Research Article
Commercial Vehicle Ride Comfort Optimization Based on Intelligent Algorithms and Nonlinear Damping
Table 4
Evaluation indexes of objective function before and after optimization.
| Speed (km/h) | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 80 | 90 | 100 |
| f1 | Original | 0.4107 | 0.5190 | 0.4430 | 0.6077 | 0.6988 | 0.6914 | 0.8738 | 0.7832 | Optimized | 0.3067 | 0.3531 | 0.3527 | 0.4318 | 0.4742 | 0.5284 | 0.5786 | 0.6012 | Fall ratio (%) | 25.3 | 32.0 | 20.4 | 28.9 | 32.1 | 23.6 | 33.8 | 23.3 | Average (%) | 27.4 |
| f2 | Original | 0.2442 | 0.2903 | 0.3118 | 0.3740 | 0.4085 | 0.4042 | 0.4731 | 0.4755 | Optimized | 0.1922 | 0.2263 | 0.2557 | 0.2908 | 0.3122 | 0.3275 | 0.3584 | 0.3701 | Fall ratio (%) | 21.3 | 22.0 | 18.0 | 22.2 | 23.6 | 19.0 | 24.2 | 22.2 | Average (%) | 21.6 |
| f3 | Original | 0.1413 | 0.1672 | 0.2050 | 0.2405 | 0.2577 | 0.2674 | 0.3045 | 0.3021 | Optimized | 0.1075 | 0.1314 | 0.1567 | 0.1756 | 0.1875 | 0.2014 | 0.2196 | 0.2282 | Fall ratio (%) | 23.9 | 21.4 | 23.6 | 27.0 | 27.2 | 24.7 | 27.9 | 24.5 | Average (%) | 25.0 |
| f4 | Original | 0.0142 | 0.0166 | 0.0171 | 0.0215 | 0.0233 | 0.0218 | 0.0271 | 0.0261 | Optimized | 0.0113 | 0.0132 | 0.0148 | 0.0172 | 0.0183 | 0.0186 | 0.0207 | 0.0209 | Fall ratio (%) | 20.4 | 20.5 | 13.5 | 20.0 | 21.5 | 14.7 | 23.6 | 19.9 | Average (%) | 19.3 |
| f5 | Original | 0.0086 | 0.0101 | 0.0125 | 0.0150 | 0.0159 | 0.0161 | 0.0188 | 0.0183 | Optimized | 0.0068 | 0.0082 | 0.0099 | 0.0114 | 0.0119 | 0.0127 | 0.0139 | 0.0144 | Fall ratio (%) | 20.9 | 18.8 | 20.8 | 24.0 | 25.2 | 21.1 | 26.1 | 21.3 | Average (%) | 22.3 |
|
|