Research Article  Open Access
Lujun Chen, Deshui Xu, Jingtao Du, Chengwen Zhong, "Flexural Vibration Analysis of Nonuniform DoubleBeam System with General Boundary and Coupling Conditions", Shock and Vibration, vol. 2018, Article ID 5103174, 8 pages, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5103174
Flexural Vibration Analysis of Nonuniform DoubleBeam System with General Boundary and Coupling Conditions
Abstract
In this paper, an analytical modeling approach for the flexural vibration analysis of the nonuniform doublebeam system is proposed via an improved Fourier series method, in which both types of translational and rotational springs are introduced to account for the mechanical coupling on the interface as well as boundary restraints. Energy formulation is employed for the dynamic description of the coupling system. With the aim to treat the varying thickness across the beam in a unified pattern, the relevant variables are all expanded into Fourier series. Supplementary terms with the smoothed characteristics are introduced to the standard Fourier series for the construction of displacement admissible function for each beam. In conjunction with the Rayleigh–Ritz procedure, the transverse modal characteristics of nonuniform doublebeam system can be obtained by solving a standard eigenvalue problem. Instead of solving the certain value of nonideal boundary conditions, the continuous spring stiffnesses of the boundary conditions are considered, and the rotational restrains are introduced in the coupling beam interface. Numerical results are then presented to demonstrate the reliability of the current model and study the influence of various parameters, such as taper ratio, boundary, and coupling strength on the free vibration characteristics, with the emphasis put on the rotational restraining coefficients on the beam interface. This work can provide an efficient modeling framework for the vibration characteristics study of the complex doublebeam system, especially with arbitrary varying thickness and coupling stiffness.
1. Introduction
The multiplebeam system has been extensively studied due to its wide application in various branches, such as mechanical and aeronautical engineering. A good understanding on its dynamic characteristics will be of great importance for the efficient design as well as vibration control of such complex system. For this reason, a lot of research attention has been devoted to the vibration behavior of multiplebeam structure by many researchers in the past decades.
For these multiplebeam structures, mechanical coupling between each beam component is usually taken into account through the introduction of translational spring across the beam interface [1]. Seelig and Hoppmann [2] formulated the differential equation of motion and obtained the solution for vibration analysis of the elastically connected parallel beams. Rao [3] solved the differential governing equation for the flexural vibration of elastically connected parallel bars based on the Timoshenko beam theory, in which the effects of rotary inertia and shear deformation are considered. Li and Hua [4] employed the dynamic stiffness method to analyze the free vibration characteristics of a threebeam system with the elastic spring and dashpot on the coupling interface. Moreover, Winkler elastic layers are also accoutered for in the vibration analysis of coupling interface of the multiplebeam system [5–7]. Deng et al. [8] also studied the double functionally graded Timoshenko beam system resting on Winkler–Pasternak elastic foundation using Hamilton’s principle.
In many occasions, the nonuniform beam component will be encountered with the background of optimal design, in which a better or more suitable distribution of mass and strength than the uniform beam is of great desire. Thus, vibration analysis of the nonuniform beam has been studied continuously [9–11]. Abrate [12] presented a method to transform the motion equation of a nonuniform beam into its uniform counterpart. Lee and Lee [13] developed a transfermatrix method to investigate the free vibration characteristics of a tapered Bernoulli–Euler beam. Bessel functions are widely used in dealing with the nonuniform beam system with different boundary conditions. Rosa and Auciello [14] solved the nonuniform beamgoverning equation and the elastic boundary condition by substituting the four flexibility coefficients of the constructed functions. Auciello and Ercolano [15] investigated the transverse vibration of a beam, for which one part was tapered, and the remaining part is the uniform thickness. Torabi et al. [16] derived an exact closedform solution for the free vibration of Euler–Bernoulli conical and tapered beams with any number of attached masses, which are described by Dirac’s delta function. Furthermore, Chen and Pan Liu [17] employed the Bessel function and the numerical assembly method (NAM) to investigate the vibration characteristics of a tapered beam with multiple arbitrarily placed rotational dampers.
