Research Article
A Comparative Study on Acoustic Optimization and Analysis of CLD/Plate in a Cavity Using ESO and GA
Table 4
Execution time in seconds using GA for first BC.
| Simulation number | Rejection ratio = 25% | Rejection ratio = 50% | Rejection ratio = 75% | SPL/dB | | | SPL/dB | | | SPL/dB | | |
| | 96.16 dB | 6552 | 384s | 96.67 | 5634 | 421 | 99.03 | 4910 | 327 | | 96.29 dB | 8392 | 378s | 96.75 | 7998 | 409 | 99.03 | 5989 | 323 | | 96.27 dB | 6556 | 385s | 96.67 | 10372 | 401 | 98.91 | 5047 | 330 | | 96.27 dB | 6502 | 382s | 96.87 | 8377 | 412 | 98.91 | 4606 | 340 | | 96.27 dB | 4055 | 338s | 96.63 | 8919 | 414 | 99.14 | 3630 | 338 | | 96.33 dB | 7208 | 392 | 96.79 | 8022 | 411 | 99.68 | 5938 | 328 | | 96.25 dB | 6744 | 390 | 96.51 | 9346 | 413 | 99.02 | 5601 | 328 | | 96.12 dB | 5644 | 398 | 96.64 | 7879 | 404 | 99.03 | 7257 | 324 | | 96.26 dB | 5643 | 399 | 96.66 | 12473 | 407 | 98.91 | 6604 | 326 | | 96.27 dB | 9561 | 376 | 96.60 | 7099 | 408 | 99.03 | 4548 | 325 |
|
|