in ion irradiated Al/B4C metal matrix composite,” Scripta Materialia, vol. 109, pp. 28–33, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. J. Zheng, Q. Li, W. Liu et al., “Microstructure evolution of 15 wt.% boron carbide/aluminum composites during liquid-stirring process,” Journal of Composite Materials, pp. 1–10, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. Y. J. Kim, J. W. Jang, D. W. Lee, and S. Yi, “Porosity effects of a Fe-based amorphous/nanocrystals coating prepared by a commercial high velocity oxy-fuel process on cavitation erosion behaviors,” Metals and Materials International, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 673–677, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. B. T. Jang, S. S. Kim, and S. Yi, “Wear behaviors of a Fe-based amorphous alloy in ambient atmosphere and in distilled water,” Metals and Materials International, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 55–61, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. J. C. Farmer, J.-S. Choi, C.-K. Saw et al., “Corrosion resistance of amorphous Fe49.7Cr17.7Mn1.9 Mo7.4W1.6B15.2C3.8Si2.4 coating: a new criticality control material,” Journal of Nuclear Technology, vol. 161, no. 2, pp. 169–189, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J. Moon and S. Yi, “Mechanical properties and thermal neutron shielding efficiency of high B amorphous ribbons in the Fe-B-Mo-Cr system,” Metals and Materials International, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 825–830, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. S. L. Wang, H. X. Li, X. F. Zhang, and S. Yi, “Effects of Cr contents in Fe-based bulk metallic glasses on the glass forming ability and the corrosion resistance,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 113, no. 2-3, pp. 878–883, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. Pang, T. Zhang, K. Asami, and A. Inoue, “Effects of chromium on the glass formation and corrosion behavior of bulk glassy Fe-Cr-Mo-C-B alloys,” Materials Transactions, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 2137–2142, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. Electric Power Research Institute, Handbook of Neutron Absorber Materials for Spent Nuclear Fuel Transportation and Storage Applications, EPRI, Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
  31. D. W. Glasgow, D. E. Velkley, J. D. Brandenberger, M. T. McEllistrem, H. J. Hennecke, and D. V. Breitenbecher, “Shielding for fast neutron scattering experiments of high sensitivity,” Nuclear Instruments & Methods, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 521–534, 1974. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. S. Joly, J. Voignier, G. Grenier, D. M. Drake, and L. Nilsson, “Measurement of fast neutron capture cross sections using a NaI spectrometer,” Nuclear Instruments & Methods, vol. 153, no. 2-3, pp. 493–501, 1978. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. V. D. Svikis, “Dense lithium fluoride for gamma-ray-free neutron shielding,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 93–105, 1964. View at: Google Scholar
  34. S. Nambiar, T. John, and W. Yeow, “Polymer-composite materials for radiation protection,” Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 5717–5726, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. Kim, B.-C. Lee, Y. R. Uhm, and W. H. Miller, “Enhancement of thermal neutron attenuation of nano-B4C, -BN dispersed neutron shielding polymer nanocomposites,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 453, pp. 48–53, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. J. Jun, J. Kim, Y. Bae, and S. S. Young, “Enhancement of dispersion and adhesion of B4C particles in epoxy resin using direct ultrasonic excitation,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 416, pp. 293–297, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. L. Bian, J. Xiao, and J. Zeng, “Effects of thermal treatment on the mechanical properties of poly (p-phenylene benzobisoxazole) fiber reinforced phenolic resin composite materials,” Materials and Design, vol. 54, pp. 230–235, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. C. Kizilkaya, Y. Mülazim, M. V. Kahraman et al., “Synthesis and characterization of polyimide/hexagonal boron nitride composite,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 214, no. 1, pp. 706–712, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. T. Özdemir, I. K. Akbay, H. Uzun, and I. A. Reyhancan, “Neutron shielding of EPDM rubber with boric acid: mechanical, thermal properties and neutron absorption tests,” Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 89, pp. 102–109, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. K. Ueki, A. Ohashi, N. Nariyama et al., “Systematic evaluation of neutron shielding effects for materials,” Nuclear Science & Engineering, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 455–464, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. K. Okuno, “Neutron shielding material based on colemanite and epoxy resin,” Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol. 115, no. 1–4, pp. 258–261, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. A. Morioka, S. Sakurai, K. Okuno et al., “Development of 300°C heat resistant boron-loaded resin for neutron shielding,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 367, pp. 1085–1089, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  43. T. Korkut, A. Karabulut, G. Budak et al., “Investigation of neutron shielding properties depending on number of boron atoms for colemanite, ulexite and tincal ores by experiments and FLUKA Monte Carlo simulations,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 70, pp. 341–345, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. G. Samuel, Sourcebook on Atomic Energy, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 1967.
