Research Article  Open Access
Shanshan Xue, Yumin Chen, Hanlong Liu, "Model Test Study on the Influence of Train Speed on the Dynamic Response of an XSection PileNet Composite Foundation", Shock and Vibration, vol. 2019, Article ID 2614709, 13 pages, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2614709
Model Test Study on the Influence of Train Speed on the Dynamic Response of an XSection PileNet Composite Foundation
Abstract
Based on a largescale Xsection pilenet composite foundation model, we experimentally studied the dynamic characteristics of the pilenet composite foundation under a highspeed railway train load; analyzed the distribution characteristics of the dynamic stress, dynamic displacement, speed, and acceleration of the foundation soil under different train speeds; and investigated the vibration response of the track subgrade foundation system, as well as the distribution characteristics and attenuation pattern of the dynamic stress inside the subgrade foundation under cyclic train loading. The following results are obtained. The peak vertical vibration speed and the peak acceleration attenuate by 90% and 62.5%, respectively, after passing through the embankment. The vibration velocity increases linearly with the train speed; the ratio of the peak dynamic soil stresses at the top of the piles and between the piles is approximately 3.4. The change in train speed does not have a large influence on the peak dynamic displacement or peak dynamic soil stress. The peak spectral vibration acceleration caused by the train loading is located within the range of mediumtolowfrequency vibrations, and the characteristic frequency corresponds to the passing frequency of the bogies and carriages; as the train speed increases, the peak spectral vibration acceleration increases, and the highfrequency components increase significantly.
1. Introduction
Along with the rapid development of the national economy in China, the highspeed railway has been developed rapidly. Because of its characteristics of a long operational cycle and fast train speed, the highspeed railway has much stricter requirements on the settlement control than those of an ordinary railway. The pilenet composite foundation has the advantages of fast construction, low cost, small settlement, and high stability and has thus been widely applied as a ground treatment for highspeed railways in China, such as the Wuhan–Guangzhou, Beijing–Shanghai, and Suining–Chongqing highspeed railway lines.
The strengthening performance of the pilenet composite foundation has resulted in its widespread practical application. However, because of its complicated working mechanism under train loading, the studies on this foundation are not adequate at present and have mainly been carried out by means of field testing and laboratory experimentation.
Heck [1] analyzed the mechanism of the train vibration and found that, besides the sleeperpassing frequency, the passing frequency of the wheelsets is also a main frequency that is produced by the train vibration. Takemiya and Bian [2] analyzed the test data of the Shinkansen line with a train speed of 240 km/h and concluded that the pulse impact on the subgrade is related to the distance between wheelsets. Bahrekazemi and Bodare [3] analyzed the fundamental dynamic patterns of vibration induced by a train using measurement data. In China, Bo and Ying [4] recorded relevant data for the dynamic response of a subgrade by field measurements of the Datong–Qinhuangdao, Chengdu–Kunming, and Baoji–Chengdu railway lines. Chen and Lü Wentian [5] carried out field tests on a roadbridge transition section of the Qinhuangdao–Shenyang passenger railway line and studied the dynamic response under the operation of a highspeed train.
Compared to field testing with its limitations, largescale model experimentation is an effective approach to study the interaction between the track and subgrade and can satisfactorily reveal the mechanism for the response of the track subgrade foundation of a highspeed railway to train loading. Anderson and Key [6] established a physical model for a 1 m long, 0.8 m wide, and 0.6 m high twolayer railway track ballast bed and studied the dynamic performance of the structure layer material of the ballast bed under longterm repeated loading. Cox et al. [7] conducted a comparative study via laboratory experiments on the different types of floating slab and fastener system and simulated the vibration characteristics of the floating slab under fixedpoint loading by a singlewheel axle load. Using a laboratory 1 : 2 slab track model, Zhan and Jiang [8] studied the dynamic response (e.g., dynamic stress, dynamic displacement, and propagation of acceleration along the cross section and depth of subgrade) of different structural layers in a ballastless track subgrade system under fixedpoint loading. Under a moving train load, the principal stress axis of the soil inside the subgrade rotates, significantly affecting the working performance of the subgrade. Therefore, it is necessary to introduce a moving load into experiments. Momoya et al. [9] conducted a laboratory experiment using a 1 : 5 ballasted track model and studied the distribution characteristics and settlement development of stress inside the subgrade under a moving load, but the simulated train speed was only 42 km/h. Al Shaer et al. [10] constructed a 1 : 3 ballasted track model containing three sleepers, adopted an Mshaped wave to represent a bogie load, and studied the relationship between the subgrade settlement and sleeper vibration acceleration. Through experiments using a laboratory 1 : 5 ballasted track model, Ishikawa et al. [11] compared the difference in the stress paths inside the subgrade under two loading scenarios (i.e., fixedpoint loading and moving loading) and revealed the rotational characteristics of the principal stress axis under a moving load and its influence on the permanent deformation of the subgrade. Their results showed that a moving load generates a larger permanent deformation of the subgrade. However, the transient dynamic response of a pilenet composite foundation under different actual train speeds has rarely been studied by experiments.
