Research Article  Open Access
Qinghua Zhang, Xuerui Fan, Xianmin Zhang, "Dynamic Analysis of Planar 3RRR Flexible Parallel Robots with Dynamic Stiffening", Shock and Vibration, vol. 2014, Article ID 370145, 13 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/370145
Dynamic Analysis of Planar 3RRR Flexible Parallel Robots with Dynamic Stiffening
Abstract
In consideration of the secondorder coupling quantity of the axial displacement caused by the transverse displacement of flexible beam, the firstorder approximation coupling model of planar 3RRR flexible parallel robots is presented, in which the rigid body motion constraints, elastic deformation motion constraints, and dynamic constraints of the moving platform are considered. Based on the different speed of the moving platform, numerical simulation results using the conventional zeroorder approximation coupling model and the proposed firstorder approximation coupling model show that the effect of “dynamic stiffening” term on dynamic characteristics of the system is insignificant and can be neglected, and the zeroorder approximation coupling model is enough precisely for catching essentially dynamic characteristics of the system. Then, the commercial software ANSYS 13.0 is used to confirm the validity of the zeroorder approximation coupling model.
1. Introduction
In recent several decades, many researchers have paid more attention to the light flexible robots with highspeed, highacceleration, and highprecision which are widely used in the assembly industry, the aerospace industry and the precision machining, and the measurement field. Essentially, the flexible parallel robots mechanism belongs to flexible multibody system. Dynamic modeling of flexible multibody system is a challenging task, in which not only rigidflexible coupling effect must be studied but also elastic deformation coupling must be analyzed carefully.
At present, dynamic modeling and control of the flexible multibody system have received considerable attention as seen in survey papers [1–4]. Unfortunately, most of published works in this area addressed the manipulators with one flexible link. Comparing with singlelink flexible manipulator, twolink flexible manipulator, or fourbar linkage flexible mechanism [5, 6], the research works on the flexible parallel robots are rather few.
Recently, few works have been done on dynamic modeling and control of complex mechanisms. Lee and Geng [7] developed a dynamic model of a flexible Stewart platform using Lagrange equations. Wang et al. [8–10] studied dynamic modeling and control of planar 3PrismaticjointRevolutejointandRevolutejoint (3PRR) parallel robots. Zhang et al. [11, 12] studied dynamic modeling method and dynamic characteristics of planar 3RRR flexible parallel robots. Q. H. Zhang and X. M. Zhang [13] also studied dynamic performance of planar 3RRR flexible parallel robots under uniform temperature change.
For a simple flexible hubbeam system, when the system operates at a high speed, the conventional hybrid coordinate model, namely, zeroorder approximation coupling model (ZOAC model) that assumes axial and transverse displacement of a point on the neutral axis of a beam are uncoupled is an invalid modeling method [14]. Kane et al. [15] found that when the nominal motion of rigidflexible rotating beam system is very large, the deformation of the flexible system deformation exists significantly warp by the conventional dynamic model and experimental method, and he thought the premature linearization would lead to lack of “dynamic stiffening” term and firstly proposed “dynamic stiffening” phenomenon. Since then, many scholars start to study the socalled “dynamic stiffening” terms of rigidflexible coupling system and different methods are used to capture it [14, 16–18]. Mayo et al. [16] reviewed different formulations to account for the geometric stiffening or dynamic stiffening effect arising from deflections large enough to cause significant changes in the configuration of the system. Lugrís et al. [17] used two different methods to calculate dynamic stiffening of the flexible system: one method is from the deformation energy and the other is from foreshortening. Zhang et al. [18] indicated that when the rotational frequency of slender beams meets or exceeds the fundamental frequency, the elastic deformation of flexible beam that is obtained by the conventional ZOAC model tends to diverge. Yu and Hong [19] summarized several methodologies for analyzing dynamic stiffening of flexible system. In consideration of structural geometric nonlinear effects, Wu and Haug [20] established a substructure synthesis formulation of flexible multibody system. Yang [21] studies dynamic model of rigidflexible system from both theory and experiment. In consideration of dynamic stiffening effect, Liu and Lu [22] established the rigidflexible coupling dynamic equations of threedimensional hubbeams system using velocity variational principle and finite element method.
Since dynamic stiffening phenomenon was proposed by Kane et al., many relevant literatures were published [14, 16–22], but they mainly focus on the flexible rotation beam system. To my knowledge, dynamic stiffening phenomenon of flexible parallel robots has never been studied. Because dynamic stiffening term was not neglected in the highspeed flexible rotation beam system, we do not know that how dynamic stiffening of flexible parallel robots influences its owe dynamic characteristics. So, it is important for us to study dynamic stiffening of flexible parallel robots.
