Research Article  Open Access
Temperature Effects on Nonlinear Vibration Behaviors of EulerBernoulli Beams with Different Boundary Conditions
Abstract
This paper is concerned with temperature effects on the modeling and vibration characteristics of EulerBernoulli beams with symmetric and nonsymmetric boundary conditions. It is assumed that in the considered model the temperature increases/decreases instantly, and the temperature variation is uniformly distributed along the length and the crosssection. By using the extended Hamilton’s principle, the mathematical model which takes into account thermal and mechanical loadings, represented by partial differential equations (PDEs), is established. The PDEs of the planar motion are discretized to a set of secondorder ordinary differential equations by using the Galerkin method. As to three different boundary conditions, eigenvalue analyses are performed to obtain the closeform eigenvalue solutions. First four natural frequencies with thermal effects are investigated. By using the LindstedtPoincaré method and multiple scales method, the approximate solutions of the nonlinear free and forced vibrations (primary, super, and subharmonic resonances) are obtained. The influences of temperature variations on response amplitudes, the localisation of the resonance zones, and the stability of the steadystate solutions are investigated, through examining frequency response curves and excitation response curves. Numerical results show that response amplitudes, the number and the stability of nontrivial solutions, and the hardeningspring characteristics are all closely related to temperature changes. As to temperature effects on vibration behaviors of structures, different boundary conditions should be paid more attention.
1. Introduction
Due to the importance in many applications in many fields, such as the industrial, civil, mechanical, automotive, aerospace, and other structural systems, a flexible beam with nonlinear characteristics has attracted more attention in the past few years. The linear and nonlinear vibration characteristics have been investigated for many years and were reviewed, e.g., by Nayfeh and Mook [1], Nayfeh and Balachandran [2], Nayfeh and Pai [3], Luongo and Zulli [4], and Lacarbonara et al. [5].
On the one hand, it is noted that beams in compression are subjected to buckle, and once the beam buckles, the beam exhibits an initially deflected static equilibrium position and looks like an arch. Due to the initial curvature, the nonlinear vibration behaviors become much more complicated [6–8]. The nonlinear dynamics of buckled beams have been investigated by many researchers. As to these buckled and postbuckling beams, natural frequencies, mode shapes, nonlinear normal modes, and nonlinear resonance responses were investigated through theoretical and experimental methods [9–16]. The geometrically nonlinear vibration of an aluminium beam hinged at both ends was investigated experimentally by Ribeiro and Carneiro [17]. The nonlinear vibration analysis of a curved beam subjected to the uniform base harmonic excitation with both quadratic and cubic nonlinearities was investigated by Huang et al. [18].
On the other hand, in many applications, these structures are often subjected to vibration under thermal and dynamic loadings [19]. Temperature fields develop thermal stress due to the thermal expansion or contraction which influences the dynamic behavior of mechanical systems. The literature on thermal vibrations of mechanical structures is quite abundant; here, only a few papers are reviewed. The dynamic instability of a pinned beam subjected to an alternating magnetic field and thermal loads with the nonlinear strain has been studied by Wu [20, 21], and effects of frequency ratio, loading factor and amplitude, damping factor, and temperature changes on the vibration behaviors have been illustrated. Manoach and Ribeiro [22, 23] studied geometrically nonlinear vibrations of moderately thick and curved beams under the combined action of mechanical and thermal loads. The coupled thermoelastic vibration characteristics of the axially moving beam were investigated by Guo et al. [24]. Treyssède [25] proposed an analytical model for the vibration analysis of horizontal beams that are selfweighted and thermally stressed. Moreover, due to the relatively high possible temperature variations in beams, Avsec and Oblak [26] have developed the mathematical model where fundamental thermomechanical properties of state are functions of temperature. Thermomechanical vibrations of a simply supported springmassbeam system were investigated analytically by Ghayesh et al. [27]. Threedimensional nonlinear motion characteristics of the perfect and imperfect Timoshenko microbeams under mechanical and thermal forces have been examined numerically by Farokhi and Ghayesh [28]. Large amplitude vibrations and regular and chaotic oscillations of a Timoshenko beam under the influence of temperature were analysed by Warminska et al. [29, 30], and mechanical and thermal loadings have been discussed. Moreover, nonlinear vibration characteristics of crossply composite plates in thermal environments were investigated by Settimi et al. [31] and Saetta et al. [32]. Recently, based on Hamilton’s principle, temperature effects on the vibration behaviors of the cablestayedbeam by introducing two nondimensional factors were investigated by Zhao et al. [33]. The nonlinear free and forced vibration characteristics of the suspended cable were studied by Zhao et al. [34, 35].
