Research Article  Open Access
Yunpu Wu, Weidong Jin, Junxiao Ren, Zhang Sun, "Fault Diagnosis of HighSpeed Train Bogie Based on Synchrony Group Convolutions", Shock and Vibration, vol. 2019, Article ID 7230194, 13 pages, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7230194
Fault Diagnosis of HighSpeed Train Bogie Based on Synchrony Group Convolutions
Abstract
Health monitoring and fault diagnosis of a highspeed train is an important research area in guaranteeing the safe and longterm operation of the highspeed railway. For a multichannel health monitoring system, a major technical challenge is to extract information from different channels with divergence patterns as a result of distinct types and layout of sensors. To this end, this paper proposes a novel group convolutional network based on synchrony information. The proposed method is able to gather signals with similar patterns and process these channels with specific groups of neurons while simultaneously assigning signals with significant difference to different groups. In this approach, the feature can be extracted more effectively and the performance can be improved, owing to the sharing of filters for similar patterns. The effectiveness of the method is validated on highspeed train fault dataset. Experiments show that the proposed model performs better than normal convolutions and normal group convolutions on this task, which achieves an accuracy of 98.27% (σ = 1.73) with good computational efficiency.
1. Introduction
As a rapid developing modern transportation method in the world, the highspeed train has the advantages of fast, efficient, and environment friendly. With the high speed, high density, and crossregional development of highspeed trains, the safe operation and maintenance of highspeed trains has become the first concern of the field [1–3]. During longterm operation of highspeed trains, the performance deterioration of critical components would threaten the safety of the vehicle. The highspeed train bogie is the only component that connects the vehicle body and the track (as shown in Figure 1). In the suspension system of the bogie, there would be deteriorating of rubber nodes, oil leakage of the dampers, air leakage of air spring, and breakage of the axle box spring, which would endanger the safety of operation.
The condition monitoring and fault diagnosis for critical components are an urgent need for highspeed trains. However, the number of sensor channels on the train body for vibration monitoring signals could be considerable. There are also couplings between sensor signals due to wheelrail contact force, friction, and interaction between suspension systems [4, 5]. Besides, the vibration of highspeed trains is also affected by many influencing factors, including environment and load [6–9]. Therefore, highspeed train monitoring signal analysis not only needs to deal with high dimensions and high complexity but also many uncertain factors. Some efforts have been performed for fault diagnosis of highspeed train, including suspension system [10–13], traction system [14, 15], wheelset bearing system [16, 17], and onboard equipment [18, 19]. Gasparetto et al. [20] proposed a datadriven approach for detecting the incipient instability of the bogie, which is based on random decrement technique and Prony method. Chen et al. [21] proposed a probabilityrelevant PCA method for detecting incipient sensor faults in electrical drive systems of highspeed trains. Zhuang et al. [22] developed a combined method based on convolution sparse representation, Hilbert transform, and manifold learning for detecting bearing faults of trains.
Deep neural network, as an efficient machine learning model, has achieved great success in many fields such as computer vision, natural language processing, and automatic driving [23, 24]. For signal analysis and recognition, the deep learning architecture can not only deal with highdimensional data but also reduce the dependence on expert experience and domain knowledge [25, 26]. Some scholars have employed deep neural networks in condition monitoring of highspeed trains [27, 28]. Hu et al. [29] used an autoencoder to obtain fault features of the bogie and then combined deep neural network faults for classification. Peng et al. [30] employed onedimensional convolutional neural networks to identify wheelset faults in highspeed trains. In [31], a multiperspective neural network was proposed for the multichannel and multicomponent signal analysis, which extract features from perspectives of channel, component, and timescale. However, the monitoring sensors on the vehicle are different not only in measure but also in different positions [32], which makes the pattern of the monitoring signals have group disparities. For conventional deep neural networks, it is tricky to make manual adjustments for input channels. Therefore, the divergences and convergences among signals in different channels present a challenge to the fault diagnosis model based on deep neural networks.