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 introduces dynamic modeling of planar 3RRR flexible parallel robots with dynamic stiffening. In consideration of the secondorder coupling quantity of the axial displacement caused by the transverse displacement of flexible beam, based on the finite element method (FEM) and the Lagrange equation, the firstorder approximation coupling model (FOAC model) of planar 3RRR flexible parallel robots is presented. Section 3 discusses the constraint equations of planar 3RRR flexible parallel robots system which include rigid body motion constraints, elastic deformation motion constraints, and dynamic constraints of the moving platform. In Section 4, numerical results are presented based on the ZOAC model and FOAC model. One finds that the influence of dynamic stiffening of planar 3RRR flexible parallel robots on dynamic characteristics can be neglected, and the ZOAC model can effectively reflects dynamic characteristics of the system (Figure 7). The commercial ANSYS 13.0 software is used to confirm the validity of the ZOAC model. Finally, the conclusions are given in Section 5.
2. Dynamic Modeling of Planar 3RR Flexible Parallel Robots with Dynamic Stiffening
The flexible link can be modeled by connecting a series of beam elements. Figure 1 shows a beam element before and after deformation. The is the global fixed frame and the Axy is the local moving frame with Ax axis coincident with the neutral line of the beam element. Its original point A is located at one node of the beam element before deformation. B is another node of the beam element. The system is an intermediate coordinate frame whose origin is rigidly attached to the origin of the and whose axes are parallel to the axes of the local moving frame Axy. is the angle between the global fixed frame and the intermediate coordinate frame . Considering the general point in the beam element, let point be the corresponding point on the neutral line. Points and are their positions after deformation, respectively. The elastic deformation of the point in the is given by where is the nodal displacement vector, in which and are the axial displacements of two nodes and , respectively; and are the transverse displacements; and are elastic rotational angles; and are section curvatures; and the superscript indicates matrix transpose. is the shape function matrix. Assuming that the axial displacement of point is a linear function, the transverse displacement is a fifthorder hermit function, yielding where is length of the beam element.
The deformation displacements of in the Axy can be written as [14] then, the displacement of can be expressed in the global fixed frame by where is the planar transformation matrix defined as is the location coordinates vector of the point in the Axy system and is given by .
Taking the first derivative on (5) and considering (1), the velocity vector of the point in the system can be written as where is the velocity vector of the original point A in the system, is 2 × 2 unit matrix, and parameter is the secondorder coupling term that is the axial shrinking quantity caused by the transverse displacement . In the ZOAC model, the small deformation assumption is adopted, so is taken, and is neglected.
2.1. Kinetic Energy of the Beam Element
Using (7), kinetic energy of the beam element which includes translational kinetic energy of the beam element, rotational kinetic energy of the crosssection, and kinetic energy of lumped mass at the end points of beam can be written as where is skew symmetric matrix, is absolute rotation angle of microsegment which distances from the original point A. , , , and are lumped mass and lumped moment of inertia at left and right end points of the beam element, respectively. . It should be mentioned that the highorder terms related with , such as , , , and , are omitted since , , , , and are very small.
2.2. Strain Energy of the Beam Element
Nonlinear terms in the straindisplacement relationship are neglected [16]. Then, strain energy of the beam element can be written as where , , and is elastic modulus of materials. , are crosssectional moment of inertia and crosssectional area of the beam element, respectively. Consider
2.3. Dynamic Equation of the Beam Element
According to Lagrange’s equation, dynamic equation of the beam element can be written as where and are the generalized external forces and the quadratic velocity vector that contains the gyroscopic and the Coriolis force components, respectively.
The elemental dynamic equation has been established in the Axy system. Before forming the dynamic equation of the system, (14) must be expressed in the system. Define the coordinate transformation matrix as follows: Let where is the elemental nodal coordinate vector in the system. Taking the first and the second derivative on (16) with respect to time yields where , . Substitute(16) and (17) into (14) and premultiply by matrix Then, dynamic equation of the beam element can be expressed in the system by where where and are the element generalized mass and stiffness matrixes in the system, respectively. is 8 × 1 the quadratic velocity vector in the system. is the generalized external forces vector in the system.
3. Governing Dynamic Equation of Planar 3RR Flexible Parallel Robots
In this section, according to the above dynamic equation of the beam element, governing dynamic equation of the planar 3RRR parallel robots can be established, in which constraint equations are considered.