In the current studies on the vibration analysis of the multiplebeam system, most of them are devoted to the uniform ones, and just little exception can be found in the literature for the vibration studies of nonuniform multiplebeam structure. For example, Mabie and Rogers [18, 19] obtained an accurate solution for determining the first five frequencies of the cantilevered doubletampered beam system. Takahashi and Yoshioka [20] utilized the transfermatrix approach to analyze the vibration and stability of a doublecantilever beam, in which only translational spring is used for the description of coupling strength between two beams. From the above literature review, it can be found that the current study mainly considered the classical boundary conditions and just one type of restraining spring on the beam interface.
From the practical point of view, elastic boundary restraint and other types of mechanical coupling strength should be considered. There is a clear gap in the literature on this aspect. In analysis of the real system, the nearest ideal boundary conditions such as clamped, free, and simply support is selected for the modeling. However, small deviations from ideal conditions in real systems indeed occur. For example, a beam connected at the ends to rigid supports by pins is modeled using simply supported boundary conditions which require deflections and moments to be zero. But the hole and pin assembly may have small gaps and/or friction which is called the nonideal boundary. In this paper, the spring stiffnesses of the boundary conditions are different and continuous, so the elastic boundary is used here which includes the aforementioned nonideal boundary. Moreover, when the beam is under axial force or in axial moving, the minimal rotations are emerged, and the rotation restrains are important. For the double beam system, when the similar rotation movements happen, rotational coupling spring is introduced to restrain the relevant displacement. Claeys et al. [21] presents a direct comparison of measured and predicted nonlinear vibrations of a clampedclamped steel beam with nonideal boundary conditions, and the results show that the nonideal boundary of transverse spring and rotational spring have significant effect for the beam and a correct estimation is necessary to simulate the real structure’s characteristic.
In this work, motivated by the current limitation in literature, an efficient modeling approach for the vibration analysis of the nonuniform doublebeam system with general elastic boundary condition is proposed, in which both the translational and rotational restraining springs are taken into account to describe the dynamic interaction between each beam interface. Energy principle is formulated for the analysis of the system motion equation, with the nonuniform thickness variation expanded into the Fourier series in a unified pattern. The transverse displacement admissible function is constructed as the superposition of the standard Fourier series and the boundary smoothed auxillary terms. In conjunction with the Rayleigh–Ritz procedure, all the modal parameters can be derived by solving an eigenvalue matrix. Numerical examples are then given to demonstrate the reliability and effectiveness of the current model. Finally, some concluding remarks are made.
2. Theoretical Formulations
2.1. Model Description
Consider an elastically connected nonuniform doublebeam system, as illustrated in Figure 1. The beam member with arbitrary boundary conditions is coupled with other through the elastic restraining springs on the coupling interfaces. Such mechanical interaction is represented using two types of springs, namely translational and rotational one. Any boundary condition can be easily obtained by setting the relevant restraining spring stiffnesses. For the beam vibration, there are two freedom degrees at each field point, namely translation and rotation. Then, a fullcoupling restraint should include the translational and rotational spring distributions, accordingly. In this way, the familiar Winklertype of elastic interface can be readily derived by setting the coefficients of rotational springs into zero.
2.2. DoubleBeam System Dynamics and Its Solution
For the coupled beam structure as shown in Figure 1, it will be described from the viewpoint of energy. Although the doublebeam system is considered here, the current modeling framework is suitable for the general N beam system. Without losing the generality, the subsequent formulation will be given for such Nbeam coupling system. Lagrangian function is used for the description of system dynamic behavior, which can be written aswhere is the system Lagrangian, and are the total potential energy and kinetic energy, is the potential energy associated with the beam member, is the potential energy stored in the interface coupling springs, and is the kinetic energy due to the vibrating beam.
For the beam member with elastically restrained edges, its potential energy iswhere is the transverse vibration displacement field function, and are respectively the stiffness coefficients for the translational and rotational springs at the end , and similar meaning can be deduced for the right end of . The subscript means that this variable is associated with the beam member. is the moment of inertia of the nonuniform beam.
The total kinetic energy of the beam structure iswhere is the radian frequency and and are respectively the mass density and cross section area of the beam member.
The coupling potential energy between the interfaces can be written asin which and are respectively the translational and rotational coupling spring stiffnesses distributed across the interface between the and beam member.
In this work, in order to treat the crosssection area variation in a most general unified pattern, variables, such as arbitrary inertia and crosssection area , associated with the nonuniform thickness variation are expanded into Fourier cosine series, with the corresponding expansion coefficients defined as follows:andin which , and is the Fourier series term.
