Nonlinear Parameters for Monitoring Gear: Comparison Between Lempel-Ziv, Approximate Entropy, and Sample Entropy Complexity

<table class="table-group" id="tab1"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="3"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td align="left"> </td><td align="center">Frequency (Hz)</td><td align="center">Amplitude </td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="3"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td align="left">Pinion: number of teeth = 20</td><td align="center">15</td><td align="center">0.15</td></tr><tr><td align="left">Gear: number of teeth = 21</td><td align="center">14.28</td><td align="center">0.15</td></tr><tr><td align="left">Gear mesh: the first harmonic</td><td align="center">300</td><td align="center">1</td></tr><tr><td align="left">Gear mesh: the second harmonic</td><td align="center">600</td><td align="center">0.6</td></tr><tr><td align="left">Gear mesh: the third harmonic</td><td align="center">900</td><td align="center">0.3</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="3"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

Geared system data of the simulated signal.

Shock and Vibration

tab1

Table 1

Table 1: Nonlinear Parameters for Monitoring Gear: Comparison Between Lempel-Ziv, Approximate Entropy, and Sample Entropy Complexity 