Furthermore, the nonlinear vibration behavior of the system is closely related to its boundary conditions. For example, the nonlinear free and forced vibrations of a beammass system under five different boundary conditions were investigated by Ozkaya et al. [36]. Large amplitude vibrations of rectangular plates subjected to the radical harmonic excitation were investigated by Amabili [37], and three boundary conditions were considered. The nonlinear dynamic response of an inclined Timonshenko beam with different boundary conditions subjected to a varying mass with variable velocity was investigated by Mamandi et al. [38]. The nonlinear free vibrations of a twolayer elastic composite beam were studied by Lenci et al. [39], and different boundary conditions, both symmetric (e.g., freefree, fixedfixed, and hingedhinged) and nonsymmetric (e.g., freefixed and hingedfixed) with respect to the beam midpoint, were investigated. Furthermore, by using a unified approach, the planar nonlinear vibrations of the shear indeformable beams with either movable or immovable supports were investigated by Luongo et al. [40].
One of the motivations of this study is that changes in the vibration characteristics of the structure due to the damage may be smaller than changes in ones due to variations in temperature [41]. Therefore, an accurate mathematical model of the beam with thermal effects is necessary to predict its vibration characteristics. To the best of our knowledge, no specific study has addressed temperature effects on the nonlinear free and forced oscillations of the beam with different boundary conditions. The structure of the paper is organized as follows: in Section 2, the governing equations of an EulerBernoulli beam by using the extended Hamilton’s principle are derived. In addition, the PDEs of the planar motion are discretized to the secondorder ordinary equations via the Galerkin method. Considering three different boundary conditions, eigenvalue analyses are performed to obtain closeform eigenvalue solutions. Then, the LindstedtPoincaré method and multiple scales method are adopted to obtain the approximate solutions of the nonlinear free and forced resonance responses in Section 3. Some numerical results and discussions are given to illustrate the influences of temperature variations on response amplitudes, localisation of the resonance zones, and the stability of the nontrivial solutions in Section 4. Finally, at the end of the paper (Section 5), some conclusions are drawn.
2. Mathematics for Nonlinear Modeling
2.1. Equations of Motion
In this study, and denote the axial and transverse deflections of the beam, respectively, is the distance along the undeflected beam, is the time, is the beam length, is the beam’s mass per unit, is Young’s modulus, is the area of crosssection, is the area moment of inertia, is the applied axial compressive load, and are the viscous damping coefficients per unit length, is the temperature variation, and is the thermal expansion coefficient.
The linear relation between the temperature variation and the stresstemperature coefficient isand the nonlinear relation is expressed as [21]
Here, the first linear relation is adopted for the sake of simplicity. By assuming the Lagrangian strain as the strain measure and introducing temperature variations, the strain in the beam motion is obtained
The extended Hamilton’s principle is given bywhere is the kinetic energy, is the elastic energy, and is the work done by external loads on the system.
By using Hamilton’s principle, one obtains [1, 20, 21]where is the spatial distribution of the harmonic load in the direction and is the excitation frequency.
