Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Shock and Vibration
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 2408234, 18 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2408234
Research Article

Seismic Failure Probability of a Curved Bridge Based on Analytical and Neural Network Approaches

1Department of Civil Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES) and Iranian Earthquake Engineering Association, Tehran, Iran

Correspondence should be addressed to P. Zarfam

Received 4 February 2017; Revised 28 April 2017; Accepted 2 May 2017; Published 17 August 2017

Academic Editor: Carlo Rainieri

Copyright © 2017 K. Karimi-Moridani et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. Straub and A. Der Kiureghian, “Improved seismic fragility modeling from empirical data,” Structural Safety, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 320–336, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. Mander, Fragility curve development for assessing the seismic vulnerability of highway bridge, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, 2000.
  3. E. Choi, R. DesRoches, and B. Nielson, “Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones,” Engineering Structures, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 187–199, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C.-H. Lee, S. Kim, K.-H. Han, and K. Lee, “Simplified nonlinear progressive collapse analysis of welded steel moment frames,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 1130–1137, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Wei, R. Quintero, N. Galati, and Nanni A, “Failure modeling of bridge components subjected to blast loading part I: strain rate- dependent damage model for concrete,” International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, vol. 1, no. 1, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. G. H. Siqueira, A. S. Sanda, P. Paultre, and J. E. Padgett, “Fragility curves for isolated bridges in eastern Canada using experimental results,” Engineering Structures, vol. 74, pp. 311–324, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Y. Bao, S. K. Kunnath, S. El-Tawil, and H. S. Lew, “Macromodel-based simulation of progressive collapse: RC frame structures,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 134, no. 7, pp. 1079–1091, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. Krauthammer, “Blast-resistant structural concrete and steel connections,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 887–910, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. Brunesi and R. Nascimbene, “Extreme response of reinforced concrete buildings through fiber force-based finite element analysis,” Engineering Structures, vol. 69, pp. 206–215, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. B. Moller, M. Liebscher, K. Schweizerhof, S. Mattern, and G. Blankenhorn, “Structural collapse simulation under consideration of uncertainty - Improvement of numerical efficiency,” Computers and Structures, vol. 86, no. 19-20, pp. 1875–1884, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Guo and H. Gao, “Seismic Behavior of Posttensioned Concrete Bridge Piers with External Viscoelastic Dampers,” Shock and Vibration, vol. 2016, Article ID 1823015, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C.-S. W. Yang, S. D. Werner, and R. DesRoches, “Seismic fragility analysis of skewed bridges in the central southeastern United States,” Engineering Structures, vol. 83, pp. 116–128, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. E. Brunesi, R. Nascimbene, F. Parisi, and N. Augenti, “Progressive collapse fragility of reinforced concrete framed structures through incremental dynamic analysis,” Engineering Structures, vol. 104, pp. 65–79, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. Del Gaudio, P. Ricci, G. M. Verderame, and G. Manfredi, “Development and urban-scale application of a simplified method for seismic fragility assessment of RC buildings,” Engineering Structures, vol. 91, pp. 40–57, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. R. Kumar and P. Gardoni, “Effect of seismic degradation on the fragility of reinforced concrete bridges,” Engineering Structures, vol. 79, pp. 267–275, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. U. Hancilar, E. Çaktö, M. Erdik, G. E. Franco, and G. Deodatis, “Earthquake vulnerability of school buildings: Probabilistic structural fragility analyses,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 67, pp. 169–178, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Calabrese and C. G. Lai, “Fragility functions of blockwork wharves using artificial neural networks,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 52, pp. 88–102, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S.-H. Kim and M. Q. Feng, “Fragility analysis of bridges under ground motion with spatial variation,” International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 705–721, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. R. Karim and F. Yamazaki, “Effect of isolation on fragility curves of highway bridges based on simplified approach,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 414–426, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. B. Nielson, Analytical Fragility Curves for Highway Bridges in Moderate Seismic Zones (M.S. thesis), Academic Faculty, 2005.
  21. J. E. Padgett and R. DesRoches, “Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1157–1174, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSees).
  23. C. C. Mitropoulou and M. Papadrakakis, “Developing fragility curves based on neural network IDA predictions,” Engineering Structures, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 3409–3421, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. P. Rajeev and S. Tesfamariam, “Seismic fragilities for reinforced concrete buildings with consideration of irregularities,” Structural Safety, vol. 39, pp. 1–13, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. Penna, M. Rota, A. Mouyiannou, F. Graziotti, and G. Magenes, “An analytical procedure for the derivation of state-dependent fragility curves for masonry buildings,” in Proceedings of the VEESD 2013, Vienna Congress on Recent Advances in Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2013.
  26. K. Goda and H. Yoshikawa, “Incremental dynamic analysis of wood-frame houses in Canada: Effects of dominant earthquake scenarios on seismic fragility,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 48, pp. 1–14, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. H. Bilgin, “Fragility-based assessment of public buildings in Turkey,” Engineering Structures, vol. 56, pp. 1283–1294, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. Papadrakakis, V. Papadopoulos, N. D. Lagaros, J. Oliver, A. E. Huespe, and P. Sánchez, “Vulnerability analysis of large concrete dams using the continuum strong discontinuity approach and neural networks,” Structural Safety, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 217–235, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. F. Jalayer, “Direct probabilistic seismic analysis: implementing non-linear dynamic assessment,” in Partial of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
  30. PEER ground motion database, http://peer.berkeley.edu.
  31. D. G. Yoo, J. H. Kim, and Z. W. Geem, “Overview of Harmony Search algorithm and its applications in Civil Engineering,” Evolutionary Intelligence, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 3–16, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. Z. W. Geem, J. H. Kim, and G. V. Loganathan, “A new heuristic optimization algorithm: harmony search,” Simulation, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 60–68, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. K. S. Lee and Z. W. Geem, “A new meta-heuristic algorithm for continuous engineering optimization: harmony search theory and practice,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 194, no. 36–38, pp. 3902–3933, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. Z. W. Geem, Harmony Search Algorithms for Structural Design, 2009.
  35. M. Nikoo, P. Zarfam, and H. Sayahpour, “Determination of compressive strength of concrete using Self Organization Feature Map (SOFM),” Engineering with Computers, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 113–121, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. H. Arslan, “An evaluation of effective design parameters on earthquake performance of RC buildings using neural networks,” Engineering Structures, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1888–1898, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. N. D. Lagaros and M. Fragiadakis, “Fragility assessment of steel frames using neural networks,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 735–752, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLVMB_20.0.0/com.ibm.spss.statistics.cs/fac_telco_kmo_01.htm.