Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Shock and Vibration
Volume 2016, Article ID 4528168, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4528168
Research Article

Exploring New Boundaries to Mitigate Structural Vibrations of Bridges in Seismic Regions: A Smart Passive Strategy

1Department of Engineering, University of Benevento “Sannio,” 82100 Benevento, Italy
2Construction Technologies Institute, National Research Council (CNR), San Giuliano Milanese, 20098 Milan, Italy
3Department of Engineering, University of Napoli “Parthenope,” 80143 Naples, Italy
4Rete Ferroviaria Italiana S.p.A., Regional Direction of Bologna, 40129 Bologna, Italy

Received 2 January 2016; Revised 7 April 2016; Accepted 20 April 2016

Academic Editor: Athanasios Chasalevris

Copyright © 2016 Giuseppe Maddaloni et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), Learning from Earthquakes Reconnaissance Archive, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), Oakland, Calif, USA, 2015, https://www.eeri.org/projects/learning-from-earthquakes-lfe/lfe-reconnaissance-archive/.
  2. A. Agrawal, P. Tan, S. Nagarajaiah, and J. Zhang, “Benchmark structural control problem for a seismically excited highway bridge-part I: phase I problem definition,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 509–529, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. Tan and A. K. Agrawal, “Benchmark structural control problem for a seismically excited highway bridge-part II: phase I sample control designs,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 530–548, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Nagarajaiah, S. Narasimhan, A. Agrawal, and P. Tan, “Benchmark structural control problem for a seismically excited highway bridge-part III: phase II sample controller for the fully base-isolated case,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 549–563, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. H.-J. Jung, D.-D. Jang, K.-M. Choi, and S.-W. Cho, “Vibration mitigation of highway isolated bridge using MR damper-based smart passive control system employing an electromagnetic induction part,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 613–625, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S.-W. Cho, H.-J. Jung, and I.-W. Lee, “Smart passive system based on magnetorheological damper,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 707–714, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. H. Pradono, H. Iemura, A. Igarashi, A. Toyooka, and A. Kalantari, “Passively controlled MR damper in the benchmark structural control problem for seismically excited highway bridge,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 626–638, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. F. Ali and A. Ramaswamy, “Optimal dynamic inversion-based semi-active control of benchmark bridge using MR dampers,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 564–585, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. F. Casciati, L. Faravelli, and R. A. Saleh, “An SMA passive device proposed within the highway bridge benchmark,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 657–667, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Y. Zhang, X. Hu, and S. Zhu, “Seismic performance of benchmark base-isolated brdiges with superelastic Cu-Al-Be restraining damping device,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 668–685, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. G. Pujol, L. Acho, F. Pozo, and J. Rodellar, “A nonlinear damping control for the vibration mitigation of the benchamark highway bridge,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, vol. 16, pp. 586–598, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  12. X.-L. Ning, P. Tan, D.-Y. Huang, and F.-L. Zhou, “Application of adaptive fuzzy sliding mode control to a seismically excited highway bridge,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 639–656, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. N. Madhekar and R. S. Jangid, “Variable dampers for earthquake protection of benchmark highway bridges,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 18, no. 11, Article ID 115011, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. N. Madhekar and R. S. Jangid, “Use of pseudo-negative stiffness dampers for reducing the seismic response of bridges: a benchmark study,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1561–1583, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. N. Madhekar and R. S. Jangid, “Control of seismically excited benchmark highway bridge with variable frequency pendulum isolator,” International Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 3, no. 1-2, pp. 83–117, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Narasimhan, “Robust direct adaptive controller for the nonlinear highway bridge benchmark,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 599–612, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. Y.-J. Cha and A. K. Agrawal, “Velocity based semi-active turbo-Lyapunov control algorithms for seismically excited nonlinear smart structures,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1043–1056, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Q. Sun, L. Zang, J. Zhou, and Q. Shi, “Experimental study of the semi-active control of building structures using the shaking table,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 32, no. 15, pp. 2353–2376, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Z. Li and L. Xu, “Shaking-table test on semi-active control for seismic response of tall buildings using MRF-04K damper,” in Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper no. 3191, Vancouver, Canada, 2004.