Introducing the quasistatic assumptions, the acceleration and velocity terms in (5) are neglected [20, 21], and we obtainwherewhere is the average strain of the systems, and one obtains
Therefore, substituting (9) into (6), we obtain the following nonlinear partial differential equation of motion without considering the torsion and shear rigidities:
For the sake of simplicity, the following nondimensional quantities are introduced:
Substituting (11) into (10) and neglecting the asterisks, one obtains
2.2. Linear Analysis
Dropping the damping, excitation, and nonlinear terms in (12), the following linear equation is obtained:and one letswhere denotes the imaginary unit, is the normalized undamped mode shape, and is the natural frequency.
Substituting (14) into (13), one obtains
The corresponding eigenvalue equation is expressed as follows:
Accordingly, one lets
The homogeneous solution of (16) is given by
In the following sections, three different symmetric and nonsymmetric boundary conditions are chosen and investigated: hingedhinged, hingedfixed, and fixedfixed.
Case A (hingedhinged). As to the hingedhinged boundary conditions, we haveSubstituting (19) into (18), we obtain the following coefficient matrix:where the determinant of the coefficient matrix in (20) equals zero; we haveHence, the natural frequency of the beam with hingedhinged boundary conditions could be obtained by solving the following equation:and the corresponding mode shapes arewhere is determined by normalization conditions.
Case B (hingedfixed). As to the hingedfixed boundary conditions, we haveSubstituting (24) into (18), the coefficient matrix isSimilarly, the following equation is obtained:Hence, the natural frequency could be obtained by solving the following transcendental equation:with the following mode shapes:where is also determined by normalization conditions.
Case C (fixedfixed). As to the fixedfixed boundary conditions, we haveSimilarly, the coefficient matrix isand we obtain the transcendental equation aswhere the natural frequency could be obtained, and the mode shapes arewhere is also determined by normalization conditions.
2.3. Discrete Model
The Galerkin procedure is used to discretize (12) into a set of secondorder ordinary differential equationswhere is the generalized coordinate and is the linear vibration mode shape.
Substituting (33) into (12), multiplying the result by , integrating the outcome over the domain, and finally using the orthonormality condition yieldwhere
3. Perturbation Analysis
Perturbation methods are used to investigate the nonlinear free, primary, super, and subharmonic resonance responses of the beam with thermal effects subjected to the planar excitation, and no internal resonance is considered in this study. For the sake of simplicity, only the singlemode discretization equation is considered
3.1. Nonlinear Free Vibration
This section begins with the approximate series solutions for the nonlinear free vibrations obtained with the LindstedtPoincaré method [42].
Firstly, a new independent variable is introduced, which iswhere is the natural frequency.
Therefore, by neglecting the damping and forcing terms, (39) is transformed intowhere the coefficient of the linear term is equal to unity since the time is nondimensionalized with respect to the linear vibration frequency.
By assuming an expansion for (where is a small finite nondimensional parameter) and omitting the tilde, we obtain
Following the method of LindstedtPoincaré, we seek the fourthorder approximate solution to (42) by lettingand a strained time coordinate is introduced
Then, we could obtain the relation between the nonlinear frequency and the linear one as follows:
Substituting (43)(44) into (42) and equating the coefficients on both sides, the nonlinear ordinary equations are reduced to a set of linearized equations. Then, the polar form is introduced and the secular terms are set to zero. Finally, the series solutions of and are obtained, based on which the fourthorder series solutions of the frequency amplitude relationship and displacement are as follows:where is the actual nondimensional response amplitude.
3.2. Primary Resonances
First of all, we order the damping, excitation, and nonlinearity term as follows [43]:
Substituting (47) into (39), the governing equation becomes
In the case of the primary resonance, we introduce a detuning parameter , which quantitatively describes the nearness of to where is a small finite parameter.
We express the solution in terms of different time scales aswhere and .
Substituting (49)(50) into (48), equating the coefficients of and on both sides, following the method of multiple scales, finally the frequency response equation is obtainedwhere is the actual nondimensional response amplitude.
Therefore, the first approximation to the steadystate solution is obtainedwhere is the actual time scale and is the phase.
3.3. Subharmonic Resonances
In order to investigate the subharmonic resonance, a detuning parameter is introducedwhere is a small but finite parameter.
