Seismic Response Analysis of an Isolated Structure with QZS under Near-Fault Vertical Earthquakes

Table 2

Near-fault pulse-like record data.

Number	Event	Station	Moment; magnitude	(km)	Mechanism
	Loma Prieta, USA, 1989	Saratoga-Aloha Ave., CMP	6.9	8.50	Reverse	380.89
	Kocaeli, Turkey, 1999	Izmit, IZT	7.4	7.21	Strike slip	811.00
	Chi-Chi, Taiwan, 1999	TCU089	7.6	8.88	Reverse	671.52
	Chi-Chi, Taiwan, 1999	CHY080	7.6	2.69	Reverse	496.21
	Chi-Chi, Taiwan, 1999	TCU049	7.6	3.76	Reverse	487.27
	Chi-Chi, Taiwan, 1999	TCU051	7.6	7.64	Reverse	350.06
	Chi-Chi, Taiwan, 1999	TCU052	7.6	0.66	Reverse	579.1
	Chi-Chi, Taiwan, 1999	TCU068	7.6	0.32	Reverse	487.34
	Chi-Chi, Taiwan, 1999	TCU075	7.6	0.89	Reverse	573.02
	Chi-Chi, Taiwan, 1999	TCU076	7.6	2.74	Reverse	614.98
	Imperial Valley, 1979	El Centro #4	6.53	7.05	Strike slip	208.91
	Imperial Valley, 1979	El Centro #5	6.53	3.95	Strike slip	205.63
	Imperial Valley, 1979	El Centro #7	6.53	0.56	Strike slip	201.51
	Imperial Valley, 1979	El Centro #10	6.53	8.6	Strike slip	202.85
	Imperial Valley, 1979	El Centro Differential Array	6.53	5.09	Strike slip	202.26
	Loma Prieta, USA, 1989	Los Gatos-Lexington Dam	6.9	5.02	Reverse	1070.32
	Tabas, Iran, 1978	Tabas	7.35	2.05	Reverse	767.77
	Northridge, USA, 1994	LA Dam	6.7	5.92	Reverse	628.99
	Northridge, USA, 1994	Pacoima Dam (upper left)	6.7	7.01	Reverse	2016.33
	Kobe, Japan, 1995	KJMA	6.9	0.96	Strike slip	312