The Xsection pile is an irregular pile with an Xshaped cross section. Because of its large perimetertoarea ratio, the Xsection pile can significantly improve the bearing capacity of a single pile without increasing the amount of concrete in it, thus increasing the cost performance [12–14]. The Liu group conducted numerous studies on the loadbearing mechanism of an Xsection pipe under static loading [15–17] and its engineering application [18]. Using a large pile foundation model test system, GuangChao et al. [19] conducted a dynamic model test of an Xsection pileraft composite foundation in sandy soil, with a focus on the patterns of change in the cumulative settlement, displacement amplitude, dynamic stiffness, and vibration velocity of the Xsection pileraft composite foundation under cyclic loading in the forms of the Mshaped wave and sinusoidal wave that are often used to simulate highspeed train loads.
In this study, according to the typical design working conditions for the pilenet subgrade foundation, as well as the construction standards for a highspeed railway, and using a 1 : 5 largescale pilenet composite foundation in a large test tank, we conducted an experimental study on the dynamic response of a tracksubgradepilenet composite foundation system under train load, with a focus on the analysis of the vibration response of the system as well as the distribution characteristics and attenuation pattern of the dynamic stress inside the subgrade foundation under varying train speeds.
2. LargeScale PileNet Composite Foundation Model
2.1. Overview of Model
To ensure the safe and effective operation of highspeed trains, there are strict requirements for the size and filling quality of the various structural layers of highspeed railways. In an earlier stage, we constructed a 1 : 5 scale highspeed railway subgrade foundation model, with dimensions of 5 m, 4 m, and 7 m in length, width, and height, respectively. The model included, from top to bottom, a track slab, CA mortar, geogrid, surface and bottom layers of the subgrade bed, and foundation. A schematic diagram of the tank section of the model is shown in Figure 1.
The static and dynamic loading control system used in the test is composed of JAW200K static and dynamic actuators, a load input and control machine, a vibrator controller, and a hydraulic oil source. The maximum test force of the vibrator equipment in this system is 200 kN, with a measurement accuracy of ±0.5%. The actuator has a travel distance of ±150 mm, with a displacement readout accuracy of ±1% and an actuator frequency of 0.1 to 30 Hz. Manufactured by Moog, Inc., Germany, the vibrator controller can set up different vibration waveforms and simulate the cyclic loading of the highspeed railway according to the magnitude of the train load and running speed.
2.2. Foundation Soil and Gravel Cushion Layer
The basic physical parameters of the foundation filling silt adopted in the test were measured by a laboratory consolidation test, with the test results shown in Table 1.

The test model used 28 Xsection piles of the same material and size. The test pile has a design length of 3950 mm, an open arc spacing of 39.5 mm, a circumscribed circle radius of 76 mm, and an open arc angle of 90°. When the foundation soil was filled and compacted to a height of 0.887 m from the bottom of the tank, the Xsection piles were buried and laid out in a quincunx shape with a pile spacing of 600 mm. To ensure perpendicularity during the laying out, the piles were secured with scaffolding and then filled and compacted layer by layer according to the filling requirements.