Correlation analysis (also known as synchrony analysis in the signal process) is a method to evaluate the relationship between two or more variables. It can be used to explore potential similarities of signal patterns. There have been some efforts to apply correlation analysis in monitoring signal analysis. Liu et al. [33] employed complex continuous wavelet coherence to quantify the intense correlation of motor current and chatter vibration, which require a wide bandwidth of frequency response. Hong and Huang [34] evaluated the health condition of the power transformer through the vibration correlation analysis. Kestner et al. [35] analysed the correlations for sensors between the pressure measurements and bearing vibration measurements of gas turbine compressor from the view of harmonics. Recent studies suggested that the analytic representation can be another way to obtain timeresolved connectivity of signals. CórdovaPalomera et al. [36] employed analytic components of the signal to quantify the oscillatory synchronization of cerebellar functional networks. Pedersen et al. [37] applied instantaneous phase synchrony analysis to obtain phase information between all possible nodewise time series and compared its performance with correlationbased sliding window analysis. Hence, analytic representation of signals can capture the temporal resolution synchrony among signals, which provide a feasible approach for similarity measure of monitoring signals.
This paper proposes a fault diagnosis structure for the multichannel monitoring system to address the issues brought by the divergences and convergences of different sensors in signal patterns. We combine group convolutions with synchrony information to improve the ability to process multichannel signals with group disparities. The proposed method is able to collect signals with similar patterns and process them with specific groups of neurons, which could extract features more effectively. On the contrary, signals with significant differences would be assigned to different groups of neurons, instead of sharing the same neurons, which makes the model much easier to optimize. The contributions of this paper are as follows:(1)Three synchrony measurements (instantaneous phase synchrony, amplitude envelope synchrony, and composite synchrony) are introduced to estimate the similarity between vibration signals, which provide a scalable and flexible approach to measure the synchronization of multichannel signals.(2)A synchrony group convolutional network is proposed for the signal pattern analysis and feature extraction of the multichannel monitoring system. The proposed structure can process multichannel signals with strong coupling and complex group disparities.(3)The proposed method is applied to fault diagnosis of a highspeed train bogie. The results show that our scheme can achieve high accuracy of fault classification and reduce the model size and burden of computation, which provides a feasible and practical structure for fault diagnosis of the multichannel monitoring system.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: Section 2 has three distinct subsections: Sections 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 give brief introductions to synchrony quantification, hierarchical clustering, and group convolutions in neural networks. Section 3 describes the proposed synchrony group convolutional network for multisensorbased fault diagnosis. Section 4 presents the experimental results for bogie fault diagnosis of the highspeed train. Finally, conclusions and some perspectives are presented in Section 5.
2. Methods
In this section, the principles of synchrony analysis and hierarchical clustering for similaritybased grouping of sensor channels are presented. Furthermore, group convolutions are introduced, which is a variant of convolution layers in neural networks.
2.1. Synchrony Analysis and Correlation Quantification
Signal synchrony [37, 38] can reveal the independence, conditioning, and correlations between two or sometimes more signals, and it can be characterized in many different ways. In this section, two correlation metrics for synchrony analysis between signals are presented: the amplitude envelope and the instantaneous phase (corresponding to and ), which both are derived from analytic representation [39].
Let be a twodimensional matrix of size including signals across channels where is the length of the signal. and are the analytic representations of rows in , i.e., and , respectively; that is,where , denotes the Hilbert transform of , and denote the instantaneous amplitudes, and are the instantaneous phases of and , respectively,. The instantaneous phase and amplitude envelope comprise distinct correction information among channels, respectively. The instantaneous phase contains the temporal oscillating properties of signals, while the amplitude envelope can represent the varying level of signals over time.