For various kinds of cross sections, the difference between them is merely the Fourier coefficients and the items which can be obtained easily through the Fourier transformation. For the traditional uniform beam, and will be constant across the beam length.
Once the system Lagrangian is obtained, the other thing is to construct the appropriate admissible function. Differential continuity of the constructed function has significant effect on the final convergence and accuracy. Here, an improved Fourier series method is employed for this purpose, in which the additional functions are introduced to the standard Fourier series to remove all the discontinuities associated with the spatial differentiation of the displacement field functions. For each beam member, its flexural vibrating displacement function is expanded as [22]in which
It can be easily proven that the current constructed trigonometric function can satisfy the displacement and its higherorder differentiation continuity requirement in the interval (0, L). It should be pointed out that the choice of the supplementary functions is not unique, while the appropriate form will be helpful for simplifying the subsequent mathematical formulations.
Substituting the admissible function Equation (9) into the elastically connected doublebeam system Lagrangian Equations (1)–(4), minimizing it with respect to all the unknown Fourier series coefficients and truncating the Fourier series into finite number , one will obtain the system characteristic equation in the matrix form:where and are the stiffness and mass matrices for the elastically connected doublebeam system, respectively, and is the unknown Fourier series coefficient vector. By solving such standard eigenvalue problem, all the modal parameters can be easily obtained.
3. Numerical Examples and Discussions
In this section, the aforementioned modeling framework is programmed in the MATLAB environment. Several numerical results of different kinds of cross sections with various boundary conditions will be presented to demonstrate the effectiveness and advantage of the proposed model. As no research has been published about the free vibration of doublebeam system with uniform cross sections, the results of the current method will be the first compared with those from other relevant literatures to validate the correctness. In current solution framework, the elastic boundary conditions are easily obtained by setting the restraining stiffness coefficient into various values accordingly. Similarly, variation of the arbitrary inertia and crosssection area can be easily handled using the same MATLAB program by just changing the mapping parameters of the nonuniform profile in Fourier space. In the following analysis, the nondimensional frequency parameter will be used, with their definitions as .
3.1. DoubleBeam System with Uniform Cross Section
Here, by setting the relevant parameters to constant in Equations (5) and (7), several vibration results can be obtained for a uniform doublebeam system, which has been investigated in some former studies. With the comparison purpose, modal parameters are kept the same as those used in Ref. [23], namely, , , , , . From the comparison tabulated in Table 1, it can be observed that the current results can agree well with those from other approaches in which the parameters of beam 1 are used for the calculation of nondimensional frequency . Comparing the results of Tables 1 and 2, it can be found that the variation of coupling stiffness will not affect the oddmode frequency in the uniform doublebeam system.
 
^{a}Results from Ref. [23]. ^{b}Results from FEM with 500 elements. 
 
^{a}Results from Ref. [23]. 
3.2. Single Nonuniform Beam with Different CrossSection Parameters
In order to validate the proposed method for the case of variable cross sections, the coupling translational spring and rotational spring are set to zero which transfer the doublebeam system to two singlebeams with the same vibration characteristics. The polynomial function of inertia and crosssection area is as follows:andwhere is the taper ratio of the crosssection area.
Table 3 shows the results of one single nonuniform beam with clampedfree (CF) boundary condition, in which the data taken form Ref. [24] are also presented to validate the correctness of the present method in dealing with the different cross sections. With the increase of the taper ratio , the frequency will raise which represents the decrease of the beam’s stiffness.

Moreover, a single beam with threestep changes in cross section is analyzed. The geometrical dimensions and material properties are L_{R} = 1 m, m_{R} = 1 kg/m, EI_{R} = 1 Nm^{2}, μ_{1} = 1.0, μ_{2} = 0.8, μ_{3} = 0.65, μ_{4} = 0.25, L_{1} = 0.25L_{R}, L_{2} = 0.3L_{R}, L_{3} = 0.25L_{R}, and L_{4} = 0.2L_{R}. Table 4 lists the first four frequency parameters for various combinations of boundary conditions. The results can agree well with those from the reference approaches.
 
^{a}Results from [25]. 