Graded gravels were used for the surface layer of the subgrade bed, group A and B fillers were used for the bottom layer of the subgrade bed, and wellgraded unweathered gravels or gravel fillers, with a maximum particle size of smaller than 25 mm, were used for the cushion layer. Approximately 10–12% stone powder or fine particles were blended in the gravels for filling after mixing well. The tensile yield strength of the geogrid used in the pilenet composite foundation is 30.0 kN/m, as shown in Figure 2.
Considering the dynamic response characteristics of the Xsection pilenet composite foundation, we installed in the model test a complete set of dynamic and static test instruments, including displacement gauge, dynamic pressure box, speedometer, accelerometer, and pore pressure gauge, to measure the vibration displacement, dynamic earth pressure, velocity, and acceleration at different locations. The specific layout is shown in Figure 3. Figure 3(a) is the front view, and Figure 3(b) is the top view.
(a)
(b)
2.3. Loading Method and Design
Different train speeds were simulated by controlling the loading frequency of the actuators. The actuators were equipped with load transducers that monitored the loads of the actuators in real time. The wheeltrack load generated by the interaction of the wheel shaft of the train and the track was transferred to the track structure and subgrade through the fastener system. According to field measurement data, the wheeltrack load of an operating train is transferred in the form of a dynamic load similar to an Mshaped wave to the foundation of the embankment. Therefore, an Mshaped wave was also adopted for loading in the test, with the load waveform shown in Figure 4. The Mshaped wave shown in the figure is the dynamic load of a train with a speed of 300 km/h and an axle load of 10 kN. This waveform was fitted using a 3rdorder Fourier series according to the variation pattern and periodic characteristics of the timehistory curve. Let t be the running time of the train and F(t) be the equation of the force applied by the actuator. The expression is shown in equation (1):where T is the vibration period of the actuator load and a_{n} and b_{n} are constants obtained based on the actual parameters of a train.
The train simulated in this test refers to the main type of CRH3/CRH380 Dseries highspeed train operated on the highspeed railway in China. The applied force is the load from the four pairs of wheels of the adjacent bogies of adjacent carriages. The time for passing through the distance of a 2.5 m bogie is two load cycles. The magnitude of the train load and the running speed is reflected through the load output and frequency of a servo vibrator. The relationship between the train speed and loading frequency is shown in Table 2.

3. Test Working Conditions and Result Analysis
3.1. Analysis of Vertical Velocity
Taking a train speed of 300 km/h as an example, the timehistory response curves of the vertical vibration velocities at different locations of the Xsection pilenet composite foundation system are shown in Figure 5.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
Under the cyclic load of an Mshaped wave, the timehistory response curve of the velocity of the entire composite foundation exhibits significant periodicity with the cyclic loading process, and the frequency of its velocity response is consistent with the frequency of the cyclic loading.
At the surface and bottom layers of the subgrade bed, the timehistory response curves of the velocity induced by the cyclic loading exhibits a significant M shape and, as the depth increases, the amplitude of the Mshaped velocity gradually decreases. Therefore, the dynamic cyclic load induced by the operating train has an important influence on the embankment, and the vibration response of this region is mainly caused by the dynamic load of the train wheel shaft. As they propagate to the foundation, the various reflected waves gradually account for a certain percentage of the total, causing the response waveform to be insignificant.
Figure 5 shows that the response of the velocity at the surface layer of the subgrade bed in the embankment is mainly caused by the cyclic dynamic load of the train, and it is relatively consistent with the waveform of the loading wave but without the influence of a large number of reflected waves in the foundation soil. Hence, it can better assist in the study of the relationship between the velocity response and the train speed. Therefore, the peak responses of the vertical velocity at the surface layer of the subgrade bed under different train speeds are averaged for analysis. Under different train speeds, the velocity responses of the Xsection pilenet composite foundation at different depths are shown in Figure 6. We can see that, with the track slab plane as the 0 m depth, 1 m is the surface layer of the subgrade. Under different train speeds, the vibration velocity of the foundation soil rapidly attenuates as the depth increases, and the maximum vibration response occurs at the surface layer of the subgrade bed. It can be seen that, within the depth of 1 m, i.e., within the embankment, the dynamic velocity attenuates by approximately 90%, indicating that the embankment has a very good reduction effect on the propagation of the vibration load, while the attenuation rate of the speed, after it reaches the foundation, decreases.
