Coupling ATMD System for Seismic Response Control of Two Adjacent Buildings

Table 6

Comparison of adaptive performances between IAS and CAS in case of one actuator being failed.

Responses	EQs	IAS				CAS
		Actuator 1 failed		Actuator 2 failed		Actuator 1 failed		Actuator 2 failed
		Bld. 1	Bld. 2	Bld. 1	Bld. 2	Bld. 1	Bld. 2	Bld. 1	Bld. 2
Maximum interstory drift (cm)	El Centro	2.85	0.96	1.09	2.48	2.38	1.55	1.58	1.66
	Kobe	3.56	1.49	1.53	3.47	2.58	1.49	1.98	2.20
	Northridge	3.46	1.26	2.04	2.21	3.32	1.48	2.02	1.97
	Max.	3.56	1.49	2.04	3.47	3.32	1.55	2.02	2.20
Maximum floor displ. (cm)	El Centro	19.77	6.46	7.27	15.62	14.39	8.42	7.38	10.84
	Kobe	25.15	11.11	10.57	24.32	19.51	10.12	11.66	15.46
	Northridge	18.47	8.26	12.31	12.20	20.73	8.19	8.09	11.85
	Max.	25.15	11.11	12.31	24.32	20.73	10.12	11.66	15.46
Maximum base shear force (MN)	El Centro	5.25	2.34	2.02	6.31	4.40	3.95	2.92	4.24
	Kobe	6.56	3.80	2.82	8.83	4.76	3.80	3.65	5.60
	Northridge	6.39	3.19	3.77	5.63	6.13	3.76	3.72	5.01
	Max.	6.56	3.80	3.77	8.83	6.13	3.95	3.72	5.60
Maximum base moment (MN·m)	El Centro	138.67	62.45	50.98	151.08	100.88	81.44	51.72	104.84
	Kobe	176.36	107.50	74.16	235.24	136.85	97.89	81.79	149.51
	Northridge	129.50	79.89	86.35	118.02	145.40	79.23	56.72	114.58
	Max.	176.36	107.50	86.35	235.24	145.40	97.89	81.79	149.51
Maximum control force (kN)	El Centro	—	713.62	745.98	—	—	2050.93	1360.33	—
	Kobe	—	977.17	970.91	—	—	2051.38	1918.71	—
	Northridge	—	1419.19	1263.59	—	—	2303.90	1288.79	—
	Max.	—	1419.19	1263.59	—	—	2303.90	1918.71	—
Maximum TMD stroke (cm)	El Centro	69.92	160.11	208.62	66.92	262.05	265.28	215.32	212.58
	Kobe	77.41	254.30	254.84	71.37	305.89	301.34	314.40	311.01
	Northridge	52.72	215.10	373.05	28.73	371.99	381.49	285.26	284.54
	Max.	77.41	254.30	373.05	71.37	371.99	381.49	314.40	311.01
Maximum control power (MW)	El Centro	—	4.98	5.54	—	—	13.15	10.01	—
	Kobe	—	10.32	9.04	—	—	23.24	29.11	—
	Northridge	—	6.31	14.59	—	—	26.87	9.82	—
	Max.	—	10.32	14.59	—	—	26.87	29.11	—