A Comparative Study on Acoustic Optimization and Analysis of CLD/Plate in a Cavity Using ESO and GA

<table class="fixed-width table-group" id="tab6"><tr><td><table class="table"><colgroup><col style="width:7.19em"/><col style="width:2.97em"/><col style="width:3.00em"/><col style="width:2.94em"/></colgroup><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="4"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_left">Rejection ratio</td><td class="align_center">25%</td><td class="align_center">50%</td><td class="align_center">75%</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="4"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">First BC</td><td class="align_center">0.93</td><td class="align_center">0.83</td><td class="align_center">0.78</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Second BC</td><td class="align_center">0.67</td><td class="align_center">0.61</td><td class="align_center">1.00</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="4"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

<div>Consistency ratios of optimal CLD layouts using ESO and GA.</div>

Shock and Vibration

tab6

Table 6

Table 6: A Comparative Study on Acoustic Optimization and Analysis of CLD/Plate in a Cavity Using ESO and GA 