Figure 7 shows the relationship curve between the response of the vertical velocity at the track slab and the train speed. The peak response of the velocity at the track slab under three different train speeds is shown. The distribution of the scattered points reveals that the peak response of the vibration velocity at the track slab and the train speed are linearly related. As the train speed increases from 160 km/h to 350 km/h, the peak response of the vibration velocity increases from 22.99 mm/s to 46.00 mm/s, an increase of 100%.
The distribution of the vertical vibration velocity response of the track under train operation along the transverse direction of the track is shown in Figure 8. We can see that, in the whole system, the track structure that is closest to the actuator exhibits the most intense vibration response. With a train speed of 350 km/h, the peak vibration velocity reaches 43.78 mm/s, while the maximum vibration velocity of the subgrade structure is only 1.02 mm/s. The vibration of the subgrade system gradually attenuates going farther away from the vibration source, and the vibration velocity at the bottom layer of the subgrade bed as well as within the range of the lower foundation is at a relatively low level and with a significantly slow attenuation rate, indicating that the subgrade bed has a significant reduction effect on the vertical vibration.
3.2. Analysis of Dynamic Earth Pressure
Figure 9 shows timehistory curves of the dynamic soil stress at the pile top and between piles when the train speed is 300 km/h. The wave is affected by the embankment and hence attenuates during the propagation process, causing the waveform characteristics of the Mshaped wave to have already been significantly weakened when it reaches the surface of the foundation. We can see that the stress at the pile top is greater than the dynamic stress of the soil between piles, and the soil arch has a significant influence on the distribution of the dynamic stress. In the soil arch region, a greater dynamic load is transferred above the top of the pile. The average of the peak dynamic stresses at the pile top is approximately 6.2 kPa, which is 3.4 times the average of the peak dynamic earth pressure (approximately 1.8 kPa) on the soil between the piles.
(a)
(b)
Figure 10 shows relationship curves of the changes in the peak dynamic stresses at the pile top and in the soil between the piles of the foundation and the train speed. We can see that, under the vibration load of the highspeed train, the load carried at the pile top in the foundation is much larger than that by the soil between the piles.
Although the vibration frequency of the dynamic load increases as the train speed increases, the influence of the train speed on the response of the dynamic stress is weak. This is likely because the wave gradually attenuates in the process of reaching the foundation through the subgrade bed, and its effect gradually decreases.
3.3. Analysis of Dynamic Displacement
Figure 11 shows the timehistory response curve of the dynamic displacement on the track surface under different train speeds. We can see that the change in the train speed does not have a large influence on the peak transient dynamic displacement response on the track surface. A comparison of dynamic displacement responses under different train speeds reveals that the faster the train speed, the more intense and shorter the induced vibration. This is because the faster the train speed, the higher the dynamic loading frequency. When the train speed is not high (160 km/h), the timehistory curve between the peak displacements attenuates. When the train speed reaches 250 km/h, the displacement time history does not significantly attenuate but instead gradually fluctuates with time. In fact, the attenuation process is not completed.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
3.4. Analysis of Acceleration
Figure 12 shows the timehistory curve of the acceleration at different locations in the pilenet composite foundation when the train speed is 300 km/h. We can see that the vibration close to the actuator has a relatively large amplitude. As the distance from the vibration source increases, the amplitude of the acceleration gradually decreases, and the highfrequency components attenuate especially rapidly. Because the track slab is relatively close to the subgrade bed, its peak acceleration is approximately 80 mm/s^{2}. After passing through the track slab, the waveform at the surface layer of the subgrade bed is not as significant as that at the track slab.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
It can be clearly seen from Figure 12 that, after passing through the subgrade bed, the peak acceleration decreases from 80 mm/s^{2} to 30 mm/s^{2}; that is, it attenuates by 62.5%. This is mainly because the highfrequency components are absorbed due to the damping effect of the soil in the embankment, while the attenuation of the lowfrequency components is relatively slow. When reaching the bottom layer of the foundation, due to the influence of the reflected waves, the Mshaped waveform has essentially disappeared. As a result, only a simple harmonic oscillation curve is presented, and the amplitude of the acceleration vibration is only 2% of that at the surface layer of the foundation. As the depth increases, the peak acceleration responses of the Mshaped waveform at different locations do not appear at the same time. This is because it takes time for the wave to propagate, causing some lag in the acceleration response.
