Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Shock and Vibration
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 2030462, 19 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2030462
Research Article

Numerical Study on the Seismic Response of Structure with Consideration of the Behavior of Base Mat Uplift

1Hubei Key Laboratory of Roadway Bridge & Structure Engineer, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
2The Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
3Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
4School of Urban Railway Transportation, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Xian-Feng Ma; nc.ude.ijgnot@am.fx

Received 12 June 2017; Accepted 31 July 2017; Published 3 October 2017

Academic Editor: Xing Ma

Copyright © 2017 Guo-Bo Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Apostolou, G. Gazetas, and E. Garini, “Seismic response of slender rigid structures with foundation uplifting,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 642–654, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. W. Housner, “The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquake,” Bull. Seism. Soc, vol. 53, pp. 403–417, 1963. View at Google Scholar
  3. C. S. Yim, A. K. Chopra, and J. Penzien, “Rocking response of rigid blocks to earthquakes,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 565–587, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. S. Koh, P. D. Spanos, and J. M. Roesset, “Harmonic rocking of rigid block on flexible foundation,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, vol. 112, no. 11, pp. 1165–1180, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. W. Harden and T. C. Hutchinson, “Beam-on-nonlinear-winkler-foundation modeling of shallow, rocking-dominated footinǵs,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 277–300, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. F. Vassiliou, K. R. Mackie, and B. Stojadinović, “Dynamic response analysis of solitary flexible rocking bodies: Modeling and behavior under pulse-like ground excitation,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 1463–1481, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Acikgoz and M. J. DeJong, “The rocking response of large flexible structures to earthquakes,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 875–908, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. F. Gelagoti, R. Kourkoulis, I. Anastasopoulos, and G. Gazetas, “Rocking isolation of low-rise frame structures founded on isolated footings,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 1177–1197, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. I. Anastasopoulos, G. Gazetas, M. Loli, M. Apostolou, and N. Gerolymos, “Soil failure can be used for seismic protection of structures,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 309–326, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. Sotomura and H. Kase, “Nonlinear response analysis on reactor building subject to horizontal and vertical ground motion simultaneously,” in Inproceedings of the 7th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT7), pp. 341–348, Chicago, 1983.
  11. G. Gazetas, I. Anastasopoulos, and E. Garini, “Geotechnical design with apparent seismic safety factors well-bellow 1,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 57, pp. 37–45, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. G. Gazetas, “4th Ishihara lecture: Soil–foundation–structure systems beyond conventional seismic failure thresholds,” Soil Dyn. Earthq, vol. 68, pp. 23–39, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  13. R. P. Kennedy, S. A. Short, D. A. Wesley, and T. H. Lee, “Effect on non-linear soil-structure interaction due to base slab uplift on the seismic response of a high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR),” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 323–355, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. N. Naohiro, A. Shodo, S. Takuya et al., “Study of ultimate seismic response and fragility evaluation of nuclear power building using nonlinear three-dimensional finite element model,” Nucl. Eng. Des, vol. 240, pp. 3551–3560, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  15. C. Bolisetti and A. S. Whittaker, “Seismic structure-soil-structure interaction in nuclear power plant structures,” in Proceedings of the 21th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT21, p. 11, New Delhi, India, 2011.
  16. N. Yabushita, N. Nakamura, T. Suzuki et al., “Analyses of reactor by 3D nonlinear FEM models considering basement uplift for simultaneous horizontal and vertical ground motions,” in Inproceedings of the 19th international conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT19), pp. 1–8, Toronto, 2007.
  17. N. Naohiro, I. Susumu, Y. Naoto, S. Takuya et al., “Analyses of reactor building by 3D nonlinear FEM models considering base mat uplift for simultaneous horizontal and vertical ground motions,” Nucl. Eng. Des, vol. 238, pp. 166–180, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  18. I. Anastasopoulos, F. Gelagoti, A. Spyridaki, J. Sideri, and G. Gazetas, “Seismic rocking isolation of an asymmetric frame on spread footings,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 133–151, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. I. Anastasopoulos, V. Drosos, and N. Antonaki, “Three-storey building retrofit: Rocking isolation versus conventional design,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1235–1254, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. K. Chopra and S. C. Yim, “Simplified Earthquake Analysis of Structures with Foundation Uplift,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 906–930, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. H. Tanaka, I. Maeda, K. Moriyama, and S. Watanabe, “Study on Horizontal Vertical Interactive SR Model for Base mat Uplift (Part 1 Formulation on Non-linear Characteristics of Soil Spring),” in Inproceedings of the 13th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT13), pp. K08-1–K08-6, 1995.
  22. H. Masaeli, F. Khoshnoudian, and M. Hadikhan Tehrani, “Rocking isolation of nonductile moderately tall buildings subjected to bidirectional near-fault ground motions,” Engineering Structures, vol. 80, pp. 298–315, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. S. Veletsos and B. Verbic, “Vibration of viscoelastic foundations,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 87–102, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. American Society of Civil Engineers Standard, “Seismic analysis of safety - related nuclear structures and commentary,” ASCE, pp. 4–98, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  25. I. Rotaru, V. Serban, N. Krutzik, D. Papandreou, and W. Schütz, “Reanalysis and evaluation of the seismic capacity of the CANDU 700 MW NPP CERNAVODA,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 212, no. 1-3, pp. 381–393, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. “Design of Nuclear Power Plants against seismic events part 4,” in Proceedings of the Requirements for procedures for verifying the safety of mechanical and electrical components against earthquakes (KTA 2201. 4 (6/90)), vol. 4, 1990.
  27. Code for seismic design of buildings, in Chinese.