Research Article  Open Access
XinChang Liu, Qi Sun, ChunJun Chen, "Damage Degree Detection of Cracks in a Locomotive Gear Transmission System", Shock and Vibration, vol. 2018, Article ID 5761064, 14 pages, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5761064
Damage Degree Detection of Cracks in a Locomotive Gear Transmission System
Abstract
The gear transmission system is a vital component of the locomotive bogie. During locomotive operation, the damage to the gear transmission system spreads rapidly and affects the locomotive’s operational safety. In this paper, a method is proposed to detect the degree of tooth root crack damage. First, a dynamic locomotive model with a gear transmission is built, and the vertical acceleration of the locomotive subsystem (car body, bogie frame, wheelset, and motor) vibrations is obtained under various degrees of tooth root crack damage on the gear transmission system. By comparing the characteristics of those signals, the subsystem that is more sensitive to the effect of the tooth root crack is found. The characteristic parameters of the sensitive subsystem are calculated, and a multidimensional characteristic parameter matrix is established. The multidimensional characteristic parameter matrix is optimized and reduced by principal component analysis (PCA). Using the Grey relational analysis method, the degree of tooth root crack damage is detected. The proposed method demonstrates the ability to recognize the degree of tooth root crack damage.
1. Introduction
The gear transmission system transmits the torque of the motor and is a key element of the locomotive system. During locomotive operation, the gear transmission system is subjected to the mesh force of the gear pair and the wheelrail impact force. When the gear transmission system goes out of order, the damage spreads rapidly and affects the locomotive’s operational safety [1]. Therefore, the detection method of the gear transmission system is the key to ensure locomotive safety.
In recent years, scholars worldwide have carried out much research on gear dynamics. Wu et al. [2] established a sixdegreeoffreedom dynamic model and analyzed gear dynamic behavior with a change in the gear root crack. Through the dynamic analysis of the gear transmission system, Endo et al. [3] noted that the change in the meshing stiffness and the geometric error of the tooth shape are important causes of tooth root crack failure. The dynamic behavior of gear wear failure is analyzed by Ding and Kahraman [4]. Cui et al. [5] established the dynamic model of the gear rotor coupling system and studied the influence of the rotational speed on the dynamic response. In 2011, Ma and Chen [6] studied the nonlinear dynamics of a gear system with a tooth root crack. To research the spalling mechanism, Ma et al. established a dynamic model of a gear pair with local spalling [7]. Bahk and Parker developed an analytical model used to study the influence of tooth profile modification on the planetary gear dynamics [8]. In 2015, Li and Peng developed a multidegreeoffreedom nonlinear gear model that considers the meshing force and tribological force of the gear pair [9]. To analyze the influence of helical gear wear on the dynamic response of the gear transmission, Brethee et al. developed a comprehensive dynamic model that consists of 18 degrees of freedom [10].
At present, scholars have studied the fault diagnosis of the gear transmission system and put forward a series of effective diagnosis methods. To monitor the mechanical condition of a railway traction system, Kia et al. used timefrequency signal processing techniques to address the machine current signal [1]. Shao et al. introduced the support vector machine (SVM) method for damage detection of the mechanical transmission system [11]. In 2011 [12], Henao et al. put forward an electromagnetictorque estimation method to detect tooth damage in a highspeed railway traction system. Cao et al. proposed a method for detecting gear damage based on empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and highorder cumulant (HOC) analysis [13]. This method is used to identify the damage to the gear transmission system under various operating conditions. In 2013, [14], Yang and Cheng proposed a damage classification method based on local mean decomposition and principle component analysis methods. In 2015, [15], Kia et al. presented a noninvasive technique using space vector analysis of the stator current to detect gear tooth surface damage faults. In 2016, [16], Heydarzadeh et al. used the discrete wavelet transform and deep neural networks to realize the automatic detection of gear faults. In 2017, [17], Chai et al. introduced a method using resonancebased sparse signal decomposition combined with envelope spectrum analysis to extract the fault features of motor current. Peng et al. realized the fault detection of wind turbine drivetrain gearboxes using the recurrent neural network [18]. Ding et al. proposed a new method to detect the fault of planetary gearboxes based on local mean decomposition and permutation entropy [19].