Figure 13 shows a spectral curve of the vertical acceleration at different locations from the vibration source when the train speed is 300 km/h. We can see that the frequency is distributed in the range of 0–100 Hz and is mainly concentrated between 10 and 50 Hz, making it lowfrequency vibrations. As the distance from the vibration source increases, the maximum vibration accelerations at different locations are 43.52 mm/s^{2}, 40.82 mm/s^{2}, 31.52 mm/s^{2}, 3.52 mm/s^{2}, and 0.14 mm/s^{2}. It can be seen that, as the distance from the vibration source increases, the amplitude of the acceleration generally attenuates. The highfrequency component is relatively rich at locations close to the vibration source, and the width of the spectrum gradually decreases when moving away from the vibration source. The most significant frequency band becomes that of the low frequency because the highfrequency components attenuate faster than the lowfrequency components.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
We can see from the peaks in Figure 13 that the four characteristic frequencies with the largest contributions to the vibration are 19.9 Hz, 23.3 Hz, 29.9 Hz, and 33.2 Hz. Among them, 33.2 Hz corresponds to the actuator frequency. At the measurement site of the track slab, the frequency of the ground vibration caused by the train is distributed within 50–85 Hz and relatively rich in the main frequency.
Figure 14 shows the timehistory curve of the acceleration at the surface layer of the foundation under different train speeds. We can clearly see that as the train speed increases, the highfrequency components significantly increase. When the train speed is 160 km/h, the peak acceleration at the surface layer of the foundation is 3.59 mm/s^{2}, and when the train velocity increases to 200 km/h, the peak acceleration at the surface layer of the foundation reaches 7.24 mm/s^{2} (approximately double). However, when the train speed reaches 250 km/h, the increase on the peak is negligible. Because the increase in the train speed is achieved by increasing the vibration frequency, the superposition of the surrounding reflected waves in this process likely produces a counteraction to the vibration of the subgrade foundation, explaining this result.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
Figure 15 shows the spectral curve of the acceleration at the surface layer of the foundation under different train speeds. We can see that the ground vibration caused by the train is mainly contributed by relatively lowfrequency components (mainly below 100 Hz). As the train speed increases, the amplitude of the acceleration increases, and the base frequencies of the vibration also gradually increase. 17.7 Hz in the base frequencies when the train velocity is 160 km/h, 22.2 Hz when the train speed is 200 km/h, 27.7 Hz when the train speed is 250 km/h, 33.2 Hz when the train speed is 300 km/h, and 38.8 Hz when the train speed is 350 km/h are all the vibration frequency of the actuator under the current working condition.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
As the train speed increases, the peak spectral vibration acceleration response also increases, and the frequency corresponding to the peak spectral vibration acceleration also gradually moves to a medium frequency as the train speed increases. The higher the train speed, the richer the frequency components of the ground vibration.
4. Conclusions
In this study, by conducting a largescale dynamic model test on an Xsection pilenet composite foundation under different train speeds, we can draw the following conclusions:(1)The response of the vertical dynamic velocity is the largest at the surface layer of the embankment and attenuates by approximately 90% in the embankment. The speed rapidly attenuates as the depth increases; the vibration gradually attenuates as the distance from the vibration source increases. At the bottom layer of the subgrade bed and in the range of the lower foundation, the attenuation rate significantly decreases, and the vibration velocity is linearly related to the train speed.(2)Inside the pilenet foundation, the peak dynamic stress at the top of the pile is 3.4 times than that in the soil between piles, and the dynamic stress attenuates with the depth.(3)The change in train speed does not have a large influence on the peak transient dynamic displacement response at the surface of the track; after passing through the subgrade bed, the peak vertical acceleration decreases from approximately 80 mm/s^{2} to 30 mm/s^{2}, attenuating by 62.5%. This is mainly because the highfrequency components are absorbed due to soil damping effects, and the lowfrequency components attenuate relatively slowly. The foundation vibration caused by the train is a lowfrequency vibration, and the subgrade foundation has an attenuation impact on the highfrequency vibration; the vibration gradually decreases as the distance from the vibration source increases and increases as the train speed increases.
