A Comparative Study on Acoustic Optimization and Analysis of CLD/Plate in a Cavity Using ESO and GA

<table class="figure-group"><tr class="fig-image" id="a"><td><object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/sv/volume-2018/7146580/figures/7146580.fig.008a.svgz" name="7146580.fig.008a" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(a) </b>Rejection ratio = 25%</td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="b"><td><object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/sv/volume-2018/7146580/figures/7146580.fig.008b.svgz" name="7146580.fig.008b" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(b) </b>Rejection ratio = 50%</td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="c"><td><object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/sv/volume-2018/7146580/figures/7146580.fig.008c.svgz" name="7146580.fig.008c" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(c) </b>Rejection ratio = 75%</td></tr></table>

<div>Optimal CLD layouts obtained using ESO under different rejection ratios for second BC.</div>

Shock and Vibration

fig8

Figure 8

Figure 8: A Comparative Study on Acoustic Optimization and Analysis of CLD/Plate in a Cavity Using ESO and GA 