However, the main object of those methods is to detect the existence of damage. The detection of the degree of damage of rotating machinery is the focus of this field. In this paper, the locomotive subsystem which can be used to reflect the gear tooth root crack is found. The degree of tooth root crack damage is detected based on the PCA and Grey relational analysis methods.
2. LocomotiveTrack Vertical Coupled Dynamics Model with a Gear Transmission and Gear Mesh Stiffness Model with Tooth Crack Damage
2.1. Vertical Dynamic Model of LocomotiveTrack Coupled with Gear Transmission
A twodimensional vertical dynamic model of the locomotivetrack coupled with the gear transmission system is developed. The dynamic model is composed of two parts: the locomotive subsystem and the track subsystem. The locomotive is modeled as a multirigid body system running on the track. It consists of one car body, two bogie frames, four wheelsets, four motors, and a gear transmission system. These components are connected by springdamper elements. The car body connects with the bogie frame by a secondary suspension. The bogie frame is supported on the wheelset via the primary suspension. One end of the motor is fixed on the bogie frame while the other end of the motor is fixed on the wheelset. Each component of this mathematical model has two vibrational degrees of freedom, which are torsional and vertical.
The track subsystem contains the rail, the sleepers, the ballasts, and the subgrade. These components are connected by springdamper elements. The rail is regarded as a continuous Bernoulli–Euler beam. It is mounted on the sleepers by the rail pads. Zhai et al. [20] provide a method of modeling railway ballasts. In the new model, the shear stiffness and shear damping are introduced between the adjacent ballasts. Each component of this mathematical model has one vibrational degree of freedom, which is vertical.
The notation used in this study is shown in Tables 1–3.



The schematic of the total dynamic system is depicted in Figure 1(a). The schematic of the gear transmission is depicted in Figure 1(b). Figure 1(c) is a detailed illustration of the gear transmission system. The gear transmission consists of motor, pinion, and gear. The dashed circle represents the base circle of the gear. The rotor of the motor is linked with the pinion by the torsional springdamper element. The pinion drives the gear to rotate through the engaging force. The gear is mounted on the wheelset. In this system, only the rotational motion of the components is considered.
(a)
(b)
(c)
As the locomotive is modeled as a multirigid body, the differential equations of the locomotive with the gear transmission can be established by D’Alembert’s principle.
Vertical vibration of car body:
Pitch motion of car body:
Vertical vibration of bogie frame:
Pitch motion of bogie frame:
Vertical vibration of motor:
Pitch motion of motor:
Vertical vibration of wheelset:
Rotational motion of motor rotor:
Rotational motion of the pinion:
Rotational motion of the gear:
Rotational motion of the wheelset:
The forces and moments are given by the following formulas:
Force between the car body and bogie:
Force between the bogie and wheelset:
Force between the bogie and motor:
Force between the motor and wheelset:
In equations (12)–(15), the symbol “round” refers to the function for rounding. denotes the half distance between the centers of the two bogie frames. is the half distance between the centers of two wheelsets. represents the longitudinal distance from the motor center of gravity to the center of the frame. represents the longitudinal distance from the pinion shaft to the motor center of gravity. represents the longitudinal distance from the pinion shaft to the gear shaft.
The symbols , , and , respectively, represent the wheelrail interaction force, the gear transmission mesh force, and the wheelrail interaction creep force. The gear transmission mesh force, and are shown as follows:where the symbols represents the transmission error. The dots above the variables indicate a firstorder differential operation. The transmission error can be calculated by the following formula:where and denote the radius of the pinion and gear base circles. Where and denote the angular displacements of the pinion and gear. The meaning of symbol and can be found in Table 1. In this paper, the manufacturing and the assembly error are ignored.
The symbol in equation (16) represents the wheelrail contact constant. The symbol represents the wheelrail elastic compressive deformation. Zhai and Cai [21] notes that the wheelrail elastic compressive deformation includes the static compressive deformation, and it is calculated as follows:where the symbols and are the vertical distances of the wheel and the rail on the contact point, respectively.
The symbol in equation (17) represents the normal load of the wheelrail contact. The symbol in equation (17) represents the adhesion coefficient of the wheelrail interface. Ishikawa gives the formula as follows:where , , , and are calculated constants and is the difference between the wheel rotational velocity and the locomotive velocity.