  45. Y. Huang, W. Zhang, L. Liang et al., “A “Sandwich” type of neutron shielding composite filled with boron carbide reinforced by carbon fiber,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 220, pp. 143–150, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. C. Harrison, S. Weaver, C. Bertelsen, E. Burgett, N. Hertel, and E. Grulke, “Polyethylene/boron nitride composites for space radiation shielding,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 109, pp. 2529–2538, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. Z. Soltani, A. Beigzadeh, F. Ziaie et al., “Effect of particle size and percentages of Boron carbide on the thermal neutron radiation shielding properties of HDPE/B4C composite: experimental and simulation studies,” Radiation Physics & Chemistry, pp. 182–187, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. T. Yasin and M. N. Khan, “High density polyethylene/boron carbide composites for neutron shielding,” e-Polymers, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 670–676, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. H. Chai, X. Tang, M. Ni et al., “Preparation and properties of flexible flame-retardant neutron shielding material based on methyl vinyl silicone rubber,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 464, pp. 210–215, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. A. C. Moloney, H. H. Kausch, T. Kaiser, and H. R. Beer, “Parameters determining the strength and toughness of particulate filled epoxide resins,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 381–393, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. S. Ahmed and F. R. Jones, “A review of particulate reinforcement theories for polymer composites,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 4933–4942, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. M. K. Lee, J. K. Lee, J. W. Kim, and G. J. Lee, “Properties of B4C-PbO-Al(OH)3-epoxy nanocomposite prepared by ultrasonic dispersion approach for high temperature neutron shields,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 445, pp. 63–71, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. B. Aygün, T. Korkut, and A. Karabulut, “Production and neutron irradiation tests on a new epoxy/molybdenum composite,” International Journal of Polymer Analysis & Characterization, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 323–329, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. Y. Mulazim, C. Kızılkaya, and M. V. Kahraman, “Thermal and neutron shielding properties of 10B2O3/polyimide hybrid materials,” Polymer Bulletin, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 1741–1750, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. M.-H. Tsai, I.-H. Tseng, J.-C. Chiang, and J.-J. Li, “Flexible polyimide films hybrid with functionalized boron nitride and graphene oxide simultaneously to improve thermal conduction and dimensional stability,” Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 8639–8645, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. C. Kizilkaya, Y. Mülazim, M. V. Kahraman, N. K. Apohan, and A. Güngör, “Synthesis and characterization of polyimide/hexagonal boron nitride composite,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 706–712, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. X. L. Fu, X. B. Tang, Y. B. Hu, H. G. Li, and J. Tao, “Effect of different lay-ups on the microstructure, mechanical properties and neutron transmission of neutron shielding fibre metal laminates,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 475, no. 4, pp. 227–236, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. T. Özdemir, A. Güngör, and İ.A. Reyhancan, “Flexible neutron shielding composite material of EPDM rubber with boron trioxide: mechanical, thermal investigations and neutron shielding tests,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, vol. 131, pp. 7–12, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. T. Özdemir, “Monte Carlo simulations of radioactive waste embedded into EPDM and effect of lead filler,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 150–154, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. B.-S. Shin, D.-K. Seo, H.-B. Kim et al., “A study of the thermal and mechanical properties of electron beam irradiated HDPE/EPDM blends in the presence of triallyl cyanurate,” Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 526–531, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. Y. Abdullah, M. R. Yusof, A. Muhamad, Z. Samsu, and N. E. Abdullah, “Cement-boron carbide concrete as radiation shielding material,” Journal of Nuclear and Related Technologies, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 74–79, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  62. C. Sivathanu Pillai, A. R. Santhakumar, S. Chandrasekaran et al., “Effect of heat treatment on neutron attenuation characteristics of high density concretes (HDC),” Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 93, pp. 76–83, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  63. A. M. Badiea, B. G. Mohammed, and A. Albadran Firas, “Glass-polymer-concrete composite and its mechanical, chemical and thermal properties,” British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1–8, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. Y. Abdullah, M. Reusmaazran Yusof, A. Muhamad et al., “Cement-boron carbide concrete as radiation shielding material,” Journal of Nuclear and Related Technologies, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 74–79, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  65. E. Gallego, A. Lorente, and H. R. Vega-Carrillo, “Testing of a high-density concrete as neutron shielding material,” Nuclear Technology, vol. 168, no. 2, pp. 399–404, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. E. Yılmaz, H. Baltas, E. Kırıs, İ. Ustabas, U. Cevikc, and A. M. EI-Khayatt, “Gamma ray and neutron shielding properties of some concrete materials,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 2204–2212, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  67. V. P. Singh, N. M. Badiger, N. Chanthima, and J. Kaewkhao, “Evaluation of gamma-ray exposure buildup factors and neutron shielding for bismuth borosilicate glasses,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, vol. 98, no. 5, pp. 14–21, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. N. A. Elalaily, E. M. Abou-Hussien, and E. A. Saad, “Bismuth silicate glass containing heavy metal oxide as a promising radiation shielding material,” Radiation Effects and Defects in Solids, vol. 171, no. 10, pp. 840–854, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. V. P. Singh, N. M. Badiger, and J. Kaewkhao, “Radiation shielding competence of silicate and borate heavy metal oxide glasses: comparative study,” Journal of Non-crystalline Solids, vol. 404, no. 11, pp. 167–173, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. M. Igashira, H. Kitazawa, and N. Yamamuro, “A heavy shield for the gamma-ray detector used in fast neutron experiments,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, vol. 245, no. 2-3, pp. 432–437, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Xuelong Fu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.