Research Article
Damage Detection and Quantification Using Transmissibility Coherence Analysis
Table 4
The comparison of transmissibility, TC, and FRF coherence in peak change.
| State | Indicator | Frequency shift (Hz) | Amplitude value | Peak 1 | (%)* | Peak 2 | (%)* | Peak 1 | (%)* | Peak 2 | (%)* |
| #1 | (5, 2) | 47.54 | — | 69.92 | — | 50.18 | — | 28.95 | — | #6 | 47.15 | −0.82 | 65.47 | −6.36 | 46.58 | −7.17 | 27.62 | −4.59 | #7 | 46.25 | −2.71 | 60.42 | −13.59 | 47.42 | −5.50 | 28.94 | −0.03 |
| #1 | TC (5, 2) | 47.58 | — | 70.08 | — | 0.54 | — | 0.18 | — | #6 | 47.07 | −1.07 | 65.55 | −6.46 | 0.36 | −33.33 | 0.21 | 0.17 | #7 | 46.25 | −2.80 | 60.63 | −13.48 | 0.26 | −51.85 | 0.52 | 188.89 |
| #1 | FRFC (5, 1) | 54.88 | — | 71.88 | — | 0.83 | — | 0.80 | — | #6 | 54.96 | 0.15 | 67.19 | −6.52 | 0.76 | −8.43 | 0.86 | 7.5 | #7 | 54.69 | −0.35 | 62.15 | −13.54 | 0.78 | −6.02 | 0.89 | 11.25 |
|
|
*Increase from the baseline “State #1.”
|