  20. D. Zhao and H. Li, “Shaking table tests and analyses of semi-active fuzzy control for structural seismic reduction with a piezoelectric variable-friction damper,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 19, no. 10, Article ID 105031, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. Franco-Anaya, A. J. Carr, and J. G. Chase, “Shaking table tests of a model structure with semi-active resettable devices,” in Proceedings of the 10th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, 2014.
  22. N. Caterino, M. Spizzuoco, and A. Occhiuzzi, “Shaking table testing of a steel frame structure equipped with semi-active MR dampers: comparison of control algorithms,” Smart Structures and Systems, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 963–995, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. B. F. Spencer Jr. and S. Nagarajaiah, “State of the art of structural control,” ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 129, no. 7, pp. 845–856, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. N. Caterino, B. M. Azmoodeh, and A. Occhiuzzi, “Medium to long term behavior of MR dampers for structural control,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 23, no. 11, Article ID 117005, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. Occhiuzzi, V. F. Grasso, and G. Manfredi, “Early warning systems from a structural control perspective,” in Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Structural Control, Wien, Austria, July 2004.
  26. A. Occhiuzzi, I. Iervolino, and G. Manfredi, “Feedforward control algorithms for seismic early warning systems,” in Proceedings of 4th World Conference on Structural Control and Monitoring, 4WCSCM-266, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2006.
  27. G. Maddaloni, N. Caterino, and A. Occhiuzzi, “Semi-active control of the benchmark highway bridge based on seismic early warning systems,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1703–1715, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. G. Maddaloni, N. Caterino, G. Nestovito, and A. Occhiuzzi, “Use of seismic early warning information to calibrate variable dampers for structural control of a highway bridge: evaluation of the system robustness,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 2407–2428, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. D. Symans and M. C. Constantinou, “Semi-active control systems for seismic protection of structures: a state-of-the-art review,” Engineering Structures, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 469–487, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. N. Caterino, M. Spizzuoco, and A. Occhiuzzi, “Understanding and modelling the physical behaviour of magnetorheological dampers for seismic structural control,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 20, no. 6, Article ID 065013, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. G. Iannaccone, A. Zollo, L. Elia et al., “A prototype system for earthquake early-warning and alert management in southern Italy,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1105–1129, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. Y. Nakamura, “Development of earthquake early-warning system for the Shinkansen, some recent earthquake engineering research and practical in Japan,” in The Japanese National Committee of the International Association for Earthquake Engineering, pp. 224–238, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  33. Y. Nakamura, “On the urgent earthquake detection and alarm system (UrEDAS),” in Proceedings of the 9th World Conference Earthquake Engineering, vol. 7, pp. 673–678, Tokyo, Japan, August 1988.
  34. T. Odaka, K. Ashiya, S. Tsukada, S. Sato, K. Ohtake, and D. Nozaka, “A new method of quickly estimating epicentral distance and magnitude from a single seismic record,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 526–532, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. S. Horiuchi, H. Negishi, K. Abe, A. Kamimura, and Y. Fujinawa, “An automatic processing system for broadcasting earthquake alarms,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 708–718, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. Y.-M. Wu and T.-L. Teng, “A virtual subnetwork approach to earthquake early warning,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 2008–2018, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. Y.