2.2. Gear Mesh Stiffness Model with Tooth Crack Damage
During gear transmission system operation, the tooth root is subjected to repeated bending stress. After some time, cracks will appear at the tooth root site. When the teeth with tooth root cracks enter the engagement, the mesh stiffness changes.
In 1987, Yang and Lin [22] used the potential energy method to calculate the gear mesh stiffness. They assumed that the gear meshing energy consists of three parts: (hertz energy), (bending potential energy), and (axial compressive energy). Tian [23] improved the mesh stiffness model in 2004. In this method, the (shear energy) was considered. In 2013, Chen and Shao [24] propose a much accurate method for calculating gear mesh stiffness. In this method, they consider the effect of the tooth root filletfoundation deflection and the range of the cantilever beam is between the base circle to the dedendum circle. In order to calculate the mesh stiffness of tooth profile modifications and profile shifted gear, Ma et al. [25] revised the model put forward by Chen. In 2016, Ma and Zeng [26] put forward a method to calculate the mesh stiffness of gear pairs with tip relief.
During gear transmission system operation, the tooth root is subjected to repeated bending stress. After some time, cracks will appear at the tooth root site. When the teeth with tooth root cracks enter the engagement, the mesh stiffness changes. References [27, 28] consider that a crack develops at the root of a single tooth. In most cases, the crack is a straight line. Based on the above study, the crack propagation path is assumed to be a smooth and continuous line. Reference [29] indicates that when the gear has a tooth root crack, parameters and will change. In 2014, Ma et al. [30, 31] put forward a model to calculate the mesh stiffness of gear with tooth root crack considering the accurate transition curve of tooth root. In 2013, Mohammed et al. [32] assumed that the crack of the gear tooth is parabolic, and the accuracy of gear stiffness calculation is improved. In order to calculate the mesh stiffness of gear with tooth crack in planetary gearbox, Liang developed an improved beam model to analyze the effect of the crack evolution on gear mesh stiffness.
In this paper, the mesh stiffness of the healthy gear can be calculated by equation (22), where , , , represent the Hertzian, bending, shear, and axial compressive mesh stiffness. Those indicators calculated by the formula equation (23), where represents the acting force at the contact point. can be divided into and , where is the radial force and is the tangential force. The schematic of gear force is shown in Figure 2. and denote the shear modulus and Young’s modulus, respectively. and are the area moment of inertia and section area, respectively, where the distance from the tooth root is . The total mesh gear potential energy can be calculated by equation (24). Chaari et al. [33] noted that the deformation of the base circle has an effect on the gear mesh stiffness. The mesh stiffness can be calculated by equation (25). The coefficients , , and can be calculated by equation (26), and represents these coefficients , , , and . The coefficients , , , and can be obtained by Table 4. θ_{f} is an angle that refers to half the base circle thickness. and represent the basic circle radius and gear bore, respectively. is calculated by equation (27).

References [27, 28] consider that a crack develops at the root of a single tooth. In most cases, the crack is a straight line. Based on the above study, the crack propagation path is assumed to be a smooth and continuous line. Reference [29] indicates that when the gear has a tooth root crack, parameters and will change. They can be calculated by equations (28) and (29), respectively. The parameter is the vertical distance from the point on the curve to the point of the tooth’s centerline, as shown in Figure 2. The bending potential energy and shear potential energy can be calculated by equations (22), (28), and (29). We can then finally obtain the mesh stiffness of a gear with a tooth crack.
3. Detection of the Degree of Locomotive Gearbox Gear Crack Damage
3.1. Feature Selection Based on PCA (Principal Component Analysis)
Principal component analysis (PCA) is a statistical analysis method that maps multiple features into a few comprehensive features. To systematically analyze a practical problem, indicators that are extracted using a timefrequency domain analysis need to be considered. However, each indicator reflects some information about the problem, and there is a certain correlation between the indicators. Principal component analysis takes effective data dimensionality reduction technology to extract several comprehensive and irrelevant features that reflect the comprehensive test information as much as possible [34, 35]. The principal component analysis process is shown as follows:(1)The standardization of data is a pdimensional random vector, and is the sample data, where . is the standardization matrix that is calculated by equation (30):where(2)The calculation of the correlation coefficient matrix of the standardization matrix is done in equation (32).(3)Calculate the principal component . The characteristic root of the correlation coefficient matrix can be obtained by equation (33). The eigenvector of the characteristic root is . is the characteristic vector matrix.