Similarly, the frequency response equation can be obtained by using the multiple scales methodwhere
The first approximation to the steadystate solution is given bywhere is the actual nondimensional response amplitude, is the actual time scale, and is the phase.
3.4. Super Harmonic Resonances
In this case, to express the nearness of to , we also introduce the detuning parameter defined bywhere is a small but finite parameter.
Following the step of the multiple scales method, a frequency response equation can be obtainedwhere
Therefore, the first approximation in this case is obtainedwhere is the actual nondimensional response amplitude, is the actual time scale, and is the phase.
4. Numerical Examples and Discussions
In the following numerical analysis, material properties and physical parameters of the beam are chosen in Table 1. The nondimensional temperature variation factor is chosen as , and the corresponding dimensional temperature variation is CC]. Moreover, the nondimensional factor in (11) is in this study.

4.1. Natural Frequencies
By using the numerical method, the transcendental equations (see (22), (27), and (31)) can be solved, and the corresponding natural frequencies are obtained. In order to investigate temperature effects on natural frequencies with different boundary conditions, a frequency variation factor is definedwhere and are the natural frequencies with and without thermal effects, respectively.
Figure 1 shows effects of temperature variations on the first four mode frequencies in the case of three different boundary conditions. As shown in these figures, with the increase (decrease) in the temperature, the mode frequencies all decrease (increase). In previous studies, it is shown that an increase in temperature leads to a decrease in natural frequencies [41], and the conclusion in this study is in good agreement with some of the previous findings.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Furthermore, the changing of natural frequencies with temperature was found to be dependent on the order of the mode and boundary conditions. With the increase of the order, the natural frequency becomes less sensitive to the temperature variation. To be more specific, in the case of , as to three different boundary conditions, the variation factors of these first order mode frequencies are (hingedhinged), (hingedfixed), and (fixedfixed), respectively. However, as to the fourthorder mode frequencies, the corresponding variation ratios are , , and , respectively. Moreover, we can observe a slightly higher sensitivity to warming than cooling in the case of the hingedhinged boundary condition, as shown in Figure 1(a). However, in the case of the fixedfixed boundary condition (Figure 1(c)), the asymmetry phenomenon between the cooling and warming conditions almost disappears. It is concluded that temperature effects are very closely related to the boundary conditions, and the natural frequency decreases with an increase in temperature. In addition, it should be pointed out that, as to these three cases, temperature effects on mode shapes can be negligible.
4.2. Nonlinear Free and Forced Vibrations
Neglecting the damping and excitation terms, the nonlinear free vibrations of the beam with thermal effects are investigated. Figure 2 illustrates temperature effects on the nonlinear free vibration behaviors in the case of three different boundary conditions. Frequency response curves all show the hardeningspring characteristics due to the cubic nonlinearity term. The hardening behavior tends to increase for a positive temperature change and to decrease for a negative one. Moreover, with the enhancement of the constraint conditions (from hingedhinged, hingedfixed to fixedfixed), temperature effects on the vibration behaviors are reduced.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Temperature effects on the nonlinear responses to the primary, super, and subharmonic excitations are studied in the following in terms of frequency response curves and excitation response curves, respectively. Moreover, by using the multiple scales method, the stability of these solutions is determined by examining the eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix evaluated at the equilibrium point.