3.1. The Sketch of Planar 3RRR Parallel Robots
The sketch of planar flexible 3RRR parallel robots is constructed by the regular triangle moving platform , the static platform, and three symmetrical kinematic chains , , and , as shown in Figure 2. Each kinematic chain has one active revolute (R) joint followed by two consecutive passive revolute (R) joints. The active revolute joints are installed at , . , and are the regular triangle's three vertices. , and . The vertexes and are centers of the regular triangles and , respectively. The is the global fixed frame. Parameters , are the angles between the axis of the fixed frame and linkages , , respectively. is the angle between the axis of the fixed frame and side of the regular triangle . , ,, and are the length of the segments , , , and .
3.2. Constraint Equations
Different from the simple structure, constraint relationships of planar 3RRR of flexible parallel robots which include the rigid body motion constraints, the elastic deformation motion constraints, and dynamic constraints of the moving platform are very complex and can be used to eliminate the correlation of generalized coordinates.
3.2.1. Constraint Equations of the RigidBody Motion
Generalized coordinates are formed by rigidbody motion coordinates and elastic coordinates. As shown in Figure 2, rigidbody motion coordinates that include drive joint rotation angles , passive joint rotation angles , translation displacement and rotation angle of the moving platform , and rigid body motion coordinate vector , , are not independent. Because three kinematic chains of 3RRR parallel robots are full symmetrical, one chain is studied. As shown in Figure 3, a closedloop vector equation can be established Projecting (21) into and component yields where and are the coordinates of the points and in the system, respectively.
3.2.2. Constraint Equations of the Elastic Deformation Motion
As shown in Figure 3, center point and vertex of the moving platform are moved to the points because of elastic deformation motion of the flexible links , . Setting Pxy is the local coordinate system with original point P, and is the elastic coordinate system with original point . and are the coordinate transformation matrixes for and , respectively. Then, . are elastic displacements and elastic rotational angle at the end point of the flexile link , and the section curvature is equal to zero at the point . , and are translational and rotational declinations of the moving platform because of elastic vibration of the flexible links. Assuming that the moving platform is rigid, so . Noting that Assuming that and are the coordinates of the points and in the system yields where . means the description in the pxy.
Setting yields where is unit matrix.
3.2.3. Dynamic Constraints of the Moving Platform
Assuming that is the generalized joint constraint antiforce that the passive joint are applied to the moving platform. , are the mass and moment of inertia of the moving platform. Then, dynamic constraint of the moving platform can be expressed by
4. Governing Dynamic Equation of the Flexible Robots System
Considering constraint equations ((22)–(27)) and assembling all the element dynamic equations with respect to the compatibility at the nodes, then the governing dynamic equation that describes the dynamic characteristic of system can be formed as where is the generalized coordinate vector of planer 3RRR flexible parallel robots in the system which includes rigidbody motion coordinates, node elastic deformation coordinates, and the declinations of the moving platform. Equation (28) is the nonlinear and rigidflexible coupling differential equation and can be decomposed into the rigid subsection and the flexible subsection as Now, one will emphatically study flexible subsection (30), in which generalized stiffness matrix can be expressed by where , , is the coordinate compatibility matrix, means summing to all elements, and is a function of rigid body motion variable . The underline term is the dynamic stiffening term [14]. In the conventional ZOAC model, the term is equal to zero. In general, when the system operates at a highspeed and highacceleration such as the flexible hubbeam [14–22], the term cannot be neglected.
5. Numerical Simulation
In this section, dynamic responses of planar 3RRR flexible parallel robots are studied using the ZOAC model and FOAC model, comparing influences of the dynamic stiffening term on dynamic response under the different speeds of the moving platform.
Assuming that all links that include three active links and three passive links are flexible and that other parts are rigid, every flexible link is divided into three equal length beam elements. Assume that the material of 3RRR system is the aluminum alloy, the thickness of the moving platform , , , , , the lumped mass of the joint , and the lumped moment of inertia . The other parameters of flexible links are defined as in Table 1.