The contributions ratio of the principal component can be calculated by equation (33). The cumulative contribution rate of the former m components can be calculated by equation (35). The number of the principal components can be determined by the value of . Finally, we can obtain the principal component by equation (36):
3.2. Grey Relational Analysis
The Grey relational analysis is a method of quantitative description of the development and change of a system [36]. It determines the state of the system by calculating the correlation degree between the standard mode and the unknown mode. The process of detecting the degree of damage using the Grey relational analysis is shown as follows:(1)Structure standard damage mode matrix. In this paper, the standard mode matrix is established using the simulation data of the locomotive car body. The standard mode matrix is shown as follows:where is the number of damage states and is the number of indicators of each standard state.
In this paper, we choose a series of statistical indicators (such as RMS, kurtosis, , , and FM4) to analysis the degree of gearbox gear crack damage. RMS, kurtosis, , , and FM4 can be calculated bywhere is the amplitude of the signal and N is the number of data. is the mean value of the data and is the difference signal of . is the mean value of . The detailed flowchart for correlation degree is shown in Figure 3.(2)Calculation of the correlation coefficient. Assume is the characteristic vector calculated from the data to be checked. is the characteristic parameter. The correlation coefficient can be calculated bywhere is the resolution coefficient. In this paper, the value of is 0.5.(3)Detection of damage degree. The vector of the correlation degree is shown as follows:
The damage mode corresponding to the maximum element of is the state of the data to be checked.
3.3. Detection of Degree of Locomotive Gearbox Gear Damage
The process of detecting the degree of gearbox gear damage is shown as follows:(1)Decompose the fault range that needs to be detected into m parts.(2)Calculate the n indicators of the vertical acceleration of car body vibration under each part that was decomposed in Section 1. These indicators make up the standard damage mode matrix. The matrix and the calculated indicators that are to be verified make up a matrix with the size of .(3)Use the method of PCA to reduce the dimension of matrix.(4)Solve the correlation degree vector between the signal to be verified and the standard mode using the Grey relational analysis method.(5)Determine the maximum value of the correlation degree vector corresponding to the degree of gear damage. The damage degree detection chart is shown in Figure 4.
4. Simulation and Result Discussion
With the development of the vertical dynamics model of the locomotivetrack coupled with the gear transmission, the dynamic responses of the locomotive subsystem can be obtained. We adopt the locomotive model reported earlier. The running speed of the locomotive is 100 km/h. The radius of the wheelset is 0.625 m. During locomotive operation, the mesh force of the gear transmission system is the primary excitation that causes locomotive vibrations. The notation for the main parameters of the gearbox is in Table 5. Using the above parameters, we can obtain the gear mesh frequency (f_{m}) and the rotation frequency of the pinion (f_{p}): 848.8 Hz and 36.9 Hz, respectively.

The total mesh stiffness of gear pair can be calculated by equations (22)–(29). When there is a crack in the gear tooth root, the mesh stiffness of the gear pair will change. The mesh stiffness of gear pair under different crack sizes is calculated and shown in Figure 5. The angle between the crack direction and the tooth center is . As shown, when there is a crack on the pinion, the mesh stiffness of the gear pair is decreased.
4.1. Acceleration Comparison of the Car Body, Frame, and Wheelset
The dynamic model of the locomotive is a largescale system that contains the car body, bogie, and wheelset. To determine the component with an acceleration that shows more sensitivity to a tooth root crack, we compare the acceleration data of the car body, bogie frame, and wheelset.
Figure 6(a) is the time domain diagram of vertical vibration acceleration of car body when there is no damage on the gear. Figure 6(b) is the time domain diagram of vertical vibration acceleration of car body when the crack length of the pinion is 4 mm. By comparing these diagrams, we find that when there is a crack on the root of the pinion, the amplitude of the acceleration of the car body is bigger.