3.3. Nonuniform DoubleBeam System with Uniform Cross Section of Beam 2
The nonuniform double beam system is considered with CF boundary condition for both beams in which the upper beam’s crosssection function is the same as defined in Equations (12) and (13) in Section 3.2. The lower beam’s cross section is uniform with the same parameter of the upper beam at . Other material parameters are the same for the two beams. Table 5 lists the results of different coupling stiffness boundaries. When the coupling translational spring and rotational spring are both zero, the frequencies are from the two single beams in which the oddmode results of the lower uniform beam is larger than the evenmode results of the upper taper beam because the nonuniform cross section makes the beam’s stiffness smaller. After the coupling stiffness and becomes bigger, the frequencies for both beams becomes larger. As the value of and are both 10^{7}, the frequencies are similar as the single beam in which the value is bigger than odd and evenmode results.

The influence of different coupling springs and on the fundamental frequency of the doublebeam system is presented in Figure 2 which can illustrate that the influence of rotational spring is obvious than that of translational spring which means the rotational spring cannot be ignored in the doublebeam system.
3.4. Nonuniform DoubleBeam System with Elastic Boundary Condition
Finally, the nonuniform doublebeam system is considered, in which both beams are tapered beams as defined in Section 3.2. Here, the boundary condition is clamped at and elastic at . The influence of elastic boundary stiffness () at of both beams and coupling spring () are plotted in Figure 3. As discussed in Section 3.3, the rotational spring cannot be ignored, and the translational and rotational springs of the coupling spring are set at the same value. From Figure 3, when the elastic boundary stiffness increases, the frequencies will become bigger, and there will be a sensitive area in which the influence to the fundamental frequency is uniform. Otherwise, the fundamental frequencies will not change when there is an increase in the coupling stiffness in Figure 3(a) which illustrates the same characteristic as in Section 3.1 for the uniform doublebeam system. In Figure 3(b), the second mode frequency will increase along with the increase of elastic boundary and coupling spring. With the increase of coupling spring , there is a rapid change when the coupling spring is around 10^{5} N/m^{2}, which means the influence of coupling spring on the frequency is more obvious than that of elastic boundary.
(a)
(b)
In order to analyze the coupling influence of elastic boundary and taper ratio of the nonuniform beam, the fundamental frequency of the same structure is shown in Table 6, and the corresponding results are plotted in Figure 4. The sensitive area of the influence of elastic boundary will move when the taper ratio changes. At the left side of the sensitive which means the elastic boundary stiffness is smaller, the fundamental frequency will increase along with the raise of the taper ratio, and the contrary tendency will occur when on the right side. In the sensitive area, each line in Figure 4 will intersect with each other which means the fundamental frequency are equal at the certain value of elastic boundary condition. This phenomenon implies that when the change of elastic boundary is difficult to achieve at, one can get the same result by changing the taper ratios of the beams.

4. Conclusion
In this paper, an efficient modeling approach for the vibration analysis of nonuniform doublebeam system with general boundary condition is established, in which the fullcoupling on the common interface are taken into account by introducing both the translational and rotational restraining springs across the beams. The elastic boundary condition of the beams and various rotational restrains in the beam’s interface can be studied easily in the current modeling. In order to treat the nonuniform beam profile in the most general pattern, the arbitrary thickness variation functions are all expanded into Fourier series. Energy formulation is employed for the description of doublebeam dynamics, with the admissible function constructed as the superposition of Fourier series and boundary smoothed auxiliary terms. In conjunction with the Rayleigh–Ritz procedure, all the modal parameters can be derived by solving a standard eigenvalue problem.
Numerical examples are then presented to demonstrate the correctness and reliability of the current model for predicting the modal frequencies of the uniform doublebeam and nonuniform beam structures. Based on the model established, the influence of boundary condition and coupling strength on the modal characteristics of the nonuniform beam is investigated and addressed. The results show that the rotational coupling stiffness can also play an important role in affecting the doublebeam system, which has received little research attention in the existing literature. It can be also found that the variation of the thickness profile can be utilized to adjust the system modal parameters when the change of boundary and/or coupling conditions may be difficult to perform. Although just simulation is implemented for the doublebeam system, this approach can be very easy for handling the multiplebeam structure of any number. This work can provide an efficient modeling approach for the dynamic study of the multiplebeam system with complex boundary, coupling, and thickness variation conditions.