It is assumed that the trajectory of the moving platform is described as where is angular frequency that can reflect moving speed of the motion platform. Due to the requirement of following numerical simulation, the parameter is chosen to be rad/s and rad/s, respectively. Let the moving platform continuously operate four motion cycles along with the given circle trajectory Equation (32). Firstly, considering the parameter rad/s in (32), in this case, the acceleration of the moving platform is ( is weight acceleration), and the maximum absolute angle speed of the drive joints , reaches to 5.46, 5.19, and 5.2 rad/s, respectively. Figure 4 shows elastic displacements and rotation angle of the moving platform with respect to four motion cycles based on the ZOAC model and the FOAC model when rad/s, respectively. Figure 5 shows elastic displacement responses which are located at the 1/3 length of active link 1. In all figures, the slide line with is a result using the ZOAC model, the slide line with + is a result using the FOAC model, and the slide line with is a result using ANSYS simulation. Figure 6(a) shows numerical result of the maximum stress response of flexible links; meanwhile, the simplified 3D model is developed by SolidWorks software and then imported into Workbench environment which is a simulation module of ANSYS 13.0 software for transient dynamic analysis as shown in Figure 6(b). All curves show periodical change in Figures 4–6.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Form Figures 4, 5, and 6(a), we can find that the numerical results are very close using the ZOAC model and the FOAC model. The influence of dynamic stiffening on dynamic characteristic of the system can be neglected when rad/s. Reviewing Figures 6(a) and 6(b), one can find that numerical results are similar with ANSYS simulation results, and the change law of the curves are consistent and show periodic variation. Then, the validity of ZOAC model and FOAC model is verified.
To illustrate the validity of the theory model, modal analysis module of Workbench is used to calculate natural frequencies of the system. Theory results using the theory model and ANSYS result using ANSYSWorkbench software are listed in Table 2. From Table 2, we can find that the difference of the first natural frequency is 0.99% and very small, and the difference of the second natural frequency is 8.91%, the difference of the third natural frequency is big and reaches to 37.14%, the fourthorder is 11.74%, meanwhile, all the first threeorder natural frequencies are smaller than the fourthorder natural frequency using two methods. The existence of difference can be explained as follows: all components are flexible in the ANSYS simulation, but, just only the links are flexible in theory model, Meshing is different, and solver may be different. Form the difference toleration and the consistent of the natural frequency change, ANSYS result can be used to verify the validity of the theory model.

To further verify, influence of stiffening dynamic of 3RRR flexible parallel robots is slight and can be neglected in the mathematics model. Let rad/s in (32). Then, the acceleration of the moving platform is 4836 g (Unbelievable), and the maximum absolute angle speed of the drive joints , reaches to 191.02 (30.04 Hz), 181.77 (28.93 Hz), and 182.58 rad/s (29.06 Hz) and exceeds the first natural frequency 27.177 Hz (or 27.446 Hz), as shown in Figures 8 and 9. Figures 8(a), 8(b), and 8(c) are elastic displacements and rotation angle of the moving platform with respect to four motion cycles using the ZOAC model and the FOAC model when rad/s, respectively. Figure 8(d) is the maximum stress response of flexible links with respect to four motion cycles. Figures 9(a) and 9(b) are elastic displacement responses along with axisand axis which are located at the 1/3 length of active link 1, respectively.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(a)
(b)
From Figures 8 and 9, we find that although the acceleration of the moving platform has reached to 4836 g m/s^{2} and the angle speed of the drive joints has exceeded the first natural frequency of the system, all curves using the ZOAC model are still very close to the relevant curves using the FOAC model. The influence of dynamic stiffening is still very slight. At the moment, elastic displacements and rotational angle of the moving platform and flexible link 1 increase two orders of magnitude more than rad/s. The maximum stress of flexible links changes from 67.99 MPa to 125600 MPa and increases four orders of magnitude. When increasing in (32) again, there are just only increasing vibration amplitude of flexible links and the moving platform and maximum stress amplitude of flexible links; numerical results of the ZOAC model are still close to those of the FOAC model, and the difference between the ZOAC model and FOAC model is very slight.
From the above analysis, we can conclude that the influence of dynamic stiffening of planar 3RRR flexible parallel robots is very slight and can fully be neglected for elastic dynamic modeling and the conventional ZOAC model can completely reveal dynamic characteristic of the system. The reasons can be explained as follows. Reviewing , where , may take positive or negative value, the values of the first two terms may be positive or negative in bracket, and the third term is positive. Then, the value of the expression in brackets will be small and its sign is indeterminate. After summing with respect to all elements, is much smaller than , so that can be neglected in (31). Because of the coupling among flexible links, the influence of dynamic stiffening which is related to rigidbody motion will be weakened.