(a)
(b)
Figure 7(a) is the frequency spectrum diagram (in logarithm form) of vertical vibration acceleration of car body when there is no damage on the gear. Figure 7(b) is the frequency spectrum diagram of vertical vibration acceleration of car body when the crack length of the pinion is 4 mm. And the frequency range of these two diagrams is 0–10000 Hz. As we can see, the mesh frequency (f_{m} = 848.8 Hz) and the harmonics of the gear pair is apparent. In order to better observe the low frequency part of Figure 7, we restrict the abscissa range of Figure 7 between 0 and 1200 Hz and obtain Figure 8. As we can see, when there is a crack on the pinion, the rotation frequency of the pinion (f_{p} = 36.9 Hz) and the harmonics of the rotation frequency of the pinion appear.
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
Figure 9(a) is the time domain diagram of vertical vibration acceleration of car body when there is no damage on the gear. Figure 9(b) is the time domain diagram of vertical vibration acceleration of car body when the crack length of the pinion is 4 mm. By comparing these diagrams, we find that when there is a crack on the root of the pinion, the amplitude of the acceleration of the car body is bigger.
(a)
(b)
Figure 10(a) is the frequency spectrum diagram (in logarithm form) of vertical vibration acceleration of car body when there is no damage on the gear. Figure 10(b) is the frequency spectrum diagram of vertical vibration acceleration of car body when the crack length of the pinion is 4 mm. And the frequency range of these two diagrams is 0–10000 Hz. As we can see, the mesh frequency (f_{m} = 848.8 Hz) and the harmonics of the gear pair are apparent. In order to better observe the low frequency part of Figure 10, we restrict the abscissa range of Figure 10 between 0 and 1200 Hz and obtain Figure 11. As we can see, when there is a crack on the pinion the rotation frequency of the pinion (f_{p} = 36.9 Hz) and the harmonics of the rotation frequency of the pinion appear.
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
Figure 12(a) is the time domain diagram of vertical vibration acceleration of car body when there is no damage on the gear. Figure 12(b) is the time domain diagram of vertical vibration acceleration of car body when the crack length of the pinion is 4 mm. By comparing these diagrams, we find that the crack of the pinion has little effect on the vertical vibration acceleration of the wheelset.
(a)
(b)
Figure 13(a) is the frequency spectrum diagram (in logarithm form) of vertical vibration acceleration of car body when there is no damage on the gear. Figure 13(b) is the frequency spectrum diagram of vertical vibration acceleration of car body when the crack length of the pinion is 4 mm. And the frequency range of these two diagrams is 0–10000 Hz. As we can see, the mesh frequency (f_{m} = 848.8 Hz) and the harmonics of the gear pair is apparent. In order to better observe the low frequency part of Figure 13, we restrict the abscissa range of Figure 13 between 0 and 1200 Hz and obtain Figure 14. As we can see, when there is a crack on the pinion, the rotation frequency of the pinion (f_{p} = 36.9 Hz) and the harmonics of the rotation frequency of the pinion appear. In addition, the difference in the gear pair mesh frequency and the pinion rotation frequency is appear.
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
By comparing the vertical acceleration of the car body, bogie, and wheelset vibrations, we find that when there is a crack on the pinion, the amplitude of the acceleration of these vibrations are larger in the time history and the frequency spectrum. The rotation frequency of the pinion and the harmonics of the rotation frequency of the pinion appear. Due to the influence of the springdamper system, the vertical acceleration of the car body and frame vibrations attenuates much more than in the wheelset. The vertical acceleration of the car body is more sensitive to the effect of the tooth root crack.
4.2. Detection of Degree of the Gear Box Gear Crack Damage by the Vertical Acceleration of the Car Body Vibration
Through the above analysis, we find that the vertical acceleration of the car body vibration is more sensitive to the effect of the tooth root crack. Therefore, we choose the vertical acceleration of the car body vibration to detect the degree of gear box gear crack damage. In this paper, the crack length of the pinion from 0 to 5 mm is simulated and analyzed. The length of the crack grows in 0.5 mm increments. The gear pair mesh stiffness under different crack sizes is calculated and shown in Figure 3. As shown, with an increase in tooth root crack length, the gear meshing stiffness decreases.