In the nonlinear resonant cases, the nondimensional excitation amplitude is chosen as , and the nondimensional damping coefficient is assumed to be independent of the temperature variation (). Figure 3 shows temperature effects on frequency response curves of the primary resonance, and three different boundary conditions are considered. There are almost three steadystate solutions: one unstable, plotted in dashed lines, and two stable, of low and high amplitudes, plotted in continuous lines, respectively. The stable solution is physically determined by the initial condition of the system finally. In the primary resonance, the system exhibits the hardeningspring behavior due to the cubic nonlinearity term, and all these curves bend to the right side. As to the hingedhinged boundary condition as shown in Figure 3(a), temperature effects are obvious. Specifically, in the range of the large response amplitude, the response amplitude decreases with the increase in the temperature. On the contrary, as to the small response amplitude, the response amplitude increases with the increase in the temperature. As to the hingedfixed and fixedfixed boundary conditions, the temperature effect on the frequency response curves is negligible in the range of small response amplitudes. However, as to the large response amplitudes, the curve bends to the right more in the warming condition. As to the boundary conditions from hingedhinged to fixedfixed, it is noted that the temperature effect on the resonance characters is reduced.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 4 shows the variation of the response amplitude with the excitation amplitude in the case of the primary resonance under three boundary conditions. Actually, it is known that, depending on the value of detuning parameter , some curves are multivalued while others are singlevalue. In this study, only the case of is investigated. As shown in these figures, the multivaluedness of frequency response curves due to the nonlinearity leads to the jump phenomenon in the excitation response curves. There are significant quantitative changes of these curves due to temperature variations. Moreover, it is noted that, in the range of large and small response amplitudes, temperature effects are different. Specifically, as to the small response amplitude, with the increase in the temperature, the response amplitude increases slightly. On the contrary, as to the large one, the response amplitude decreases significantly in the same condition.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Temperature effects on the subharmonic resonance are shown in Figure 5. In this case, the stable trivial solution () is not shown, and only two nontrivial solutions are studied, in which one is stable and another is unstable. It is noted that there is no jump phenomenon in the case of the subharmonic resonance. As shown in Figure 5(a), as to the hingedhinged boundary condition, the temperature effect is the most visible, and the threshold response amplitude decreases with an increase temperature and increases with a decrease one. The same conclusion could be observed from the Figure 5(b), in the case of the hingedfixed boundary condition. In the last case (Figure 5(c)), it is shown that the temperature effect on the frequency response curve is not obvious.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Moreover, excitation response curves of the subharmonic resonance in the case of the hingedhinged boundary condition when are illustrated in Figure 6. It is noted that there are significant quantitative changes of these curves due to temperature variations. Considering the temperature variations, the same response amplitude is induced by very different excitation amplitude . Moreover, under the excitation with the same amplitude , very different response amplitudes are obtained due to the temperature variations.
Figure 7 illustrates temperature effects on frequency response curves in the case of the super harmonic resonance, and three boundary conditions are also included. Due to the effect of the cubic nonlinearity, the system exhibits the hardening behavior. Generally, as same as the previous resonant cases, the hardening behavior also increases with an increase in temperature and decreases with a decrease in temperature. However, it should be pointed out that, in the case of the super harmonic resonance (Figure 7(a)), no unstable solution is obtained and no jump phenomenon is observed in the warming condition (). As shown in Figure 7(b), with the increase in the temperature, the curve bends to the right more and the system exhibits stronger hardeningspring behavior. It should be pointed out that, in the case of the cooling condition (), the peak value of the frequency response curve decreases significantly. In the last case as shown in Figure 7(c), as to the system with fixedfixed boundary condition, temperature effects on the super harmonic resonance are much more obvious than the ones on the primary resonance, and frequency response curves are shifted to the right more with the increase in temperature.
(a)
(b)
(c)
5. Summary and Conclusions
A positive (resp., negative) temperature change does decrease (resp., increase) natural frequencies, and temperature effects on mode shapes can be negligible. Temperature effects on the vibration behaviors are closely related to the mode order and boundary conditions, and one can observe a slightly higher sensitivity to warming than cooling. As to the nonlinear vibration characteristics with thermal effects, no matter the primary, super, or subharmonic resonant cases, the system exhibits the hardeningspring behavior due to the cubic nonlinearity term. The hardening behavior increases with an increase in temperature, and it decreases with a decrease in temperature. Only some quantitative changes are observed due to the temperature changes by examining the frequency response curves and excitation response curves. The response amplitude, the stability, and the number of the nontrivial solutions and the range of the resonance response are all closely related to temperature variations. Moreover, as to temperature effects on vibration characteristics of the beam, different symmetric and nonsymmetric boundary conditions should be paid more attention.
