|
Study | Number of pedestrians | Structure | | | | DLFs |
|
Ohlsson, 1982 [33] | — | Timber floor | ↑ | ↓ | ↓ | — |
|
Baumann and Bachmann, 1988 [34] | — | 19 m prestressed beam | — | — | — | 10%↓ |
|
Ebrahimpour et al., 1989 [36] | 1–40 | Lab-based composite floor | ↑ | — | ↓ | — |
|
Ebrahimpour and Sack, 1996 [37] | 1–40 | Lab-based composite floor | — | — | — | ↓ |
|
Pimentel and Waldron, 1996 [39] | 1 | Composite footbridge Hz, % | ↑ | — | — | ↓ |
|
Ellis and Ji, 1997 [10] | 1 | Precast reinforced concrete beam Hz, % | 0% | 0% | — | — |
|
Pimentel, 1997 [35] | — | Stressed ribbon footbridge Hz, % | 17% ↑ | 1.7% ↓ | ↓ | — |
|
Willford, 2002 [2] | — | Millennium Bridge Hz, % | ↑ | — | ↓ | — |
|
Brownjohn, 2004 [40] | Up to 150 | Changi Mezzanine steel footbridge Hz, % | Up to 100% ↑ | — | ↓ | — |
|
Brownjohn and Fu, 2005 [41] | 1–35 | Singapore Polytechnic steel footbridge Hz, % | 100%–500% ↑ | 7% ↑ | ↓ | — |
|
Živanović et al., 2009 [11] | 2–10 | Posttensioned lab footbridge Hz, % | 297% ↑ | 1.6% ↑ | 38% ↓ | — |
|
Živanović et al., 2010 [4] | 6.1 pedestrians/min | Podgorica steel footbridge Hz, % | 158% ↑ | 2% ↓ | 65% ↓ | — |
|
Fanning et al., 2010 [42] | 4–30 | O’Casey steel footbridge Hz, % | ↑ | — | 20% ↓ | — |
|
Dong et al., 2011 [43] | 0–2 pedestrians/s | Olga cable-stayed footbridge Hz, % | 280% ↑ | 4.4% ↓ | — | — |
|
Georgakis and Jorgensen, 2013 [32] | 4–10 | Steel lab footbridge Hz, % | ↑ | ↓ | — | — |
|
Shahabpoor et al., 2015; 2016 [50, 51] | 3–15 | Posttensioned lab footbridge Hz, % | 400% ↑ | 1.0% ↑ | 32% ↓ | — |
|
Zhang et al., 2015 [44] | 4–10 | Steel lab footbridge Hz, % | ↑ | ↓ | — | — |
|
Van Nimmen et al., 2015 [45] | 9–21 | Eeklo steel footbridge Hz, % | 900% ↑ | 0–1.5% ↑ | — | — |
|