The process of detecting the degree of gearbox gear damage is shown as follows:(1)Decompose the fault range that needs to be detected into m parts. In this paper, the crack length of the pinion is increased from 0 to 5 mm in 0.5 mm increments. Therefore, the damage states that it is 11.(2)Calculate the 5 indicators (RMS, kurtosis, , , and FM4) of the vertical acceleration of car body vibration under each damage states. And those indicators of matrix are shown in Table 6. These indicators make up the standard damage mode matrix. The acceleration of the car body vibration with a crack length of 3.25 mm was verified. The 5 indicators of the signal to be verified are shown in Table 7. The standard damage mode matrix and the calculated indicators that are to be verified make up a matrix with the size of .(3)Use the method of PCA to reduce the dimension of matrix. The principal component analysis method proposed in the Section 3.1 is applied to deal with the standard damage mode matrix.(4)Use the Grey relational analysis method proposed in the Section 3.2 to solve the correlation degree vector between the signal to be verified and the standard mode. So, we can obtain the normalization curve of the correlation degree vector, as shown in Figure 12. The maximum correlation degree vector is 0.9765. The crack length corresponding to the maximum correlation degree is 3 mm. Therefore, the crack length of the detected data is between 2.5 and 3.5 mm. It can be seen from Figure 12 that the correlation curve is consistent. The value of the correlation degree becomes larger when the value of the standard damage mode approaches the data to be verified.


5. Conclusions
In this paper, a vertical dynamic model of the locomotivetrack coupled with the gear transmission is established. Using a comprehensive model, the dynamic response of the locomotive subsystem is obtained under various degrees of tooth root crack damage in the gear transmission system. By comparing the vertical acceleration for vibrations in an undamaged locomotive and in one with a gear tooth root crack, we find that when there is a gear tooth root crack on the pinion of the gear transmission system, the rotation frequency and the harmonics of the rotation frequency of the pinion appear. The vertical acceleration of the car body vibration is more sensitive to the effect of the tooth root crack. The degree of tooth root crack damage is detected using PCA and the Grey relational analysis methods.
The track excitation is inevitable when a locomotive operating at track. However, in this paper, track excitation is not considered. The dynamic response of a locomotive subsystem to track excitation will be investigated in the future.
Data Availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
This project is supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2017YFB120110307).
References
 S. H. Kia, H. Henao, and G. A. Capolino, “Mechanical health assessment of a railway traction system,” in Proceedings of IEEE MELECON, pp. 453–458, Ajaccio, France, May 2008. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Wu, M. J. Zuo, and A. Parey, “Simulation of spur gear dynamics and estimation of fault growth,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 317, no. 3–5, pp. 608–624, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Endo, R. B. Randall, and C. Gosselin, “Differential diagnosis of spall vs. cracks in the gear tooth fillet region: experimental validation,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 636–651, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Ding and A. Kahraman, “Interaction between nonlinear spur gear dynamic and surface wear,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 307, no. 3–5, pp. 662–679, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. H. Cui, Z. S. Liu, and J. H. Ye, “Dynamic response of geared rotor system and the effect of clearance on jump characteristics of amplitude,” Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 7–15, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Ma and Y. S. Chen, “Nonlinear dynamic research on gear system with cracked failure,” Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 47, no. 21, pp. 84–90, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Ma, Y. Chen, and Q. Cao, “Research on dynamics and fault mechanism of spur gear pair with spalling defect,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 331, no. 9, pp. 2097–2109, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. J. Bahk and R. G. Parker, “Analytical investigation of tooth profile modification effects on planetary gear dynamics,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 298–319, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Li and Z. Peng, “Nonlinear dynamic response of a multidegree of freedom gear system dynamic model coupled with tooth surface characters: a case study on coal cutters,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 271–286, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. F. Brethee, D. Zhen, F. Gu, and A. D. Ball, “Helical gear wear monitoring: modelling and experimental validation,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 117, pp. 210–229, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. P. Shao, Y. L. Li, and J. M. Cao, “Damage detection and multifaults classification of gear transmission system,” Journal of Vibration and Shock, vol. 9, no. 25, pp. 185–190, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
 H. Henao, S. H. Kia, and G. A. Capolino, “Torsionalvibration assessment and gearfault diagnosis in railway traction system,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 1707–1717, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. M. Cao, R. P. Shao, and W. T. Hu, “Gear damage detection based on higher order cumulant combined with empirical mode decomposition,” Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 729–735, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