Data Availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
The research described in this paper was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11602089) and the Promotion Program for Young and MiddleAged Teacher in Science and Technology Research of Huaqiao University (ZQNYX505).
References
 A. H. Nayfeh and D. T. Mook, Nonlinear Oscillations, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1979. View at: MathSciNet
 A. H. Nayfeh and B. Balachandran, Applied Nonlinear Dynamics: Analytical, Computational and Experimental Methods, Wiley Series in Nonlinear Science, John Wiley & Sons, 1995. View at: Publisher Site  MathSciNet
 A. H. Nayfeh and P. F. Pai, Linear and Nonlinear Structural Mechanics, WileyInterscience, New York, NY, USA, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  MathSciNet
 A. Luongo and D. Zulli, Mathematical Models of Beams and Cables, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, USA, 2013.
 W. Lacarbonara, Nonlinear structural mechanics, Springer, Berlin, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  MathSciNet
 D. Zulli, R. Alaggio, and F. Benedettini, “Nonlinear dynamics of curved beams. Part 1: Formulation,” International Journal of NonLinear Mechanics, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 623–629, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Zulli, R. Alaggio, and F. Benedettini, “Nonlinear dynamics of curved beams. Part 2, numerical analysis and experiments,” International Journal of NonLinear Mechanics, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 630–643, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Benedettini, R. Alaggio, and D. Zulli, “Nonlinear coupling and instability in the forced dynamics of a nonshallow arch: Theory and experiments,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 505–517, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. H. Nayfeh, W. Kreider, and T. J. Anderson, “Investigation of natural frequencies and mode shapes of buckled beams,” AIAA Journal, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1121–1126, 1995. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. Kreider and A. Nayfeh, “Experimental investigation of singlemode responses in a fixedfixed buckled beam,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 15, pp. 155–177, 1998. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. H. Nayfeh, W. Lacarbonara, and C.M. Chin, “Nonlinear normal modes of buckled beams: threetoone and onetoone internal resonances,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 253–273, 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 W. Lestari and S. Hanagud, “Nonlinear vibration of buckled beams: Some exact solutions,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 38, no. 2627, pp. 4741–4757, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. A. Emam and A. H. Nayfeh, “Nonlinear Responses of Buckled Beams to SubharmonicResonance Excitations,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 105–122, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. H. Nayfeh and S. A. Emam, “Exact solution and stability of postbuckling configurations of beams,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 395–408, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 S. A. Emam and A. H. Nayfeh, “Nonlinear response of buckled beams to 1:1 and 3:1 internal resonances,” International Journal of NonLinear Mechanics, vol. 52, pp. 12–25, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. A. Emam and M. M. Abdalla, “Subharmonic parametric resonance of simply supported buckled beams,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 1443–1456, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Ribeiro and R. Carneiro, “Experimental detection of modal interaction in the nonlinear vibration of a hingedhinged beam,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 277, no. 45, pp. 943–954, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. L. Huang, R. K. L. Su, Y. Y. Lee, and S. H. Chen, “Nonlinear vibration of a curved beam under uniform base harmonic excitation with quadratic and cubic nonlinearities,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 330, no. 21, pp. 5151–5164, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Maleki and A. MaghsoudiBarmi, “Effects of Concurrent Earthquake and Temperature Loadings on CableStayed Bridges,” International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, vol. 16, no. 6, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
 G. Y. Wu, “The analysis of dynamic instability and vibration motions of a pinned beam with transverse magnetic fields and thermal loads,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 284, no. 12, pp. 343–360, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G.Y. Wu, “The analysis of dynamic instability on the large amplitude vibrations of a beam with transverse magnetic fields and thermal loads,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 302, no. 12, pp. 167–177, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. Manoach and P. Ribeiro, “Coupled, thermoelastic, large amplitude vibrations of Timoshenko beams,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 1589–1606, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Ribeiro and E. Manoach, “The effect of temperature on the large amplitude vibrations of curved