In order to capture the synchrony between signals, the Pearson correlation coefficient [40] is introduced to qualify the amplitude envelope synchrony between signals, which is a statistical measure of the strength of a linear relationship between paired data and can indicate the covarying of two continuous signals. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the amplitude envelopes can be calculated as follows:where is the mean of vector and is the mean of the vector . The values of the Pearson correlation coefficient range from −1 to 1. The positive value denotes two signals have positive correlation and vice versa. An additional consideration is that we are more concerned with the strength of the correlation between signals for the purpose. Hence, the absolute value of the Pearson correlation coefficient, which ignores the sign, is employed as an indicator of the relationship between signals.
The Pearson correlation coefficient is a global synchrony measurement that reduces the relationship between two signals to a single value. However, it is equally essential to analyse the local synchrony in synchrony analysis. One way to obtain the timeresolved Pearson correlation is to calculate the coefficient with the sliding window, which partitions the timedomain input signal into several disjointed or overlapped blocks by multiplying the signal with a window function until the entire signal is covered. For local synchrony of the instantaneous phase, there is another measurement for signal synchrony. Instantaneous phase synchrony analysis is a method for deriving timeresolved connectivity analysis of signals, which has been applied in functional connectivity analysis [37] and could characterize the phase synchrony at the same temporal resolution as the input signal.
Assuming that signals satisfy Bedrosian’s theorem [41], the two signals and are phase locked of order 1 : 1 whenwhere is the absolute value operator. The instantaneous phase difference between the signal pairs and , which obtained from all pairs of rows in the analytic associate matrix, can be calculated as follows:
The sinusoid accounts for phase wrapping and ambiguity in the sign of phases over time. Calculation of equation (4) for all pairs of channels and alltime points yields a threedimensional matrix . At each time point, the phase coherence quantity between signal pairs is calculated, ranging from 0 (no phase coherence) to 1 (maximal phase coherence).
In this paper, the global level synchrony of the phase synchrony and the amplitude envelope between each combination is quantified by the Pearson correlation coefficient and average phase coherence for all time steps, respectively. Besides, the composite synchrony among channels is calculated through the weighted average of amplitude envelope synchrony and instantaneous phase synchrony. This average approach and its relationship with hierarchical clustering are explained in the following section.
2.2. Hierarchical Clustering
The hierarchical clustering [42] is a hierarchical decomposition method based on group similarities. Hierarchical clustering builds a cluster hierarchy, which is widely known as the dendrogram (Figure 2), representing the nested grouping of patterns and similarity levels at which groupings change. The clustering process is performed by merging the most similar patterns in the cluster set to form a bigger one. The agglomerative hierarchical clustering which is the most common hierarchical clustering based on the bottomup approach is employed in this paper. It considers each data point as an individual cluster. At each iteration, the similar clusters merge with other clusters until one cluster is formed.
The basic scheme of the agglomerative hierarchical clustering is shown as follows:(1)Clusters initialization: each data point is considered as an individual cluster(2)Clusters distance (similarity) calculation: all pairwise distances are calculated according to the similarity, which results in a distance matrix(3)Combine the foremost closed two clusters(4)Update the distance matrix to replicate the pairwise distance between the new cluster and the original clusters(5)Repeat Steps 3 and 4 until only a single cluster remains
Agglomerative hierarchical clustering relies on constructing a distance matrix between all of the clusters. A critical operation is to determine the distance of two clusters. There are various approaches which are used to calculate the distance between two clusters. The most common ways include single linkage, complete linkage, and average linkage [43]. Single linkage hierarchical clustering defines the shortest distance between two points in each cluster as the distance between two clusters. Complete linkage hierarchical clustering defines the longest distance between two points in each cluster as the distance between two clusters, while average linkage is a compromise solution to measuring the distances of clusters. The distance between two clusters is the average of the pairwise distance between points in the two clusters. The cluster distance between clusters A and B is defined aswhere represents the distance measurement between points. The composite synchrony, which has been mentioned in Section 2.1, is the weighted average of amplitude envelope synchrony and instantaneous phase synchrony. This approach is equivalent to the average of two distance measurement between clusters, and thus it can be directly taken as the distance measurement for hierarchical clustering.