 B. Yang and J. S. Cheng, “Fault detection method for gear condition based on LMD method and principle component analysis,” Journal of Vibration, Measurement and Diagnosis, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 809–912, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
 S. H. Kia, H. Henao, and G. A. Capolino, “Gear tooth surface damage fault detection using induction machine stator current space vector analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 1866–1878, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Heydarzadeh, S. H. Kia, M. Nourani, H. Henao, and G. A. Capolino, “Gear fault diagnosis using discrete wavelet transform and deep neural networks,” in Proceedings of IECON 201642nd Annual Conference of the IEEE of Industrial Electronics Society, pp. 1494–1500, Florence, Italy, October 2016. View at: Google Scholar
 N. Chai, M. Yang, Q. N. Ni et al., “Gear fault diagnosis based on resonancebased sparse signal decomposition of motor current,” in Proceedings of IEEE Industry Applications Society Meeting, pp. 1–8, Cincinnati, OH, USA, October 2017. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Peng, F. Cheng, W. Qiao, and L. Qu, “Fault prognosis of drivetrain gearbox based on a recurrent neural network,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology, pp. 593–599, Rochester, MI, USA, May 2017. View at: Google Scholar
 C. Ding, B. Z. Zhang, F. Z. Feng et al., “Application of local mean decomposition and permutation entropy in fault diagnosis of planetary gearboxes,” Journal of Vibration and Shock, vol. 36, no. 17, pp. 55–60, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
 W. M. Zhai, K. Y. Wang, and J. H. Lin, “Modelling and experiment of railway ballast vibrations,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 207, no. 45, pp. 673–683, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. Zhai and Z. Cai, “Dynamic interaction between a lumped mass vehicle and a discretely supported continuous rail track,” Computers and Structures, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 987–997, 1997. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. C. H. Yang and J. Y. Lin, “Hertzian damping, tooth friction and bending elasticity in gear impact dynamics,” Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions and Automation in Design, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 189–196, 1987. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. H. Tian, Dynamic Simulation for System Response of Gearbox Including Localized Gear Faults, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, 2004.
 Z. G. Chen and Y. Shao, “Mesh stiffness calculation of a spur gear pair with tooth profile modification and tooth root crack,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 62, pp. 63–74, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Ma, X. Pang, R. Feng, and B. Wen, “Evaluation of optimum profile modification curves of profile shifted spur gears based on vibration responses,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 7071, pp. 1131–1149, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Ma and J. Zeng, “An improved analytical method for mesh stiffness calculation of spur gears with tip relief,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 98, pp. 64–80, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Meltzer and N. P. Dien, “Fault diagnosis in gears operating under nonstationary rotational speed using polar wavelet amplitude maps,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 985–992, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. G. Lewicki, “Gear crack propagation path studiesguidelines for ultrasafe design,” Journal of the American Helicopter Society, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 64–72, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. H. Tian, M. J. Zuo, and K. R. Fyfe, “Analysis of the vibration response of a gearbox with gear tooth faults,” in Proceedings of ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, pp. 785–793, Anaheim, CA, USA, November 2004. View at: Google Scholar
 H. Ma, R. Z. Song, X. Pang, and B. C. Wen, “Fault feature analysis of a cracked gear coupled rotor system,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 832192, 22 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Ma, R. Z. Song, and X. Pang, “Timevarying mesh stiffness calculation of cracked spur gears,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 44, pp. 179–194, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 O. D. Mohammed, M. Rantatalo, and J. Aidanpaa, “Improving mesh stiffness calculation of cracked gears for the purpose of vibrationbased fault analysis,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 34, pp. 235–251, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Chaari, T. Fakhfakh, and M. Haddar, “Analytical modelling of spur gear tooth crack and influence on gear mesh stiffness,” European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 461–468, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. L. Gao, M. H. Xu, D. W. Li et al., “Online tool life measurement technique based on PCA and dynamic monitoring model,” Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 2416–2421, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
 X. Q. Cao, “Softsensing technology based on PCAimproved BP neural network,” Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 23422343, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
 B. Tao, L. M. Zhu, H. Ding et al., “An alternative diagnostic index of rolling element bearings—a comparison study,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 660–670, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 XinChang Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.