Review Article

A Review of the Evaluation, Control, and Application Technologies for Drill String Vibrations and Shocks in Oil and Gas Well

Table 7

Comprehensive comparative analysis of drill string V&S control methods.

ClassificationMethod/mechanismAdvantagesDisadvantagesTechnologiesAdapt the form
Transverse/
lateral
Axial/
longitudinal
Torsional/
rotational

Passive controlPrevent resonanceThe earliest, the most commonly used, mainly considering the inherent characteristics of drill string, fast calculation, can avoid the vibration modeModel is simplified, the control of drill string structure optimization is limitedAdjust RPM, drilling fluid lubrication
Adjust WOB/
Change energy distributionThe most common, mainly considering the boundary conditions of the drill string system economic and effective, simple and feasible, mature technologyThe contact between tools and borehole wall will increase the friction of the drill string torque, reduce drill string extension ability and the drilling efficiencyRoller stabilizer/double core bit/reamer/DOC bit
Variable diameter/near-bit/V stabilizer/fairing/spiral stripes//
Hybrid bit/
AbsorberThe most effective and simple device, economyControl ability is limited, tool is easy to damageAxial/AST shock absorber

Active
control
Whole drill string closed loop Good simulation resultIt is hard to get accurate underground data, calculation is complex, and hardware development is difficultμ//PID/PI/GA/
Wellhead closed loopFast response and low costTransmission rule of vibration signal is unknownTransmission wave decomposition//
Whole drill string open loopReduce drill string vibration by control RPMSystem response time is long, calibration is difficultSoft torque rotation system

Semiactive controlSemiactive varied damperControl precision, high energy utilization, being better than active control and passive controlControl system research and development is difficult and expensive, belongs to the strongly nonlinear controlThe magnetic fluid damper/