Data Availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
This project was supported by the Funds for International Cooperation and Exchange of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 51420105013).
References
 M. A. Heckl, “Railway noisecan random sleeper spacings help,” Acta Acustica United with Acustica, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 559–564, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
 H. Takemiya and X. Bian, “Substructure simulation of inhomogeneous track and layered ground dynamic interaction under train passage,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, vol. 131, no. 7, pp. 699–711, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Bahrekazemi and A. Bodare, “Effects of limecement soil stabilization against train induced ground vibrations,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Specialty Conference on Grouting and Ground Treatment, New Orleans, LA, USA, February 2003. View at: Google Scholar
 L. Bo and C. Ying, “Dynamic analysis on subgrade of high speed railways in geometric irregular condition,” Journal of the China Railway Society, vol. 21, pp. 84–88, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
 X. Chen and W. Y. Lü Wentian, “Study on the dynamic response of high speed railway bridgesubgrade transition section,” Journal of Vibration and Shock, vol. 25, pp. 95–98, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
 W. F. Anderson and A. J. Key, “Model testing of twolayer railway track ballast,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 317–323, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. J. Cox, A. Wang, C. Morison, P. Carels, R. Kelly, and O. G. Bewes, “A test rig to investigate slab track structures for controlling ground vibration,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 293, no. 3–5, pp. 901–909, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Zhan and G. Jiang, “Study of dynamic characteristics of soil subgrade bed for ballastless track,” Rock and Soil Mechanics, vol. 31, pp. 392–396, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Momoya, E. Sekine, and F. Tatsuoka, “Deformation characteristics of railway roadbed and subgrade under movingwheel load,” Soils and Foundations, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 99–118, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Al Shaer, D. Duhamel, K. Sab, G. Foret, and L. Schmitt, “Experimental settlement and dynamic behavior of a portion of ballasted railway track under high speed trains,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 316, no. 1–5, pp. 211–233, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Ishikawa, E. Sekine, and S. Miura, “Cyclic deformation of granular material subjected to movingwheel loads,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 691–703, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Q. Kong, X. M. Ding, Y. M. Chen, and G. Yang, “Vertical uplift capacity characteristics and influence factor analysis of castinsitu Xsection reinforced concrete pile group,” Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, vol. 29, pp. 49–54, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 M. X. Zhang, H. L. Liu, X. M. Ding, and Z. Q. Wang, “Comparative tests on bearing capacity of castinsitu Xshaped concrete piles and circular pile,” Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 33, pp. 1469–1476, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
 Z. Q. Wang, H. L. Liu, M. X. Zhang, J. Yuan, and J. Yong, “Full scale model tests on vertical bearing characteristics of castinplace Xsection piles,” Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 32, pp. 903–907, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Jun, L. XiaoMin, and L. HanLong, “Model test study of antipulling property of Xshaped concrete pile,” Rock and Soil Mechanics, vol. 31, pp. 3430–3434, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
 L. HanLong, L. ZhiPing, and W. XinQuan, “Study on the geometric characteristics of the castinplace Xtype vibropile section,” China Railway Science, vol. 30, pp. 17–23, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
 M. X. Zhang, S. M. Ding, and Y. M. Chen, “Test on vertical behavior of castinsitu Xshaped concrete pile and its ultimate bearing capacity prediction,” Journal of China Coal Society, vol. 36, pp. 267–271, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
 L. HanLong, J. Hui, and D. XuanMing, “Field test research on squeezing effects of Xsection castinplace concrete pile,” Rock and Soil Mechanics, vol. 33, pp. 219–224, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 S. GuangChao, L. HanLong, K. GangQiang, and D. XuanMing, “Model tests on effect of vibration waves on dynamic response of XCC pileraft composite foundation,” Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 38, pp. 1021–1029, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Shanshan Xue et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.