6. Conclusions
The FOAC model of planar 3RRR flexible parallel robots with six flexible links was established through the finite element method and the Lagrange equation, in which dynamic stiffening term was considered. The explicit expression of dynamic stiffening was presented. The constraint equations of the system that include the rigid body motion constraints, elastic deformation motion constraints, and dynamics constraints of the moving platform were studied in detail. For comparing the FOAC model with the conventional ZOAC model, numerical simulation was given under two different speeds of the moving platform. The results indicated that the conventional ZOAC model can fully reveal dynamic characteristic of the system and that the influence of dynamic stiffening is very slight and can be neglected for dynamic modeling of planar 3RRR flexible parallel robots. So, the modeling process can be simplified. Meanwhile, the commercial software ANSYS 13.0 is used to confirm the validity of the zeroorder approximation coupling model.
Appendix
Conflict of Interests
The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 91223201), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Grant no. S2013030013355), Project GDUPS (2010), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2012ZP0004). This support is greatly acknowledged.
References
 M. Benosman and G. l. Vey, “Control of flexible manipulators: a survey,” Robotica, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 533–545, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. K. Dwivedy and P. Eberhard, “Dynamic analysis of flexible manipulators, a literature review,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 749–777, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. A. Shabana, “Flexible multibody dynamics: review of past and recent developments,” Multibody System Dynamics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 189–222, 1997. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. G. Erdman and G. N. Sandor, “Kinetoelastodynamics—a review of the state of the art and trends,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 19–33, 1972. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. M. Zhang, C. J. Shao, and A. G. Erdman, “Active vibration controller design and comparison study of flexible linkage mechanism systems,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 985–997, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. M. Zhang, C. J. Shao, Y. W. Shen, and A. G. Erdman, “Complex mode dynamic analysis of flexible mechanism systems with piezoelectric sensors and actuators,” Multibody System Dynamics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 51–70, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. D. Lee and Z. Geng, “A dynamic model of a flexible stewart platform,” Computers & Structures, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 367–374, 1993. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Y. Wang and J. K. Mills, “FEM dynamic model for active vibration control of flexible linkages and its application to a planar parallel manipulator,” Applied Acoustics, vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 1151–1161, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Y. Wang and J. K. Mills, “Dynamic modeling of a flexiblelink planar parallel platform using a substructuring approach,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 671–687, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. P. Zhang, J. K. Mills, and W. L. Cleghorn, “Experimental implementation on vibration mode control of a moving 3PRR flexible parallel manipulator with multiple PZT transducers,” Journal of Vibration and Control, vol. 16, no. 13, pp. 2035–2054, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Q. H. Zhang, X. M. Zhang, and J. L. Liang, “Dynamic analysis of planar 3$\underset{\xaf}{\text{R}}$RR flexible parallel robot,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO '12), pp. 154–159, Guangzhou, China, December 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Q. H. Zhang and X. M. Zhang, “Dynamic modeling and analysis of planar 3$\underset{\xaf}{\text{R}}$RR flexible parallel robots,” Journal of Vibration Engineering, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 239–245, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Q. H. Zhang and X. M. Zhang, “Dynamic analysis of planar 3$\underset{\xaf}{\text{R}}$RR flexible parallel robots under uniform temperature change,” Journal of Vibration and Control, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. P. Cai, J. Z. Hong, and S. X. Yang, “Model study and active control of a rotating flexible cantilever beam,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 871–889, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. R. Kane, R. R. Ryan, and A. K. Banerjee, “Dynamics of a cantilever beam attached to a moving base,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 139–151, 1987. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. M. Mayo, D. GarcíaVallejo, and J. Domínguez, “Study of the geometric stiffening effect: comparison of different formulations,” Multibody System Dynamics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 321–341, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 U. Lugrís, M. A. Naya, J. A. Pérez, and J. Cuadrado, “Implementation and efficiency of two geometric stiffening approaches,” Multibody System Dynamics, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 147–161, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. J. Zhang, Y. W. Liu, and R. L. Huston, “On dynamic stiffening of flexible bodies having high angular velocity,” Mechanics of Structures and Machines, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 313–329, 1996. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Q. Yu and J. Z. Hong, “Some topics on flexible multibody system dynamics,” Advances in Mechanics, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 145–155, 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. C. Wu and E. J. Haug, “Geometric nonlinear substructure for dynamics of flexible mechanical systems,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 2211–2226, 1988. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Yang, Study of dynamic modeling theory and experiments for rigidflexible coupling systems [Ph.D. thesis], Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China, 2002. (Chinese).
 J. Y. Liu and H. Lu, “Rigidflexible coupling dynamics of threedimensional hubbeams system,” Multibody System Dynamics, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 487–510, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Qinghua Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.