Influence of Non-Structural Localized Inertia on Free Vibration Response of Thin-Walled Structures by Variable Kinematic Beam Formulations

<table>Mesh discretization for the FEM-2D and FEM-3D MSC <svg height="16.5375" id="M250" style="vertical-align:-0.13792pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 63.724998 16.5375" width="63.724998" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,16.263)"><path d="M719 650v-28q-43 -2 -62 -15t-22 -44q-6 -47 -6 -169v-403h-31l-426 524h-2v-251q0 -111 6 -169q4 -37 24 -50.5t72 -16.5v-28h-237v28q45 2 64.5 16t23.5 49q6 62 6 171v220q0 54 -3 68.5t-17 32.5q-16 19 -34.5 26.5t-54.5 10.5v28h147l418 -502h3v246q0 117 -7 166
q-4 34 -24.5 47t-73.5 15v28h236z" id="x4E"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,12.251,16.263)"><path d="M433 39l-85 -51q-27 0 -47 20q-16 16 -24 44q-5 -3 -24 -16.5t-27 -18.5t-23 -13.5t-25 -12t-19 -3.5q-52 0 -86 36.5t-34 85.5q0 71 81 99q128 43 155 65v17q0 54 -23 83.5t-62 29.5q-28 0 -45 -19t-29 -66q-7 -23 -29 -23q-15 0 -29 13t-14 30t31 40q25 19 68.5 40.5
t81.5 29.5q49 0 82 -27q45 -39 45 -123v-185q0 -60 35 -60q18 0 36 11zM275 84v156q-12 -6 -49 -23t-41 -19q-31 -14 -46 -31t-15 -43q0 -35 22.5 -55.5t48.5 -20.5q19 0 42 10.5t38 25.5z" id="x61"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,19.662,16.263)"><path d="M319 325l-25 -7q-33 99 -103 99q-29 0 -47 -19.5t-18 -49.5t22 -49.5t62 -36.5q63 -26 95 -57t32 -79q0 -64 -50 -101t-115 -37q-35 0 -67.5 10.5t-46.5 23.5q-5 11 -11 51t-6 67l27 5q14 -53 46.5 -88.5t75.5 -35.5q29 0 50 19.5t21 50.5t-19.5 51.5t-59.5 39.5
q-28 12 -46 22.5t-38.5 27t-30.5 38.5t-10 49q0 54 42.5 92t109.5 38q48 0 88 -18q6 -15 13 -50.5t9 -55.5z" id="x73"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,25.816,16.263)"><path d="M298 36l-68 -35q-25 -13 -42 -13q-98 0 -98 119v290h-69l-4 11l28 29h45v72l65 67l14 -2v-137h113q8 -8 6 -21t-12 -19h-107v-256q0 -96 59 -96q29 0 61 17z" id="x74"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,31.068,16.263)"><path d="M181 342h2q63 107 121 107q24 0 41 -16t17 -34q0 -34 -32 -49q-17 -7 -26 2q-21 20 -43 20q-20 0 -42 -22t-38 -63v-183q0 -50 12.5 -62t69.5 -16v-26h-230v26q47 5 58 17t11 61v207q0 49 -9 60.5t-53 16.5v23q74 12 141 40v-109z" id="x72"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,37.375,16.263)"><path d="M433 39l-85 -51q-27 0 -47 20q-16 16 -24 44q-5 -3 -24 -16.5t-27 -18.5t-23 -13.5t-25 -12t-19 -3.5q-52 0 -86 36.5t-34 85.5q0 71 81 99q128 43 155 65v17q0 54 -23 83.5t-62 29.5q-28 0 -45 -19t-29 -66q-7 -23 -29 -23q-15 0 -29 13t-14 30t31 40q25 19 68.5 40.5
t81.5 29.5q49 0 82 -27q45 -39 45 -123v-185q0 -60 35 -60q18 0 36 11zM275 84v156q-12 -6 -49 -23t-41 -19q-31 -14 -46 -31t-15 -43q0 -35 22.5 -55.5t48.5 -20.5q19 0 42 10.5t38 25.5z" id="x61"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,44.701,16.263)"><path d="M524 0h-209v26q44 5 55 18t11 65v167q0 114 -91 114q-50 0 -109 -51v-235q0 -50 10 -61.5t55 -16.5v-26h-217v26q51 5 62 17t11 61v206q0 47 -9.5 58.5t-50.5 19.5v23q82 15 139 40v-79l67 47q47 30 83 30q60 0 94.5 -40t34.5 -112v-193q0 -50 10 -61.5t54 -16.5v-26z
" id="x6E"></path></g>
<g transform="matrix(.012,-0,0,-.012,54,8.1)"><path d="M531 248h16l-17 -76q-1 -10 -53 -21q-47 -10 -95 -10q-87 0 -139.5 51.5t-52.5 136.5q0 92 61 147q62 56 160 56q56 0 107 -22q13 -6 13 -17v-71h-17q-6 44 -33.5 67t-70.5 23q-65 0 -104 -48t-39 -127q0 -81 40.5 -128.5t107.5 -47.5q41 0 68.5 20.5t47.5 66.5zM722 330
q0 -144 -99 -245q-99 -99 -242 -99q-144 0 -244 100q-99 100 -99 244q0 146 100 246t248 100q140 0 237 -102q99 -100 99 -244zM667 334q0 123 -86 212q-85 88 -204 88q-115 0 -200 -91q-84 -90 -84 -212q0 -125 85 -214q86 -89 203 -89q118 0 202 90t84 216z" id="xA9"></path></g>
</svg> models.</table>

Shock and Vibration

fig18

Figure 18

Figure 18: Influence of Non-Structural Localized Inertia on Free Vibration Response of Thin-Walled Structures by Variable Kinematic Beam Formulations 

Figure 18 | Influence of Non-Structural Localized Inertia on Free Vibration Response of Thin-Walled Structures by Variable Kinematic Beam Formulations 