There are two main advantages of hierarchical clustering for our purpose. Firstly, it makes it possible to obtain clusters by precomputed pairwise distance matrix, which is compatible with the measure of pairwise synchrony and ease of handling of any types of similarity or distance. Secondly, the hierarchical clustering can embed flexibility concerning the extent of granularity. A sensor channel may belong to different clusters under different viewpoints. For example, vibration sensors on the vehicle can be divided into displacement sensors and accelerometers based on measured values. Alternatively, these sensors can also be grouped by the measured directions, namely, lateral direction, vertical direction, and longitudinal direction. The desirable hierarchy and number of clusters could be obtained by “cutting” the dendrogram at the proper level, which makes it convenient to adjust the number of clusters according to requirements. Thus, the agglomerative hierarchical clustering can be applied to obtain the groups of sensor channels from signal synchronicity.
2.3. Group Convolutions
Group convolutions are a variant of convolution layer in neural networks where the channels of the input feature map are grouped, and the convolution operation is performed independently for each channel group. Usually, convolution filters are applied on an input layer by layer to get the final output feature maps. Instead of applying all filters on all channels, group convolutions use different sets of convolution filter groups on the same input so that there is more than one pathway for convolutions on a single input (Figure 3). The initial use of this idea of group convolutions can be noticed in the study of Krizhevsky et al. [44], through which deep neural networks can be trained with less resource requirement for processor and memory.
The main advantages of group convolution are as follows [45]:(1)Reducing model size: The group convolutions can decrease the model parameters by filter grouping. Moreover, for a convolution layer with input channels and output channels, the group convolution with independent groups can reduce filter dimensions from to , in which filters operate on channels. Through that, the computational complexity and the number of model parameters can be significantly reduced.(2)Efficient training process: By the group approach, the convolution operations are divided into multiple independent parts and can be handled by different processors in a parallel way. The parallel execution can reduce the training time and improve scalability of the model.(3)Better feature representation: Group convolutions can also provide a better model than normal convolutions. Through the filter group structure, feature maps are forced into a dense block diagonal structure, and filters with strong mutual information are grouped adjacent to each other.
In this paper, instead of dividing channels into equal groups sequentially, the groups of sensor channels are inferred based on the signal correlation from amplitude envelope synchrony and phase synchrony.
3. Proposed Fault Diagnosis Framework Based on Synchrony Group Convolutions
This paper focuses on improving the ability of the neural network in processing multichannel signals with group disparities. Because of different settings of monitoring sensors in types and locations, there would be divergences and convergences among signals in different channels. The diversity of channel signals would grow with increase in the channel number, which requires more effective neural network model for feature extraction.
In order to address this issue, we propose synchrony group convolutions to construct a fault diagnosis scheme for a highspeed train bogie. We combine group convolutions with synchrony information to improve the ability to process multichannel signals with group disparities. A complete description of the proposed structure for fault diagnosis is schematically represented in Figure 4. Different from conventional group convolutions, the proposed method does not require that each group has the same number of filters because the channels are grouped based on synchrony information. The structure details and process are as follows:(1)Synchrony calculation: the pairwise phase synchrony and amplitude envelope synchrony between sensor channels are calculated based on analytic components and correlation measurement. The composite synchrony between signals is obtained through a weighted average of these two correlation metrics derived from the Pearson correlation coefficient and the average phase coherence, respectively.(2)Channel clustering based on synchrony: after obtaining the synchrony information between channels, we use the pairwise correlations to construct a correlation matrix. Then, agglomerative hierarchical clustering is employed to cluster channels with strong correlations. It should be noted that the group number should be adjusted taking into account not only clustering results but the complexity of the neural network.(3)Synchrony group convolutional network training: in the fault diagnosis model, channel groups in group convolution layers are based on the cluster results of hierarchical clustering. Synchrony group convolutions are configured in the forepart of the network. The filters in each group keep independent in these layers. At a more specific level, the output feature maps for a certain group would still be in one group in the next convolution layer, which could extract much deeper features for a channel group with synchrony signals. After all synchrony group convolution layers, standard convolution layers are attached for feature fusion.