-M. Wu and L. Zhao, “Magnitude estimation using the first three seconds P-wave amplitude in earthquake early warning,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 33, no. 16, Article ID L16312, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. J. M. Espinosa-Aranda, A. Cuellar, A. Garcia et al., “Evolution of the mexican seismic alert system (SASMEX),” Seismological Research Letters, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 694–706, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. R. M. Allen and H. Kanamori, “The potential for earthquake early warning in Southern California,” Science, vol. 300, no. 5620, pp. 786–789, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. R. M. Allen, H. Brown, M. Hellweg, O. Khainovski, P. Lombard, and D. Neuhauser, “Real-time earthquake detection and hazard assessment by ElarmS across California,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 36, no. 5, Article ID L00B08, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. R. M. Allen, P. Gasparini, O. Kamigaichi, and M. Böse, “The status of earthquake early warning around the World: an introductory overview,” Seismological Research Letters, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 682–693, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. Böse, E. Hauksson, K. Solanki, H. Kanamori, and T. H. Heaton, “Real-time testing of the on-site warning algorithm in southern California and its performance during the July 29 2008 Mw5.4 Chino Hills earthquake,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 36, no. 5, Article ID L00B03, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. H. Alcik, O. Ozel, N. Apaydin, and M. Erdik, “A study on warning algorithms for Istanbul earthquake early warning system,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 36, no. 5, Article ID L00B05, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. M. Böse, C. Ionescu, and F. Wenzel, “Earthquake early warning for Bucharest, Romania: novel and revised scaling relations,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 34, no. 7, Article ID L07302, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. H. S. Peng, Z. L. Wu, Y.-M. Wu, S. M. Yu, D. N. Zhang, and W. Huang, “Developing a prototype earthquake early warning system in the Beijing capital region,” Seismological Research Letters, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 394–403, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. C. Satriano, L. Elia, C. Martino, M. Lancieri, A. Zollo, and G. Iannaccone, “PRESTo, the earthquake early warning system for Southern Italy: concepts, capabilities and future perspectives,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 137–153, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. I. Iervolino, M. Giorgio, C. Galasso, and G. Manfredi, “Uncertainty in early warning predictions of engineering ground motion parameters: what really matters?” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 36, no. 5, Article ID L00B06, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. I. Iervolino, “Engineering earthquake early warning via regional networks,” in Early Warning for Geological Disasters, Scientific Methods and Current Practice, F. Wenzel and J. Zschau, Eds., Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  49. Q. Ma, X. Jin, and S. Li, “Ground shaking prediction for earthquake early warning,” in Proceedings of the 15th World Conference of Earthquake Engineering (WCEE '12), Lisbon, Portugal, September 2012.
  50. R. M. Allen, “Rapid magnitude determination for earthquake early warning,” in The Many Facets of Seismic Risk, G. Manfredi, M. R. Pecce, and A. Zollo, Eds., 2004. View at Google Scholar
  51. M. Hoshiba and S. Aoki, “Numerical shake prediction for earthquake early warning: data assimilation, real-time shake mapping, and simulation of wave propagation,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 1324–1338, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. A. Zollo, S. Colombelli, L. Elia et al., “An integrated regional and on-site earthquake early warning system for southern italy: concepts, methodologies and performances,” in Early Warning for Geological Disasters: Scientific Methods and Current Practice, F. Wenzel and J. Zschau, Eds., Advanced Technologies in Earth Sciences, pp. 117–137, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. N. Caterino, M. Spizzuoco, and A. Occhiuzzi, “Promptness and dissipative capacity of MR dampers: experimental investigations,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1424–1440, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. ITACA, “Italian Acceleration Archive,” http://itaca.mi.ingv.it.
  55. PEER, “Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center,” http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/.
  56. Eurocode 8, Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, Brussels, Belgium, 2003.
  57. C. L. Hwang and K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1981.
  58. K. Yoon, “A reconciliation among discrete compromise situations,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 277–286, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. C.-L. Hwang, Y.-J. Lai, and T.-Y. Liu, “A new approach for multiple objective decision making,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 889–899, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  60. N. Caterino, I. Iervolino, G. Manfredi, and E. Cosenza, “Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods for seismic structural retrofitting,” Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 432–445, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. N. Caterino, I. Iervolino, G. Manfredi, and E. Cosenza, “Multi-criteria decision making for seismic retrofitting of RC structures,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 555–583, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. I. Nuzzo, N. Caterino, G. Maddaloni, and A. Occhiuzzi, “Hybrid isolation of highway bridge via FPS and MR dampers exploiting seismic early warning information,” in Proceedings of the XVI ANIDIS Conference, L'Aquila, Italy, 2015.