On the Equivalence between Static and Dynamic Railway Track Response and on the Euler-Bernoulli and Timoshenko Beams Analogy

<div>Effect of train speed on relative rail bending stiffness for the Timoshenko and Euler-Bernoulli beams (<svg height="12.584pt" id="M229" style="vertical-align:-3.29567pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -9.28833 60.2717 12.584" width="60.2717pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M387 375C387 402 357 448 257 448C172 448 82 404 82 326C82 289 108 255 156 241V239C85 223 23 181 23 116C23 39 89 -12 182 -12C265 -12 336 31 378 91L361 114C320 73 269 47 216 47C157 47 115 82 115 137C115 191 160 219 218 219C243 219 262 218 272 217L304 259L302 266C295 265 281 264 255 264C195 264 163 294 163 335C163 377 200 416 249 416C293 416 321 389 329 342C331 332 335 329 341 329C355 329 387 352 387 375Z" id="g113-247"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,8.963,0)"><path d="M535 323V373H52V323H535ZM535 138V188H52V138H535Z" id="g117-34"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,20.226,0)"><path d="M593 650H142L136 622C219 616 224 611 209 531L130 120C114 39 108 34 23 28L17 0H501C518 32 557 130 568 158L540 169C519 132 495 93 469 70C439 43 409 35 332 35C272 35 241 37 225 50C211 61 211 89 222 149L253 320H350C441 320 443 312 441 239H471L510 434H481C455 366 448 358 360 358H260L303 572C311 613 312 615 348 615H431C509 615 522 603 532 581C544 555 546 531 545 491L574 493C583 555 592 631 593 650Z" id="g113-70"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,27.843,0)"><path d="M405 650H141L135 622C222 616 230 610 215 535L133 116C118 41 113 33 29 28L23 0H289L295 28C209 33 205 40 219 116L298 535C312 609 317 616 399 622L405 650Z" id="g113-74"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,33.41,0)"><path d="M368 703H309L44 -163H104L368 703Z" id="g113-48"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,38.771,0)"><path d="M578 512C578 619 494 650 387 650H140L134 622C219 615 223 609 210 542L127 119C112 40 104 34 23 28L17 0H235C317 0 387 7 444 33C515 65 564 122 564 195C564 289 495 335 412 352V354C505 373 578 422 578 512ZM486 510C486 422 423 367 314 367H257L294 565C299 591 305 602 315 608C324 614 339 617 362 617C421 617 486 595 486 510ZM466 200C466 100 393 35 296 35C222 35 198 51 212 127L250 333H303C388 333 466 303 466 200Z" id="g113-67"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,46.519,3.132)"><path d="M327 325C324 350 312 408 304 433C283 442 256 451 213 451C120 451 59 391 59 320C59 243 125 210 188 181C237 158 266 136 266 93C266 52 231 24 195 24C134 24 93 81 74 148L42 143C42 106 51 37 59 23C78 8 125 -12 177 -12C257 -12 345 35 345 127C345 198 292 234 216 264C171 283 131 305 131 348C131 387 156 416 195 416C243 416 277 378 297 317L327 325Z" id="g58-113"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,49.895,3.132)"><path d="M527 54L498 55C459 56 451 63 451 114V445C436 442 413 438 384 435C353 432 318 430 291 429V402L328 396C361 390 370 387 370 331V101C336 70 300 54 262 54C217 54 173 78 173 166V300C173 361 173 412 176 445C160 442 132 438 105 434C77 431 52 430 29 429V402L59 395C83 390 92 385 92 331V141C92 30 150 -12 218 -12C246 -12 266 -4 295 13C324 29 346 47 370 64V-6L376 -12C396 -7 421 1 448 8C476 15 504 21 527 24V54Z" id="g58-115"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,54.782,3.132)"><path d="M156 406V710C117 695 54 682 9 675V647C73 642 75 635 75 573V25C131 -2 180 -12 223 -12C359 -12 478 92 478 240C478 357 387 451 278 451C265 451 251 447 236 440L156 406ZM156 373C175 384 208 392 235 392C315 392 387 328 387 214C387 97 332 30 251 31C197 31 170 66 162 84C158 93 156 104 156 118V373Z" id="g58-96"></path></g></svg>).</div>

Shock and Vibration

fig8

Figure 8

Figure 8: On the Equivalence between Static and Dynamic Railway Track Response and on the Euler-Bernoulli and Timoshenko Beams Analogy 