The proposed structure is an entire endtoend neural network that all synchrony group convolution layers can be freely adjusted. It should be added that the proposed synchrony group convolutions are compatible with existing deep structures of neural networks. Synchrony group convolution layers can be plugged into the forepart of established structures, which can improve the capabilities of the neural network model for handling multisensor signals. The main advantages of the proposed scheme are concluded as follows:(1)Correlated pattern assembly: The synchrony group convolutions can discover and extract the latent features for signals with similar patterns, which improve the performance and capacity of the neural network for multichannel signals.(2)Scalable and adjustable: The synchrony group convolution layers can be configured on the basis of actual requirements of signal channels. The depth and width of these layers are fully controllable. The group’s number can also be adjusted through proper hierarchy choice.(3)Fully learnable structure: The entirely datadriven scheme reduces the requirement for prior knowledge and needs few human interventions, which also reduces the biases caused by limited domain knowledge.
4. Experimental Results and Analysis
4.1. Data Description
The data for experiments is from the simulation platform of the highspeed train bogie, which is developed by the State Key Laboratory of Traction Power at Southwest Jiaotong University [31]. The simulation platform is based on the nonlinear dynamic model of an electric multipleunit system with the multibody dynamics analysis software Simpack. The geometric nonlinearity of wheelrail contact, the creep nonlinear, and the nonlinear suspension of wheelrail are all taken into account. The track irregularity spectrum, obtained by measuring the highspeed railway in China, is imposed as inputs and excitations of the simulation model. Suspension parameters of the bogie in the simulation model are consistent with the highspeed train CRH380A. Hence, the monitoring signals under this track spectrum can be viewed as a maximum approximation to real environments, with track irregularity, and other factors contained.
The monitoring sensors measure the motion characteristics, including lateral, longitudinal, and vertical vibration accelerations of different parts (Figure 5) of the vehicle and displacements of the body, the bogie, and the wheelset. Table 1 gives all descriptions to the 58 channels of the dataset. The data are collected at a sampling frequency of 243 samples per second from 58 channels. Five categories of fault are considered in the experiments, which are air spring fault, wheelbox spring fault, lateral damper fault, yaw damper fault, and vertical damper fault. Considering there are multiple same type components in the locomotive frame (e.g., there are four yaw dampers for each bogie), there would be 30 types of fault in classification.

4.2. Channel Synchrony and Hierarchical Clustering
In order to explore the correlation between channels, the pairwise synchrony for all combinations of 58 sensor channels is calculated, both the instantaneous phase and the amplitude envelope. Here, two examples of the channel synchrony calculation are presented, which are local synchrony and global synchrony in the instantaneous phase and the amplitude envelope. The results of synchrony analysis are illustrated in Figure 6.
(a)
(b)
The first example is channel 11 and channel 20 which is shown in Figure 6(a). It can be seen from Table 1 that two sensor channels measure the lateral acceleration, respectively, in the middle of bogie 1 and axle box 1. From the results, it can be seen that these two channels have significant synchrony in both instantaneous phase (0.65) and amplitude envelope (0.48), as a result of the close spatial location and the same measurement direction. However, the position difference leads to the amplitude difference, which lowers the amplitude envelope synchrony. Another example is the lateral acceleration (channel 11) and the vertical acceleration (channel 12) of the bogie 1 in the middle which is shown in Figure 6(b). We can see that even the position of two sensor channels is completely identical and the synchrony between them is weak with respect to the orthogonality of measurement direction. The results of the synchrony analysis for these two examples are consistent with our domain knowledge.