Data Availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation (Grant no. 161049).
References
 Z. Oniszczuk, “Free transverse vibrations of an elastically connected complex beam–string system,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 254, no. 4, pp. 703–715, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. M. Seelig and W. H. Hoppmann, “Normal mode vibrations of systems of elastically connected parallel bars,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 93–99, 1964. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. S. Rao, “Natural vibrations of systems of elastically connected Timoshenko beams,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1232–1237, 1974. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Li and H. X. Hua, “Dynamic stiffness vibration analysis of an elastically connected threebeam system,” Applied Acoustics, vol. 69, no. 7, pp. 591–600, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Oniszczuk, “Free transverse vibrations of elastically connected simply supported doublebeam complex system,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 232, no. 2, pp. 387–403, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. G. Kelly and S. Srinivas, “Free vibrations of elastically connected stretched beams,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 326, no. 3–5, pp. 883–893, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. A. De Rosa and M. Lippiello, “Nonclassical boundary conditions and DQM for doublebeams,” Mechanics Research Communications, vol. 34, no. 78, pp. 538–544, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Deng, W. Cheng, and S. G. Zhao, “Vibration and buckling analysis of doublefunctionally graded Timoshenko beam system on WinklerPasternak elastic foundation,” Composite Structures, vol. 160, pp. 152–168, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. R. Banerjee and F. W. Williams, “Exact Bernoulli–Euler dynamic stiffness matrix for a range of tapered beams,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 2289–2302, 1985. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. M. Cem, M. Aydogdu, and V. Taskin, “Vibration of a variable crosssection beam,” Mechanics Research Communications, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 78–84, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Lenci, F. Clementi, and C. E. N. Mazzilli, “Simple formulas for the natural frequencies of nonuniform cables and beams,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 77, pp. 155–163, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Abrate, “Vibration of nonuniform rods and beams,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 185, no. 4, pp. 703–716, 1995. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. W. Lee and J. Y. Lee, “Free vibration analysis using the transfermatrix method on a tapered beam,” Computers & Structures, vol. 164, pp. 75–82, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. A. Rosa and N. M. Auciello, “Free vibrations of tapered beams with flexible ends,” Computers & Structures, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 197–202, 1996. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. M. Auciello and A. Ercolano, “Exact solution for the transverse vibration of a beam a part of which is a taper beam and other part is a uniform beam,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 34, no. 17, pp. 2115–2129, 1997. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Torabi, H. Afshari, M. Sadeghi, and H. Toghian, “Exact closedform solution for vibration analysis of truncated conical and tapered beams carrying multiple concentrated masses,” Journal of Solid Mechanics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 760–782, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Chen and L. Pan Liu, “A complexvalued solution of free vibration for tapered beams with any number of rotational dampers,” Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 749–758, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 H. H. Mabie and C. B. Rogers, “Transverse vibrations of doubletapered cantilever beams,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 51, no. 5B, pp. 1771–1774, 1972. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. H. Mabie and C. B. Rogers, “Transverse vibrations of doubletapered cantilever beams with end support and with end mass,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 986–991, 1974. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 I. Takahashi and T. Yoshioka, “Vibration and stability of a nonuniform doublebeam subjected to follower forces,” Computers & Structures, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 1033–1038, 1996. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Claeys, J. J. Sinou, J. P. Lambelin, and B. Alcoverro, “Multiharmonic measurements and numerical simulations of nonlinear vibrations of a beam with nonideal boundary conditions,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 4196–4212, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. L. Li, X. F. Zhang, J. T. Du, and Z. G. Liu, “An exact series solution for the transverse vibration of rectangular plates with general elastic boundary supports,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 321, no. 12, pp. 254–269, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Q. B. Mao, “Free vibration analysis of elastically connected multiplebeams by using the Adomian modified decomposition method,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 331, no. 11, pp. 2532–2542, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. R. Banerjee, H. Su, and D. R. Jackson, “Free vibration of rotating tapered beams using the dynamic stiffness method,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 298, no. 45, pp. 1034–1054, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Wang and Y. Wang, “Free vibration analysis of multiplestepped beams by the differential quadrature element method,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 219, no. 11, pp. 5802–5810, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Lujun Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.