beams,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 285, no. 45, pp. 1093–1107, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X.X. Guo, Z.M. Wang, Y. Wang, and Y.F. Zhou, “Analysis of the coupled thermoelastic vibration for axially moving beam,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 325, no. 3, pp. 597–608, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Treyssède, “Vibration analysis of horizontal selfweighted beams and cables with bending stiffness subjected to thermal loads,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 329, no. 9, pp. 1536–1552, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Avsec and M. Oblak, “Thermal vibrational analysis for simply supported beam and clamped beam,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 308, no. 3–5, pp. 514–525, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. H. Ghayesh, S. Kazemirad, M. A. Darabi, and P. Woo, “Thermomechanical nonlinear vibration analysis of a springmassbeam system,” Archive of Applied Mechanics, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 317–331, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Farokhi and M. H. Ghayesh, “Thermomechanical dynamics of perfect and imperfect Timoshenko microbeams,” International Journal of Engineering Science, vol. 91, pp. 12–33, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 A. Warminska, E. Manoach, and J. Warminski, “Nonlinear dynamics of a reduced multimodal Timoshenko beam subjected to thermal and mechanical loadings,” Meccanica, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 1775–1793, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 A. Warminska, E. Manoach, J. Warminski, and S. Samborski, “Regular and chaotic oscillations of a Timoshenko beam subjected to mechanical and thermal loadings,” Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics, vol. 27, no. 45, pp. 719–737, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 V. Settimi, E. Saetta, and G. Rega, “Local and global nonlinear dynamics of thermomechanically coupled composite plates in passive thermal regime,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 167–187, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. Saetta, V. Settimi, and G. Rega, “Nonlinear vibrations of symmetric crossply laminates via thermomechanically coupled reduced order models,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 199, pp. 802–807, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Zhao, Z. Wang, X. Zhang, and L. Chen, “Effects of temperature variation on vibration of a cablestayed beam,” International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, vol. 17, no. 10, 1750123, 18 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 Y. Zhao, J. Peng, Y. Zhao, and L. Chen, “Effects of temperature variations on nonlinear planar free and forced oscillations at primary resonances of suspended cables,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 2815–2827, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 Y. Zhao, C. Huang, L. Chen, and J. Peng, “Nonlinear vibration behaviors of suspended cables under twofrequency excitation with temperature effects,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 416, pp. 279–294, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. Özkaya, M. Pakdemirli, and H. R. Öz, “Nonliner vibrations of a beammass system under different boundary conditions,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 199, no. 4, pp. 679–696, 1997. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Amabili, “Nonlinear vibrations of rectangular plates with different boundary conditions: theory and experiments,” Computers & Structures, vol. 82, no. 3132, pp. 2587–2605, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Mamandi, M. H. Kargarnovin, and S. Farsi, “An investigation on effects of traveling mass with variable velocity on nonlinear dynamic response of an inclined Timoshenko beam with different boundary conditions,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 1694–1708, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Lenci, F. Clementi, and J. Warminski, “Nonlinear free dynamics of a twolayer composite beam with different boundary conditions,” Meccanica, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 675–688, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 A. Luongo, G. Rega, and F. Vestroni, “On nonlinear dynamics of planar shear indeformable beams,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 619–624, 1986. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Xia, B. Chen, S. Weng, Y.Q. Ni, and Y.L. Xu, “Temperature effect on vibration properties of civil structures: a literature review and case studies,” Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 29–46, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Zhao, C. Sun, Z. Wang, and L. Wang, “Approximate series solutions for nonlinear free vibration of suspended cables,” Shock and Vibration, vol. 2014, Article ID 795708, 12 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Zhao, C. Sun, Z. Wang, and L. Wang, “Analytical solutions for resonant response of suspended cables subjected to external excitation,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 1017–1032, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Yaobing Zhao and Chaohui Huang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.