Through calculating phase synchrony and amplitude envelope synchrony of all combination of 58 sensor channels, the correlation matrix is available. According to the correlation matrix, clusters of sensor channels can be obtained through the hierarchical clustering, which is shown in Figure 7. It can be seen from the cluster results that hierarchical clustering can capture the group’s correlations among multichannel signals. As mentioned previously, hierarchical clustering can obtain the desired number of clusters in engineering applications. Phase synchrony and amplitude envelope synchrony tend to gather channels with common characteristics from their individual perspectives. In comparisons, the composite synchrony provides an integrative perspective for synchrony between channels through the weighted average of two measurements, which can be regarded as an information synthesis in distance measurement for hierarchical clustering.
(a)
(b)
(c)
4.3. Fault Diagnosis for HighSpeed Train Bogie
Our experiments compare the proposed synchrony group convolutions with the normal convolution and normal group convolutions (GC) to validate the performance of the proposed scheme. We also compare the performance of synchrony group convolutions based on three measurements, namely, amplitude envelope synchrony (ASGC), instantaneous phase synchrony (PSGC), and composite synchrony (CSGC).
As mentioned before, the monitoring data come from multibody dynamics simulations under activation of the track spectrum. The data samples for experiments are processed by the sliding window with 243 points width. For data in the training set, the window is slid by 20 points. For data in the valid set and the test set, the window is slid by 243 points, which is equal to window length and no overlapping. There are a total of 17980 samples which contain 3100 training samples, 7440 validation, and 7440 testing samples, and each class at each speed has an equal number of samples.
In addition, for proposed synchrony group convolutions and normal group convolutions, we compare the performance under 4 groups, 8 groups, and 12 groups, respectively, to test the model performance under various conditions. For the sake of comparison, only synchrony group convolution layers are replaced with normal convolution layers in corresponding comparative experiments, the structure and parameters being maintained. We conduct ten trials with random split training sets to obtain the average accuracy and standard deviation. The experiment results are reported in Table 2. The training curves with error bands for experiments are also presented in Figure 8.
 
The number behind the hyphen () represents the group number in normal group convolution layers or synchrony group convolution layers. 
It can be seen from the results in Table 2 that synchrony group convolutions show superior performance and significantly improve the performance when dealing with multichannel signals compared with normal convolution and normal group convolutions, especially the experiment groups based on amplitude envelope synchrony and composite synchrony. The only exception is the experiment 8, in which channels are divided into 4 groups based on instantaneous phase synchrony. It implies that the instantaneous phase synchrony method may require finegrained groups. As the experimental data display, compared with convolutions without groups, normal group convolutions could improve the accuracy (experiment 2) and may decrease the performance (experiments 3 and 4) of the model under improper group numbers.
It is worth to mention that each synchrony measurement has its own merits (experiments 7, 9, and 11) when specifying the number of groups according to the hierarchical clustering. The synchrony group convolution based on composite synchrony is a compromise between phase synchrony and amplitude envelope synchrony, which achieves the best performance among all experiments when the group number equals 4.
The training curves for synchrony group convolutions are more stable in the initial few epochs and increase faster, which suggests that synchrony group convolutions are much easier to optimize. Besides, the model size of synchrony group convolutions is less than or equal to normal group convolutions when the number of groups is equal, owing to the unequal group sizes.
5. Conclusion and Future Work
This paper proposes synchrony group convolutions for multichannel monitoring systems. The proposed method is able to gather signals with similar patterns and process them with specific groups of neurons, which could extract features more effectively. Signals with significant differences would be processed with different groups of neurons, instead of sharing the same neurons, which makes the model much easier to optimize. Experiment results show that the proposed model performs much better than normal convolutions and normal group convolutions on our task, which achieves an accuracy of 98.27% (σ = 1.73) with good computational efficiency. The proposed framework is highly practical for the multisensor monitoring system and provides a reference for other engineering fields.
As an initial work on synchrony group convolutions, the proposed approach has achieved promising performance. One possible extension of this work is the joint optimization for the number of groups and the network structure to achieve better performance. Another difficult challenge is interpretable feature cluster and fusion for multichannel fault diagnosis system, which is essential for the evaluation of reliability and uncertainty. The authors would investigate this topic in future research.
