Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Shock and Vibration
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 5450865, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5450865
Research Article

On the Shaker Simulation of Wind-Induced Non-Gaussian Random Vibration

1School of Reliability and System Engineering, Beihang University, 37 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China
2Mechanical Engineering, Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, 371 79 Karlskrona, Sweden

Received 29 July 2015; Revised 28 September 2015; Accepted 15 October 2015

Academic Editor: Dumitru I. Caruntu

Copyright © 2016 Fei Xu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. W. H. Connon III, “Comments on kurtosis of military vehicle vibration data,” Journal of the IES, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 38–41, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. Charles, “Derivation of environment descriptions and test severities from measured road transportation data,” Journal of the IES, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 37–42, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  3. R. G. Lambert, “Fatigue life prediction for various random stress peak distributions,” The Shock and Vibration Bulletin, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1–10, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  4. DoD, “Department of defense test method standard for environmental engineering considerations and laboratory tests,” Tech. Rep. MIL-STD-810G, Department of Defense, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  5. D. O. Smallwood, “Generation of stationary non-Gaussian time histories with a specified cross-spectral density,” Shock and Vibration, vol. 4, no. 5-6, pp. 361–377, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. O. Smallwood, “Generating non-Gaussian vibration for testing purposes,” Sound and Vibration, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 18–23, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Steinwolf, “Random vibration testing beyond PSD limitations,” Sound and Vibration, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 12–21, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Steinwolf, “Two methods for random shaker testing with low kurtosis,” Sound and Vibration, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 18–22, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Steinwolf, “Random vibration testing with crest factor limiting by Kurtosis manipulation,” Experimental Techniques, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 16–24, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Steinwolf, “Random vibration testing with kurtosis control by IFFT phase manipulation,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 28, pp. 561–573, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. V. Rouillard and M. A. Sek, “Synthesizing non-stationary, non-Gaussian random vibrations,” Packaging Technology and Science, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 423–439, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. Lalanne, Mechanical Vibration and Shock, Fatigue Damage, Wiley, 2010.
  13. C. Lalanne, Mechanical Vibration and Shock Analysis: Fatigue Damage, Wiley, 2010.
  14. S. Rubin, “Damage-based analysis tool for flight vibroacoustic data,” in Proceedings of the 19th Aerospace Testing Seminar, pp. 190–203, Manhattan Beach, Calif, USA, 2000.
  15. S. J. DiMaggio, B. H. Sako, and S. Rubin, “Analysis of nonstationary vibroacoustic flight data using a damage-potential basis,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 682–689, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. Ahlin, “Comparison of test specifications and measured field data,” Sound and Vibration, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 22–25, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Halfpenny and T. C. Walton, “New techniques for vibration qualification of vibrating equipment on aircraft,” Aircraft Airworthiness & Sustainment, vol. 2010, p. 19, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  18. A. Halfpenny, “Methods for accelerating dynamic durability tests,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Recent Advances in Structural Dynamic, Southampton, UK, 2006.
  19. J. J. Wijker, M. H. M. Ellenbroek, and A. Boer, “Characterization and synthesis of random acceleration vibration specifications,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics & Earthquake Engineering (COMPDYN '13), pp. 1–30, Kos Island, Greece, June 2013.
  20. S. I. McNeill, “Implementing the fatigue damage spectrum and fatigue damage equivalent vibration testing,” in Proceedings of the 79th Shock and Vibration Symposium, pp. 1–20, Orlando, Fla, USA, October 2008.
  21. H. A. Gaberson, “Shock severity estimation,” Sound & Vibration, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 12–20, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. G. R. Henderson and A. G. Piersol, “Fatigue damage related descriptor for random vibration test environments,” Sound and Vibration, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 20–24, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. C. Lalanne, Mechanical Vibration and Shock Analysis: Specification Development, Wiley, 2010.
  24. K. Ahlin, “Detection of transients in vibration time histories,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on Sound and Vibration (ICSV6 '99), Copenhagen, Denmark, July 1999.
  25. C. Lalanne, Mechanical Vibration and Shock, Specification Development, Wiley, 2010.