Data Availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
References
 Y. Zang, W. Shangguan, B. Cai, H. Wang, and M. G. Pecht, “Methods for fault diagnosis of highspeed railways: a review,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, vol. 233, no. 5, pp. 908–922, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Chen and B. Jiang, “A review of fault detection and diagnosis for the traction system in highspeed trains,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 1–16, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Y. Chong, J.R. Lee, and H.J. Shin, “A review of health and operation monitoring technologies for trains,” Smart Structures and Systems, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 1079–1105, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Ström, Operational Transfer Path Analysis of Components of a HighSpeed Train Bogie, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2014.
 A. Herrero, Towards Optimization of a High Speed Train Bogie Primary Suspension, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2013.
 E. L. Iglesias, D. J. Thompson, M. Smith, T. Kitagawa, and N. Yamazaki, “Anechoic wind tunnel tests on highspeed train bogie aerodynamic noise,” International Journal of Rail Transportation, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 87–109, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Lu, P. Xiang, P. Dong, X. Zhang, and J. Zeng, “Analysis of the effects of vibration modes on fatigue damage in highspeed train bogie frames,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 89, pp. 222–241, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Zhu, Aerodynamic Noise of HighSpeed Train Bogies, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, 2015.
 Q. Wang, J. Zeng, L. Wei, and B. Zhu, “Carbody vibrations of highspeed train caused by dynamic unbalance of underframe suspended equipment,” Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 10, no. 12, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Melnik and S. Koziak, “Rail vehicle suspension condition monitoringapproach and implementation,” Journal of Vibroengineering, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 487–501, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 O. Polach, A. Böttcher, D. Vannucci et al., “Validation of simulation models in the context of railway vehicle acceptance,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, vol. 229, no. 6, pp. 729–754, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Lebel, C. Soize, C. Funfschilling, and G. Perrin, “Highspeed train suspension health monitoring using computational dynamics and acceleration measurements,” Vehicle System Dynamics, pp. 1–22, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Jesussek and K. Ellermann, “Fault detection and isolation for a fullscale railway vehicle suspension with multiple Kalman filters,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 1695–1715, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Mao, G. Tao, B. Jiang, and X.G. Yan, “Adaptive compensation of traction system Actuator failures for highspeed trains,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 2950–2963, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Feng, J. Xu, W. Liao, and Y. Liu, “Review on the traction system sensor technology of a rail transit train,” Sensors, vol. 17, no. 6, p. 1356, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Cheng, Z. Wang, and W. Zhang, “A novel conditionmonitoring method for axlebox bearings of highspeed trains using temperature sensor signals,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 205–213, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Ding, W. Zhao, B. Miao, and J. Lin, “Adaptive sparse representation based on circularstructure dictionary learning and its application in wheelsetbearing fault detection,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 111, pp. 399–422, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Yin and W. Zhao, “Fault diagnosis network design for vehicle onboard equipments of highspeed railway: a deep learning approach,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 56, pp. 250–259, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Li, S. Luo, C. Cole, and M. Spiryagin, “An overview: modern techniques for railway vehicle onboard health monitoring systems,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 1045–1070, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Gasparetto, S. Alfi, and S. Bruni, “Datadriven conditionbased monitoring of highspeed railway bogies,” International Journal of Rail Transportation, vol. 1, no. 12, pp. 42–56, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Chen, B. Jiang, W. Chen, and H. Yi, “Datadriven detection and diagnosis of incipient faults in electrical drives of highspeed trains,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 4716–4725, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Zhuang, J. Ding, A. C. Tan, Y. Shi, and J. Lin, “Fault detection of highspeed train wheelset bearing based on impulseenvelope manifold,” Shock and Vibration, vol. 2017, Article ID 2104720, 17 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, “Deep learning,” Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436–444, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Schmidhuber, “Deep learning in neural networks: an overview,” Neural Networks, vol. 61, pp. 85–117, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Henriquez, J. B. Alonso, M. A. Ferrer, and C. M. Travieso, “Review of automatic fault diagnosis systems using audio and vibration signals,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 642–652, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Bustos, H. Rubio, C. Castejón, and J. GarcíaPrada, “EMDbased methodology for the identification of a highspeed train running in a gear operating state,” Sensors, vol. 18, no. 3, p. 793, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Wu and W. Jin, “A fault diagnosis scheme for highspeed train bogie based on depthwise convolution,” in Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Progress in Informatics and Computing (PIC), pp. 169–174, Suzhou, China, December 2018. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Kraft, J. Causse, and A. Martinez, “Blackbox modelling of nonlinear railway vehicle dynamics for track geometry assessment using neural networks,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 1241–1270, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Hu, B. Tang, X. Gong, W. Wei, and H. Wang, “Intelligent fault diagnosis of the highspeed train with big data based on deep neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 2106–2116, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Peng, Z. Liu, H. Wang, Y. Qin, and L. Jia, “A novel deeper onedimensional CNN with residual learning for fault diagnosis of wheelset bearings in highspeed trains,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 10278–10293, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Wu, W. Jin, J. Ren, and Z. Sun, “A multiperspective architecture for highspeed train fault diagnosis based on variational mode decomposition and enhanced multiscale structure,” Applied Intelligence, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Ning, Q. Liu, H. Ouyang, C. Chen, and B. Zhang, “A multisensor fusion framework for detecting small amplitude hunting of highspeed trains,” Journal of Vibration and Control, vol. 24, no. 17, pp. 3797–3808, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Liu, X. Wang, J. Lin, and W. Zhao, “Correlation analysis of motor current and chatter vibration in grinding using complex continuous wavelet coherence,” Measurement Science and Technology, vol. 27, no. 11, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Hong and H. Huang, “Power Transformer Fault Diagnosis Based on Vibration Correlation Analysis,” in Proceedings of the ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Montreal, Canada, November 2014. View at: Google Scholar
 B. Kestner, T. Lieuwen, C. Hill, L. Angello, J. Barron, and C. A. Perullo, “Correlation analysis of multiple sensors for industrial gas turbine compressor blade health monitoring,” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, vol. 137, no. 11, Article ID 112605, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. CórdovaPalomera, C. Tornador, C. Falcón et al., “Environmental factors linked to depression vulnerability are associated with altered cerebellar restingstate synchronization,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 37384, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Pedersen, A. Omidvarnia, A. Zalesky, and G. D. Jackson, “On the relationship between instantaneous phase synchrony and correlationbased sliding windows for timeresolved fMRI connectivity analysis,” NeuroImage, vol. 181, pp. 85–94, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. V. Parise and M. O. Ernst, “Correlation detection as a general mechanism for multisensory integration,” Nature Communications, vol. 7, Article ID 11543, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Feldman, “Hilbert transform in vibration analysis,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 735–802, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. C. F. de Winter, S. D. Gosling, and J. Potter, “Comparing the Pearson and spearman correlation coefficients across distributions and sample sizes: a tutorial using simulations and empirical data,” Psychological Methods, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 273–290, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Venouziou and H. Zhang, “Characterizing the Hilbert transform by the bedrosian theorem,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 338, no. 2, pp. 1477–1481, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Murtagh and P. Contreras, “Algorithms for hierarchical clustering: an overview,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 86–97, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 O. Yim and K. T. Ramdeen, “Hierarchical cluster Analysis: comparison of three linkage measures and application to psychological data,” The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 8–21, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, “ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks,” in Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 1, pp. 1097–1105, Lake Tahoe, NV, USA, December 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Ioannou, D. Robertson, R. Cipolla, and A. Criminisi, “Deep roots: improving CNN efficiency with hierarchical filter groups,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1231–1240, Honolulu, HI, USA, July 2017. View at: Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Yunpu Wu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.